Friday, November 27, 2015

Van Jones, Who Led Anti-US Rally In Oakland On 9/12/2001, Calls Donald Trump "UnAmerican" For Claiming Muslims In New Jersey Cheered 9/11

Oh this one is rich! (Breitbart)
CNN Political Commentator and former green jobs advisor to President Obama Van Jones argued that Donald Trump says things that are “un-American” and “somebody’s going to go hurt some Muslim, as a result of this kind of hatred” while discussing the controversy over Trump’s statements regarding Muslims in the US celebrating on September 11, 2011 on Monday’s “AC 360″ on CNN.
Jones said, “I just want to say this is just terrible. You have a presidential candidate who is deliberately stoking fear. and smearing a whole population of people. … You have a political candidate, your candidate [Jones was speaking to Trump supporter Jeffrey Lord], you come on night after night and defend, no matter what despicable, horrible, un-American, racist, inflammatory thing he says, you defend him. At some point, do you have no shame? He said there that were thousands of Arabs out there, and there’s not one picture, in a world of — where you got cell phone cameras, you got video cameras from coast-to-coast, not one picture, not one image. This is demagoguery. It is dangerous, and somebody’s going to go hurt some Muslim, as a result of this kind of hatred. It’s wrong.”
Jones later added, “every single time a Muslim extremist, or a jihadi does something horrible, we ask every Muslim ever born, from the crib to 97-years-old to denounce that kind of activity. At what point can we start asking every Republican to denounce this sort of scapegoating and demagoguery?”
As pointed out here, there is credible evidence (at least reported after 9/11) that Trump was right, maybe not in the number who were cheering, but that it actually happened. I've seen several comments from people over the years that it did happen not only in Jersey City, but also Patterson, New Jersey.

One story found at says a source at the FBI told of calls that were logged by concerned citizens who saw "Muslims celebrating over the the destruction of the Twin Towers and the Pentagon"

Since moving to Northern Virginia, I've heard stories of Muslim tenants who lived at a high rise luxury apartment complex near Falls Church cheering the 9/11 attacks. In looking at various accounts over the Web in the last few days, I've seen similar stories that happened in Michigan, Houston, TX; Austin, TX, even in Manhattan.

There was also an anti-American rally held in Oakland, CA the day after the attacks, where the 19 radical Muslim hijackers were called "heroes".  The irony? That rally was organized by the same Van Jones who dares call Donald Trump "un-American."

Here's some of the footage of Van Jones' hate-America fest in Oakland, the day after 9/11.

Text of Van Jones remarks:
It’s the bombs that the government has been dropping around the world that are now blowing up inside the U.S. borders. ...We’ve got something stronger than bombs, we have solidarity. That dream of revolutionary change is stronger than bombs.” 
Also, at about the 3:05 mark, someone who may have been the inspiration for Obama pastor Jeremiah Wright’s sermon (at 2:10 through 2:45 of the video at the link) the next Sunday, talked of “chickens comin’ home to roost.” Imagine that.
(0:33) “…. use this time to show that we’re really upset about all the violence that is goin’ down not only in New York, but also the violence goin’ down around the world, and that the United States was founded on this kind of terrorism, and it still continues today.” 
(1:10) “We also want to be angry, and allow ourselves to feel that anger and that rage for those stolen lives. We want to also understand though, that those lives were lost because of our government’s inhumane foreign policy. And we should be angry, we should be p***ed off, that what our government does around rest of the world that leads us not to be safe here. That’s what we should be angry at ….” 
(4:10) “But when we knew what those places represented, we were kind of also glad that there’s a place called the Pentagon where, where, military strategies which have killed millions of people around the face of the world (unintelligible). We know, to see that place burnin’, there was some satisfaction to it.
One of the racists in the video even called the hijackers who murdered 3,000 "heroes." (3.38)
"Don't call them (the Islamic terrorists) cowards, they're heroes who died, and they're the people we need to support in these days, and the People of Color are rising..."
Jones resigned in 2009 from a post created by the Obama Regime as "Green Jobs czar" after it was revealed he'd signed a 9/11 Troof letter, one that he has disavowed after it's discovery and asked that his name be removed from.

I'd say the last person who needs to lecture about being un-American is Van Jones, whose past actions are anything but pro-American.

Dictator-in-Chief Obama Blackmails States: Take Syrian Refugees Or Else!

In September 2012, the would-be celebrity who lives in the White House, Richard Milhous Hussein-Obama, said the following on David Letterman's late night show in a rebuke to Mittens Romney's "47 percent" statement secretly taped at a fundraiser.

"If you want to be president you have to work for everybody not just for some."
It was good campaign rhetoric, but a statement that Obama time and time again has not lived up to. He's doing it once again.

Polls show that a majority of Americans, especially after the Paris jihadist attacks, oppose the resettlement of refugees from Syria in the United States, given how some of the jihadists who attacked Paris posed as refugees. In keeping with that statistic, almost thirty states, led by Texas Governor Greg Abbott, have opposed resettlement in their states.

But do you think the person who swore an oath to defend the Constitution and protect America would take this seriously? No he doesn't and now he's acting like a petty, tin-pot dicktator by threatening these states (Fox News).
The Obama administration warned states over the Syrian refugee crisis Wednesday, telling them in a letter they do not have legal authority to refuse the refugees, and states that do not comply may be subject to enforcement action.
The letter, from the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR), told state resettlement officials that they may not deny benefits and services to refugees based on their country of origin or religion.
“Accordingly, states may not categorically deny ORR-funded benefits and services to Syrian refugees,” the letter, dated Wednesday, says. “Any state with such a policy would not be in compliance with the State Plan requirements, applicable statutes, and their own assurances, and could be subject to enforcement action, including suspension and termination.”
The letter went on to say that the 1964 Civil Rights Act prohibits discrimination based on race and national origin in all programs that receive federal financial assistance.
“Thus, it is not permissible to deny federally funded benefits such as Medicaid or TANF to refugees who otherwise meet the eligibility requirements,” the letter says.
The letter came after more than two dozen governors, mostly Republicans, announced they would resist efforts to resettle Syrian refugees in their states in light of the November 13 terrorist attacks in Paris, and fears that ISIS militants could use the controversial program to infiltrate the U.S.
This is tantamount to blackmailing the states, especially when it involves the security of our nation. It is also a huge encroachment of separation of powers. But Obama is familiar with that (see: executive amnesty), and no one is willing to stand up to him over it.

This isn't the only time Obama has acted like a dicktator. His Regime has threatened states who sought to defund Planned Infanticide Parenthood. Why? Because Obama has ridden to power thanks to the abortion-on-demand lobby, who are big supporters politically and financially. It's an issue he can use as a strawman argument against his opponents and try to appeal to radical feminists.

But do you think Obama will stop or impose similar penalties on "sanctuary cities" who do so in violation of federal law? No! Because Obama does not represent all of America. He only represents illegal aliens, Muslims, racial grievance groups and any other group who he can pit against another...all for the sake of political expediency.

Notice too, when this nation, or the states, or citizens, dare to reject him, Obama acts like a petulant little man-child, threatening retribution, all because he's a raging narcissist still wounded by his father and mother (in many ways) abandoning him as a child, with his only role model being a Communist (Frank Marshall Davis) who fed into his anger and resentment.

And our security hangs in the balance.

Tuesday, November 24, 2015

2016 Endorsement: Ted Cruz for President

Well, the headline is giving it away, but I feel ready to now make an endorsement of who I would vote for, and hope to see as the 2016 Republican well as the 45th President of the United States.

None other than the Senator from my home state of Texas, Ted Cruz.

On March 23rd, I wrote the following after watching his announcement seeking the Republican nomination in a speech at Liberty University that I called one of the greatest in recent political history.
Why is this speech important. Because Ted Cruz used his 2016 candidacy announcement to remind America of the greatness of this nation, our core values, and how what we take so much for granted is not from government, but from God.  Basically, Cruz reminded us that what makes this nation great is far greater than any man or woman, any political party, or any government. It is in our core values and in the heart of the American people. That's something the current Regime, his party, and quite frankly too many Republicans have lost sight of.
True, Cruz spoke without a teleprompter, because maybe you don't necessarily need one when you are able to speak from your heart. In sharing his personal story, Cruz connected with his audience and showed the greatness of American. Plus, Cruz acknowledges a Being higher than him, instead of a certain guy who you'll find on a golf course in DC who mistakenly thinks he is God.
Whether Cruz will end up being the nominee is another thing, because it's a long way to the nomination. However, Cruz raised the bar that every 2016 GOP candidate must meet. It isn't enough just to be a Republican, you have to stand for something. Being for Common Core, being pro-amnesty, and making money off of Obamacare isn't acceptable. It's not enough to be for "quasi-big government," or  to be a "compassionate conservative." Talk is cheap. Are you as a candidate going to be willing to be one of "bold colors, not pale pastels"?
That's what Ted Cruz showed today, bold colors. That's what whoever the GOP candidate needs to articulate and show by their actions.
As we are nearing the time when the 2016 caucuses will begin, it is time to start gathering around a candidate. Cruz, in my book, lives up to his billing as being the most consistent conservative in the GOP field.

Why? Because he has shown something over and over which too many, and especially inside the Republican Party, have been afraid to show, something John F. Kennedy called a "Profile in Courage." Cruz has never made positions based on polls, or what is in the best interest of the party, it is always what is in the best interest of the nation. Very much like a similar character named Ronald Reagan who was seen as "too extreme" but ended up being our last greatest President.

Since Reagan, America has hungered for a leader, and everyone since then has fallen short of the mark. There never will be another Reagan, but it is not a "Cult of Personality" we seek, it is someone who can uphold the principles that made America great, that made it a land of opportunity, a beacon of hope and freedom, a "shining city on a hill."  That's what made Reagan great and as beloved as he is, and that's what I believe Ted Cruz can be for America.

Too many of the other candidates in the 2016 field are just the "same old, same old." Bush, Kasich, Christie, FioRINO, and even Marco Rubio, who has been a disappointment, especially in ganging up with the Brooklyn ambulance chaser UpChuck Schumer on the Senate's try at amnesty. Too many of these candidates have wanted to do the work of the GOPe Party Bosses in trying to take out Donald Trump. But Cruz hasn't played that game. He's smart, a lot smarter than the media and establishment types give him credit for.

I think Donald Trump and Ben Carson have done important work in illustrating the disconnect between many Americans and the political class. Not just Republicans, but also many Democrats. The GOP establishment has been too caught up in the "good ole boy" mentality that they could care less. Trump and Carson have shook that up. Carson, I don't believe has the seasoning to be President, but that doesn't mean he should not have a role to play in an upcoming Cruz administration. Trump could also be a good adviser, but Trump has gone many different directions over his lifetime as far as political beliefs that it's hard for me to trust him in a GOP primary. I think he's made important points about border security, national security, and economics that are on the minds of many voters, not just Republican voters. I know that Cruz believes the same way, but unlike many others in the GOP field, Cruz has been smart not to get in a fight with Trump, so as not to alienate his supporters.

So, there it is. If ever America needed a strong, conservative leader, it is now, and I believe in my heart Ted Cruz is the man. That's why I'm making this endorsement.

Monday, November 23, 2015

Here's Proof Trump Was Right About Muslims In New Jersey Celebrating9/11

Donald Trump has once again come under fire for stating he saw Muslim-Americans in New Jersey celebrating the destruction of the World Trade Center on 9/11 (Fox News).
The mayor of a New Jersey city slammed Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump Sunday after the real estate mogul repeatedly claimed that he saw people cheering the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks across the Hudson River from where the Twin Towers fell.
Trump first told the story Saturday at a rally in Birmingham, Ala., as he pressed the need for greater surveillance, including monitoring certain mosques, in the wake of the Paris attacks.
"I watched when the World Trade Center came tumbling down. And I watched in Jersey City, New Jersey, where thousands and thousands of people were cheering as that building was coming down. Thousands of people were cheering," Trump said.
Trump repeated the claim Sunday in an interview on ABC's "This Week" after host George Stephanopoulos explained that police had refuted any such rumors at the time.
"It did happen. I saw it," said Trump. "It was on television. I saw it."
"There were people that were cheering on the other side of New Jersey, where you have large Arab populations. They were cheering as the World Trade Center came down," he said.
"I know it might be not politically correct for you to talk about it," he added, "but there were people cheering as that building came down, as those buildings came down. And that tells you something."
A spokeswoman did not respond to a request for clarification Saturday about Trump's comments.
In a statement, Jersey City Mayor Fulop criticized Trump for his statements.
"Trump is plain wrong, and he is shamefully politicizing an emotionally charged issue," said Fulop. "No one in Jersey City cheered on September 11th. We were actually among the first to provide responders to help in lower Manhattan."
The Washington Compost "fact-checker" says it didn't happen either.

However, those claims contradict what was in the September 18, 2001 edition of the Washington ComPost. (FreeRepublic)
In Jersey City, within hours of two jetliners' plowing into the World Trade Center, law enforcement authorities detained and questioned a number of people who were allegedly seen celebrating the attacks and holding tailgate-style parties on rooftops while they watched the devastation on the other side of the river.
Screenshot from Washington ComPost website:

Not only that, but the Creeping Sharia website posted something I've heard about a couple of high-rise apartments around Alexandria, VA.
The area also includes two luxury apartment high-rises that erupted into cheers when the World Trade Center fell on 9/11. Law enforcement has dubbed them the “Taliban Towers.” Investigators routinely find posters and computer screen savers celebrating Osama bin Laden as a hero.
Down the street is a Saudi charitable front for al-Qaida once run by bin Laden’s nephew. The U.S. branch of the dangerous Muslim Brotherhood is in the same office park. Farther down in Alexandria is the Saudi madrassa (MIM note: Islamic Saudi Academy) that’s graduated several terrorists, including the al-Qaida operative who plotted to assassinate President Bush.

But apparently, everyone who saw it must have imagined it, according to the gatekeepers of information.

Wednesday, November 18, 2015

Obama Emboldens Evil...Our Very Lives And Civilization Hang In The Balance

Honestly, when I saw some of the comments made by Richard Milhous Hussein Obama, in regards to the jihadist attacks in Paris, I could not believe those were real quotes, because they sounded like something from The Onion or some other parody news organization.

An American President not interested in defeating an enemy, and who attacks fellow countrymen for simply disagreeing with him, with more of a vigor than he is willing to attack radical Islamists (for which he refuses to name).

But the same Obama is willing to rush to the microphone to condemn gun violence, the police, any other "oppressed" group. But to do his job that he swore an oath twice to uphold? Forget about it!

Remember when he told David Letterman that he learned a President represents the entire nation?

Well, that was good rhetoric to use as a comeback to attack his opponent in an election. But we see again, in the last few days, how Obama is unwilling to defend and protect all Americans.

He has more concern for the plight of illegal aliens, Islamists, gang-bangers, and so-called Syrian "refugees" but displays a condescending, haughty attitude toward those of us who say no to this misguided plan with "Show me your plan."

I'll show you my plan...protect Americans first!

This is what got us to 9/11. A disconnect from reality. Liberals spent eight years after 9/11 complaining and attacking the war. Well, against our better judgement, we gave Obama and his Leftist Democrats their chance at power, and the problem didn't go away with the Kumbaya, hippie peace chants and the Grateful Dead music.

Instead, it only got worse.

The Little Rock recruiting center, Ft. Hood, Boston Marathon, Benghazi, Chattanooga, the Oklahoma City beheader, and now the growth of ISIS, with Obama wanting to welcome them into the country.

Now, what do we have today? Instead of a President unifying this nation, he and his party and their zombie-like followers pit us against each other, all for the sake of making some people who are looking for meaning in their lives feel better about themselves, which is why I say Liberalism is the philosophy of the selfish. It is all based on emotion...logic or common sense cannot factor into liberalism.

Every evil known to mankind was done for the sake of "good intentions." One such evil took place 37 years ago today in a South American jungle, after being aided and abetted by the liberal community in the San Francisco Bay Area. No one would listen until it was too late.

I thought about this again after hearing quotes of Obama over the last couple of days. One man who first tried to warn people in the Bay Area about this Cult of Personality that led a cult following to their "Kool-Aid" laced deaths wrote the following in 2008.
What do we have, then, if we were to lay out a comprehensive analysis of the Jim Jones history? An exciting and charismatic preacher comes out to California and is welcomed by his liberal compadres in a leftwing denomination fraught with theological deviancies so bizarre that it would shock Hollywood’s spicier icons. He claims to have been active in community organizing back in Richmond, Indiana. And he knows how to raise much money. He is clean, exemplary even. He professes a morality based in compassion for the underprivileged. With all that, he easily ingratiates himself with the far left politicians of San Francisco. Cecil Williams, pastor of the socialist oriented Glide Memorial Methodist Church, brought Jones on his TV show and plainly could not keep his hugging hands off the sleek and dazzling Jones.
The Bay Area elites saw Jones’ energy and how they could use it. The inner city crowd thought he was the answer to all problems, seen or unseen. Jones had invaded Bay Area ecclesiastical sanctuaries as well as political arenas throughout the State of California. Jerry Brown spoke from his pulpit, as did President Carter’s wife, Rosalynn. The Lieutenant Governor and Jones scratched each other’s backs to the bone, and even went to the Caribbean together. Indeed, this “Marxist Messiah” had managed more than ten years, scheming in and out and through the back alleys of California’s darkest political regions.
Jones succeeded because California was infested with liberals who laughed proudly at anyone to their right. They even scoffed at a couple of conservatives who shouted warnings into the deaf skulls of scoundrels unable to see past the glowing tips of their marijuana stogies.
...But, with all the failings and subterfuge I confronted throughout my long investigation of Jim Jones, certain questions have never left my conscious mind: Why did conservatives, alone, see Jones for what he was, a hazard to humanity? Why was it that only liberals fell for his charisma, his rhetoric, his deceit?
But now we come to my main point signaled by the title of this article: “Jonestown, Its Portent Has Arrived."  You see, after my having warned fellow workers, two journalists, a couple of attorneys and a family member, that Congressman Leo Ryan would not leave Jonestown alive—and after having this worst fear turn to reality—I was stunned to the point where I was barely able to accept the apologies that poured forth from my liberal minister friends. Then soon came the inquiries from people needing to know how such a horror could have happened. Some, however, asked the heavier question: “What is the meaning of it?”
These kinds of questions began only after people got their bellies full of the gorier details. The scapegoating was rampant, to be sure. But gradually a pursuit of meaning began. My response was something that I knew intuitively. And I would tell people, either directly or in letters, that we must look upon it as a portent, a mini-example, a kind of metaphor for where our country is heading. Jones was the hint of some more grotesque leader waiting on the dark horizon of a festering America.
I've quoted this section before, and after just reading it again, given the events of the last few days, it brings goosebumps to my arms.

Keep in mind, this was written in 2008.
Here it is, then, the manifestation of the portent. A young and charismatic black lawyer comes almost out of nowhere to work the hopes and weaknesses of a na├»ve citizenry. He molds them into an image of his Marxist-socialist vision. And, just as it was with Jones (where people, politicians, and radical activists flocked to him, believing he was just what they wanted and needed), it is now with Barack Obama who is looked upon as a saint of sorts—just as people told me Jones was a saint and a leader the world desperately needed. And just as I was forced to go up to Jones’ cult and study him close up (since one of my close friends said he was a tower of compassion and understanding, while another of my friends, within two weeks of the first friend, told me that “Jim Jones is doing weird things with my ex-wife and my kids”), I now had no choice but to study Obama. Why? Because, again, people had given me polar opposite assessments. So once again I was impelled to look heavily into the matter.

I have done so. But in this case, and unlike with Jim Jones where I had no real bias, I was right at the start predisposed against Obama, for economic and political reasons. He was a far left extremist, documented to be the most liberal man in the Senate. So I observed him and his wife (just as I did Jim Jones and his wife). I studied their rhetoric. And I can now assure you that there is no significant difference between Obama’s rhetoric and that of Jim Jones. As with Jones, I saw the clever fashioning of an out-group in order to solidify the loyalty of the in-group. I saw straw man fallacies, and the lack of moments wherein a truth is uttered strictly for the sake of truth. Obama lacked authenticity, the character that puts national stability ahead of self-achievement. I saw in Obama a sense of entitlement, a belief that he should have what he wants, meaning that he does not consider those deeper elements of his desires, the whys and wherefore of them. He desires being the nation’s president much more than the well-being of the nation. He, as did Jones, wants and needs to change the external world, not for the sake of the world, but for the sake of himself. That is to say: Though he thinks he is dynamic, he is in fact static. So he needs to change the world into a wild entity that tolerates almost everything, and enslaves the minds of its denizens. That is the world that will tolerate the Obama who is death-oriented, un-alive, hopelessly static. He is a statue molded by the dull artisans of socialism. He is hopelessly ignorant of inner change, the “new creation” heralded two eons ago. I tell you an irony: Jim Jones sensed that he was un-alive. It accounts for his preoccupation with death, from childhood up to the moment he gasped his last breath. But Obama, with his static mind, has not a clue that he got it all backward, that he is a lost artificiality. My fear is that he might well see the Light only after some cataclysmic event of his own making. Because, you see, unlike Jones who had his own little cult, Obama leads a gigantic cult. He leads it disguised as an outsider. The cult is Islam. And Obama leads it by way of being its great Western Defender. In the most insidious fashion he has become the energizer of Islam’s massive incursion, from East to West. As President, he would be the principal driver of Islam’s invasion, and therefore the ultimate manifestation of the Jonestown portent.
Obama is merely a purveyor of other peoples’ ideas. He fears scrutiny. He thrives only in company with fellow radicals. It’s a cult-like characteristic used metaphorically in several theater and literary classics such as Invasion of the Body Snatchers, Night of the Living Dead, Bram Stoker’s novel, Dracula, and Stevenson’s Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde.
In other words Barack Obama is not a genuine thinker. He therefore disallows the tough questions. There is, then, but a bare chance that he, by way of powerful questions, would ever be drawn to those dungeons of his own absurdities. (I do not say this glibly. For my specialty over the years has been in questioning the cult-like thinking within the radical minds that have pushed America to the edge of chaos. My assessment of Obama comes without any doubts. It could easily be proven, were he to allow a confrontation with the truth. (But, of course he would never allow it.) Truth demands certain questions. Obama fears those questions. He fears truth even though he is not cognizant of it. It has been said other ways: “The light shone in the darkness and the darkness comprehended it not.”
Do you have doubts? Does he have doubts? Well, then, let him answer the questions that have not thus far been put to him.
Politically correct, spiritually incorrect: that was the Jim Jones cult. 
And now comes its portent: the immensely more dangerous Barack Obama.

Dangerous and evil, because he is emboldening evil, while all our lives and civilization hang in the balance.

Tuesday, November 17, 2015

Montage Of Obama Praising Islam, Even At The Expense Of Christianity

This audio montage appeared on Sean Hannity's radio show today.
Since his election, President Obama has gone out of his way to praise the tenets of Islam--sometimes even at the expense of Christianity. A few of his greatest hits include:
- "We are no longer a Christian nation."
- "Since our founding, Muslim Americans have enriched the United States."
- "Islam has always been part of America's story."
- "We will convey our deep appreciation for the Islamic faith, which has done so much over the centuries to shape the world."
Here's a trip down memory lane of President Obama bending over backwards to make nice with Muslims.

Never forget these two quote, either.

Monday, November 16, 2015

Shame On YOU, Terry McAuliffe! VA Governor Refuses To Block Syran Refugees After Paris Jihad

Today, the governors of Michigan, Alabama, Louisiana, as well as my beloved native state of Texas (among others), used their authority to say they refuse to take Syrian "refugees" after Friday night's jihadist attack in Paris by radical Muslims, after evidence has shown some of them posed as refugees.

But some states are refusing to, apparently the current home base of the Commonwealth of Virginia is one of them (Richmond Times-Dispatch).
Gov. Terry McAuliffe indicated Monday that Virginia would not be among the growing number of U.S. states seeking to block Syrian refugees, despite calls from Republicans for the state to close its doors to those fleeing war in Syria as a security precaution following Friday's terrorist attacks in Paris.
As of early Monday afternoon, nearly a dozen Republican governors had announced they were taking steps to block Syrian refugees from their states, and Virginia Republicans urged McAuliffe to follow suit. In a statement, the governor's office said security measures are in place for all refugees entering the United States.
"With respect to refugees, the governor and his public safety team are in constant communication with federal authorities about all refugee resettlements, including those involving refugees from Syria," McAuliffe spokesman Brian Coy said in a written statement.
"Every refugee who is settled in the U.S. undergoes intensive security screening, and the governor has asked [Secretary of Public Safety and Homeland Security Brian J. Moran] to ensure that every proper precaution is taken to keep Virginians safe."
The governor left Friday for an 11-day trade mission to India and the Middle East, where he recently met with leaders of Dubai and the United Arab Emirates to discuss economic development.
I don't believe one word of this clap-trap from from the aptly named Brian Coy. If McAwful really wanted to keep Virginians safe, he wouldn't accept these refugees, especially when DHS officials have admitted there's no way that these "refugees" can be properly vetted. McAwful sounds no different from Hillary Rotten Clinton or any of the other contenders for the Party of Treason (Democrats) seeing the 2016 nomination.

So here, we clearly see that McAwful's loyalty is not to the citizens of the Commonwealth, whom he swore an oath to defend. His loyalty is only to the Clintons, Obama, and the Democrat Party. His only goal as Virginia's governor is not to make Virginia safe or prosperous, but to make sure it ends up in the electoral column of that criminal witch Hillary in November hook or crook.

Where Terry McAwful's loyalty lies...with the Clinton Crime Syndicate

If that's the way he wants to be, then Terry McAwful should be prepared to be held responsible should any terrorist attack, or any killing of an American be perpetrated by a Syrian refugee who was residing in the Commonwealth of Virginia, because he (like all liberals) puts ideology and party ahead of his state and country.

Shame on you, Terry McAwful! And shame on the Virginia RINOs who helped elect him in 2013!

Sunday, November 15, 2015

TREASON! Obama Releases Five Islamic Terrorists From Gitmo...Two Days After Paris Jihad

Breaking (Fox News).
The Department of Defense announced late Sunday that five detainees at the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba have been released and sent to the United Arab Emirates.
The transfer of Ali Ahmad Muhammad al-Razihi, Khalid Abd-al-Jabbar Muhammad Uthman al-Qadasi, Adil Said al-Hajj Ubayd al-Busays, Sulayman Awad Bin Uqayl al-Nahdi, and Fahmi Salem Said al-Asani, came after a “comprehensive review” by the interagency Guantanamo Review Task Force, according to the Pentagon.
The Pentagon said the five Yemeni men were accepted for resettlement in the Persian Gulf nation after U.S. authorities determined they no longer posed a threat.
The Defense Department said in a statement Sunday that their release brings the Guantanamo prisoner population to 107.
Is there any denying whose side Obama is on?

He is on the side of the Islamofascists, or, as David Beamer said, he is a Muslim sympathizer and has the track record to prove it.

If we had real leaders who care about this nation, impeachment proceedings and charges of treason would be brought upon this scumbag who desecrates the White House.

After Paris Jihadi Attacks: Democrat Debate Shows They're Unfit To Lead

In case you didn't know, there was another Democrat Party Presidential debate last night.

I didn't watch it, have only read reports of it afterwards (I don't like listening to BS), but was surprised yesterday to hear the debate was still on, given what had happened Friday evening in Paris.

But, after reading the highlights of the debate, it was probably a good idea it wasn't postponed, because what those who watched it heard was more of the dangerous policies that led to the rise of ISIS and Islamic extremism, instead of rooting out this evil that threatens the Western world.

First, despite the fact that 9/11, 9/11/12, Ft. Hood, the Boston Marathon, Chattanooga, and now Paris all have Islamic Terrorism in common, every Democrat refuses to acknowledge who the enemy is (Breitbart).
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told the Democratic Party presidential debate on Saturday evening in Iowa that she would not use the phrase "radical Islam" to describe the enemy responsible for attacking the United States and the west in general.
The exchange with moderator John Dickerson of CBS News was as follows (rush transcript):
Moderator: Secretary Clinton, you mentioned radical jihadists. Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL), also running for president, said this attack in Paris showed that we are at war with radical Islam. Do you agree with that characterization  "radical Islam" 
Clinton: I don't think we're at war with Islam. I don't think we're at war with all Muslims. I think we're at war with jihadists
Moderator: Just to interrupt. he didn't say all Muslims. He said "radical Islam" 
Clinton: I think you can talk about Islamists who clearly are also jihadists, but I think it's not particularly helpful to make the case that Senator Sanders was just making that I agree with that we've got to reach out to Muslim countries. We've got to have them be part of our coalition. If they hear people running for president who basically shortcut it to say we are somehow against Islam.
Plus, despite the fact that we now know some of these radical Muslims who attacked Paris posed as refugees from Syria, all the Democrats think we should roll out the red carpet for them. Never mind they're already landing on our shores and receiving government aid.

We know who Hillary thinks is the enemy...

But radical Islamists, who have attacked America several times? Hillary thinks we should "empathize" with them.


This is why the Democrat Party was unfit to lead in 2008 and is unfit to lead now.

When you listen to this kind of talk, you have to ask yourself, what planet are these people from? Keep in mind, not all Democrats thought like this. FDR, the statist that he was, was willing to take action against the evil of Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan. Had Bill Clinton been President on December 7, 1941, he probably would have sent the FBI to investigate Pearl Harbor, like he did the USS Cole attack.

Democrats were quick to act patriotic after 9/11, but turned when they saw it was politically expedient for them to. 9/11 has always been something Hillary Rotten has tried to play politically, see how she did it last night, as well as with her vote for the Iraq War. But when it was politically expedient for her, she was quick to join the appeasers of radical Islamists in attacking the war effort.

There was a time when politics "stopped at the water's edge, " but that's not the case anymore. The Democrat Party of FDR and JFK doesn't exist anymore. The modern Democrat Party has more in common with radical, left-wing terror groups like the Symbionese Liberation Army than your great-grandparents Democrats. You think I'm being extreme? Look at how Barack Hussein Obama got his political start in the living room of an unrepentant domestic terrorist. Bill Clinton not only commuted the sentences of FALN terrorists in 1999, but also gave clemency to two Weather Underground (Obama's friend Bill Ayers' terror group) members. Remember too, how Hillary was so quick to blame Benghazi on a video but not on Islamic terrorists. Democrats always appear more sympathetic to terrorists who attack America, the West, and capitalism, but always point to the defenders of capitalism and a civil society as the enemy.

Yes, insanity is "doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results."

Saturday, November 14, 2015

Obama State Department May Rule Christians Aren't ISIS Genocide Victims

This is stunning! (National Review Online)
A report by a renowned journalist states that Christians are to be excluded from an impending official United States government declaration of ISIS genocide. If true, it would reflect a familiar pattern within the administration of a politically correct bias that views Christians — even non-Western congregations such as those in Iraq and Syria — never as victims but always as Inquisition-style oppressors. (That a State Department genocide designation for ISIS may be imminent was acknowledged last week in congressional testimony, by Ambassador Anne Patterson, the assistant secretary of the State Department’s Near East Bureau.)
Yazidis, according to the story by investigative reporter Michael Isikoff, are going to be officially recognized as genocide victims, and rightly so. Yet Christians, who are also among the most vulnerable religious minority groups that have been deliberately and mercilessly targeted for eradication by ISIS, are not. This is not an academic matter. A genocide designation would have significant policy implications for American efforts to restore property and lands taken from the minority groups and for offers of aid, asylum, and other protections to such victims. Worse, it would mean that, under the Genocide Convention, the United States and other governments would not be bound to act to suppress or even prevent the genocide of these Christians. 
An unnamed State Department official was quoted by Isikoff as saying that only the attacks on Yazidis have made “the high bar” of the genocide standard and as pointing to the mass killing of 1,000 Yazidi men and the enslavement of thousands of Yazidi women and girls. To propose that Christians have been simply driven off their land but not suffered similar fates is deeply misinformed. In fact, the last Christians to pray in the language spoken by Jesus are also being deliberately targeted for extinction through equally brutal measures. 
Christians have been executed by the thousands. Christian women and girls are vulnerable to sexual enslavement. Many of their clergy have been assassinated and their churches and ancient monasteries demolished or desecrated. They have been systematically stripped of all their wealth, and those too elderly or sick to flee ISIS-controlled territory have been forcibly converted to Islam or killed, such as an 80-year-old woman who was burned to death for refusing to abide by ISIS religious rules. Pope Francis pronounced their suffering “genocide” in July. The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops and a broad array of other churches have done so as well. Analysis from an office of the Holocaust Museum apparently relied on by the State Department asserts that ISIS protects Christians in exchange for jizya, an Islamic tax for “People of the Book,” but the assertion is simply not grounded in fact. 
ISIS atrocities against Christians became public in June 2014 when the jihadists stamped Christian homes in Mosul with the red letter N for “Nazarene” and began enforcing its “convert or die” policy. The atrocities continue. Recently the Melkite Catholic bishop of Aleppo reported that 1,000 Christians, including two Orthodox bishops, have been kidnapped and murdered in his city alone. In September, ISIS executed, on videotape, three Assyrian Christian men and threatened to do the same to 200 more being held captive by the terrorist group. Recent reports by an American Christian aid group state that several Christians who refused to renounce their faith were raped, beheaded, or crucified a few months ago.
How telling that this is coming from a State Department under the Muslim Sympathizer-in-Chief, who wanted to lecture Christians earlier this year about "getting off their high horse."

NATIONAL INSECURITY: Syrian Refugees Already Arriving In New Orleans

Here's a story from The Hayride, a Louisiana blog, which was published November 3rd that should raise eveyone's eyebrows, especially after the events of yesterday in Paris.
After the Hayride broke the exclusive story on 10,000 Syrian refugees possibly resettling in Baton Rouge, Lafayette and Metairie, it has now come to light that refugees are already coming into the New Orleans area.
Catholic Charities, which receive federal grants from U.S. Department of State/Bureau of Population, Refugees and Migration, have apparently taken in two Syrian refugee families already and are expecting many more.
There are approximately 180 cities in the country that are eligible to accept the 10,000 Syrian refugees. Here is the full list of those cities, which includes Baton Rouge, Matairie and Lafayette:
US Refugee Public Affiliate Directory by zerohedge
The 10,000 Syrian refugees are first flown to the United States, according to the French news wire Agence France-Presse, with the State Department paying the International Organization for Migration (IOM) for the airfare.
Then, once the refugees arrive in the country, they could be dispersed across the 180 cities listed above, where they are to aided within the first 30 to 90 days in settling and finding employment in the area.
After approximately 90 days, refugees are no longer eligible for the State Department-funded support that they were receiving through migrant and refugee services. However, they are able to join support programs through the Department of Health and Human Services.
Additionally, it is unclear how much the screening process for the 10,000 Syrian refugees will cost American taxpayers.
The State Department spent $1.1 billion resettling people from around the world in the country last year. That’s about $16,000 per person.
After yesterday, and how Judicial Watch has revealed the FBI has 1,000 active ISIS investigations here in America, how are we able to properly screen these refugees Obama and Kerry want to bring into this country?

There is also the topic of taxpayer dollars being used to house and find work for them. How can we as a nation afford this and pay for it? Why should we be bringing more people from out of the country and find them work, when more Americans since 1977 are out of the labor force? And, after 90 days, they're able to go to programs through Department of Health and Human Services, which when you read between the lines means they're eligible for taxpayer-funded welfare.

After yesterday, we need to have Congress look into this and put a stop to this program immediately. Even though Obama and Kerry only care about serving and representing illegal aliens, Muslims, and radical racial activists, our government took an oath and has a duty to protect Americans.

Friday, November 13, 2015

TERROR IN PARIS - Sources Say 100 Dead, Terrorists Scream "Allah Akbar"

Sadly, it has happened again!

Paris, France has been the target of multiple terrorist attacks around the city, including a bombing at a soccer stadium and a hostage situation at a concert hall. 

Right now, 100 are feared dead, according to AFP.
Paris (AFP) - Around 100 people were killed in an attack on the Bataclan concert venue in Paris on Friday night, police sources said. 
Three suspected jihadists were killed when police stormed the venue, the sources said.
Forty more around Paris are dead, according to Fox News, who is also reporting the following.
The massacre inside the music venue ended around midnight local time when French police stormed inside, killing at least two Kalashnikov-toting gunmen who witnesses said wore flak jackets as they slaughtered horrified spectators. The victims had gathered to see the American rock band Eagles of Death Metal, and a handful managed to escape to tell of the horror taking place inside as the killers shouted "This is for Syria!" and "Alahu Akhbar!" as they cut down patrons from a balcony before the band took the stage.
There was one unconfirmed report one of the attackers claims he is from ISIS.

But, the Muslim-sympathizer-in-chief Barack Hussein Obama did not want to speculate on the motives behind the attacks, when he spoke to the press this evening.

Earlier, Obama spoke with his sycophant at ABC, "Curious" George  Stephanopoulos, and had the audacity to say the following.

“I don't think they're gaining strength,” the president told Stephanopoulos in an interview at the White House Thursday. “From the start our goal has been first to contain, and we have contained them. They have not gained ground in Iraq. And in Syria it -- they'll come in, they'll leave. "But you don't see this systematic march by ISIL across the terrain," he added, using the government's acronym for ISIS.
Well, obviously the same clown who once called ISIS a "JV team" shows how he's spending too much time on the golf course instead of being aware of the threats facing the United States and the Western world by the Islamists.

But never mind that the clown who couldn't even make a JV golf squad who acts as President wants America to take thousands of Syrian refugees, even when we don't know if there are ISIS terrorists mixed in. Not only that, but how this Regime refuses to close the border and instead offers unconstitutional executive amnesties which only acts as a magnet to illegal border crossers. Did you notice what the French prime minister did tonight? He closed the border. Something our "leadership" doesn't have the will to do in this nation for fear of being called "RAAAAACIST" by every left-wing racial grievance monger group.

No, but these same clowns want us to believe ISIS is under control so they can say GloBULL warming is our greatest threat.

After tonight, anyone in our government, namely Obama and "Hanoi" John Kerry, who has the audacity to claim GloBULL warming is our greatest threat needs to have their head surgically removed from their butt.

We need leadership in our nation and our people to demand two things first.



Wednesday, November 11, 2015

Hypocrite Hillary: Speaks Out Against Violence On Women; Laughs At Man Who Wants To Strangle Carly Fiorina

I'm no fan of Carly FioRINO and I think she would be a horrible choice if she were to be the GOP nominee, as I've explained earlier.

But despite that, I have to shake my head in disgust at what happened yesterday in New Hampshire, when a man told Hillary Rotten Clinton about Fiorino...
 “Every time I see her on TV, I want to reach through and strangle her.” 

There were no lectures of civility, no repudiation of the remark, just the Hildebeast laughing hysterically and saying "I wouldn't mess with you. (witch cackle follows)"

Now, can you imagine if some man told, lets say Donald Trump, how every time he saw Hillary on TV he wanted to strangle her, and Trump's reaction was similar to Hillary's? You'd never hear the end of it on TV.

But what is worse is the hypocrisy from this (rhymes with witch). She will laugh at some big ogre who wants to strangle a Republican woman, but she will pen pieces saying how it's time to get tough on violence against women. She will supposedly champion sexual assualt survivors but says nothing about the women who were assualted (and even one allegedly raped) by her "husband". Just like she laughed at her defense of the rapist of a 12-year old. She has no soul.

It's further proof of how unfit she is to even run for President. The only thing Hillary deserves in 2016 is a clean cot in a prison cell for her lies about Benghazi and putting our national security at risk with her unsecured e-mails.

Monday, November 09, 2015


Breaking news tonight (Bloomberg News)
President Barack Obama’s plan to shield more than 5 million undocumented immigrants from deportation before he leaves office was dealt another blow by an appeals court’s refusal to let the program begin while 26 states fight to derail it.
The U.S. Court of Appeals in New Orleans said a federal judge’s ruling blocking the plan was “impressive and thorough” and that states led by Texas were likely to ultimately win the lawsuit. The judge in Brownsville, Texas, ruled the White House had skipped required federal policy-making steps and halted the program in February, hours before it was to begin taking applications.
The White House may take the dispute to the U.S. Supreme Court, where further delays would likely thrust immigration policy onto center stage in the 2016 presidential contest. Newly elected Speaker Paul Ryan has said House Republicans won’t be offering legislation on immigration reform, calling Obama an unreliable partner because he had attempted to go around Congress with executive orders.
The appeals court “has pretty effectively closed down any meaningful chance of immigration reform before Obama leaves office,” Richard Murray, a pollster and political science professor at the University of Houston, said in a phone interview. If the administration appeals, the Supreme Court will likely order the status quo maintained as the court fight continues, out of reluctance to “inject itself” into such a divisive issue, “especially during the final year of a presidential term,” Murray said.
If the high court’s four Democratic appointees vote to take the case, the decision will come down in June, “just as the political parties are settling in on their candidates,” Murray said. “Immigration has already become a huge issue; I think it will be a wedge issue in the presidential campaign.”
Obama’s initiative targets undocumented immigrants who’ve been in the U.S. for at least five years, can pass a criminal background check, and have a child who is an American citizen. Obama announced the unilateral policy shift in November 2014, after he failed to persuade the Republican-controlled Congress to pass reforms he said would bring illegal immigrants “out of the shadows” into productive society.
The pushback on Obama's 2014 illegal executive amnesty began in February when a Federal judge in Brownsville blocked it.  It even got to the point where the Regime was investigated for lying to the judge.

Now that the tyrant Obama has been smacked down, I wonder what the petulant little tinpot dicktator's response will be?

Saturday, November 07, 2015

Ben Carson Nails The Media: "The American People Are Waking Up To Your Game"

Like Donald Trump, Ben Carson is not my first choice in the GOP Presidential primary for 2016. However, I'd have no problem voting for him if he were the nominee in 2016.

Here's one reason. Unlike other GOP establishment types who are willing to let the media walk all over them, the mild-mannered Carson still takes on the media in a way that not only resonates, it illustrates the media hypocrisy.

Like he did last night, after a smear story by Politico claimed Carson lied about being offered a scholarship from West Point. Carson took the media on and threw it back in their faces, showing them he won't play their game (The Blaze).

“I do not remember this level of scrutiny for one President Barack Obama when he was running,” Carson said. “In fact, I remember just the opposite. I remember people just – oh wait, we won’t talk about that. We won’t talk about that relationship.”
“Why is his records sealed?” he later asked. “Why are you guys not interested in his record are sealed? Why are you not interested in that? Let me ask that. Can someone tell me why please?”
A reporter asked, “Why do you think they are?”
“I’m asking you why it’s sealed. No, no, no! Don’t change it!” he said over the reporter. “I’m asking you will someone, will someone tell me why you have not investigated that? I want to know.”
“Why are you raising it?” a reporter asked.
“Because I want to know. You should want to know too,” Carson answered.
He added, “Hold on one second. You are saying that something that happened with the words ‘a scholarship was offered’ is a big deal, but president of the United States, his academic records being sealed is not? Tell me how there is equivalency there!”
And another thing, how come it is safe for liberals and media liberals to attack Carson racially, compared to how just a policy disagreement with Obama is called "racist" or "dog whistle racism." Yet a liberal professor can call Carson a "coon," while others can call him a "token" and a "safe negro."

Because liberals fear Carson, and though they won't admit it, see him as a "runaway negro," someone who left the plantation and they fear him being uppity will cause others to leave the plantation. In today's case, the Democrat-Liberal Victimization Plantation. Because once the dependence on liberal politicians is gone, they are out of business, and Ben Carson threatens that.

Which is why liberals want to see him destroyed.

George Will Rips O'Reilly's "Killing Reagan," Gets Bullied By The Blowhard Fox Host

I will say this about George Will--he's always appeared to me to be too much of an Inside-the-Beltway, GOP establishment hack, one who attacks conservatives and even attacked Ronald Reagan's supporters in the mid-1970s as "Kamikaze Conservatives."

But at least George Will is a fair person, and is one of many who have publicly ripped Bill O'Reilly's recent tome, "Killing Reagan."

Will appeared on O'Reilly's show last night in the aptly named "Personal Story," because the whole point was for O'Reilly to berate Will for bruising his fragile ego.

But it's not just George Will, there's also Craig Shirley, who has authored several books on Reagan (they are essential reading for anyone interested in Reagan), including his 1976 and 1980 campaigns, as well as his most recent "The Last Act," a look at Reagan's final years.

At his website, Shirley wrote:
So far, I’ve written four books on Ronald Reagan, written dozens of articles, given dozens of lectures, am a Trustee of Eureka College, taught a course there entitled Reagan 101, and have lectured at the Reagan Library and the Reagan Ranch. My co-authors Kengor, Skinner and Hayward are equally knowledgeable about our 40th president.
Thus, it is fair to say we probably know a little bit more about Ronald Reagan than Bill O’Reilly. We certainly know the facts of Ronald Reagan.
Reagan's attorney general Ed Meese is another:
We have watched numerous television interviews of Mr. O’Reilly since the release of “Killing Reagan” to assess the reasons he wrote the book. O’Reilly calls himself an “investigative historian” and claims such an approach “offers something new.” But there is “new” and there is “accurate”—and it’s unwise to confuse the two. O’Reilly says what he’s discovered is that for some of the time Reagan was in office, he was incapacitated to the point that it was questionable whether he could capably serve in the role of president of the United States.
But this assertion is neither new nor accurate. The “investigative historian” has swung and missed. One need only turn to “Landslide: The Unmaking of the President, 1984-1988” by Jane Mayer and Doyle McManus to learn that during Reagan’s second term, a memo (not a “study” as O’Reilly puts it) written by a newly arrived White House staffer suggested that Reagan’s diminished mental capacity compromised his ability to effectively perform as president. A shocking allegation to be sure, were it true. The historical record proves that it was not.
...What we learned from “Landslide” is that this staffer, James Cannon, went beyond his initial charge to assess the White House operation and began collecting gossip and rumors about the president. Cannon hears second-hand and third-hand innuendo that led him to question the president’s mental capacity. In his memo, Cannon highlights the concerns he has heard and suggests, incredibly, that the 25th Amendment—the one about relieving the president of his duties—might be in order.
And so, on March 2, 1997, Howard Baker and James Cannon, along with two other White House aides—Thomas Griscom and A.B. Culvahouse—bracketed the president at a meeting in the Cabinet Room to watch him closely. The Los Angeles Times later reported what happened next: “To Cannon's surprise, Reagan seemed attentive and alert, charming and glib—the same Ronald Reagan he had known for years,” the paper reported.
The newspaper quoted Baker as saying that although he didn’t dismiss James Cannon’s concerns out of hand, he never seriously considered invoking the 25th Amendment because “from the first time I saw [Reagan] he was fully in control and I never had any question about his mental competence.”
The L.A. Times also identified the sources who gossiped about the president—aides to deposed White House chief-of-staff Don Regan. In other words, the people bad-mouthing the president were people who had been fired and were not happy about it.  
Yet now, in describing the very genesis of his “Killing Reagan” book, Bill O’Reilly says that “Baker was worried [Reagan] wasn’t up to the job.” This is plainly not true. Culvahouse terms his account a “myth.” 
“That was thoroughly discredited when it first appeared 27 years ago,” he told us. “It should be returned to the dust bin of fiction masquerading as history.”
Someone else who has a wealth of knowledge about the real Reagan is someone who served under Meese, radio talk show host Mark Levin.

Levin called O'Reilly's book "a cheap smear" and invited the 8pm blowhard on his radio show. O'Reilly doesn't have the courage to take up the offer, because he'd come off looking worse than he did when he was attacking George Will last night.

Even more telling, O'Reilly never bothered to contact any of the Reagan family, as Michael Reagan has noted.
...If an author is writing a book on the attempted assassination of Ronald Reagan, I have a news flash: I’m still alive.
“Killing Reagan: The Violent Assault That Changed a Presidency” by Bill O'Reilly and Martin Dugard is the second book to come out this year that completely failed to contact any surviving members of the Reagan family so we could put the event into context.
Earlier this summer H.W. Brands released his biography “Reagan: The Life” although for many of the incidents contained within the book a more accurate title would have been “Reagan: The Lie.” 
Even the dancer, Ronald Prescott (because he doesn't act like a real Reagan), made one intelligent statement in his life, saying O'Reilly is a "snake-oil salesman."

If George Will ever felt the need to after last night, he would have a wealth of co-authors to help him write and publish a book entitled "Killing O'Reilly's Ego."

(Viewer warning - language)

Wednesday, November 04, 2015

Election 2015--Virginia Makes McAuliffe The Lamest of Ducks

"Terrible" Terry McAwful was handed a rebuke at the polls last night, according to none other than the liberal Washington ComPost.
Republicans held onto the Virginia Senate in fiercely contested elections Tuesday, leaving Gov. Terry McAuliffe without legislative leverage or political momentum as he works to deliver Virginia for his friend and ally Hillary Rodham Clinton in 2016.
The outcome was a blunt rebuke to McAuliffe (D), who had barnstormed the state with 24 events over the past four days and who portrayed the elections as a make-or-break moment for his progressive agenda.
All 140 seats in the General Assembly were on the ballot. But all eyes were on a handful of Senate seats that would decide whether Republicans held their 21-19 majority in Richmond’s upper chamber. Because the GOP dominates the House, flipping the Senate was the term-limited governor’s only hope for building a legislative legacy.
Democrats could have taken control by picking up just one seat because of the tie-breaking authority of Lt. Gov. Ralph Northam (D). But Republicans held all of their seats.
“Today, Virginians voted for a fiscally responsible and conservative majority,” Senate Majority Leader Thomas K. Norment (R-James City) said Tuesday. “Our victory is all the more impressive in that it was achieved despite the record-breaking millions of dollars spent by Governor McAuliffe, his allies and out-of-state PACs. This election was decided by Virginians.”
McAwful was making the 2015 off year election about nothing but Obama's liberal agenda, including expansion of Obamacare in Virginia and attacks on the Second Amendment, especially in the wake of the tragic shooting in Roanoke last August by black racist Vester Flannigan.

I'm sure another issue that didn't help McAwful was his proposal to put a $17 toll on Interstate 66 to pay for bike lanes in Arlington County. Republicans has voiced strong opposition to the Governor's idea to rename I-66 the "Gov. Terry McAuliffe Thruway."

Except it will cost more than a dime.

The one downside to the elections was Fairfax and Loudoun counties, which are becoming more liberal. Tom Rust, who is retiring from the House of Delegate, was replaced by liberal Jennifer Boysko, who did nothing but run a fear mongering campaign about the mean ole GOP thinking women can't make their health decisions (read: abortion).

But I fear that McAuliffe's real purpose is for next year's presidential election. I've heard a few Republicans, like Michael Reagan, say "oh, we want Hillary to be the nominee because she'll be the easiest to beat." Really? Did they forget that Virginia, since 2008, has now become a swing state, thanks to Northern Virginia becoming a part of Washington DC and Maryland. Plus, thanks to the backstabbing of Ken Cuccinelli two years ago by the GOP establishment and Bill Bolling all but installed McAwful, the former leader of the Clinton Hillbilly Mafia, to the state's highest office. And since his partisan attorney general won election the same year in a fraudulent manner (I suspect), they'll pull out all the stops and dirty tricks to help the Hildebeast become President.