Tuesday, October 29, 2019

Impeachment Vote Is The Democrats’ Attempt At Obstruction of Justice

It was announced yesterday evening by the Democrat-led House of Representatives that the official vote to begin the impeachment of President Donald Trump will be held this coming Thursday. Appropriately, that day (Halloween) is the Democrat’s favorite Holiday, next to Tax Day, based on their penchant for fear mongering the electorate into voting for them.

After the unconstitutional way that House Democrat Leadership announced that impeachment would begin last month, as well as the secret hearings that deprived President Trump of any due process, it is tempting to call it a victory for the way that those in the GOP and the few voices in the media who have called out the process that has flown in the face of the Constitution and past precedent.

But I believe that is not the reason why the Democrats have decided to call this vote. I believe the motivation to move ahead with a House vote on impeachment was prompted by the news last Thursday evening that the investigation led by Attorney General William Barr and Prosecutor John Durham into the origins of the Russia collusion hoax is now a criminal investigation. (Gateway Pundit)

That news is the Deep State’s worst nightmare.

Judging by the way the unofficial DNC stenographers in the Corrupt Media, and several elected Democrats, are attacking this news; it is obvious that they are upping the ante on impeachment because they want to discredit any findings or criminal prosecutions that may come out of the Barr/Durham probe, claiming the DOJ and the AG have been “weaponized” by the Trump Administration.

Well, I’m no lawyer or legal expert, but to me, their attacks on the Barr/Durham investigation smell like obstruction of justice. Because in doing so, aren't these Grand Inquisitors in the Democrat Party and their Corrupt Media allies are acting the same way they accused President Trump of during the Mueller investigation.

Why? Because for all their accusations, from Hillary Rotten Clinton on down, there has been no evidence of Russia collusion with President Trump’s campaign. But, there has been plenty of evidence to connect the DNC and Clinton campaign colluding with Russia, as those independent of the Corrupt Media have illustrated over the last three years.

But then there is also the issue that Nancy Pelosi and Little Adam Schitt used to launch their faux impeachment inquiry: Ukraine and supposed “quid pro quo” from President Trump. The Biden connection is only one element, but not the only one. We saw in the transcript released by President Trump that there is another element to the phone call, when he asks the incoming President of the Ukraine about Crowdstrike, which was the outfit hired by the DNC to look into their computer system hack in 2016.

From BeforeItsNews:
But CrowdStrike is alleged to have gotten something big wrong about Ukraine. CrowdStrike accused Russia of hacking a Ukrainian artillery app resulting in heavy losses, even though Ukraine has no incentive to help Russia, which is attacking them. Ukraine said it never happened. And yet CrowdStrike was asserting that Russia hacked a Ukrainian artillery app. How do I know this? Well, Andy McCarthy’s written about this in his book Ball of Collusion. Here’s the short little passage here that’s relevant. 
“CrowdStrike widely believed to have been wrong in a controversial 2016 judgment when it claimed that Russia hacked a Ukrainian artillery app resulting in heavy losses of howitzers in combat against separatists used by Moscow.” That’s a pretty big thing to be wrong about, and the only reason to point it out is, okay, if they’re wrong about that, what if the Democratic National Committee server was not hacked?
Ukraine is also linked in the Russia Collusion conspiracy, as this Politico story from 2017 noted, I’m sure by accident.

Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.

A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation. 
The Ukrainian efforts had an impact in the race, helping to force Manafort’s resignation and advancing the narrative that Trump’s campaign was deeply connected to Ukraine’s foe to the east, Russia. But they were far less concerted or centrally directed than Russia’s alleged hacking and dissemination of Democratic emails.
Back in April, John Solomon wrote the following about Ukraine:
As Donald Trump began his meteoric rise to the presidency, the Obama White House summoned Ukrainian authorities to Washington to coordinate ongoing anti-corruption efforts inside Russia’s most critical neighbor. 
The January 2016 gathering, confirmed by multiple participants and contemporaneous memos, brought some of Ukraine’s top corruption prosecutors and investigators face to face with members of former President Obama’s National Security Council (NSC), FBI, State Department and Department of Justice (DOJ). 
The agenda suggested the purpose was training and coordination. But Ukrainian participants said it didn’t take long — during the meetings and afterward — to realize the Americans’ objectives included two politically hot investigations: one that touched Vice President Joe Biden’s family and one that involved a lobbying firm linked closely to then-candidate Trump. 
U.S. officials “kept talking about how important it was that all of our anti-corruption efforts be united,” said Andrii Telizhenko, then a political officer in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington tasked with organizing the meeting.  
Telizhenko, who no longer works for the Ukrainian Embassy, said U.S. officials volunteered during the meetings — one of which was held in the White House’s Old Executive Office Building — that they had an interest in reviving a closed investigation into payments to U.S. figures from Ukraine’s Russia-backed Party of Regions. 
That 2014 investigation was led by the FBI and focused heavily on GOP lobbyist Paul Manafort, whose firm long had been tied to Trump through his partner and Trump pal, Roger Stone. 
Agents interviewed Manafort in 2014 about whether he received undeclared payments from the party of ousted Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych, an ally of Russia’s Vladimir Putin, and whether he engaged in improper foreign lobbying.
The FBI shut down the case without charging Manafort.
Lee Smith, who has just written a book on the whole Russia collusion narrative “The Plot Against the President: The True Story of How Congressman Devin Nunes Uncovered the Biggest Political Scandal in U.S. History,”  wrote this at Real Clear politics.
The Ukraine story starts no later than March 2016, when Democratic Party operative and Ukrainian-American activist Alexandra Chalupa approached the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington for information on the Trump campaign. 
As John Solomon of The Hill newspaper wrote in May, Chalupa asked Ukrainian diplomats for “evidence that Trump, his organization and [campaign manager Paul] Manafort were Russian assets, working to hurt the U.S. and working with Putin against the U.S. interests.” 
Chalupa emailed Democratic National Committee officials that she was briefing U.S. media on Manafort’s work in Ukraine. One of the journalists was Michael Isikoff of Yahoo News, who would later publish one of the key stories advancing the collusion narrative. 
Ukraine’s ambassador to Washington told Solomon that Chalupa wanted to approach a member of Congress to initiate hearings on Manafort or arrange for Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko to comment on Manafort’s alleged Kremlin ties during a visit to Washington.  
Keep that in mind when Democrats and their media allies routinely suggest it is treasonous to seek foreign aid during an election. 
As Chalupa was pursuing these channels, the Clinton campaign stepped up its efforts to find foreign dirt on Trump by hiring the Washington, D.C., firm Fusion GPS that March to compile and distribute opposition research on Trump. One of the company’s co-founders, Glenn Simpson, was a former Wall Street Journal reporter who had written several articles about Manafort’s work for former Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych.
Read the whole article, it is very detailed.

Even more interesting is this from former CIA agent Larry Johnson. As a background, Johnson (a former Hillary supporter) used to run a blog NoQuarterUSA and was a defender of Valerie Plame when her name was “leaked” back during the Bush years. I read his site from time to time, though I didn't agree sometimes with his assertions, he still made interesting points. He shut down his blog in March 2017 after coming under attack for publishing his belief that Trump’s campaign was spied on, which he explained in this other post.

This is why Pelosi, Schitt, their unofficial stenographers in the Corrupt Media are engaging in an obstruction of justice in the Barr / Durham probe. Because it threatens to expose the whole lot of them: members of the Corrupt Media, the DNC, the Clinton Campaign, and the Obama Regime, up to and, I believe, including Obama.

And in the minds of the Democrats and the Corrupt Media, all those people and their crimes must be protected by any means necessary, even if it means destroying the fundamentals of rule of law in our Constitution, and any remaining kernels of faith we as citizens might have in our government.

Thursday, September 12, 2019

9/11 18 Years Later: The Saddest Anniversary


Those of us who were alive 18 years ago yesterday will never forget where we were the moment we heard of the terrorist attacks in New York, the Pentagon, and the heroes of United 93, who sacrificed their lives to prevent the US Capitol or White House from being destroyed.

I’ve done that in prior years; I won’t do that this year for brevity sake.

Two days ago, on 9/10, after reflecting on so much of what has been happening in our nation the last few weeks, as well as the last 18 years, I had posted the following on Twitter, bemoaning what has become of America.


I did get this one snarky response.


Bad taste?

I don’t apologize for my Tweet of 9/10, because what I saw so much of yesterday, today, and the previous years leading up to now proved me to be right.

The New York Slimes remembered how their city was attacked 18 years ago this way.


Then, they removed and edited it, but still had their heads in the sand.

CNN, another one of the corrupt media outlets, used this sacred day to bash…white people.



Do you remember 18 years ago today, 9/12/2001?

We woke up, hoping the day before was just a bad dream, but the news showed us otherwise.

We were one nation.

We didn’t look at our differences or what divided us. We were all Americans. One Nation United. We were all in this together.

Oh sure, we had a few nuts in various parts of this country who wanted to blame America, and our allies like Israel. But they were seen as nuts and rightly ostracized.

Today, the voices of the nuts are no longer ostracized. Slowly but surely, our unity and resolve on 9/12 faded like the flags we attached to our car doors or bumper stickers. It started with influential voices here and there, increasing in a steady crescendo over the past 18 years to the sickening point where we are at today. 

Liberals and leftists in the political class and Corrupt Media will do anything to excuse radical Islamists who have committed terror attacks in the name of Islam. But as we’ve seen recently in several mass shootings and the horrific attack in Charlottesville, VA two years ago, are giddy at any chance to attack all White Anglo-Saxon Protestant males as murdering, maniacal bigots.

The law abiding members of the NRA, who have not committed one single mass shooting, were labeled by the literal dunghole called SanFrancisco a “domestic terrorist group.” Never mind this is the same city, in the days after 9/11, hosted rallies condemning any possible action against al-Queda, and whose Board of Stupidvisors declared themselves a “military-free zone.”

In the East Coast leftist suburb of Montgomery County, MD outside of Washington DC. The County Executive decreed MoCo, by a stroke of his pen and no vote (like all good totalitarians do), that the county law enforcement was not to share immigration information with ICE. Then, after a series of rapes committed by illegal aliens in the county, critics of their sanctuary policy andconservative media outlets who reported on this outrage were basically labeledas neo-Nazis in a cowardly written statement.

Then today, Rep. Jerrold Nadler, a rabid, mad-dog partisan Democrat who once said of George W. Bush in 2007, “Nine-eleven was an act of war. The villains aren’t the terrorists. The villains live in the White House,” declared war on the US electoral system and the 63 million Americans who voted for President Donald J. Trump by beginning an impeachment inquiry into the President, even though there is no crime that has been committed by the President, except defeating the unfit Hillary Rotten Clinton (who even once said America had to “empathize” with our enemies).

Eighteen years later, we have become a nation who has shamefully forgotten the lessons of that day. Al-Queda did not single out their victims by their political beliefs, their skin color, their religion, or anything else. They attacked us as Americans. But the actions of the Left in the political class and media who spend too much time dividing us have dishonored the memory of the 9/11 victims (and those who’ve fought, died, or been maimed in the War on Terror) by engaging in the kind of “amnesia” CNN talked about. Instead of being at war with the enemy who attacked us on 9/11 (and who had for many years prior), these Leftists in politics and media are too politically correct to state who attacked us. Instead, they’re more than willing to attack their fellow Americans who disagree with them as being worse than those who attacked us 18 years ago, while also attacking the very foundations of our Republic.

Of all the anniversaries of 9/11, this one is the saddest and most shameful.

Thursday, August 08, 2019

Do You Remember The Protests When Obama Came to Tucson, AZ After 2011 Shooting?

Question: What did the horrific 2011 shooting in Tucson, AZ have in common with the mass murders in El Paso and Dayton this past weekend?

Several things.

One: was that liberal activists used these terrible tragedies to blame two politicians they hate and want to get rid of for perpetrating the shootings. Just as President Donald Trump has been falsely accused by opportunistic Democrats and their Corrupt Media lackeys, former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin was relentlessly blamed (with no evidence whatsoever) for inspiring the shooting. The flimsy reed used to link Palin to the shooting was the election 2010 map "targeting" Rep. Gabby Giffords' district with a surveyor's target. The allegation that Palin was responsible was made despite the fact that the gunman, Jared Loughner, had no evidence of support for Palin or the Tea Party. Evidence did show, however, he had an obsession with a conspiracy theory film. Zeitgeist that attacked Christianity and promoted 9/11 Trutherism, among other things. (R.S. McCain at The Spectator).

Two: Piggybacking on the first point, the corrupt media and political opportunists used this tragedy for their own political aims. Pushing more gun control and silencing their political opposition, accusing their political opponents (at that time, the Tea Party movement) of inciting vitriolic speech. It is worth note that the El Paso killer's "manifesto" did reference Hispanics, but that one section was cherrypicked among his socialist (advocating for universal healthcare, a guaranteed income) and environmentalist rantings.

Three: The President (Barack Obama in 2011; Donald Trump in 2019) visited the communities affected by the shooting.

What is the difference?

Obama gave a televised speech, while Trump met with the families and those wounded, as well as local officials.

In Dayton, Ohio, the Democrat Mayor Nan Whaley encouraged protests of the President. She also held a press conference afterwords with fellow Democrat, Senator Sherrod Brown and used it to for a partisan attack the President. In El Paso, Democrat Congresswoman Veronica Escobar and the faux Hispanic for political purposes Robert Francis O'Rourke said President Trump was not welcome in El Paso. Escobar declined to participate with the President during his appearance.

Flashback to 2011. Barack Obama previously had a very contentious relationship with then Arizona Governor Jan Brewer over the Obama Regime's unwillingness to secure the Mexico/Arizona border, to the point at one of his visits she pointed her finger at him expressing her displeasure.

However, when Obama appeared for his speech in Tucson, Brewer and other Republicans were in attendance. In an internet search, I could not find any reference to protests of Obama appearing in Tucson, or, for that matter, Brewer or any other Republican either refusing to attend Obama’s appearance and/or encouraging protests. Brewer did sign legislation to prohibit the disgusting, faux "church" known as Westboro Baptist to protest the funerals with their vile signs.

Both sides of the aisle came together for a few minutes. Obama gave a speech that sounded good on the surface, but he, his party, and their radical activist base were anything but civil over the rest of 2011.


You want to lecture me again about incivility and inciting language?

Elected Democrats and their media propagandists can talk about unity only when it suits them. But while they point their fingers toward Donald Trump accusing him of hateful rhetoric, inciting violence, their actions show that they, the Left, are the ones who embrace violent, hate, inciteful rhetoric as a political tool that does not unite, but only divides.

That is what America saw from these Leftist like Whaley, Brown, O'Rourke, and Escobar yesterday. A far different sight from Tucson eight years ago. 

Sunday, January 20, 2019

First The Tea Party, Now Pro-Life Teens Smeared As Bigots By Media, Elected Democrats

It feels like the last two years since Donald Trump has been inaugurated President, you can tell when the outrage mob, fed by the corrupt, activist media, has been ignited the moment when your Facebook feed is filled with outrage posts from any liberal friends (who have not unfriended you yet) about some alleged atrocity either the President or a supporter of his has been accused of.

Yesterday and this morning, the liberal outrage mob on social media was fired up about news reports that Covington Catholic School students allegedly surrounded and harassed a group of native Americans, in footage that was shot in the steps of the Lincoln Memorial this past Friday during the pro-life March for Life. The fact that several students wore Make America Great Again hats made the corrupt liberal media giddy.

Except there was more to the story that has come out in the last few hours. Unedited video footage paints a different picture than the one portrayed by the media.

Unfortunately this is not the first time the corrupt, activist media has taken the opportunity to slander conservatives with false accusations of bigotry.

On March 20, 2010, Tea Party activists who opposed the Obamacare legislation were slandered by the media, after Congressman Andre Carson made the claim that he, Cong. John Lewis, and other members of the Congressional Black Caucus had the “n-word” yelled at them 15 times and were surrounded by Tea Party activists on the steps of the Cannon House Office Building.

This lie against the Tea Party was being repeated without question until the late Andrew Breitbart dared to fire back at the claims, using videos posted by several who were on the scene that day, including this blog.





Just like March 2010, the corrupt, activist media found another group of conservatives to tar and feather with their favorite stereotype of white racist bigots, using the same out of context footage they routinely accused Andrew Breitbat and James O’Keefe of. The fact that Make America Great Again hats were worn by those alleged was the icing on the cake for the corrupt media.

Similarly just as RINOs in Congress were quick to condemn the Tea Party, several prominent Never Trump faux conservative pundits jumped on the bandwagon, because the image of people in Make America Great Again hats allegedly acting like bigots gave them another opportunity to act in smug
condescension towards voters of President Trump, who they despise because he is not part of their good ole boy GOP country club.

The difference though between the Tea Party and what happened at the Lincoln Memorial is that these allegations are made against teenagers. Not only is their scholarly pursuits threatened by these allegations, but the tolerant-In-name-only Left threatening violence, as well as doxxing of their identities. (https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/01/20/delingpole-left-wing-and-the-right-attack-kids-to-demonstrate-virtue/)




My question is when will the media be held responsible for the spreading of inaccurate news that may hurt the lives of teenagers? Does their willingness to do anything to not only bring a President they hate down, but also defend the sacred blood sacrament of the Religion of Liberalsm (abortion on demand) override their so called “objectivity” as well as responsibility in using their First Amendment right to freedom of press?

Well done liberals in entertainment, you elected Democrats who have attacked these teens, and you at CNN and the other Fake News corrupt activist media outlets. You showed this weekend that all the bigotry you claim to oppose isn’t with conservatives, it is with all of you.