Monday, December 26, 2016

The Uncivil Left's Nationwide Temper-Tantrum After Trump's Election

Hi there, it's been a while! How were your Thanksgiving and Christmas holidays? How many arguments did you have, either at the dinner table or social media, over Donald Trump's election?

Well if you are like me, semi-retired blogger, you have to shake your head at the nationwide insanity that has occurred after Donald Trump defeated Hillary Rotten Clintoon this past November 8th. There's been almost too much to document.

I personally stayed off Facebook for all of November because the angry, vicious, insane and ignorant posts from Leftists in my friends feed was too much to bear.

But this isn't the first time that liberals acted like this. Check out what Rush Limbaugh talked about back in 1995 after the Republicans took over Congress for the first time in 40 years, and how the Democrats were having visible temper tantrums after losing their power. And everything Rush says about how Democrats acted is still true today.

The only difference between now and 1994 is we had the years of 2001-2009, when liberal Democrats did all they could to derail the War on Terrorism, all to defeat George W. Bush politically, never mind if it meant hurting the nation. Their time at bat for the last eight years was the loss of Iraq, Afghanistan in turmoil, the rise of ISIS and more terror attacks than the Bush years.

So Donald Trump defies the odds of both the Democrat and Republican Party establishments and wins the election, and it's time for the far-Left, who still live back in the 1960s to go into a fit of rage.

Liberals always want to lecture against bullying. Well, I agree, bullying is wrong. But the problem is, they think it's perfectly OK to bully members of Donald Trump's family and possible entertainers who were invited to perform at The Donald's Inauguration. (see links below for a sample of the liberal incivility)

LEFTIST BULLY ARTISTS Tell Ivanka Trump: “Get My Artwork Off Your Walls”…”I Am Embarrassed To Be Seen With You”

Reports: Ivanka Trump and Kids Berated by Man on JetBlue Flight

Feminists Defend Man Who Harassed Ivanka Trump on JetBlue Flight

Teen opera singer cyberbullied for performing at Trump's inauguration

Andrea Bocelli Won’t Be Singing at the Trump Inauguration

And it's going to get worse in the next month. (Andrew Marcus/Rebel Pundit at Gateway Pundit)
Violent activists (#ObamasChildren) plan to cause chaos and “create a sense of crisis” through harassment and intimidation that could devolve into something much uglier and more dangerous, according to Roger Stone.
Stone obtained details about the coordinated chaos from a operative inside a #J20 Planning Committee Session, where activists planned to disrupt the inaugural events. He says that activists are planning to use violent tactics against peaceful Americans gathering for the swearing in of the 45th President. This may go as far launching rockets from drones to activists playing roller derby knockdown games with civilians.
Trump’s success confirms the bankruptcy of representative democracy. Rather than using the democratic process as an alibi for inaction, we must show that NO ELECTION could legitimize his agenda. Neither the Democrats nor any other political party or politician will save us—they just offer a weaker version of the same thing. If there is going to be a positive change in this society, we have to make it ourselves, together, through direct action. 
Groups planning to participate in the attacks include (a militant environmental activist org), Black Lives Matter, and (White allies of Black Lives Matter who are using Black Lives Matter to advance their own issues, who were told by Black Lives Matter operatives to keep an arms length distance from “people of color” who are in Black Lives Matter to make it look more like an authentic black movement).
Stone has more information in the first few minutes of the following video from Infowars
And the next day, January 21, is another liberal meltdown, when radical bra-burners and feminazis plan to march in a Rally for Women that is being organized by radical groups and promoted by Socialists.
A mass march of women will take place in the nation’s capital on Jan. 21, 2017. This is the first full day that Donald Trump will be president, and will follow demonstrations that are being called for Inauguration Day. The call states, “We will stand in solidarity with our partners and children for the protection of our rights, our safety, our health and our families”.
Although it focuses on women, the march and rally will also include and speak to the demands of other oppressed groupings: “We support the advocacy and resistance movements that reflect our multiple and intersecting identities.” This includes “immigrants of all statuses, those with diverse religious faiths, particularly Muslim, people who identify as LGBTQIA, Native and indigenous people, Black and Brown people, people with disabilities, the economically impoverished, and survivors of sexual assault.”
Women have responded in massive numbers to the call for a march on Washington. This is in response to decades of attacks on abortion rights, physical attacks on Planned Parenthood and murder of abortion providers. We have seen a rise in rape culture and increasing violence against women. Women continue to struggle to survive on poverty wages at the same time that many face the increasing burden of unpaid work in child care and elder care.

Bolded and italicized in the above paragraph by this author are the words "rape culture." Granted, sexual assault anywhere should be a legitimate concern. However, the problem is when false reports and exaggerated stories are used by radical feminazis to push the idea of an epidemic of campus rapes. A case in point is the false report published by Rolling Stoned about an alleged rape at the UVA campus, pushed by the same liberals who are now complaining about "fake news" after the election of Donald Trump.

I'll tell you what this rally is all about. Promoting abortion on demand, bashing of males, the patriarchy, and traditional family roles. These radical feminists have done nothing to make life better for women, instead, they've used their bully pulpit given to them by the media to attack men and especially masculinity and men who attempt to court women in the manner our fathers/grandfathers once did (hold the door open for a woman, take her coat off, etc.).

Despite the Leftist brigades, it appears a new spirit is rising in America. I have to disagree in part with Jerry Falwell Jr. that it is because of Trump. As much as I didn't like the "cult of personality" attitude of the Left towards Obama, I'm weary of those on our side who want to act the same way towards Trump.

However, I do think that Trump's outspokenness, and willingness to not cower to the media and leftists have emboldened the American people in a way that hasn't happened since the days of Ronald Reagan. I'm not saying Trump is Reagan (I still don't think he is a conservative), but Trump's rise has emboldened middle and working Americans. As I told a friend who (like me) was a "Reluctant Trump" voter, I felt the Left had successfully bullied working Americans for years with the finger-jab to the chest, call us "racists," "sexists," "bigots," "homophobes." Then after years of this chest poking, when Trump came along, it was the chance for the "silent majority" to shove back hard at the Left.

And as we are seeing now, they just can't take it.

Saturday, October 29, 2016

Former US Attorney: Hillary E-Mail Investigation Reopened To Avoid Revolt In FBI, Plus Agents Refused To Destroy Cheryl Mills' Laptops

Former US attorney Joe DiGenova was on the Drive at Five with Larry O'Connor on WMAL yesterday afternoon with insight into why FBI Director James Comey reopened the investigation into Hillary Clinton's e-mails.

DiGenova questioned why the phone used by Anthony Weiner and Huma Abedin was not looked at earlier and went into an explanation of why Director Comey sent the letter to Congress yesterday.
"The agents came to Comey yesterday (Thursday), they told him about the new evidence. He said 'oh s...!,' and realized his goose was cooked. That this would prove conclusively that his original investigation was incompetent, and he knew the agents running the Weiner investigation would leak it, if he did not send this letter to Congress.
But that wasn't the extent to the revolt going on in the FBI, as DiGenova had even more blockbuster revelations.
"It's been reported that those laptops (from Cheryl Mills and others) were destroyed. They were not, and the reason is the FBI agents refused to do it. The laptops exist, they were not destroyed, the agents refused to destroy them. ...There is a quiet and serious revolt against the director (Comey) right now. He sent those letters today because he is in deep trouble inside the Bureau.
DiGenova said if the investigation was run properly, the Weiner phones would have been discovered earlier, if the original investigation had been run properly. He also said the bar had been set in the General Carthright case and David Petraeus case that if you lie to the FBI, you're in trouble, and that any immunity deals would become null and void if any of the players lied to the FBI agents.

Pro-Hillary "Get Out The Vote" Concert Headlined By (C)Rapper Who Used "P Word" Donald Trump Was Savaged Over

WARNING: Explicit content 

Next Friday, November 4th, a "Get Out The Vote" concert for the Hildebeast will be held in Ohio to motivate minority voters to go vote for the twice under FBI investigation Democrat nominee (Billboard).
Jay Z will be helping Hillary Clinton rally minority voters in Ohio for a "Get Out The Vote" show next month.
Set for Nov. 4, just four days before the 2016 election, the rap mogul/philanthropist will be joined by "special guests" to help mobilize Ohioans to vote for Clinton, according to a release. A huge turnout in the African American community for Clinton in the swing state would be a crucial victory in the race against Republican Party rep Donald Trump, BuzzFeed reports.
Ah yes, Jay Z, a vile (c)rapper who sings snappy tunes about "bitches," "hoes," and drops the n-word as well.

Wonder if he will sing this song at this Vote for Hillary concert.
The power of the P-U-S-S-Y,
Thatz why every mutherf*cka in the world dress fly.
Every baller
that can afford it they cop the best ride, for the power of the P-U-S-S-Y.
(Let's have some fun)
The power of the P-U-S-S-Y, thatz why niggaz get they hair cut, try to dress fly.
Every baller that can afford it he cop the best ride.
For the Power of the P-U-S-S-Y. 
I-I know this girl we call her Sweet Cooch Brown.
Hands down mami had the bombest pussy in town.
One dip in the girl pool, thatz all it took.
One sample of the snappa and ya ass was whooped.
Didn't Donald Trump just get into a lot of controversy for using that word in a private conversation, but Hillary Clinton has a concert with a (c)rapper who uses it?

Or these lyrics from a "song" called "Big Pimpin'"
You know I thug em, f*ck em, love em, leave em
Cause I don't f*ckin' need em
Take em out the hood, keep em lookin' good
But I don't f*ckin' feed em
First time they fuss I'm breezin'
Talkin' bout, "What's the reasons?"
I'm a pimp in every sense of the word, bitch
Better trust than believe em
In the cut where I keep em
'Til I need a nut, 'til I need to beat the guts
Then it's, beep beep and I'm pickin' em up
Let em play with the dick in the truck
Many chicks want to put Jigga fist in cuffs
Divorce him and split his bucks
Just because you got good head, I'm a break bread
So you can be livin' it up? Shit I
Parts with nothin', y'all be frontin'
Me give my heart to a woman?
Not for nothin', never happen
I'll be forever mackin'
Heart cold as assassins, I got no passion
I got no patience
And I hate waitin'
Hoe get yo' ass in
And let's ride, check em out now
Ride, yeah
And let's ride check em out now
Ride, yeah
And for a candidate who claims to care for women who have been abused, what about the "song" Jay Z sang with his trashy wife, Beyonce, called "Drunk In Love" that has a line referencing spousal abuse?
I am Ike Turner…Baby know I don’t play.Now eat the cake, Anna Mae.Said Eat the Cake, Anna Mae
"Eat the cake, Anna Mae" is a reference to the scene below from the movie "What's Love Got to Do With It?" on the life of Tina Turner, when her scumbag, spousal abusing ex-husband Ike Turner, jealous at the attention she was getting, humiliates her in a restaurant with a piece of cake.

It's not just the Hildebeast. Moochelle Obama, who claimed she was "shaken to the core" by Donald Trump using the "p-word" apparently found Jay-Z's graphic lyrics to be family entertainment, as back in 2014 she took her teenage daughters to his Chicago concert.

If it wasn't for double standards, liberals wouldn't have any standards at all.

Wednesday, October 26, 2016

Corrupt Media Ignoring Leftist Violence & Hate Toward Trump, GOP

Remember back in 2011, just after the House overwhelmingly turned to a GOP majority thanks to the Tea Party, Richard Milhous Hussein Obama hijacked a memorial to lives lost at a shooting in Tucson, AZ to lecture about inflamed political discourse?

Well, as that video compilation from the year of 2011 showed, leftists were the ones acting uncivil, violent and hateful. This year being an election year is no exception.

The Left and the Corrupt Media propping up the candidacy of Hillary Rotten Clinton has accused Donald Trump of inciting violence and hate.

Really? Remember what happened in San Jose earlier this summer? Those weren't liberals getting attacked by Trump supporters. It was the other way around. And now we know from the great work of James O'Keefe and Project Veritas that the Hillary campaign was involved in violent protests in Chicago and in Arizona.

Last weekend, we saw the dolt Joe Biden, who makes Dan Quayle look like an intellectual giant, wanted to take Donald Trump out behind the gym. Which is laughable, because Biden would probably lose a fight with a speedbag.

So did the washed up Robert DeNiro recently, a guy who is so desperate for attention because he hasn't made a decent movie in almost 20 years.

And what does that inspire?

Today, it was reported that some nut in Hollyweird destroyed Trump's star on the Walk of Fame.

In North Carolina, a county GOP headquarters was vandalized and firebombed. Closer to here in Northern Virginia, Loudoun County VA deputies are investigating threats made against the GOP headquarters in Sterling. The Fairfax County Republican County has reported they get calls almost daily being stolen or destroyed.

A month ago, when I was in Las Vegas for a little R and R, I saw this "artwork" from an artist on Fremont Street. Trump being beheaded by drug lord El Chapo, and other anti-Trump "artwork."

But do you see any of this being reported in the media?

When Megyn Kelly, Protector Of Women Against Trump, Talked Smut With Howard Stern

Last night, Megyn Kelly showed how she was a part of the Corrupt Media for Hillary, even though she works at Fox News, when she went after former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich.

"You know, Mr. Speaker, I'm not fascinated with sex. But I am fascinated with teh protection of women and understanding what we're getting in the Oval Office and I think the American voters would like to know," said Kelly, after Newt told her she was "fascinated with sex and you don't care about public policy."

Well, Newt may just have a point there. It seems that Sanctimonious Megyn, the self-appointed Protector of Women, had no problem talking about her breasts and penises on the Howard Stern Show. And anyone who knows about Stern known he talks about things that would make Donald Trump blush (Newsmax).

In a 2010 interview, the Fox News star laughed with glee as Stern talked about her breasts
"We used to call them 'Killer B's' then when I got pregnant they became 'Swimmin' C's' and Doug was frolicking in the ocean," Kelly said of her husband, author Douglas Brunt.
Stern asked whether she would have considered not marrying Brunt if his penis had been small.
"I reject the hypotheticals. There's no issues there," Kelly said, laughing. "I've never had to choose. Let's put it that way."
She also talked about having sex with Brunt even while she was pregnant – into the third trimester.
That doesn't include the photo below, as well as her suggestive GQ photos.

And does she not worry about the Hillary Clinton who attacked the women that her sexual predator husband preyed upon?

Sorry Megyn, you need to go work on your own issues before you lecture Newt about "anger issues."

Monday, October 24, 2016

The Same GOP Establishment Who Brought Virginia Terry McAuliffe Now Want To Bring Hillary To The White House

Do you want one more reason why I am not in the #NeverTrump camp?

Because I saw what happens when the sore losers in the GOP establishment don't get their candidate, as they did in Virginia in 2013.

The establishment's lackey was then Lt. Governor Bill Bolling, who pushed Mittens Romney on the state in the 2012 primaries by giving us him or Ron Paul (I voted Ron Paul as a protest vote, though I strongly disagreed with his foreign policy). The way the "good old boy" GOP works, it was Bolling's turn to run for governor, except the more conservative, Tea Party grassroots wanted a solid conservative candidate in then Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli.

Cuccinelli won the gubernatorial nod at the GOP convention, then Bolling the sore loser grabbed his toys and stomped off, refusing to endorse Cuccinelli, and airing sour grapes in the process. The national GOP abandoned Virginia and gave money instead to Krispy Kreme Chris Christie.

The result of Bolling's and the Establishment's temper tantrum? The head of Bill Clinton's Hillbilly Mafia named Terry McAuliffe became governor, a Democrat attorney general gained a questionable victory after ballots were mysteriously discovered in Fairfax county that put him over the top, all setting up the state to go for Hillary Rotten Clinton in 2016.

Turns out not only was Terry McAwful trying to help the Hildebeast by giving an unconstitutional amnesty to felons, he was giving money to the campaign of the wife of a top FBI official who later looked into the Clinton e-mail investigation (WSJ).
The political organization of Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe, an influential Democrat with longstanding ties to Bill and Hillary Clinton, gave nearly $500,000 to the election campaign of the wife of an official at the Federal Bureau of Investigation who later helped oversee the investigation into Mrs. Clinton’s email use.
Campaign finance records show Mr. McAuliffe’s political-action committee donated $467,500 to the 2015 state Senate campaign of Dr. Jill McCabe, who is married to Andrew McCabe, now the deputy director of the FBI.
The Virginia Democratic Party, over which Mr. McAuliffe exerts considerable control, donated an additional $207,788 worth of support to Dr. McCabe’s campaign in the form of mailers, according to the records. That adds up to slightly more than $675,000 to her candidacy from entities either directly under Mr. McAuliffe’s control or strongly influenced by him. The figure represents more than a third of all the campaign funds Dr. McCabe raised in the effort.
Mr. McAuliffe and other state party leaders recruited Dr. McCabe to run, according to party officials. She lost the election to incumbent Republican Dick Black.
 And some laugh when Donald Trump says the system is rigged?

Our former Governor, Bob McDonnell, left office under a cloud because of trumped up ethics charges that he was later cleared of that, while looking improper, there was no quid pro quo proven. But what McAuliffe has done stinks on dry ice and is much worse. He is connected to a contender for the Presidency, who is under investigation for improper use of government e-mail that puts our national security at risk, and he's throwing money around to the "right people."

And now, three years later, the same GOP establishment is playing the same game. Started by allies of the Bushes, the Romneybots, the Marco Rubio cultists, still butt-hurt from their defeat at the hands of a crass, billionaire real estate mogul, are doing the same Bill Bolling sore-loser tantrum in the face of a candidate who is not only more corrupt than Richard Nixon, but a disciple of Saul Alinsky's radicalism who learned at the feet of the Lucifer-inspired community activist. Their savior is an unknown, kamikaze Republican whose name sounds like Egg McMuffin and who claimed admiration for the drunken John Boehner and the eunuch Paul Ryan, two people who did more to damage the GOP and caused the rise of Trump. I don't know about you, but when I hear Egg McMuffin and his surrogates at RedState and The Resurgent, they use the talking points of Hillary against Trump every chance they get.

No, I'm not trying to say that Trump is a conservative (he's not), or that he's "anointed by God to save America" (as some televangelists claimed). I think Trump is a fool, but even a fool is less dangerous than Hillary Rotten Clinton, who would sell out this nations security to enrich her and her family. The same Hillary who would embolden the murder of more unborn children under the legal term "abortion on demand." The same Hillary who would add more radical Left wing judges to not just the Supreme Court, but the whole Federal bench. The same Hillary who "empathizes" with America's enemies and sees her political opponents as more of a threat than jihadists.

We had our chance to stop Trump in the primaries and failed, mostly because a lot of these sore establishment #NeverTrumpers refused to coalesce around the one Constitutional Conservative who was the strongest (Ted Cruz) or were the Johnny Come Latelys who got on board when it was too late to make a difference (thanks Marco). At this point, I'm not concerned about saving the Republican Party, all I'm concerned about is saving the country. Going #NeverTrump is putting Party Before Country, and would only to to America what the GOPe did to Virginia three years ago.

Saturday, October 15, 2016

#NeverTrump Just Isn't An Option In Election 2016

Back on August 31, I wrote the following, in response to Sean Hannity and some comments he made:
And if you want to know where I stand, Sean, buddy, in November, let me say I’m voting my conscience, and my conscience is hurting me right now. But I can with a clear conscience say I cannot sit on my hands and do nothing while Hillary is running for President. I am #NeverHillary.
I cannot vote for Gary Johnson, who is pro-abortion, pro-gloBULL warming, and whose whole candidacy is based on legalizing marijuana. Libertarians once had a lot in common with conservatives, however modern libertarians tend to be cheap, pothead liberals who don’t want to fight wars.
Likewise, I cannot endorse the #NeverTrump, because they have offered no viable alternative to the Trump candidacy, just a guy (funded by Romney, I suspect) whose name is mistaken with Egg McMuffin and has similar views on Supreme Court decisions as the putrid John Kasich.
So, with less than a month away from the election that will decide whether or not America can recover from eight years of self-imposed destruction under Richard Milhous Obama, or fade into European-style socialism and a permanent one-party state, I can still say #NeverTrump is not an option for me as a voter, as well as anyone who cares about preserving America.

I am 100 percent #NeverHillary.

That means, after searching my conscience (as my first choice, Ted Cruz, said at the Republican National Convention), I searched my soul and decided back in August that the only real choice I had was Donald Trump for President, and I feel the same way today.

Does that mean Trump is a conservative? No, he's not. Does that mean I approve or defend the revelations of smut talk on a tape he made 11 years ago? No I don't. Does it bother me that several women are coming forward claiming to have been sexually assaulted by him? Yes, but however the timing, as well as some of the characters involved, make me suspicious. The presence of Gloria AllRED, that ambulance-chasing, Democrat party hack is one of them.

The fact that there were no allegations of this behavior from Trump for 30 or 40 years, until less than a month before an election when he is running as the Republican nominee, makes me suspicious. I remember how AllRED and the Democrat Party played the same trick in California, before the 2003 recall election of Gov. "Red" Davis, because Davis could not defend his failed time as California's governor. All he had, just like the Democrats of today have, are negative personal attacks and character assassinations.

Trump says these allegations are false, and as I thought when I heard him say that, you better be telling us the truth.

But it seems too many in the #NeverTrump camp were too gleeful, using the language of Hillary and the Left by passing along these allegations on their social media pages and blogs. Remember how those of us who opposed Mittens Romney in the 2012 primary were slammed as "attacking capitalism" and "using the language of the Left" in going after him? It seems the #NeverTrump crowd is doing the same. And why not? Many of them pushed the loser Romney on us because he was a pure as the wind-driven snow.

And look what the liberals did to the clean Mitt Romney? They made him out to be worse than Attila the Hun.

This is why the GOP establishment loses all the time. The Republican Party has become infested with Bushies since the days of GHW Bush, who thought being Mr. Rogers would help in winning political battles with the "out-for-blood, play-to-win" Left, and instead, he got creamed and we got stuck with the Rapist-in-Chief, Bill Clinton.

But this election is more about Republican vs. Democrat, Right vs. Left. As we can tell from the Wikileaks drops, this is an election about the Elites vs. the rest of us. And the elites aren't all liberals, they infest both parties. Too many elites are in the Republican Party establishment, and if you are not a part of their "country club" they don't want you. Witness the way the GOP and the same traitors supporting Hillary who were in the McCain campaign trashed Sarah Palin to the press. Why? She wasn't one of them. She didn't go to their elite private schools and Ivy League colleges. Look at how Ken Cuccinelli, a reliable conservative, was thrown under the bus by the Virginia and national GOP. Why? He wasn't part of the "country club," and the "country club GOP" was more comfortable with Terry McAwful than Cuccinelli, because McAwful was an elitist like them.

There's also the aspect of those who emphasize "social conservatism" over everything else. I agree with social conservatism, but it is not the "be all and end all" of conservatism. Donald Trump has apologized for smut talk he made before he even wanted to run for President, and pledged to be a better person. Who among us would want to be judged on not just something we said in private, but also some of our pasts?

Too many in the Christian right seem to forget how we are all fallen and broken people, and it is only by Grace that we have any kind of chance at Redemption. It is not by holding our Bibles and using them as weapons, like one sidewalk evangelist I was in college, who basically pointed at people and shouted "FORNICATOR!" "MASTURBATOR!" "SODOMIZER!"

And to the Pius who cannot vote for Trump because of his behavior in the past, I say, is the speck cleared from your eyes to be able and judge him? I say thing about one regular Trump critic who is a radio host and writes a blog, and is attending seminary. He goes after Trump because of his lifestyle and worries what Trump will do to the church. Excuse me! We are electing a President, not an archbishop. And some (like Southern Baptists) might look at this blogger/seminarian and question his morality, especially in the area of regularly drinking adult beverages.

Another reason why #NeverTrump isn't an option is if offered no reasonable alternative. It's just a movement made up mostly of butt-hurt ¡Jeb! and Marco Rubio supporters from the GOP country club. Who is their savior? An unknown guy named Evan McMullen, who has been mocked as Egg McMuffin. He took on Trump last weekend on Twitter:
If that is the case, why then does McMullin employ a GOP establishment consultant like Rick Wilson. Wilson refered on Twitter to "Ted F***ing Cruz", as well as made crude comments about Trump supporters and an obscene tweet to Ann Coulter (who I'm no fan of). So what does that say about your values, Egg McMuffin?

Wilson is part of the problem in the GOP elite who gave us Trump. They all want our vote but (if they win) will spend too much time shafting the voters who put them in office they end up losing elections. If Wilson, Karl Rove had to make a living on winning elections, they'd be out of a job.

They say they're doing it to stand up for their values, and for the party. Well, I could really give a rip about the Republican Party, especially how it no longer stands for anything remotely conservative under the Bushes, Roves and Rick Wilsons. After saying for years we only needed the presidency, now they want us to surrender it to Hillary, and promise to fight her in Congress? Yeah, isn't that what they said they'd do with Obama, and instead only cut deals to give him what he wanted?

For all the talk of what Trump would allegedly do to the church, what about how Wikileaks shows how hostile Hillary will be toward Christians and any other faith (except Islam, of course). We aren't sure what Trump will bring, but we know where Hillary will take us.

I love this nation more than I care about the Republican Party. Members of my family have served it, and died defending it. A corrupt, lying Alinskyite is the very thing that is an insult to anyone who loves and had defended this nation.

Personally, I think Trump has been a fool and the nation could survive him, but Hillary is someone who I see as pure evil and our nation would not survive her. She claims to be a champion of women, yet attacked the women whom her husband sexually assualted. She defended the rapist of a 12 year old girl and laughed because the scumbag got off. She put our national security at risk and did nothing while four people died at Benghazi. Then, not only did she lie to the families, but attacked them as liars. She and her husband make deals with foreign nations that only serve to benefit them financially. They are the very definition of treason.

As Cicero once said:
“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.”
I don't blame those who want to stand for their principles, but what use are they when the nation is gone thanks to a Hillary presidency? And for all we know about Hillary, when my son and my nephew ask me what I did in 2016, I won't have to say, "Well, I did nothing because standing on my principles were more important than making sure we left you a more free, more prosperous nation."

Wednesday, October 12, 2016

HYPOCRISY! - Obama Condemns Trump Tape, But Video Surfaces Of Obama Displaying His Anthony Weiner To Female Reporters

As you would guess, Richard Milhous Obama recently weighed in on the infamous Trump tape from over the weekend (Corrupt News Network - CNN).
"You don't have to be a husband or a father to hear what we heard just a few days ago and say, 'that's not right.' You just have to be a decent human being to say that's not right," he said during a campaign event in North Carolina. "And if it makes you mad ... you can do something about it North Carolina!"
Oh but here's the kicker, Obama the great protector of women against sexist, misogynistic males, had no problem showing off his erect Anthony Weiner to female reporters on a campaign plane back around 2008, but even worse, the reporters (see video below) seemed thrilled and amused by this.

(UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE as blonde woman walks in front of Obama) "Move, move, move!"

"Laughter Come on!"

"Agent, sit down!!!"

All of these are apparently from CNN, who (along with the Democrat Party, and the sanctimonious RINOs and the Hillary-enabling "Never Trumpers") are so offended by words Trump used in private conversation.

I don't know which is worse, that these sanctimonious liberals are practically drooling at the mouth, or the fact they covered this tape up?

The media isn't biased, they are just as corrupt as the liberal politicians they cover for.

Tuesday, October 11, 2016

Repulsed By Trump's 2005 Comments, Hypocrite Hillary Campaigns With Alleged "Crazed Sex Poodle" Algore

Hillary Rotten Clinton was so repulsed by the 2005 tape released on Friday, where Donald Trump talked about "p*ssy" and tweeted her outrage.

But Hypocrite Hillary hit the campaign trail today with the modern Chicken Little, Algore.

The same Algore who was accused in 2010 of sexual assault by a masseuse, who called the climate fearmonger a "crazed sex poodle" (UK Telegraph).

The unidentified 54-year-old woman gave police a detailed account of her claims that Mr Gore groped and kissed her in an aggressive attempt to have sex during a night-time appointment in his suite.
However, the police concluded that there was insufficient evidence to press charges.
The woman, who recalled telling Mr Gore he was behaving like a "crazed sex poodle", claims he pinned her to his bed and forcibly French kissed her.
...In her statement, made public by police, the masseuse said she arrived at the St Lucia Hotel's VIP suite to find Mr Gore drinking beer.
He greeted her with a hug and told her to call him "Al", she told police.
However, the nearly three-hour therapy session soon went sour after Mr Gore angrily insisted she massage him around his groin and then pounced on her, she claimed.
"He pleaded, groped me, grabbed me, engulfed me in embrace, tongue kissed me, massaged me, grabbed my breasts," she told detectives.
She said she feared he might rape her as he "flipped me flat on my back and threw his whole body face down over atop me, pinning me down and outweighing me by quite a bit".
The woman said Mr Gore provided a "dramatic display of violent temper as well as [an] extremely dictatorial, commanding attitude besides his smiley, global warning concern persona".
Two other massage therapists accused Gore of sexual abuse around the same time. No word if Gore blamed his actions on gloBULL warming.

If our media wasn't so corrupt, acting objective while serving as the Hillary/DNC PR firm, she'd be questioned for her hypocrisy. But then again, Democrats look out for one another.

Wednesday, August 31, 2016

Sorry Sean Hannity, But You’re Wrong to Blame Ted Cruz If Trump Loses

Yesterday afternoon, driving back with my son from day trip up to Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, I did something rare and listened to the Sean Hannity show on Sirius XM, as he is hard to find on Washington DC radio stations.

Now Sean Hannity is someone I have greatly admired over the years, since I first saw him during the Clinton impeachment on Fox News, heard him subbing for Rush Limbaugh, then tuned in when his radio show went national the day before 9/11. I got to meet him a year later and have met him several times in the preceding years (I have the photos and signed books to prove).

So it was disappointing to hear the following words yesterday from someone who has built his career as a “Reagan conservative.” (Business Insider)
“You own Hillary Clinton. National Review, you own it. Glenn Beck, you own it. Ted Cruz, you own it. ... She wins, I'm blaming all of you," Hannity said. "[Y]ou own all of her policies."
He added: "Yeah, I'm going to name names. I'm not sitting here and wimping out. I know there are people out there blaming me."
The conservative radio host first named Ohio Gov. John Kasich, former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, and Cruz. He then went after members of the conservative media, particularly seeming to home in on Beck, whom he characterized as on a "holy war" against Trump.
Here's a glimpse of his fiery diatribe:
"Well, let me just say to all of you. And that includes the commentator class. That includes the Jonah Goldberg class that includes radio talk show hosts. Glenn Beck is like on a — it's a holy war for him at this point. I mean, he's off the rails attacking me every day. Blaming me for Trump. Well, no. I was fair to everybody, Glenn. Whether you want to admit it or not. I know I was fair. My conscience is clear. And I, frankly, I'm proud to pull the lever for Donald Trump with a clear conscience.
Really Sean?

If you want to blame the Bushes, who are so cozy with the Clintons that they’ve become almost adopted members of the family, fine. You want to blame William Kristol and a load of other establishment Republicans who aren’t voting (or voting for any unknown candidate) because their guy ¡Jeb! Or “Little Marco” Rubio didn’t get the nomination, I understand. You want to blame Meg Whitman, Rep. Richard Hanna, Larry Pressler, Sally Bradshaw (a ¡Jeb! aide), Maria Comella, Hank Paulson, McCainiac Mark Salter, and several other RINOs who have publicly stated they will vote for the Hildebeast, that’s fine with me, because any supposed Republican who votes for Hillary deserves scorn (as well as a coat of tar and feathers).

But Ted Cruz? Isn’t that going too far, Sean?

All Ted Cruz did was say “vote your conscience” and everyone lost it. I don’t blame Ted Cruz for not publicly endorsing Donald Trump. I could not publicly endorse someone who insulted my father, or spouse, in such a horrible manner and did not have the decency to publicly make amends. After all, Sean, buddy, didn’t our political hero Ronald Reagan once quote something called the “11th Commandment” (Never speak ill of any Republican)? Seems to me under the iron fist of RNC Party Chair Rinse Preebus, the 11th Commandment has been tossed to the ash heap.

After such a vicious primary, moves would have had to be made to ensure party unity. Reagan had to do it in 1980, and Ford failed to do it in 1976. But Donald didn’t feel the need to do that, out of his own arrogance. (Real Clear Politics)
"I am confident that I can unite much of it. Some of it, I don't want. There were statements made about me that those people can go away and maybe come back in eight years after we serve two terms," Trump said Wednesday morning on NBC's TODAY show.
"Honestly, there are some people I really don't want. I don't think it's necessary. People would be voting for me, they're not voting for the party," Trump added.
And The Hill:
“Does the party have to be together, does it have to be unified?” he said during an interview on ABC’s “This Week” Sunday. “I’m very different from anybody who’s perhaps ever run for office. I actually don’t think so.
The same arrogance applies to Rinse Prewash (RedState).
“It is essential to victory in November that we all support our candidate,” Priebus said at the RNC’s spring meeting in Hollywood, Fla.
“This goes for everyone, whether you’re a county party chairman, an RNC member, or a presidential candidate. Politics is a team sport, and we can’t win unless we rally around whoever becomes our nominee,” he added, drawing applause from the audience.
“They’re trying out for our team. No one is forcing them to wear our jersey. We expect our candidates to support our party and our eventual nominee.”
That’s not unifying the party, it is instead a Soviet-style order of shut your mouth, get in line and goosestep. Isn’t that how liberal Democrats (who don’t dare question the most corrupt Presidential nominee in history) are supposed to behave? You don't win an election by telling the grassroots of your party to go to hell. But that’s what we’ve come to expect under Rinse Prewash, who has used conservatives and the Tea Party movement for votes, just like how Democrats use minorities and special interest groups for votes, only to abandon them when it comes to governing.

Prewash has made it a personal mission to undermine anyone who rocks the establishment boat, from Newt Gingrich (in 2012), Ken Cuccinelli, Chris McDaniel, and most recently Ted Cruz. In order to undermine Cruz, he got in bed with someone who has been allied with the Clintons and said good things about Hillary in the past.

And if you want to know where I stand, Sean, buddy, in November, let me say I’m voting my conscience, and my conscience is hurting me right now. But I can with a clear conscience say I cannot sit on my hands and do nothing while Hillary is running for President. I am #NeverHillary.
I cannot vote for Gary Johnson, who is pro-abortion, pro-gloBULL warming, and whose whole candidacy is based on legalizing marijuana. Libertarians once had a lot in common with conservatives, however modern libertarians tend to be cheap, pothead liberals who don’t want to fight wars.

Gary Johnson campaign anthem

Likewise, I cannot endorse the #NeverTrump, because they have offered no viable alternative to the Trump candidacy, just a guy (funded by Romney, I suspect) whose name is mistaken with Egg McMuffin and has similar views on Supreme Court decisions as the putrid John Kasich.

So come election day, and should Trump lose (and it doesn’t look good now), I will say to you Sean, to Donald Trump, and to Rinse Prewash, don’t blame Ted Cruz. The blame goes to Trump and Preewash, who thought they didn’t need conservatives and a unified Republican Party to win.

If you want confirmation, ask ¡Jeb!, who also thought he didn’t need every Republican vote to win, and look where he is now.

Sunday, August 14, 2016

#NeverTrump Isn't About Conservatism, It's The Last Gasp Of The GOP Establishment

Recently, there were two political conventions that gave us their nominees to vote for in November, along with a lot of drama and sideshow.

Except breaking my exile to discuss the Khan con, I didn't comment on the convention. But now that we are into the general election cycle, I feel compelled to pop my head out from the bunker once again and give my point of view, as I see it.

How am I going to vote in November? Honestly, I'm not sure yet. But I know if definitely ain't gonna to be for Hillary. In other words, I'll be voting my conscience, and my conscience is really bothering me.

If you haven't gone to see it, I recommend you see Dinesh D'Souza's "Hillary's America" and you can understand why the only place Hillary Rotten Clinton deserves to occupy is a prison cell, not the Oval Office. She is a dangerous person, and anyone who is so turned off by Donald Trump that they've decided to vote for her should have their sanity checked.

Which brings us to Donald Trump. I'm not excited about him either. It's another "lesser of two evils," but there's only a little less evil than Hillary. But these two candidates really are a reflection of how our society has sadly become accepting of the lowest common denominator that we have two candidates who are a reflection of that.  More about Trump later, but first I want to discuss those who are opposed to Trump, aka the "NeverTrump" movement.

Honestly, I found myself sympathetic to a lot of their arguments, reasoning, etc. But the recent actions of the #NeverTrump movement have shown me that their arguments are not about conservatism. Far from being what some Trumpkins called Ted Cruz crybabies, the #NeverTrump movement is not about conservatism. It is instead the last gasp of the GOP establishment, the Bushies, as well as the supporters of Jeb! and "Little" Marco Rubio who are having their public temper-tantrum after seeing that the public has tired of the "do-nothing" establishment and their milquetoast losers like McCain, Romney, Dole, et al.

So what did the #NeverTrumpers decided to do? They found their own candidate who they're rolling out two and a half months before the election, some guy named Egg excuse me, Evan McMullin.

But don't be deceived, McMullin is no conservative (National Review Online).
In three years of Facebook posts, he never commented on a domestic issue, economic or social. He never said anything on any specific issue that a diehard Democrat couldn’t applaud.  
When I was telling my boss Frank Cannon about McMullin’s Facebook page, he made a possibly unfair, or possibly telling, comment: “I find the people who post photos of Lincoln and Churchill are the least likely to actually be leaders like these men.” He meant that if you want to be a uniter, not a divider, you cannot be a leader in perilous times like Lincoln and Churchill were. Now, after their battles are long won, they unite us in admiration. But they were leaders precisely because they were willing to be reviled and despised at the time, not only by their opponents but by their fellow party members, if that was the price of defending core principles. Principles that turned out to be right. 
After I scoured Evan McMullin’s Facebook page, I went to his website, wherein he says he’s very pro-life, but the only policy he commits to is no taxpayer financing of abortion; he boasts of support for adoption; and he commits to virtually nothing concrete on any issue, much less religious liberty, trying, I suppose, to be a unifier through vagueness, as many consultants would no doubt advise. This may or may not help you win (I think not, in this instance, as voters are onto this game), but it definitely makes it almost impossible to have a victory worth winning, as the GOP majorities in Congress have proved time and time again.  
A few days later, consistent with his desire to be the new face of the Republican party that existing Washington GOP power players are longing for, McMullin was asked by Mark Halperin about gay marriage:  
“As a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Rommey behind this??? MIM), I believe in traditional marriage between a man and a woman, but I respect the decision of the Court, and I think it’s time to move on,” McMullin said, according to Lifesite News.  
When Halperin asked if a President McMullin would at least appoint Supreme Court justices who would overturn the Obergefell decision, he replied, “I wouldn’t.”  
He could have evaded. He could have said he would look for constitutionalists like Justice Scalia. But he didn’t. He instead said its time to accept that the Left gets to decide what is in our Constitution and move on.  
No one who cares about or understands constitutional conservatism would answer that way.
Where have we heard an answer like that before? Um, let's see...John Kaisch? (Ding, ding ding!!!!) So according to Egg McMuffin and John Kaisch, the Supreme Court spoke and their word is Gospel. Leaders they're not! If we had poor excuses for leaders like that in our history, some of the worst decisions by the court might still stand today, such as slavery being found constitutional (see Dred Scott), as was segregation (see Plessy vs. Ferguson "separate but equal"). 

McMuffin's campaign is being pushed by a GOP-e consultant named Rick Wilson, who is obsessed with destroying Trump. But conservative he is not, as Wilson tweeted this obscene tweet out back in May (censored).

That tweet tells you all you need to know about why, for better or for worse, Donald Trump is the GOP nominee.

My personal opinion, seeing the polls how they are, the rebellion among the GOP establishment #NeverTrumpers, as well as conservatives who are planning to either sit out the election of vote 3rd Party, I have a painful feeling we will witness a blowout election that will cost not only the White House, but the Congress and ultimately the Supreme Court.

And I think this was by design. It was a con set up to help a candidate who most American see as unlikable and who is so ethically challenged defeating her should have been a cakewalk, just as defeating Obama in 2012 should have been easy. But a con-job needed to be planted who could win the GOP nomination and divide the party in the process. And the RNC leadership, who so wanted to destroy Ted Cruz or any similar candidate, fell for the con-job that came straight out of The Godfather (read between the lines for my theory about the Corleone, I mean Clinton family crime syndicate).

You can blame the Rinse Preebus led Republican Party for blowing yet another Presidential election, just to make sure a real constitutional conservative candidate is not allowed to run against an Alinskyite socialist extremist.

No I'm not blaming Donald Trump, I'm blaming the feckless Rinse Preebus (I misspell his name on purpose). Preebus has made it his mission in the last few years he led the Republican party to destroy the chances of conservatives and Tea Party types, making sure these people never rise to prominence within the party or as a candidate.

Need proof? When the handpicked choice for 2012, Flip Romney, faced opposition, the GOP-establishment attacked candidates like Newt Gingrich with a barrage of smear stories that violated the famous 11th Commandment (Never speak ill of any Republican) quoted by Ronald Reagan. None of these RINOs, Romney included, who attacked any conservatives in 2012 attacked Obama with the same vigor.

In 2013, the Virginia GOP nominated a real Constitutional conservative, Ken Cuccinelli, as the candidate for governor that year. But the sore losers in the establishment, like Bill Boilling, did not endorse Cuccinelli and Preebus sent financial support to Krispy Kreme in New Jersey instead, leaving Cuccinelli's campaign to wither on the vine, and giving us the head of the Clinton Hillbilly Mafia, Terry McAwful, as governor, which allows him the opportunity to put the Commonwealth in the Clinton column by hook or crook.

In 2014, when the establishment GOP incumbent senator Thad Cochran was nearing defeat by Tea Party candidate Chris McDaniel. But Cochran was saved when the establishment came to his aid by attacking McDaniel using the bigoted language of the Left. And Preebus said nothing.

So, we had so many candidates spit the conservative vote, as a scheme to get the establishment's choice as GOP nominee. But it didn't work. Instead, we have Trump who foiled their plans but is not a conservative, but instead acts as the liberal's stereotype of what a conservative/Tea Party supporter is. But that was only part of Preebus' act for 2016. Also, in a move similar to 2012, the establishment steamrolled over any rules changes by the grassroots and orchestrated the uncivil attacks on Ted Cruz during his convention speech, after approving the contents beforehand. So Rinse got a twofer in 2016, destroy Ted Cruz in the eyes of the press and the Trump nomination, so when Trump loses, he can point the finger of blame at all those Tea Party types who aren't wise enough (in his view) to know what a great leader Jeb Bush, John Kaisch, or Little Marco Rubio are. And don't blame Trump for losing Congress, after two years of the Boehner/Ryan and McConnell white-flag leadership, why would anyone vote for a GOP majority who act like they're in the minority?

Which is why I've always said establishment Republicans are just as unpatriotic as liberals, but in a different way.

Sunday, July 31, 2016

Patricia Smith vs. Khizr Khan -- A Tale Of Two Gold Star Parents

Thank goodness both clown shows that passed for political conventions are over.

For both of the Republican and Democrat Party conventions, there was a sea of difference in many ways between the two contentions, as well as a whole lotta hypocrisy.

I'll focus on at least one hypocrisy, since it involves parents of adult children who gave their lives in defense of this nation.

The Democrat Party brought to the stage  Khizr Khan and his wife, whose son,  Army Cpt. Humayun Khan, was killed in 2004 protecting his unit from a car bomb. The Democrats, who spent the week honoring the mothers of fallen gang-bangers and dishonoring the police, decided to use Khan and his son's service to attack Donald Trump by wrapping themselves in the Constitution and our fallen, two things liberal Democrats thumb their nose at in disrespect 99.9 percent of the time.

The Hildebeast's lapdogs in her Super PAC known as the media, gushed over Khan's "powerful" speech, and are using it to attack Trump, who walked into the libs fire by saying he wished he'd heard from Khan's wife. The implication being that Muslim women are not supposed to talk.

Trump and his dingy cheerleader Ann Coulter have not helped matters in attacking the Khan family. If you're going to attack anyone, attack the Democrats and their own hypocrisy.  Because the DNC simply used Army Cpt. Khan's sacrifice to play their usual game of identity politics, implying that Muslims are just as patriotic, if not more, than all you white crackers who are going to vote for Donald Trump.

Contrast that with Patricia Smith, who spoke at the Republican National Convention.

As opposed to Mr. Khan, Mrs. Smith had a reason to speak at the RNC Convention and against Hillary Rotten Clinton specifically, because of how the Hildebeast not only lied about telling the families that a video was responsible for the Benghazi attacks, but attacked the families later as liars.

Here's proof how Hillary, as well as Barack Hussein Obama, lied about the Benghazi attacks being the result of an anti-Islamic video, when the bodies of the Benghazi Four arrived back in America after the September 11, 2012 attack. Keep in mind the Hildebeast told her daughter in an e-mail it was a terrorist attack.

And yet how did Hillary's Super PAC treat Patricia Smith? They attacked her. The LA Slimes claimed she "echoes the Republican party line," while the old drunk on MSNBC, Chris "Thrill up my Leg" Matthews, called Mrs. Smith a liar, and said that he didn't care how she felt.

But that just goes to show that if liberal Democrats didn't have double standards, they'd have no standards at all.

Thursday, June 23, 2016

The Hypocrisy of Anti-Gun, Pro-Terrorist Democrats

The Democrat Party reminds me of one kind of person you might see at your high school reunion. You know, the kind that has done nothing since graduation, and can only talk about reliving high school days.

That is the modern Democrat Party, stuck in the 1960s, like it was some magical time that they never wanted to leave. Never mind what most of the 1960s (with the exception of the Civil Rights movement) wrought upon America was the start of hedonism, treason, and an erosion of the moral and social order that made America great and productive.

We see these aging hippies who traded tye-dye for suits again as they threw their temper tantrum on the House floor, but this time, instead of advocating for equal rights, they wanted to take rights away from Americans as a way of playing SQUIRREL to distract from their inability to fight Islamofascist terror.

And why is that? Because if you look at some of the names of these anti-gun Democrats, you'd do just a little bit of digging to find out how they support arming our enemies and/or support domestic terrorists.

Let's start with the tax-cheating Charlie Rangel, who thinks law abiding Americans don't need guns, but he needs armed security.

Who recently met with Congressman Rangel?

The daddy of the Orlando Jihadi, that's who.

Congressman Jerrold Nadler from New York, said during the Party of Treason's temper tantrum that the Congress “is drenched in blood and the only way we can cleanse it is if the speaker of the House allows us to vote on this legislation. Every day that we don’t commit to a vote, the blood is on the leadership of this House.”

But Nadler supported Baraq Hussein Obama's arming of America's long-time enemy, Iran, with nuclear weapons. At one Hillary Rotten Clinton rally, Nadler said "Nine-eleven was an act of war. The villains aren’t the terrorists. The villains live in the White House," obviously referring to the Bush Administration.

Nadler, like Obama, has a soft sport for anti-American domestic terrorists. He played a role in the 2001 Presidential Pardon of a Weather Underground terrorist suspected in a deadly 1981 bombing (NY Post).
A Manhattan congressman and his rabbi played a crucial role in President Clinton’s controversial pardon of former Weather Underground member Susan Rosenberg, aides said yesterday.
Rabbi J. Rolando Matalon of Temple B’nai Jeshurun showed Democratic Rep. Jerrold Nadler “compelling information from [Rosenberg’s] parole hearing” and “passed on the concerns of her family,” said Nadler spokesman Eric Schmeltzer.
That intercession played a key role in Clinton’s decision Friday to commute the 58-year weapons-possession sentence for Rosenberg, long a suspect in the deadly 1981 Brink’s robbery in Nyack. She was never convicted on that charge.
“What [Nadler] did was to pass on the materials to the White House counsel’s office and say, ‘I’d like you to take a look at this,'” Schmeltzer said.
Neither the rabbi nor Nadler, who was well-regarded at the Clinton White House because he was one of the president’s most ardent defenders during Sexgate, could be reached for comment yesterday.
... Though the Brink’s robbery happened nearly 20 years ago, for those touched by the tragedy, it is still an open wound.
“The whole family is very disappointed,” said Crowley’s son, John Hanchar, who spoke with O’Grady’s widow, Diane O’Grady, after the pardon.
“She’s just stunned and hurting,” Hanchar said.
So are officers who worked side-by-side with the slain cops.
“I’m not happy about it at all,” said retired Officer Brian Lennon, Brown’s partner at the time. “Shame on President Clinton. Shame on him for moving to New York and letting her go.”
Southern California race-baiting corruptocrat Maxine Waters was quoted as saying she would take part in the sit-in for gun-control, "until hell freezes over." This is the same Maxine Waters who voiced opposition to a resolution calling for the communist hellhole of Cuba to extradite several criminals, one of them named Joanne Chesimard. Waters wrote to Pinko Cuban Dictator Fidel Castro in 1998.
I, and some of the Members of the Congressional Black Caucus, mistakenly voted for House Concurrent Resolution 254 which called on the Government of Cuba to extradite to the United States Joanne Chesimard and all other individuals who have fled the United States from political persecution and received political asylum in Cuba. Joanne Chesimard was the birth name of a political activist known to most Members of the Congressional Black Caucus as Assata Shakur.
For the record, I am opposed to the resolution.
...the most vicious and reprehensible acts were taken against the leaders and organizations associated with the Black Power or Black Liberation Movement. Assata Shakur, was a member of the Black Panther Party, one of the leading groups associated with the Black Liberation Movement. The Black Panther Party was the primary target of U.S. domestic government political harrassment and persecution during this era.
This illegal, clandestine political persecution was wrong in 1973, and remains wrong today.
What Maxine Waters didn't say is that Chesimard/Assata Shakur, is on the FBI Ten Most Wanted list, wanted for the 1973 killing of New Jersey State Trooper Werner Foerster twice in the head with his sidearm. Chesimard served time in prison until 1979, when Black Liberation Movement terrorists  "making a prison visit drew pistols, took guards as hostages and commandeered a prison van, spiriting Chesimard to a waiting getaway car — all in broad daylight. She emerged five years later in Cuba, given asylum by Fidel Castro, who cast her as a victim of U.S. racism."

For a bunch of Congresspersons who claim to hate guns and violence sure have a history of being comfortable supporting gun-toting, Left-wing terrorists. It appears that the modern Democrat Party has more in common with the SLA (Symbionese Liberation Army) than they do JFK and FDR.

Thursday, June 16, 2016

This Is What A Leader Sounds Like: Ted Cruz Takes On Obama & Democrats On Terror, Gun Control

This is Ted Cruz today on the Senate floor, with some moral clarity that has been missing since the horrific jihadist terror attack in Orlando this past Sunday.

“Madam President, our nation is at war. Five days ago, we saw a horrific terror attack in Orlando, Florida. From 9/11 to the Boston Marathon, from Fort Hood to Chattanooga, from San Bernardino to this attack in Orlando, radical Islamic terrorism has declared jihad on America. As the facts have unfolded, it now indicates that the Orlando terrorist has pledged his allegiance to ISIS in the process of murdering 49 and wounding more than 50 at a nightclub.

“All of us, our hearts go out to those who were murdered, to the families of those who were victims and who are grieving. We stand in solidarity. We lift them up in prayer at this horrific act of terrorism.

“But it is also a time for action. We need a Commander-in-Chief who will speak the truth, who will address the enemy we face, who will unleash the full force and fury of the American military on defeating ISIS and defeating radical Islamic terrorists.

“In the wake of the attack, many of us predicted what would unfold, and it was sadly the same political tale we have seen over and over again. Many of us predicted that Democrats would, as a matter of rigid partisan ideology, refuse even to say the words ’radical Islamist terrorism;’ that they would suggest this attack was yet another isolated incident, one lone criminal not connected to any global ideology, not connected to any global jihad, and that even worse they would try to use it as an excuse to go after the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens.

“Madam President, I wish when we predicted that that we had been proven incorrect, but this week played out all too predictably. Yesterday, we saw a political show on the Senate floor. Democrat after Democrat standing for hours incensed, not at ISIS, incensed, not at radical Islamic terrorism, incensed that Americans have a right to keep and bear arms. This is political distraction. This is political gamesmanship. And I think the American people find it ridiculous that in response to an ISIS terror attack, the Democrats go on high dungeon that we’ve got to restrict the second amendment rights of law-abiding citizens. This is not a gun control issue. This is a terrorism issue. And it is nothing less than political gamesmanship for them to try to shift for their favorite hobby horse of taking away the Bill of Rights from law-abiding citizens.

“...Now, in response to my criticism and that of many others, President Obama gave a press conference where he said, echoing the words of Hillary Clinton, ‘what difference does it make if we call it radical Islamic terrorism?’ Well, Mr. President, it makes a world of difference because the failure to address the enemy impacts every action taken to fight that enemy, and I want to talk in particular about three areas where this Administration and the Senate Democrats’ refusal to confront radical Islamic terrorism has made America less safe and what we need to do about it.

“Let’s start with prevention. Over and over again, we have seen the Obama administration having ample information to stop a terrorist attack, and yet because of the political correctness, because of the ideology of this administration that won’t even say the word ’jihad,’ won’t even say the words ’radical Islamic terrorism,’ they look the other way and the attacks go forward.

“In my home state of Texas, Fort Hood, Nidal Hasan, the Obama administration knew that Nidal Hasan had been in communication with a radical Islamic cleric, Anwar al-Awlaki. The Obama administration knew that Nidal Hasan had asked al-Awlaki about the permissibility of waging jihad against his fellow soldiers. All of that was known beforehand, and yet they did nothing. They did nothing, and on that fateful day, Nidal Hasan murdered 14 innocent souls, yelling ‘Allahu Akbar’ as he pulled the trigger. And yet, just to underscore the blindness of this administration, even after the terror attack, the administration insisted on characterizing that terror attack as ‘workplace violence.’ That is nothing short of delusion, and it’s a delusion that cost 14 lives. If we know of a U.S. service member who is communicating with a radical Islamic cleric and asking about waging jihad against his fellow soldiers, MPs should show up at that individual’s door within minutes. And if we didn’t have an administration that plunged its head in the sand like an ostrich and refused to acknowledge radical Islamic terrorism, Nidal Hasan would have been stopped before he carried out that horrific act of terrorism.

“Likewise, the Boston bombing: the Tsarnaev brothers. Russia had informed the Obama administration they were connected with radical Islamic terrorism. We knew that. The FBI had gone and interviewed them. And yet once again, they dropped the ball. They stopped monitoring them, so they didn’t even note when the elder Tsarnaev brother posted on YouTube a public call to jihad. Now, mind you, this was not requiring complicated surveillance. This was YouTube. Anyone with a computer who could type in Google could see this. And yet, because the administration will not acknowledge that we’re fighting radical Islamic terrorism, they were not watching and monitoring the Tsarnaev brothers; so when they called for public jihad, they then carried out that public jihad with pressure cookers at the Boston marathon. Yet another example where we knew about the individual beforehand, and if we had focused prevention on the problem, we could have stopped it.

“A third example was San Bernardino. San Bernardino, that horrific terror attack. Once again, we had ample information about the individuals in question. The female terrorist who came to San Bernardino had given the administration a fake address in Pakistan, and yet the so-called vetting that this administration tells us they do had failed to discover that it was a fake address. She had made calls for jihad, and yet the administration failed to discover that. In San Bernardino, we saw yet another horrific terror attack.

“And how about Orlando? Let’s talk about what the facts are in Orlando. Now, we’re only five days in. The facts will develop further as they’re more fully developed, but here is what’s been publicly reported. What’s been publicly reported is that Omar Mateen was interviewed not once, not twice but three times by the FBI in 2013 and 2014; that one of the reasons why he was interviewed by the FBI was because he was talking in his place of employment, which ironically, which shockingly enough, was a contractor to the Department of Homeland Security, and he was talking about being connected to terrorist organizations including the Boston bombers.
Do you think Donald Trump, aka Sideshow Bob, would give a speech like this? He's already finding ways to surrender the Second Amendment.  Sorry Trumpkins, he will let you down. He does not have a track record you can trust.

We need a leader who is like Churchill or Reagan now, not Trump or Hillary, who would be nothing more but the same old/same old.

All we need now is a delegate revolt, and we can get a real nominee with moral clarity.

Democrats: The Party of Islamofascist Terrorism Denial


That's the label that Democrats and liberals throw around to those of us who question the newest tenet of their man-made religion: Climate Change, aka GloBULL Warming. Earlier this year, 20 attorney generals (all of them Democrats) have begun an inquisition into "climate change deniers."

The Washington Free Beacon put this video together of how Barack Hussein Obama, Hanoi John Kerry and Clueless Joe Biden drone on about climate change being our biggest threat. Indeed, as points out, Obama has made that claim at least 22 times.

What is missing from that video, and can soon be added to it, is the horrible terror that happened in Orlando this past Sunday night, once again committed by a Muslim fanatic, and the pivot from Democrats to blaming guns, the NRA and anything else but the ideology behind it...Islamofascism. I've not heard anyone outside the conservative blogopshere comment on this video that I saw passed around Sunday morning when we were waking up to news of the terrorist attack.

Yet the Democrat Party Response? Denial

From Obama's Astorturf Organization:

And then Mayonnaise hair Debbie Wasserman Schulz came to come spew her venom.

Do you think being from Florida that Wasserman Schultz would have known about this Imam, but nooooooooooo! She immediately points her crooked finger at Donald Trump and calls him a bigot, probably because Debbie has a problem with men anyway.

The Democrat tantrum and attack on our right to defend ourselves from such Islamic madmen (and their denial of that problem) continued. Interrupting a moment of silence led by the putrid House Speaker, Paul Ryan, and then the Senate Democrats held their own temper tantrum about guns, until the GOP Senate eunuchs gave in to the spoiled children. Democrat Chris Murphy can say they're doing this about the children, but it's hypocritical to claim, especially since they're the biggest supporters of liberalism's sacred blood sacrament: abortion on demand.

And don't get me started on the media. I have never seen as much dishonest reporting with such an agenda since the Tea Party and Sarah Palin were blamed for the Gabby Giffords shooting, or the time that the Congressional Black Caucus claimed the Tea Party called them the n-word.

Instead of fulfilling their oath of office to defend America from "all enemies, foreign and domestic" the Democrat Party show they're more concerned about defending one group of people, while demanding the rest of us give up more of our liberties. Trust us they say, but I cannot trust this government, who has let Islamic terrorists slip under their radar multiple times because they've given into pressure from the Muslim grievance organizations.

So if we're going to talk about "deniers," lets talk about Islamofascist Terrorism Deniers and where it resides: the Democrat Party and liberalism. The last few days show the truth in that statement. All the proof from not just the last nearly 15 years since 9/11/2001, but world history show that Islam is an ideology bent on world domination and submission. Yet liberals and Democrats deny the facts of history because of "racism" and "diversity." Democrats, unlike FDR and Truman, no longer let politics "stop at the water's edge" when it comes to attacks on our citizens. Instead of the knowledge that we're all in this together, they look for more ways to pit one group of Americans against the other.

You think I'm kidding? Look at how liberals so-called patriotism lasted after 9/11, just about 30 minutes. Nearly half of Democrats are so unhinged they believed the loony 9/11 Troofer theories that Bush knew about the attacks. Because Bill Clinton was the first Islamofascist Terrorism Denier. From the first World Trade Center attack a month after he took office to the USS Cole, Slick Willie cautioned us never to "rush to judgement," and was too busy dropping his pants instead of bombs on al-Queda training facilities when they were planning 9/11. So, naturally, after 9/11, the Democrats decided Muslims were the real victims and saw another group they could pander to for votes and pit against the rest of us. Because they thought the cowboy Bush wanted to blame the Middle East and go after their oil or something like that.

And what has all the butt-kissing to the Islamic world by Obama gotten us? Certainly not peace, but a more dangerous world. And Democrats are not only putting more lives at risk with their Islamofascist Terror Denial, they are, by proxy, aiding the enemy who has been at war with us.

Isn't that called treason?

Tuesday, June 14, 2016

He Proved It Again Today, Obama More Angry At His Fellow Citizens Than Our Enemies

Let me preface what I'm about to say by showing a video I've posted several times in the past of David Beamer from 2010, the father of United 93 hero Todd Beamer.

"What is going on in this country is unbelievable. Cannot be fathomed hardly. And, most of our fellow Americans are asleep, still. ...I don't know if Obama is a Muslim or not. But he sure is a Muslim sympathizer. He has the track record to prove it."
Well, judging from his reaction the last couple of days, and especially today, Barack Hussein Obama showed once again how one can argue he is a Muslim sympathizer.

His first reaction to the terrorist attack in Orlando was not only to attack the Second Amendment rights of every law abiding American in defending themselves against another Jihadist, but to blame this nation, saying “we need the strength and courage to change.”  Today he sunk deeper, sounding more passionate against Donald Trump and any political opponent who dares to question his ability to fight terrorism than against radical Islamists who have attacked this nation several times under his watch.
“There has not been a moment in my seven and a half years as president where we have not been able to pursue a strategy because we didn’t use the label ‘radical Islam.’ Not once has an adviser of mine said, ‘Man, if we use that phrase, we are going to turn this whole thing around.’ Not once,” Obama said. “Calling a threat by a different name does not make it go away. This is a political distraction.” 
Obama, who emphasized that he has previously detailed how “extremist groups have perverted Islam to justify terrorism,” said language like Trump’s would reinforce the claim that terrorists speak for the world’s 1.7 billion Muslims. 
“That’s their propaganda; that’s how they recruit. And if we fall into the trap of painting all Muslims with a broad brush, and imply that we are at war with an entire religion, then we are doing the terrorists’ work for them,” Obama scolded.
We are inspiring terrorism by calling it by knowing our enemy? YOU gave birth to ISIS by retreating on the battlefield in the War on Terror, with your constant butt-kissing to radical Islamist grievance groups and the Muslim Brotherhood, as well as mocking ISIS as a JV team. We should be glad you weren't President in 1941-1945, because you'd have been too afraid to go after Imperial Japan. For that matter, we saw how you were willing to go to Hiroshima as a disrespectful swipe to those who served (and died) fighting Japan from Pearl Harbor to the end of World War II. Not only that, for all your talk at Hiroshima of a world without nuclear weapons, you and your party were willing to help the Islamic state of Iran get nuclear weapons with your appeasement deal.

The Democrat Party Slogan since 2001

It's beyond Muslim sympathizer, Obama is a sympathizer of America's enemies. He has more anger and contempt for anyone who dares oppose or criticize him, but no willingness to defend the nation and the Constitution he swore an oath twice to defend.

Which reminds me of another video...

"If you want to be president you have to work for everybody not just for some."
Well you certainly are not working for all Americans, Mister Obama, if you're doing nothing but attacking Americans and their civil liberties, and those who defend us (police and the military) while you stand on the side of the terrorists, criminal gang-bangers, and illegal aliens.

And yet Obama and the Democrats claimed to be such big champions of the gay community?

And don't get me started on Hillary Rotten Clinton. We've found out that the Butcher of Benghazi's state department shut down investigations into the Orlando jihadist's mosque. Just like Obama, she's pushing gun control just like she pushed the lie about Benghazi being inspired by an anti-Islamic video. Meanwhile, Hillary employs a pathetic creep who tweets an obscene response to the NRA for an editorial in USA Today.

This is the modern Democrat Party, empathy for our enemies and harsh words for their fellow Americans.

How many more Americans have to die before we have leaders who are serious about defeating this enemy and the Quislings in the nation who enable them?

Friday, May 06, 2016

On A Personal Note...All Good Things Must Come To An End

I was going to tag this at the end of my last post about the 2016 primary, but it seemed that this was more deserving of its own, stand-alone post. I want to address a decision I've made in the last few days that has been on my mind the last couple of years, and even more so the last few months. I've been blogging for the last 10 1/2 years and I feel like I've taken this project as far as I can take it.

I've had a lot of fun doing this, met a lot of people I would have otherwise never met, and made a number of friends along the way. But in the last couple of years, I've undergone various personal challenges, including separation/divorce, the near death and miraculous recovery of my father, and professional upheavals that have taken an emotional toll, as well as sapping the energy, passion and desire I had to blog. The clown show that was this year's primary was the final straw. Though I still plan on using my Twitter and Facebook accounts linked with this blog (I'm not going away entirely), it's time for me to suspend blogging to recover, do the things I find fun to restore my soul, be a co-parent and role model to my son, and seek God's will in finding out what my next move should be.

But I have some people to thank and times to recall.

Melanie Morgan (now at KSRO in Santa Rosa) gave me my first exposure in my early days as a blogger when I was going up against the liberal loons in the Bay Area when she was on KSFO with the late, great Lee Rodgers. They were both an inspiration to me to get involved in activism back in 2000. I'm eternally grateful and indebted to her for her support and friendship over the years, even after leaving the Bay Area.

Michelle Malkin was an inspiration to read as a blogger, and I don't think I would have started this blog had it not been for reading her work. I've never had the chance to meet her, but when she's given me some link exposure over the years, I was wow'ed be noticed by someone who was an influence on me as a writer and thinker.

So many bloggers and activists have been great support over the years. Kristinn Taylor at, Alana Burke who interviewed me when she was on the radio up in Redding, CA, Donald Douglas at American PowerJonn Lilyea at This Ain't HellTania Gail (aka Skye, the former blog host of Midnight Blue) Sister Toldjah, John Ruberry at Marathon PunditAaron WorthingRobert Stacy McCain, Dana (and Chris) LoeschJosh PainterErica at Conservative JunkieszombietimeWilliam Jacobson at Legal Insurrection, Larry O'Connor (formerly of now on WMAL in Washington, DC), Bookroom Worm, Brandon Darby, Lee Stranahan, and I'm probably going to leave out so many so please forgive me, but you know who you are!

If I were to be asked what was my proudest moment in blogging, it was the accidental moment I took a nine-second video on March 20, 2010, as well as a follow up video about an hour later, both on Capitol Hill. Those videos were among a few which showed that the "Tea Party called us the n-word" accusation pushed by Andre Carson and the Congressional Black Caucus (with a little help from the liberal media) was nothing but a flat out, blatant lie in an attempt to tar and feather opponents of Obamacare. It was due to the first video I took that I came in contact with the late Andrew Breitbart. If you haven't yet, go to Netflix and watch Hating Breitbart. Thanks also to Andrew Marcus for using the video in the movie and for including the time Breitbart and I met in Washington DC at a Tea Party rally.

Most of all, to all of you (especially you, Mom! my biggest fan), who took the time to read my writings, e-mail, like my FB page or Twitter account, I cannot thank you enough. I am a Blessed man.

Please feel free to e-mail me, send a Facebook message or Tweet and I'll get back with you.

Until we meet or talk again, maybe some future time?