Tuesday, October 29, 2019

Impeachment Vote Is The Democrats’ Attempt At Obstruction of Justice

It was announced yesterday evening by the Democrat-led House of Representatives that the official vote to begin the impeachment of President Donald Trump will be held this coming Thursday. Appropriately, that day (Halloween) is the Democrat’s favorite Holiday, next to Tax Day, based on their penchant for fear mongering the electorate into voting for them.

After the unconstitutional way that House Democrat Leadership announced that impeachment would begin last month, as well as the secret hearings that deprived President Trump of any due process, it is tempting to call it a victory for the way that those in the GOP and the few voices in the media who have called out the process that has flown in the face of the Constitution and past precedent.

But I believe that is not the reason why the Democrats have decided to call this vote. I believe the motivation to move ahead with a House vote on impeachment was prompted by the news last Thursday evening that the investigation led by Attorney General William Barr and Prosecutor John Durham into the origins of the Russia collusion hoax is now a criminal investigation. (Gateway Pundit)

That news is the Deep State’s worst nightmare.

Judging by the way the unofficial DNC stenographers in the Corrupt Media, and several elected Democrats, are attacking this news; it is obvious that they are upping the ante on impeachment because they want to discredit any findings or criminal prosecutions that may come out of the Barr/Durham probe, claiming the DOJ and the AG have been “weaponized” by the Trump Administration.

Well, I’m no lawyer or legal expert, but to me, their attacks on the Barr/Durham investigation smell like obstruction of justice. Because in doing so, aren't these Grand Inquisitors in the Democrat Party and their Corrupt Media allies are acting the same way they accused President Trump of during the Mueller investigation.

Why? Because for all their accusations, from Hillary Rotten Clinton on down, there has been no evidence of Russia collusion with President Trump’s campaign. But, there has been plenty of evidence to connect the DNC and Clinton campaign colluding with Russia, as those independent of the Corrupt Media have illustrated over the last three years.

But then there is also the issue that Nancy Pelosi and Little Adam Schitt used to launch their faux impeachment inquiry: Ukraine and supposed “quid pro quo” from President Trump. The Biden connection is only one element, but not the only one. We saw in the transcript released by President Trump that there is another element to the phone call, when he asks the incoming President of the Ukraine about Crowdstrike, which was the outfit hired by the DNC to look into their computer system hack in 2016.

From BeforeItsNews:
But CrowdStrike is alleged to have gotten something big wrong about Ukraine. CrowdStrike accused Russia of hacking a Ukrainian artillery app resulting in heavy losses, even though Ukraine has no incentive to help Russia, which is attacking them. Ukraine said it never happened. And yet CrowdStrike was asserting that Russia hacked a Ukrainian artillery app. How do I know this? Well, Andy McCarthy’s written about this in his book Ball of Collusion. Here’s the short little passage here that’s relevant. 
“CrowdStrike widely believed to have been wrong in a controversial 2016 judgment when it claimed that Russia hacked a Ukrainian artillery app resulting in heavy losses of howitzers in combat against separatists used by Moscow.” That’s a pretty big thing to be wrong about, and the only reason to point it out is, okay, if they’re wrong about that, what if the Democratic National Committee server was not hacked?
Ukraine is also linked in the Russia Collusion conspiracy, as this Politico story from 2017 noted, I’m sure by accident.

Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.

A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation. 
The Ukrainian efforts had an impact in the race, helping to force Manafort’s resignation and advancing the narrative that Trump’s campaign was deeply connected to Ukraine’s foe to the east, Russia. But they were far less concerted or centrally directed than Russia’s alleged hacking and dissemination of Democratic emails.
Back in April, John Solomon wrote the following about Ukraine:
As Donald Trump began his meteoric rise to the presidency, the Obama White House summoned Ukrainian authorities to Washington to coordinate ongoing anti-corruption efforts inside Russia’s most critical neighbor. 
The January 2016 gathering, confirmed by multiple participants and contemporaneous memos, brought some of Ukraine’s top corruption prosecutors and investigators face to face with members of former President Obama’s National Security Council (NSC), FBI, State Department and Department of Justice (DOJ). 
The agenda suggested the purpose was training and coordination. But Ukrainian participants said it didn’t take long — during the meetings and afterward — to realize the Americans’ objectives included two politically hot investigations: one that touched Vice President Joe Biden’s family and one that involved a lobbying firm linked closely to then-candidate Trump. 
U.S. officials “kept talking about how important it was that all of our anti-corruption efforts be united,” said Andrii Telizhenko, then a political officer in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington tasked with organizing the meeting.  
Telizhenko, who no longer works for the Ukrainian Embassy, said U.S. officials volunteered during the meetings — one of which was held in the White House’s Old Executive Office Building — that they had an interest in reviving a closed investigation into payments to U.S. figures from Ukraine’s Russia-backed Party of Regions. 
That 2014 investigation was led by the FBI and focused heavily on GOP lobbyist Paul Manafort, whose firm long had been tied to Trump through his partner and Trump pal, Roger Stone. 
Agents interviewed Manafort in 2014 about whether he received undeclared payments from the party of ousted Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych, an ally of Russia’s Vladimir Putin, and whether he engaged in improper foreign lobbying.
The FBI shut down the case without charging Manafort.
Lee Smith, who has just written a book on the whole Russia collusion narrative “The Plot Against the President: The True Story of How Congressman Devin Nunes Uncovered the Biggest Political Scandal in U.S. History,”  wrote this at Real Clear politics.
The Ukraine story starts no later than March 2016, when Democratic Party operative and Ukrainian-American activist Alexandra Chalupa approached the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington for information on the Trump campaign. 
As John Solomon of The Hill newspaper wrote in May, Chalupa asked Ukrainian diplomats for “evidence that Trump, his organization and [campaign manager Paul] Manafort were Russian assets, working to hurt the U.S. and working with Putin against the U.S. interests.” 
Chalupa emailed Democratic National Committee officials that she was briefing U.S. media on Manafort’s work in Ukraine. One of the journalists was Michael Isikoff of Yahoo News, who would later publish one of the key stories advancing the collusion narrative. 
Ukraine’s ambassador to Washington told Solomon that Chalupa wanted to approach a member of Congress to initiate hearings on Manafort or arrange for Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko to comment on Manafort’s alleged Kremlin ties during a visit to Washington.  
Keep that in mind when Democrats and their media allies routinely suggest it is treasonous to seek foreign aid during an election. 
As Chalupa was pursuing these channels, the Clinton campaign stepped up its efforts to find foreign dirt on Trump by hiring the Washington, D.C., firm Fusion GPS that March to compile and distribute opposition research on Trump. One of the company’s co-founders, Glenn Simpson, was a former Wall Street Journal reporter who had written several articles about Manafort’s work for former Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych.
Read the whole article, it is very detailed.

Even more interesting is this from former CIA agent Larry Johnson. As a background, Johnson (a former Hillary supporter) used to run a blog NoQuarterUSA and was a defender of Valerie Plame when her name was “leaked” back during the Bush years. I read his site from time to time, though I didn't agree sometimes with his assertions, he still made interesting points. He shut down his blog in March 2017 after coming under attack for publishing his belief that Trump’s campaign was spied on, which he explained in this other post.

This is why Pelosi, Schitt, their unofficial stenographers in the Corrupt Media are engaging in an obstruction of justice in the Barr / Durham probe. Because it threatens to expose the whole lot of them: members of the Corrupt Media, the DNC, the Clinton Campaign, and the Obama Regime, up to and, I believe, including Obama.

And in the minds of the Democrats and the Corrupt Media, all those people and their crimes must be protected by any means necessary, even if it means destroying the fundamentals of rule of law in our Constitution, and any remaining kernels of faith we as citizens might have in our government.

Thursday, September 12, 2019

9/11 18 Years Later: The Saddest Anniversary


Those of us who were alive 18 years ago yesterday will never forget where we were the moment we heard of the terrorist attacks in New York, the Pentagon, and the heroes of United 93, who sacrificed their lives to prevent the US Capitol or White House from being destroyed.

I’ve done that in prior years; I won’t do that this year for brevity sake.

Two days ago, on 9/10, after reflecting on so much of what has been happening in our nation the last few weeks, as well as the last 18 years, I had posted the following on Twitter, bemoaning what has become of America.


I did get this one snarky response.


Bad taste?

I don’t apologize for my Tweet of 9/10, because what I saw so much of yesterday, today, and the previous years leading up to now proved me to be right.

The New York Slimes remembered how their city was attacked 18 years ago this way.


Then, they removed and edited it, but still had their heads in the sand.

CNN, another one of the corrupt media outlets, used this sacred day to bash…white people.



Do you remember 18 years ago today, 9/12/2001?

We woke up, hoping the day before was just a bad dream, but the news showed us otherwise.

We were one nation.

We didn’t look at our differences or what divided us. We were all Americans. One Nation United. We were all in this together.

Oh sure, we had a few nuts in various parts of this country who wanted to blame America, and our allies like Israel. But they were seen as nuts and rightly ostracized.

Today, the voices of the nuts are no longer ostracized. Slowly but surely, our unity and resolve on 9/12 faded like the flags we attached to our car doors or bumper stickers. It started with influential voices here and there, increasing in a steady crescendo over the past 18 years to the sickening point where we are at today. 

Liberals and leftists in the political class and Corrupt Media will do anything to excuse radical Islamists who have committed terror attacks in the name of Islam. But as we’ve seen recently in several mass shootings and the horrific attack in Charlottesville, VA two years ago, are giddy at any chance to attack all White Anglo-Saxon Protestant males as murdering, maniacal bigots.

The law abiding members of the NRA, who have not committed one single mass shooting, were labeled by the literal dunghole called SanFrancisco a “domestic terrorist group.” Never mind this is the same city, in the days after 9/11, hosted rallies condemning any possible action against al-Queda, and whose Board of Stupidvisors declared themselves a “military-free zone.”

In the East Coast leftist suburb of Montgomery County, MD outside of Washington DC. The County Executive decreed MoCo, by a stroke of his pen and no vote (like all good totalitarians do), that the county law enforcement was not to share immigration information with ICE. Then, after a series of rapes committed by illegal aliens in the county, critics of their sanctuary policy andconservative media outlets who reported on this outrage were basically labeledas neo-Nazis in a cowardly written statement.

Then today, Rep. Jerrold Nadler, a rabid, mad-dog partisan Democrat who once said of George W. Bush in 2007, “Nine-eleven was an act of war. The villains aren’t the terrorists. The villains live in the White House,” declared war on the US electoral system and the 63 million Americans who voted for President Donald J. Trump by beginning an impeachment inquiry into the President, even though there is no crime that has been committed by the President, except defeating the unfit Hillary Rotten Clinton (who even once said America had to “empathize” with our enemies).

Eighteen years later, we have become a nation who has shamefully forgotten the lessons of that day. Al-Queda did not single out their victims by their political beliefs, their skin color, their religion, or anything else. They attacked us as Americans. But the actions of the Left in the political class and media who spend too much time dividing us have dishonored the memory of the 9/11 victims (and those who’ve fought, died, or been maimed in the War on Terror) by engaging in the kind of “amnesia” CNN talked about. Instead of being at war with the enemy who attacked us on 9/11 (and who had for many years prior), these Leftists in politics and media are too politically correct to state who attacked us. Instead, they’re more than willing to attack their fellow Americans who disagree with them as being worse than those who attacked us 18 years ago, while also attacking the very foundations of our Republic.

Of all the anniversaries of 9/11, this one is the saddest and most shameful.

Friday, August 09, 2019

Note To President Trump, GOPs in House & Senate: Let's Not Rush Into The Left's Push For "Red Flag" & Other Gun Laws

Tomorrow has been a week since the deadly shootings in El Paso and Dayton, Ohio; and the vultures have not only continued their slanderous attacks on President Trump, but also the Second Amendment and defenders of our constitutional freedom, such as the NRA.

It wasn't even hours after the shooting that the anti-gun Left began their assault on America by going after one of the key freedoms we are guaranteed as people. And, earlier in the week, the President signaled he was willing to look at some these proposals.

And that is the last thing America needs right now; a knee jerk reaction to these horrors by surrendering more of our liberty to the government.

I'm sure we all remember after 9/11, and so many of the changes that happened afterwards pushed by the Bush Administration. Federalized TSA workers and creating a new bureaucracy called the Department of Homeland Security. 

There was also various aspects of the Patriot Act. I supported much of this back then. But looking back almost 18 years later, I believe we rushed to implement a lot of things that basically just grew the size of government. I didn't have a problem with the NSA wiretaps on suspected terrorists; however, neither I or anyone else could imagine that we would one day elect a President who used these safeguards that were meant against foreign terrorist suspects to what we've learned was unconstitutional spying on an opposing Presidential campaign.

I'm not saying that there should not have been some changes in how the government protected Americans after 9/11; I am, however, questioning some aspects of the changes that allow for abuse of civil liberties and rogue elements of an administration.

But more background checks on guns? Don't we already have background checks? Why don't we do some kind of investigation into what went wrong and why any red flags about the shooter did not appear. We know that, after the Parkland, FL school shooting that there were a ton of signs that were missed or ignored. 

So why would more laws stop that?

Speaking of Red Flags, the "Red Flag" proposal sounds good on paper, but based on what I'm seeing, there's a lot of civil liberties concerns, like a gun owner's lack of due process (Fourth Amendment).

Six states have enacted these laws. At their core, they allow the police to convene a Kafkaesque secret proceeding, in which an American can be stripped of his or her gun rights and Fourth Amendment rights, even though gun owners are barred from participating in the hearings or arguing their side of the dispute. 
The first thing gun owners learn is when police knock on the door — ready to ransack their house and, if they resist, to arrest or even shoot them and their family. 
The standard is not whether there is probable cause to believe that the gun owner has committed a crime, as the Constitution would seem to require. Rather, the standard is some subjective determination about whether the owner represents some "danger."
As in the film Minority Report, Americans are stripped of their fundamental constitutional rights based on the subjective possibility of a "future crime." And we know from our limited experience that many accusers lie or make mistakes — even more reach delusional conclusions — and the target is frequently an abused victim who is most in need of the wherewithal to protect against an abuser.  
After a fixed period of time — say, 21 days — the gun owner can ask for a court hearing to restore his or her constitutional rights. But guess what? Few gun owners have the sophistication or the thousands of dollars it would take to hire a lawyer and expert witnesses. And few courts are willing to second-guess themselves and reverse the Gun Confiscation Order which has been issued.  
In fact, hundreds of thousands of veterans have lost their gun rights without due process pursuant to a comparable procedure. And recent revelations from the VA suggest that fewer than 50 have successfully invoked this "process" to get their rights back.  
But there's a larger issue: If the Constitution can be suspended in a secret hearing, where does this lead?  
What if this newspaper could be shut down for 21 days without due process — based on a secret complaint? Or an individual could be arrested or imprisoned for 21 days? Or tortured?  
Far from being a "consensus proposal," the suspension of the Constitution in a secret hearing is a constitutional Rubicon from which there is no return. 
The same goes with proposals with online media companies to police for possible shooters. The problem is, we've seen how tech companies like Twitter, Facebook and others have gone after accounts because of political content..

What I would tell President Trump and Congress is to take your time and act on this with prudence and good judgement, not out of haste and pressure from the Haters on the Left. Their goal, though they deny it, is eventual repeal and seizure of guns.

Don't think they can?

Remember how the pro-abortion crowd only wanted abortion up the first trimester, and only to save the life of a mother? Now, we have abortion activist cheer in one state as a law is approved that would allow abortions up to the time of birth!

Our Second Amendment is not an issue that can be compromised on. Plus, no matter how much you try to give them a little, it is never enough.

And they will still hate you anyway. 

Thursday, August 08, 2019

Liberal KY Attorney/Radio Host Tells Black GOP Candidate: “Stop Eating The Coon Flakes”

The overwhelming accusation from elected Democrats, their activists and their paid propagandists in the Corrupt Media about President Donald Trump is that he is a racist, a white supremacist and so are all his voters.

Really?

Well, in Kentucky, Daniel Cameron, a black Republican who is running as State Attorney General, was attacked by a local attorney and radio host named Dawn Elliott with a racial slur (LifeSiteNews)
“How does a person of color proudly flaunt an endorsement from a president who is clearly racist and is determined to oppress the very people that gave Mr. Cameron life? … My suggestion to Mr. Cameron is to stop eating the ‘Coon Flakes’ the White House is serving,” she said according to the Louisville Courier Journal. “Daniel is slapping all the black ancestors in the face. All their hard work, struggles and even death means nothing to him.”
Isn’t this typical? Liberals always brag about how open minded and tolerant they are. But if anyone dares to think for themselves, they are considered “uppity” and attacked with slurs.

Any yet liberals have the audacity to accuse Republicans of being linked to white supremacy?

Do You Remember The Protests When Obama Came to Tucson, AZ After 2011 Shooting?

Question: What did the horrific 2011 shooting in Tucson, AZ have in common with the mass murders in El Paso and Dayton this past weekend?

Several things.

One: was that liberal activists used these terrible tragedies to blame two politicians they hate and want to get rid of for perpetrating the shootings. Just as President Donald Trump has been falsely accused by opportunistic Democrats and their Corrupt Media lackeys, former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin was relentlessly blamed (with no evidence whatsoever) for inspiring the shooting. The flimsy reed used to link Palin to the shooting was the election 2010 map "targeting" Rep. Gabby Giffords' district with a surveyor's target. The allegation that Palin was responsible was made despite the fact that the gunman, Jared Loughner, had no evidence of support for Palin or the Tea Party. Evidence did show, however, he had an obsession with a conspiracy theory film. Zeitgeist that attacked Christianity and promoted 9/11 Trutherism, among other things. (R.S. McCain at The Spectator).

Two: Piggybacking on the first point, the corrupt media and political opportunists used this tragedy for their own political aims. Pushing more gun control and silencing their political opposition, accusing their political opponents (at that time, the Tea Party movement) of inciting vitriolic speech. It is worth note that the El Paso killer's "manifesto" did reference Hispanics, but that one section was cherrypicked among his socialist (advocating for universal healthcare, a guaranteed income) and environmentalist rantings.

Three: The President (Barack Obama in 2011; Donald Trump in 2019) visited the communities affected by the shooting.

What is the difference?

Obama gave a televised speech, while Trump met with the families and those wounded, as well as local officials.

In Dayton, Ohio, the Democrat Mayor Nan Whaley encouraged protests of the President. She also held a press conference afterwords with fellow Democrat, Senator Sherrod Brown and used it to for a partisan attack the President. In El Paso, Democrat Congresswoman Veronica Escobar and the faux Hispanic for political purposes Robert Francis O'Rourke said President Trump was not welcome in El Paso. Escobar declined to participate with the President during his appearance.

Flashback to 2011. Barack Obama previously had a very contentious relationship with then Arizona Governor Jan Brewer over the Obama Regime's unwillingness to secure the Mexico/Arizona border, to the point at one of his visits she pointed her finger at him expressing her displeasure.

However, when Obama appeared for his speech in Tucson, Brewer and other Republicans were in attendance. In an internet search, I could not find any reference to protests of Obama appearing in Tucson, or, for that matter, Brewer or any other Republican either refusing to attend Obama’s appearance and/or encouraging protests. Brewer did sign legislation to prohibit the disgusting, faux "church" known as Westboro Baptist to protest the funerals with their vile signs.

Both sides of the aisle came together for a few minutes. Obama gave a speech that sounded good on the surface, but he, his party, and their radical activist base were anything but civil over the rest of 2011.


You want to lecture me again about incivility and inciting language?

Elected Democrats and their media propagandists can talk about unity only when it suits them. But while they point their fingers toward Donald Trump accusing him of hateful rhetoric, inciting violence, their actions show that they, the Left, are the ones who embrace violent, hate, inciteful rhetoric as a political tool that does not unite, but only divides.

That is what America saw from these Leftist like Whaley, Brown, O'Rourke, and Escobar yesterday. A far different sight from Tucson eight years ago. 

Wednesday, August 07, 2019

Is The White Supremacy Terrorism Allegation Just A Ruse?

If you've tried to look at social media, the news, or the online Leftist sewer known as Twitter, it seems every elected Democrat, their paid propagandists in Corrupt Media outlets like CNN or MSNBC are labeling "Orange Man Bad, He's a White Supremacist."

This is a venomous label, the worst kind of allegation you can throw at any individual, with the intent of silencing those who you disagree with, especially when you are unable to defeat their argument.

I remember right after Donald Trump was elected President and someone expressed concern to me about this "alt-right movement," and how could I vote for someone connected to the "alt-right?" I scratched my head and pled ignorance. I followed news during that time, I was starting to wind down my blogging, and yet for the life of me I hadn't heard of the f$&#!@g alt-right. I'd never heard the name Richard Spencer (aka Dick Spencer). But the sore losers among elected Democrats and the corrupt media held their magnifying glass up at them, making them look like a big group, when in reality they couldn't fill a bathroom stall at a Buc'ees in Texas.

Tucker Carlson at Fox News is once again under attack today by the online gestapo at Media Mutters who are trying to fire him for daring to question the validity of a rise of "White Nationalist Terrorism."

Julie Kelly wrote the interesting piece at American Greatness that I heard her discuss this afternoon on the Larry O'Connor show.
The anti-Trump forces, now stripped of their Russian collusion ammunition, have invented another imaginary threat they hope to weaponize against the president: The public menace posed by “white supremacist” terrorism. 
Much like the collusion conspiracy theory—which relied on random incidents, fictional villains, unconvincing evidence, and the Bad Orange Man in the White House—there is little substance to this purported danger. 
Unironically, the whole ruse is being pushed by the same people who foisted the Russian collusion hoax on the American people for three years in the hopes of prompting President Trump’s impeachment and removal. The political agenda behind this manufactured white supremacy crisis is equally sinister because its specific purpose is to influence and undermine the 2020 elections. 
The “white supremacy” canard is intended to further demonize Trump; falsely defame his supporters as white supremacists; and pressure nervous voters into defeating Trump and Republican candidates next year. The strategy is as cynical as it is pernicious. 
....In his Senate testimony last month, FBI Director Christopher Wray was intentionally vague when questioned by Senator Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) about the supposed rise of white supremacy. 
“In terms of number of arrests, we have, through the third quarter of this fiscal year, had about, give or take, a hundred arrests in the international terrorism side, which includes the homegrown violent extremists,” Wray explained. “But we’ve also had about the same number, again, don’t quote me to the exact digit, on the domestic terrorism side. And I will say that a majority of the domestic terrorism cases that we’ve investigated are motivated by some version of what you might call white supremacist violence but it includes other things as well.” 
Some version of what you might call white supremacist violence? Even giving Wray the benefit of the doubt, that means the FBI investigated roughly 50 or so cases of some version of white supremacy. Not exactly solid evidence to justify a law enforcement, political and media war against white supremacy.
But the real danger is in the possibility of "Red Flag Laws" which on the surface sound good, but can be used for nefarious purposes.
What should frighten every American is that the emerging proposals to mitigate “white supremacy” include a jaw-dropping array of strong-arm tactics that will, in short order, violate the free speech rights of millions of Americans as the government and news media malign anyone they identify as sympathizing with “white supremacy.” 
If these measures are enacted, they will give legal and political cover to social media platforms to ban Trump officials, his supporters and perhaps even the president himself—they may extend to anyone in the Republican Party. Guns will be confiscated, careers ruined, and reputations irreparably destroyed. It will be the Kavanaugh hearing and show trials on steroids. 
Conservative news and opinion outlets such as this one could be placed on some kind of watch list, or worse, shuttered altogether simply for challenging immigration policy or defending the president. Private companies and financial institutions could be warned against doing business with the Trump campaign or Republican candidates and lawmakers. Donors could be censured under the guise of aiding and abetting a domestic enemy. 
MSNBC already is advocating on behalf of taking that path: “Because you keep writing checks to this president, it’s on you . . . because you are funding this white supremacist campaign . . . It is your money that is funding this white supremacy,” claimed Joe Scarborough on Monday’s show. 
Pending approval of a catalog of harsh policy prescriptions, the Democrats, the news media and NeverTrump Right will continue openly to brand any voter planning to reelect Donald Trump as a white supremacist. The social shame will be as destructive as any measures that could be taken by any law enforcement agency. 
And while the Trump haters scream at shadows and unleash the dogs of war, the real danger—how we address the mental, emotional and social defects in a generation of isolated young men—will be ignored just so #TheResistance can move poll numbers before November 2020.
I think there's another cynical ploy in smearing Trump as a racist or white supremacist. Despite the language from the Democrats and their propaganda arms, many polls have shown not only are Hispanics (who are supposed to hate Trump because of the Border Wall) rallying to him, but also he had support rise among black voters.

Kind of like when the Tea Party was starting to attract a lot of prominent minority voices, all of a sudden, it was time for the Democrats to scheme and come up with another cynical ploy for them and the Corrupt Media to slander the Tea Party as racist and scare any minority voter away from voting other than Democrat.

As the late Andrew Breitbart said in the 2012 film, "Hating Breitbart."
"There is a historic amount of black candidates who are Tea Party created in essence. And so while the Left is trying to say that the Tea Party is racist, a batch of brilliant, pro-American exceptionalism, pro-American freedom, pro-fiscal responsibility black conservatives start inhabiting the Tea Party and the Democratic Party says 'Uh oh! We've got a problem here.'"
And I think the Democrat Party is thinking the same thing today, hence why the "white supremacist" slander is getting tossed around.

Speaking As One American—An Open Letter to the President, Congress, The 2020 Candidates, The Media, Pop Culture After El Paso & Dayton

Saturday, August 3rd started like a routine weekend. A rare day to sleep in late, late breakfast, then getting prepared for my wife and I go to an early afternoon movie.

Before the feature started, there was the ominous “report any suspicious behavior, find the nearest exit.” My mind flashed to the deranged individual who went into a movie theater a few years ago to kill people.

It wasn’t until after the movie ended, and we were back at home that I scanned social media to find out the horrors that happen in El Paso, in my beloved home state of Texas.

The news got worse that night, as all of us saw the news of another mass shooting in Dayton, Ohio.

It is hard to imagine the shock, grief, and other feelings family members of loved ones must feel when they are waiting for news of a family member who has not been heard from, only to find out they aren’t coming home. Their lives taken away by some crazed mass shooter who was too cowardly to find help for themselves, who selfishly did not care for the lives and loved ones of the people around him, and then extinguished the light of their lives.

Not only did these insane madmen and others like them in recent years wreck those lives, but they attacked America. They attacked the idea of their fellow citizens living out their God-given gift of “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.”

In horrific events like what happened this past weekend, the “better angels” of our nation feel a sense of vulnerability. Could such a horror happen around them? They also grieve and pray in their hearts out of sympathy for people they don’t know, but who are connected to them as citizens of our great nation.

Unfortunately, while those of us who felt grief and sorrow for the families and the victims; we braced ourselves at the same time for the tidal wave of vitriol from the opposite of our “better angels, “ those “worst devils” who use tragedies like this like vultures circling their prey, all for some gain.
Following Rahm Emmanuel’s credo of, “never let a good crisis go to waste,” these vultures among us did not seek unity, they only brought division. Where love, compassion, prayer, and a time for mourn is needed, these vultures mock the idea of “thoughts and prayers,” demanding action instead, and incendiary rhetoric to punish those who do not think as they do.

Who are these vultures? I will name a few:

Almost all elected Democrats, among them Robert Francis O’Rourke, Kamala Harris, Cory Booker, Elizabeth Warren and Pete Buttgieg. Also Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Jerrold Nadler, Adam Schiff, the corrupt and disgraced James Comey, Jake Tapper of CNN, Chuck Todd of NBC, Joe Scarborough, Mika Brzezinski, and Nicole Wallace of MSNBC.

These ghouls used a horrific tragedy as a weapon to attack President Donald Trump using some of the worst, dirtiest, and slanderous language possible, using terms like “white supremacist,” “racist,” “bigot,” along with comparisons to the Third Reich.

But these vultures were not just content in attacking President Trump. While claiming to speak out against racism, they use racist attacks against his voters and supporters, labeling all them “white nationalists.” They attack law abiding gun owners who make up the National Rifle Association as terrorists. They attack any news outlet (i.e. Fox News) who dares not to act like Democrat Party propagandists, masquerading as objective journalists.

This is not to say that legitimate criticism or questioning of a President is off limits. But there is a difference in legitimate and reasoned criticism vs. slanderous allegations, in racist accusations of a President and his supporters, in the Corrupt Media cherry picking the lunatic rantings of the gunman’s manifesto (they skipped over his socialist ideas) in desperation to link anyone not a “progressive” as a white supremacist and blame them for a mass murder they did not commit.

Why? All because of resentment over the 2016 election (looking at you Hillary), the acquisition of political power in regaining the White House, as well as chasing ratings on their 24 hour news networks and clickbait for likes and retweets on the Internet and social media.

By engaging in such irresponsible rhetoric, these vultures have unwittingly aided and given credence to this demented killer and his lunatic rantings. They think they are attacking the President, but in a greater sense, they are attacking America and what has made us great as a nation.

To any of you elected Democrats, you media personalities I named earlier; have you no shame? No decency?

Speaking as one American, I say out loud, STOP IT! Let these families and their communities and we as a nation mourn. Let us think of real solutions to address the issues instead of proposing more laws that threaten liberties of law abiding Americans. Probably the saddest footnote to the horrible mass shooting over a year ago in Florida has been the number of suicides of students who survived that shooting.
The politicization and media-frenzied response to the murders overwhelmed and eclipsed the real, personal needs of the survivors and their loved ones. To be blunt, the cacophony of voices on gun control drowned out and suppressed a needed conversation on the mental health needs at the school and in the community. For that failure, our community is paying a heavy price.
Think about that, Robert Francis O'Rourke, as you are so desperate to gain footing in your vain attempt to become President that you'll prey off the blood of those who were killed in your city.

And for all the complaints about the so-called “incendiary language” of the President, why is it that you people pointing your fingers don’t look at the three fingers pointing back look at your own speech? You’ve spent the last 50 plus years attacking everyone to the right of you as a Klansman, a Nazi or some other demoralizing language, and too many have shrunk away timidly, thinking that by not saying anything you’re not fueling the rhetoric. That’s dangerous. It’s been noted that if one repeats a lie often enough, soon it will become the truth. That’s the way demagogues came to power. In that vein, that is why this once “reluctant Trump voter” (check out my posts from three years ago), is glad he takes on these vultures, and why more of us need to stand up against it.

Sunday, January 20, 2019

First The Tea Party, Now Pro-Life Teens Smeared As Bigots By Media, Elected Democrats

It feels like the last two years since Donald Trump has been inaugurated President, you can tell when the outrage mob, fed by the corrupt, activist media, has been ignited the moment when your Facebook feed is filled with outrage posts from any liberal friends (who have not unfriended you yet) about some alleged atrocity either the President or a supporter of his has been accused of.

Yesterday and this morning, the liberal outrage mob on social media was fired up about news reports that Covington Catholic School students allegedly surrounded and harassed a group of native Americans, in footage that was shot in the steps of the Lincoln Memorial this past Friday during the pro-life March for Life. The fact that several students wore Make America Great Again hats made the corrupt liberal media giddy.

Except there was more to the story that has come out in the last few hours. Unedited video footage paints a different picture than the one portrayed by the media.

Unfortunately this is not the first time the corrupt, activist media has taken the opportunity to slander conservatives with false accusations of bigotry.

On March 20, 2010, Tea Party activists who opposed the Obamacare legislation were slandered by the media, after Congressman Andre Carson made the claim that he, Cong. John Lewis, and other members of the Congressional Black Caucus had the “n-word” yelled at them 15 times and were surrounded by Tea Party activists on the steps of the Cannon House Office Building.

This lie against the Tea Party was being repeated without question until the late Andrew Breitbart dared to fire back at the claims, using videos posted by several who were on the scene that day, including this blog.





Just like March 2010, the corrupt, activist media found another group of conservatives to tar and feather with their favorite stereotype of white racist bigots, using the same out of context footage they routinely accused Andrew Breitbat and James O’Keefe of. The fact that Make America Great Again hats were worn by those alleged was the icing on the cake for the corrupt media.

Similarly just as RINOs in Congress were quick to condemn the Tea Party, several prominent Never Trump faux conservative pundits jumped on the bandwagon, because the image of people in Make America Great Again hats allegedly acting like bigots gave them another opportunity to act in smug
condescension towards voters of President Trump, who they despise because he is not part of their good ole boy GOP country club.

The difference though between the Tea Party and what happened at the Lincoln Memorial is that these allegations are made against teenagers. Not only is their scholarly pursuits threatened by these allegations, but the tolerant-In-name-only Left threatening violence, as well as doxxing of their identities. (https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/01/20/delingpole-left-wing-and-the-right-attack-kids-to-demonstrate-virtue/)




My question is when will the media be held responsible for the spreading of inaccurate news that may hurt the lives of teenagers? Does their willingness to do anything to not only bring a President they hate down, but also defend the sacred blood sacrament of the Religion of Liberalsm (abortion on demand) override their so called “objectivity” as well as responsibility in using their First Amendment right to freedom of press?

Well done liberals in entertainment, you elected Democrats who have attacked these teens, and you at CNN and the other Fake News corrupt activist media outlets. You showed this weekend that all the bigotry you claim to oppose isn’t with conservatives, it is with all of you.