Thursday, June 23, 2016

The Hypocrisy of Anti-Gun, Pro-Terrorist Democrats

The Democrat Party reminds me of one kind of person you might see at your high school reunion. You know, the kind that has done nothing since graduation, and can only talk about reliving high school days.

That is the modern Democrat Party, stuck in the 1960s, like it was some magical time that they never wanted to leave. Never mind what most of the 1960s (with the exception of the Civil Rights movement) wrought upon America was the start of hedonism, treason, and an erosion of the moral and social order that made America great and productive.

We see these aging hippies who traded tye-dye for suits again as they threw their temper tantrum on the House floor, but this time, instead of advocating for equal rights, they wanted to take rights away from Americans as a way of playing SQUIRREL to distract from their inability to fight Islamofascist terror.

And why is that? Because if you look at some of the names of these anti-gun Democrats, you'd do just a little bit of digging to find out how they support arming our enemies and/or support domestic terrorists.

Let's start with the tax-cheating Charlie Rangel, who thinks law abiding Americans don't need guns, but he needs armed security.

Who recently met with Congressman Rangel?

The daddy of the Orlando Jihadi, that's who.

Congressman Jerrold Nadler from New York, said during the Party of Treason's temper tantrum that the Congress “is drenched in blood and the only way we can cleanse it is if the speaker of the House allows us to vote on this legislation. Every day that we don’t commit to a vote, the blood is on the leadership of this House.”

But Nadler supported Baraq Hussein Obama's arming of America's long-time enemy, Iran, with nuclear weapons. At one Hillary Rotten Clinton rally, Nadler said "Nine-eleven was an act of war. The villains aren’t the terrorists. The villains live in the White House," obviously referring to the Bush Administration.

Nadler, like Obama, has a soft sport for anti-American domestic terrorists. He played a role in the 2001 Presidential Pardon of a Weather Underground terrorist suspected in a deadly 1981 bombing (NY Post).
A Manhattan congressman and his rabbi played a crucial role in President Clinton’s controversial pardon of former Weather Underground member Susan Rosenberg, aides said yesterday.
Rabbi J. Rolando Matalon of Temple B’nai Jeshurun showed Democratic Rep. Jerrold Nadler “compelling information from [Rosenberg’s] parole hearing” and “passed on the concerns of her family,” said Nadler spokesman Eric Schmeltzer.
That intercession played a key role in Clinton’s decision Friday to commute the 58-year weapons-possession sentence for Rosenberg, long a suspect in the deadly 1981 Brink’s robbery in Nyack. She was never convicted on that charge.
“What [Nadler] did was to pass on the materials to the White House counsel’s office and say, ‘I’d like you to take a look at this,'” Schmeltzer said.
Neither the rabbi nor Nadler, who was well-regarded at the Clinton White House because he was one of the president’s most ardent defenders during Sexgate, could be reached for comment yesterday.
... Though the Brink’s robbery happened nearly 20 years ago, for those touched by the tragedy, it is still an open wound.
“The whole family is very disappointed,” said Crowley’s son, John Hanchar, who spoke with O’Grady’s widow, Diane O’Grady, after the pardon.
“She’s just stunned and hurting,” Hanchar said.
So are officers who worked side-by-side with the slain cops.
“I’m not happy about it at all,” said retired Officer Brian Lennon, Brown’s partner at the time. “Shame on President Clinton. Shame on him for moving to New York and letting her go.”
Southern California race-baiting corruptocrat Maxine Waters was quoted as saying she would take part in the sit-in for gun-control, "until hell freezes over." This is the same Maxine Waters who voiced opposition to a resolution calling for the communist hellhole of Cuba to extradite several criminals, one of them named Joanne Chesimard. Waters wrote to Pinko Cuban Dictator Fidel Castro in 1998.
I, and some of the Members of the Congressional Black Caucus, mistakenly voted for House Concurrent Resolution 254 which called on the Government of Cuba to extradite to the United States Joanne Chesimard and all other individuals who have fled the United States from political persecution and received political asylum in Cuba. Joanne Chesimard was the birth name of a political activist known to most Members of the Congressional Black Caucus as Assata Shakur.
For the record, I am opposed to the resolution.
...the most vicious and reprehensible acts were taken against the leaders and organizations associated with the Black Power or Black Liberation Movement. Assata Shakur, was a member of the Black Panther Party, one of the leading groups associated with the Black Liberation Movement. The Black Panther Party was the primary target of U.S. domestic government political harrassment and persecution during this era.
This illegal, clandestine political persecution was wrong in 1973, and remains wrong today.
What Maxine Waters didn't say is that Chesimard/Assata Shakur, is on the FBI Ten Most Wanted list, wanted for the 1973 killing of New Jersey State Trooper Werner Foerster twice in the head with his sidearm. Chesimard served time in prison until 1979, when Black Liberation Movement terrorists  "making a prison visit drew pistols, took guards as hostages and commandeered a prison van, spiriting Chesimard to a waiting getaway car — all in broad daylight. She emerged five years later in Cuba, given asylum by Fidel Castro, who cast her as a victim of U.S. racism."

For a bunch of Congresspersons who claim to hate guns and violence sure have a history of being comfortable supporting gun-toting, Left-wing terrorists. It appears that the modern Democrat Party has more in common with the SLA (Symbionese Liberation Army) than they do JFK and FDR.

Thursday, June 16, 2016

This Is What A Leader Sounds Like: Ted Cruz Takes On Obama & Democrats On Terror, Gun Control

This is Ted Cruz today on the Senate floor, with some moral clarity that has been missing since the horrific jihadist terror attack in Orlando this past Sunday.

“Madam President, our nation is at war. Five days ago, we saw a horrific terror attack in Orlando, Florida. From 9/11 to the Boston Marathon, from Fort Hood to Chattanooga, from San Bernardino to this attack in Orlando, radical Islamic terrorism has declared jihad on America. As the facts have unfolded, it now indicates that the Orlando terrorist has pledged his allegiance to ISIS in the process of murdering 49 and wounding more than 50 at a nightclub.

“All of us, our hearts go out to those who were murdered, to the families of those who were victims and who are grieving. We stand in solidarity. We lift them up in prayer at this horrific act of terrorism.

“But it is also a time for action. We need a Commander-in-Chief who will speak the truth, who will address the enemy we face, who will unleash the full force and fury of the American military on defeating ISIS and defeating radical Islamic terrorists.

“In the wake of the attack, many of us predicted what would unfold, and it was sadly the same political tale we have seen over and over again. Many of us predicted that Democrats would, as a matter of rigid partisan ideology, refuse even to say the words ’radical Islamist terrorism;’ that they would suggest this attack was yet another isolated incident, one lone criminal not connected to any global ideology, not connected to any global jihad, and that even worse they would try to use it as an excuse to go after the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens.

“Madam President, I wish when we predicted that that we had been proven incorrect, but this week played out all too predictably. Yesterday, we saw a political show on the Senate floor. Democrat after Democrat standing for hours incensed, not at ISIS, incensed, not at radical Islamic terrorism, incensed that Americans have a right to keep and bear arms. This is political distraction. This is political gamesmanship. And I think the American people find it ridiculous that in response to an ISIS terror attack, the Democrats go on high dungeon that we’ve got to restrict the second amendment rights of law-abiding citizens. This is not a gun control issue. This is a terrorism issue. And it is nothing less than political gamesmanship for them to try to shift for their favorite hobby horse of taking away the Bill of Rights from law-abiding citizens.

“...Now, in response to my criticism and that of many others, President Obama gave a press conference where he said, echoing the words of Hillary Clinton, ‘what difference does it make if we call it radical Islamic terrorism?’ Well, Mr. President, it makes a world of difference because the failure to address the enemy impacts every action taken to fight that enemy, and I want to talk in particular about three areas where this Administration and the Senate Democrats’ refusal to confront radical Islamic terrorism has made America less safe and what we need to do about it.

“Let’s start with prevention. Over and over again, we have seen the Obama administration having ample information to stop a terrorist attack, and yet because of the political correctness, because of the ideology of this administration that won’t even say the word ’jihad,’ won’t even say the words ’radical Islamic terrorism,’ they look the other way and the attacks go forward.

“In my home state of Texas, Fort Hood, Nidal Hasan, the Obama administration knew that Nidal Hasan had been in communication with a radical Islamic cleric, Anwar al-Awlaki. The Obama administration knew that Nidal Hasan had asked al-Awlaki about the permissibility of waging jihad against his fellow soldiers. All of that was known beforehand, and yet they did nothing. They did nothing, and on that fateful day, Nidal Hasan murdered 14 innocent souls, yelling ‘Allahu Akbar’ as he pulled the trigger. And yet, just to underscore the blindness of this administration, even after the terror attack, the administration insisted on characterizing that terror attack as ‘workplace violence.’ That is nothing short of delusion, and it’s a delusion that cost 14 lives. If we know of a U.S. service member who is communicating with a radical Islamic cleric and asking about waging jihad against his fellow soldiers, MPs should show up at that individual’s door within minutes. And if we didn’t have an administration that plunged its head in the sand like an ostrich and refused to acknowledge radical Islamic terrorism, Nidal Hasan would have been stopped before he carried out that horrific act of terrorism.

“Likewise, the Boston bombing: the Tsarnaev brothers. Russia had informed the Obama administration they were connected with radical Islamic terrorism. We knew that. The FBI had gone and interviewed them. And yet once again, they dropped the ball. They stopped monitoring them, so they didn’t even note when the elder Tsarnaev brother posted on YouTube a public call to jihad. Now, mind you, this was not requiring complicated surveillance. This was YouTube. Anyone with a computer who could type in Google could see this. And yet, because the administration will not acknowledge that we’re fighting radical Islamic terrorism, they were not watching and monitoring the Tsarnaev brothers; so when they called for public jihad, they then carried out that public jihad with pressure cookers at the Boston marathon. Yet another example where we knew about the individual beforehand, and if we had focused prevention on the problem, we could have stopped it.

“A third example was San Bernardino. San Bernardino, that horrific terror attack. Once again, we had ample information about the individuals in question. The female terrorist who came to San Bernardino had given the administration a fake address in Pakistan, and yet the so-called vetting that this administration tells us they do had failed to discover that it was a fake address. She had made calls for jihad, and yet the administration failed to discover that. In San Bernardino, we saw yet another horrific terror attack.

“And how about Orlando? Let’s talk about what the facts are in Orlando. Now, we’re only five days in. The facts will develop further as they’re more fully developed, but here is what’s been publicly reported. What’s been publicly reported is that Omar Mateen was interviewed not once, not twice but three times by the FBI in 2013 and 2014; that one of the reasons why he was interviewed by the FBI was because he was talking in his place of employment, which ironically, which shockingly enough, was a contractor to the Department of Homeland Security, and he was talking about being connected to terrorist organizations including the Boston bombers.
Do you think Donald Trump, aka Sideshow Bob, would give a speech like this? He's already finding ways to surrender the Second Amendment.  Sorry Trumpkins, he will let you down. He does not have a track record you can trust.

We need a leader who is like Churchill or Reagan now, not Trump or Hillary, who would be nothing more but the same old/same old.

All we need now is a delegate revolt, and we can get a real nominee with moral clarity.

Democrats: The Party of Islamofascist Terrorism Denial


That's the label that Democrats and liberals throw around to those of us who question the newest tenet of their man-made religion: Climate Change, aka GloBULL Warming. Earlier this year, 20 attorney generals (all of them Democrats) have begun an inquisition into "climate change deniers."

The Washington Free Beacon put this video together of how Barack Hussein Obama, Hanoi John Kerry and Clueless Joe Biden drone on about climate change being our biggest threat. Indeed, as points out, Obama has made that claim at least 22 times.

What is missing from that video, and can soon be added to it, is the horrible terror that happened in Orlando this past Sunday night, once again committed by a Muslim fanatic, and the pivot from Democrats to blaming guns, the NRA and anything else but the ideology behind it...Islamofascism. I've not heard anyone outside the conservative blogopshere comment on this video that I saw passed around Sunday morning when we were waking up to news of the terrorist attack.

Yet the Democrat Party Response? Denial

From Obama's Astorturf Organization:

And then Mayonnaise hair Debbie Wasserman Schulz came to come spew her venom.

Do you think being from Florida that Wasserman Schultz would have known about this Imam, but nooooooooooo! She immediately points her crooked finger at Donald Trump and calls him a bigot, probably because Debbie has a problem with men anyway.

The Democrat tantrum and attack on our right to defend ourselves from such Islamic madmen (and their denial of that problem) continued. Interrupting a moment of silence led by the putrid House Speaker, Paul Ryan, and then the Senate Democrats held their own temper tantrum about guns, until the GOP Senate eunuchs gave in to the spoiled children. Democrat Chris Murphy can say they're doing this about the children, but it's hypocritical to claim, especially since they're the biggest supporters of liberalism's sacred blood sacrament: abortion on demand.

And don't get me started on the media. I have never seen as much dishonest reporting with such an agenda since the Tea Party and Sarah Palin were blamed for the Gabby Giffords shooting, or the time that the Congressional Black Caucus claimed the Tea Party called them the n-word.

Instead of fulfilling their oath of office to defend America from "all enemies, foreign and domestic" the Democrat Party show they're more concerned about defending one group of people, while demanding the rest of us give up more of our liberties. Trust us they say, but I cannot trust this government, who has let Islamic terrorists slip under their radar multiple times because they've given into pressure from the Muslim grievance organizations.

So if we're going to talk about "deniers," lets talk about Islamofascist Terrorism Deniers and where it resides: the Democrat Party and liberalism. The last few days show the truth in that statement. All the proof from not just the last nearly 15 years since 9/11/2001, but world history show that Islam is an ideology bent on world domination and submission. Yet liberals and Democrats deny the facts of history because of "racism" and "diversity." Democrats, unlike FDR and Truman, no longer let politics "stop at the water's edge" when it comes to attacks on our citizens. Instead of the knowledge that we're all in this together, they look for more ways to pit one group of Americans against the other.

You think I'm kidding? Look at how liberals so-called patriotism lasted after 9/11, just about 30 minutes. Nearly half of Democrats are so unhinged they believed the loony 9/11 Troofer theories that Bush knew about the attacks. Because Bill Clinton was the first Islamofascist Terrorism Denier. From the first World Trade Center attack a month after he took office to the USS Cole, Slick Willie cautioned us never to "rush to judgement," and was too busy dropping his pants instead of bombs on al-Queda training facilities when they were planning 9/11. So, naturally, after 9/11, the Democrats decided Muslims were the real victims and saw another group they could pander to for votes and pit against the rest of us. Because they thought the cowboy Bush wanted to blame the Middle East and go after their oil or something like that.

And what has all the butt-kissing to the Islamic world by Obama gotten us? Certainly not peace, but a more dangerous world. And Democrats are not only putting more lives at risk with their Islamofascist Terror Denial, they are, by proxy, aiding the enemy who has been at war with us.

Isn't that called treason?

Tuesday, June 14, 2016

He Proved It Again Today, Obama More Angry At His Fellow Citizens Than Our Enemies

Let me preface what I'm about to say by showing a video I've posted several times in the past of David Beamer from 2010, the father of United 93 hero Todd Beamer.

"What is going on in this country is unbelievable. Cannot be fathomed hardly. And, most of our fellow Americans are asleep, still. ...I don't know if Obama is a Muslim or not. But he sure is a Muslim sympathizer. He has the track record to prove it."
Well, judging from his reaction the last couple of days, and especially today, Barack Hussein Obama showed once again how one can argue he is a Muslim sympathizer.

His first reaction to the terrorist attack in Orlando was not only to attack the Second Amendment rights of every law abiding American in defending themselves against another Jihadist, but to blame this nation, saying “we need the strength and courage to change.”  Today he sunk deeper, sounding more passionate against Donald Trump and any political opponent who dares to question his ability to fight terrorism than against radical Islamists who have attacked this nation several times under his watch.
“There has not been a moment in my seven and a half years as president where we have not been able to pursue a strategy because we didn’t use the label ‘radical Islam.’ Not once has an adviser of mine said, ‘Man, if we use that phrase, we are going to turn this whole thing around.’ Not once,” Obama said. “Calling a threat by a different name does not make it go away. This is a political distraction.” 
Obama, who emphasized that he has previously detailed how “extremist groups have perverted Islam to justify terrorism,” said language like Trump’s would reinforce the claim that terrorists speak for the world’s 1.7 billion Muslims. 
“That’s their propaganda; that’s how they recruit. And if we fall into the trap of painting all Muslims with a broad brush, and imply that we are at war with an entire religion, then we are doing the terrorists’ work for them,” Obama scolded.
We are inspiring terrorism by calling it by knowing our enemy? YOU gave birth to ISIS by retreating on the battlefield in the War on Terror, with your constant butt-kissing to radical Islamist grievance groups and the Muslim Brotherhood, as well as mocking ISIS as a JV team. We should be glad you weren't President in 1941-1945, because you'd have been too afraid to go after Imperial Japan. For that matter, we saw how you were willing to go to Hiroshima as a disrespectful swipe to those who served (and died) fighting Japan from Pearl Harbor to the end of World War II. Not only that, for all your talk at Hiroshima of a world without nuclear weapons, you and your party were willing to help the Islamic state of Iran get nuclear weapons with your appeasement deal.

The Democrat Party Slogan since 2001

It's beyond Muslim sympathizer, Obama is a sympathizer of America's enemies. He has more anger and contempt for anyone who dares oppose or criticize him, but no willingness to defend the nation and the Constitution he swore an oath twice to defend.

Which reminds me of another video...

"If you want to be president you have to work for everybody not just for some."
Well you certainly are not working for all Americans, Mister Obama, if you're doing nothing but attacking Americans and their civil liberties, and those who defend us (police and the military) while you stand on the side of the terrorists, criminal gang-bangers, and illegal aliens.

And yet Obama and the Democrats claimed to be such big champions of the gay community?

And don't get me started on Hillary Rotten Clinton. We've found out that the Butcher of Benghazi's state department shut down investigations into the Orlando jihadist's mosque. Just like Obama, she's pushing gun control just like she pushed the lie about Benghazi being inspired by an anti-Islamic video. Meanwhile, Hillary employs a pathetic creep who tweets an obscene response to the NRA for an editorial in USA Today.

This is the modern Democrat Party, empathy for our enemies and harsh words for their fellow Americans.

How many more Americans have to die before we have leaders who are serious about defeating this enemy and the Quislings in the nation who enable them?