Sunday, November 30, 2014

Communist Front Groups Disrupt DC This Weekend Over #Ferguson. I-395 Blocked Sunday Afternoon By Protesters

If you were driving either direction on Interstate 395 just about an hour ago, you probably were sitting in a traffic jam.

That's because a bunch of rabble-rousers protesting the grand jury decision not to indict Officer Darren Wilson over the death of Michael Brown were allowed to block this major artery connecting Washington DC and Alexandria, VA. (photos via Twitter)




These videos (Video 1, Video 2, Video 3) were uploaded onto Instagram, as was this embedded one on YouTube.


Yesterday, the protesters protested in Georgetown, before heading over to Pentagon Mall to hold a "die in" both inside and outside the mall (photos via Flickr acct untoldcarlisle)








Taking a look at the photos from yesterday, there are various signs that one should pay attention to, in order to tell the groups behind them, and that the media no doubt will ignore the radical backgrounds of.

ANSWER Coalition (whom this blog has blogged about for years) evolved after 9/11 in response to the War on Terror. From David Horowitz' Discover the Network website.
International ANSWER (an acronym for "Act Now to Stop War and End Racism") is run by Ramsey Clark’s International Action Center, which is staffed by members of the Marxist-Leninist Workers World Party (WWP). ANSWER views the United States as a racist, imperialist, sexist, homophobic nation and the world’s chief violator of human rights -- guilty of unspeakable atrocities, past and present, foreign and domestic.
PSLWeb (signs in the photo near the FedEX truck) stands for Party for Socialism and Liberation, per Wikipedia.

National Black United Front was listed on this FreeRepublic link as a communist organization. Per Wikipedia, the group was called "Christian, Left-leaning, somewhat Black nationalist and to work in the tradition of the Million Man March and Malcolm X."

That is why this manufactured outrage over the Ferguson grand jury has echoed nationwide. Since the beginning, what happened in Ferguson has been taken and manipulated by these and various other Communist front groups who use the theme of "racism" to agitate for the overthrow of capitalism.

Thursday, November 27, 2014

Happy Thanksgiving 2014

Wishing you all a very Happy Thanksgiving, and that you have a great day with family and friends.

Especially, let's give thanks to those who have given up this day to be away from their families in the defense of our Nation.

Pray for America and each other.

Wednesday, November 26, 2014

Racist Obama: Unless You're Native American, Quit Complaining About My Unlawful Amnesty

It is bad enough that Richard Milhous-Hussein Obama admitted yesterday he unilaterally (and unlawfully, I must add) changed immigration law, but he bascially told the American citizenry to go to hell as well (Daily Caller).
The only Americans who can legitimately object to immigration are native Indian-Americans, President Barack Obama told his Chicago audience Nov. 24, as he made an impassioned ideological plea for endless immigration, cultural diversity and a big government to manage the resulting multicultural society.
There have been periods where the folks who were already here suddenly say, ‘Well, I don’t want those folks,’ even though the only people who have the right to say that are some Native Americans,” Obama said, rhetorically dismissing the right of 300 million actual Americans to decide who can live in their homeland.
Americans should not favor other Americans over foreigners, Obama demanded. “Sometimes we get attached to our particular tribe, our particular race, our particular religion, and then we start treating other folks differently… that, sometimes, has been a bottleneck to how we think about immigration,” he said in the face of many polls showing rising opposition to his immigration agenda.
And guess what else? Dictator Obama's unConstitutional amnesty rewards US companies $3,000 for hiring an illegal alien over an native-born American worker.

Let me remind Obama about something he said right after Benghazi on David Letterman's show, when he was attacking Mittens Romney for his "47 percent" comment that Jimmy Carter's spawn secretly taped.


“Well, I don’t know what he was referring to, but I can tell you this. When I won in 2008, 47 percent of the American people voted for John McCain, they didn’t vote for me. And what I said on election night was, even though you didn’t vote for me, I hear your voices and I’m going to work as hard as I can to be your president. And one of the things I’ve learned as president is you represent the entire country. And when I meet Republicans as I’m traveling around the country, they are hard working, family people, who care deeply about this country and my expectation is that if you want to be president you got to work for everybody not just for some.”
Obviously, those were "just words" because you didn't mean any of it.  Your comments above from Chicago certainly don't resemble someone who "represents the entire country," because one can objectively look over your failed time in office and see that you've only put the interests of those people or groups of people who support or helped you (Solyndra, anyone?), and make snide remarks toward your opponents. You've talked about "getting in people's faces" and "punishing your enemies."  You have more understanding for an illegal alien, a gang-banger or a Islamic terrorist than you do the police, the military, or black citizens who are unemployed or lost their business in the racially charged circus you and your fellow racist Eric Holder created.  Because you're an angry racist with a huge chip on your shoulder.

In short, you don't respect the citizens of this nation, your Oath of Office or the Constitution you swore to uphold.  It's just a taxpayer-funded ticket for you and Moochelle to take your lavish vacations and play all the golf you want.

Maybe if you have such a disrespect for this nation and it's people, you should do the honorable thing (if you had honor) and resign your office.

Joe Biden might be off his rocker, but God knows we could use come comedy relief after the pain you've put this nation through.

Tuesday, November 25, 2014

Mark Levin: Ferguson Is "Left's War On Civil Society"

Like most of America last night, I was following the grand jury decision in Ferguson, MO, in which they found Officer Darren Wilson not criminally liable for the death of Michael Brown this past August.

I also followed, via Twitter and online streams, the ensuing riot and lawlessness that occurred, and saw a transcript of Richard Milhous Obama's remarks on the matter, which were sickening and offensive, to say the least because of his attacks on the police and this nation, trying to imply that this came about because of the "legacy of discrimination" that happened a long time ago, and which Leftist agitators like him, Attorney General Eric Holder, Al Sharpton and others do not want to let go of.

Mark Levin wrote the following this morning on his Facebook page that really put the events in Ferguson in context.
Ferguson burns and violence has been unleashed thanks to the reckless liberal media, the lawless administration (especially Eric Holder) exploiting the shooting to smear police departments across the nation, phony civil rights demagogues, race-baiting politicians, and radical hate groups.  
The lies about why and how Officer Darrin Wilson shot Michael Brown started on day one and never ended.  The indisputable facts are that Brown was shot because he assaulted a police officer, attempted to take the officer's pistol resulting in two close range gun shots in the police cruiser, and then turned around and charged the officer as he was being pursued. The entire event was precipitated by Brown earlier stealing cigars from a local store and assaulting the owner.  
What we are witnessing now is the left's war on the civil society.  It's time to speak out in defense of law enforcement and others trying to protect the community and uphold the rule law
Not to long after reading The Great One's Facebook post this morning, I saw a heartbreaking photo that appeared in my Twitter feed of a woman, Natalie DuBose, tears in her eyes after losing her cake store to these thugs whose emotions had been stirred up by the people Levin referenced in his note.


I also saw a comment referenced from a black employee at the Little Ceasars Pizza in Ferguson that was burned to the ground, that it looked like he was now unemployed.

But when you listened to Obama last night, you got the sense that Obama felt an "understanding" with the protesters, instead of business owners like the lady above, and the people who were employed in those businesses that went up in flames. Remember how he'd met with them the day after the mid-term election and told them "stay the course?" Sure, he made references to protest peacefully and made it sound like the trouble was from just a handful of troublemakers. But it looked like more than a handful on the news. Obama had the audacity to talk about the "rule of law," but, it was not the protesters and their lawlessness Obama came down on. Instead, like Holder many other times before, Obama the lawless Ruler by Executive Fiat focused on the police and law enforcement, making them appear to be the problem, as they've created, "mistrust" in black communities.

Where has that mistrust come from?  We can get a clue from a quote by Booker T. Washington.
"There is a class of colored people who make a business of keeping the troubles, the wrongs and the hardships of the Negro race before the public. Some of these people do not want the Negro to lose his grievances because they do not want to lose their jobs. There is a certain class of race-problem solvers who don't want the patient to get well."
I can start here with the so-called "Reverend" Al Sharpton. Events like Ferguson are made to order for this rabble-rouser to come in with his bullhorn screaming "No Justice, No Peace." The fact Sharpton still is given a platform to spew his venom is a testament to the corrupt media in America, as Sharpton first came to prominence by pushing the Tawana Brawley alleged rape case that turned out to be a massive hoax. Sharpton lost a slander suit by an Assistant DA Steven Pagones (paid for by supporters) and now owes over a million dollars in back taxes, but this fraud has been a confidante of Obama, being the source for the "stay the course" comment, and also pushing Loretta Lynch to continue Eric Holder's race-baiting legacy leading the Department of (Racial) Justice. It's not just Sharpton. "Screwy" Louis Farrakhan and Jesse Jackson are others who can be counted upon to stir up racial resentment and bring up past grievances As far as we've come as a nation on race, these Three Stooges would make people think there's a KKK meeting around the corner, if you took them at face value.

Then there's the political class, where Obama and Holder fit in. But it's not just them. It's also the Congressional Black Caucus, who have also weighed in on the Ferguson manner in a racially-divisive way.  Don't forget these are the same people who will make up false stories of racial slurs used against them in a way to smear Tea Party activists as being motivated by race.  Obama and Holder have also played into this narrative that their ideological opponents are motivated by bigotry. Where playing on racial resentment keeps Sharpton, et al, in business, people like Obama, the CBC, use it to acquire and hold onto political power. Martin Luther King Jr.'s dream of a color-blind society doesn't work for these people, so they use racism as a way to divide America as "us vs. them."

But none of these so-called "leaders" will address serious issues facing the black community. A high unemployment rate that's worse under Obama, and the breakdown of the black family.  For one, take a look at Michael Brown's stepfather after the grand jury decision talking about "burn this mother-f**ker down" and you have to ask yourself what kind of parenting skills were being used in the home.

Beyond that, there are also outside extremist groups who prey on these situations in order to topple American society, as the Christian Science Monitor explains.
Among the groups active in Ferguson are the Revolutionary Communist Party (RCP) and the Revolution Club of Chicago. The RCP – a small, mysterious, but nationally dispersed Maoist cell led by activist Bob Avakian – has been in the area since at least Wednesday, along with the Revolution Club and the New Black Panthers Party. The New Black Panthers Party has been classified as a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center, among other organizations.
“We have a responsibility to be here,” Lou Downey of the Revolution Club told The Kansas City Star. “We are revolutionaries. We’re working to do this in a way that puts an end to the system that for generations has criminalized youth, especially black youth, and rounds them up into prisons.”
So, yes, it is a war on civil society as well as the very fabric of our nation, and the lawlessness in the Executive Branch of our government is an encouragement to these activists. It's more of a reason why all American need to stand up when too many others are afraid to lead during these uncertain and trying times.

Sunday, November 23, 2014

When You've Lost Saturday Night Live....

Even the NBC late night comedy show mocks Dicktator-in-Chief Obama's unconstitutional end-run around Congress using the classic Schoolhouse Rock.

Wednesday, November 19, 2014

If Not Now, When? Addressing GOP Hesitancy To Stand Up For America Against Obama Tyrannical Executive Amnesty

"Speak for England, Arthur!"

Those words were spoken by Leo Amery, member of England's Parliament as Labour Party leader Arthur Greenwood rose to respond to British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain on September 2, 1939, after the Appeaser of Hitler at Munich gave a lackluster speech on whether England would aid Poland against invading Nazi Germany or not. It was certainly a dark time for Europe, for England, and the world, which was soon to be plunged in World War II and needed leadership to stand up against the forces of tyranny that sought to take over Europe, and, eventually, the entire world.

Tonight, America is on the cusp of some dark and uncertain days ahead, the outcome of which threaten the very ideas and principles that our nation was not only founded upon, but also made it great and a beacon for all peoples around the world.

On Friday, Richard Milhous-Hussein Obama will, by executive order (without Congressional approval) grant amnesty to an estimated five million illegal aliens at an event in Las Vegas, Nevada.

This also comes on the heels of uncertainty in Ferguson, MO, where racist activists like Al Sharpton, who have been egged on by Obama (who urged the protesters to stay the course), are threatening violence if police officer Darren Wilson is not criminally charged with the killing of the thuggish Michael Brown, who was caught on video strong-arming a store clerk in a robbery before he was shot and killed by the officer.

Obama's actions in bypassing Congress are, despite what the Regime bootlickers at the Associated (with Obama) Press say, unprecedented.  (Here's why what Reagan and Bush 41 did does not compare to Obama's actions).  Unlike Reagan and Bush, Obama cannot get the "immigration reform" (read: amnesty) bill he wants passed, so, he's going to thwart the very fabric our government was founded upon, the Separation of Powers laid out in the Constitution, and bypass that lawmaking body.

Unconstitutional lawlessness of the type one would see in a third-world dictator or communist despot is going to be taken by the President of the United States. But why should the law matter to Obama?  He embraces lawlessness, or he would not be standing on the side of anarchists and rabble-rousers in Ferguson, MO.

But it's more than just the Constitution and the rule of law, it is a slap-in-the-face to those immigrants who went through the years of red tape, etc, and followed the rules to become legal citizens of the United States, because the very idea that made so many risk their lives to come to this nation--liberty--is being replaced with the tyranny of a rule-by-fiat from a narcissistic, thin-skinned, and petty little man stung by the rebuke he and his party received from the voters of America two weeks ago tonight.

But though the American voter spoke against Obama and his radical ideology and designs (even Blue State Oregon rejected overwhelmingly giving driver's licenses to illegal aliens), Obama smirks in their face and goes ahead anyway, because he has no fear of retribution right now.

Why? The new Republican leadership, Mitch McConnell and John Boehner, are adamant that there will be no government shut down.  Even impeachment, which Obama's actions (as well as others) warrant, is off the table.

The Democrat Party, who made such an issue of alleged abuses of executive power during George W. Bush's administration, is marching in goose-step with Obama's unlawful action. Clearly, their loyalty is only to Party and to their leader..."My Party, Right or Wrong." What about the oath you took to America? To defend the Constitution "against all enemies, foreign and domestic?"

Likewise, what about the Republican Party and their leaders, McConnell and Boehner? They seem more intent on destroying any conservative, Tea Party Senator or Congressman but will play kid gloves with Obama because they're so afraid of being called "racists," and Karl Rove said "let's not turn people off by looking mean."  To the Republican Party, I would remind them as well that you took an oath to this nation to defend the Constitution "against all enemies, foreign and domestic." You did not take an oath to Karl Rove and the GOP consultant class who are more afraid of losing an election than they are of winning one, the US Chamber of Commerce, or the crony-capitalist corporatists who want amnesty just as bad as Obama.

This is not a Republican or Democrat issue, nor a right or left issue. This is about the rule of law and whether or not those whom the voters entrusted two weeks ago with leadership to stand up against Obama's radical "transformation of America" will (as Ronald Reagan said 50 years ago) "preserve for our children this, the last best hope of man on earth, or we'll sentence them to take the last step into a thousand years of darkness."

Because if not now, when will those "leaders" finally have the courage.

Sorry to say, If not now, it will be too late, because that fine line will have been crossed, and the cowardice of Boehner and McConnell will reward Obama's lawlessness and encourage him to push the envelope even further.

Now's the time for those we entrusted to power to, for once, have the courage to "Speak for America!"

Monday, November 17, 2014

State of Emergency Declared In Missouri Over Protesters To Whom Obama Told To "Stay The Course"

The Governor of Missouri declared a "state of emergency" over the possibility of violent protests pending the grand jury decision if Ferguson, MO Police Officer Darren Wilson should be criminally liable for the death of Michael Brown (Fox News).
Residents and officials in the region fear another wave of rioting if the grand jury decides not to indict Wilson.
"We are bracing for that possibility. That is what many people are expecting. The entire community is going to be upset," said Jose Chavez, 46, a leader of the Latinos en Axion community group.
For some cities, a decision in the racially-charged case will, inevitably, re-ignite long-simmering debates over local police relations within minority communities.
"It's definitely on our radar," said Lt. Michael McCarthy, police spokesman in Boston, where police leaders met privately Wednesday to discuss preparations. "Common sense tells you the timeline is getting close. We're just trying to prepare in case something does step off, so we are ready to go with it."
Meanwhile, The New York Times (h/t Gateway Pundit) revealed President Obama met with the activists in Ferguson, MO, where all the unrest is happening.
Some of the national leaders met with President Obama on Nov. 5 for a gathering that included a conversation about Ferguson.
According to the Rev. Al Sharpton, who has appeared frequently in St. Louis with the Brown family and delivered a speech at Mr. Brown’s funeral, Mr. Obama “was concerned about Ferguson staying on course in terms of pursuing what it was that he knew we were advocating. He said he hopes that we’re doing all we can to keep peace.”
 You mean this Al Sharpton?


Meanwhile, the President of the United States, who said on David Letterman's show a President has to represent all of the people, is meeting with a racist, rabble rouser who always goes to these towns with his bullhorn screaming "No Justice, No Peace," while they're threatening the property and well-being of the law-abiding citizens of Ferguson.

How can Obama lecture about "civility" on one hand, and then meet with violent street agitators the next.

Because Obama does not "represent" all of America, and if, God forbid, there is violence, he and that other bigot, Eric Holder, are responsible for helping to agitate the discontent for pure political purposes.

OBAMA LIED: Named Jonathan Gruber In 2006 As Someone Whose Ideas He'd "Stolen From Liberally"

Yesterday Richard Milhous Obama tried to pretend that Jonathan Gruber had little or nothing to do with putting together Obamacare.
“The fact that an adviser who was never on our staff expressed an opinion that I completely disagree with in terms of the voters is not a reflection on the actual process that was run,”
Well, Obama lied and here's the more evidence that he did.

From April 5, 2006 (Washington Free Beacon). 
"You have already drawn some of the brightest minds from academia and policy circles, many of them I have stolen ideas from liberally, people ranging from Robert Gordon to Austan Goolsbee; Jon Gruber; my dear friend, Jim Wallis here, who can inform what are sometimes dry policy debates with a prophetic voice."

Think of it.

In 2006, Obama credit Gruber among those whose ideas he'd stolen from liberally.

Gruber visited the Obama White House 19 times, and the Obama campaign in 2012 prominently featured Gruber in a video.

Now, when citizen journalists find videos of Gruber saying the process had to be "less than transparent" to put Obamacare together, in order to take advantage of the "stupidity of the American voter," Obama and the Democrats act like they've never heard of him.

They got caught with their hands in the cookie jar and now they're lying about it. All of them!

Sunday, November 16, 2014

PROOF OBAMA LIES! Calls Gruber "Adviser Who Was Never On Our Staff," But 2012 Campaign Featured Gruber In Video

Channeling former President Bill Clinton, Richard Milhous-Hussein Obama addressed the growing Jonathan Gruber/Obamacare scandal that is engulfing his Regime from Australia this morning (Politico).
“The fact that an adviser who was never on our staff expressed an opinion that I completely disagree with in terms of the voters is not a reflection on the actual process that was run,” Obama declared at a press conference here, speaking for the first time about the comments by MIT economist Jonathan Gruber.
When the president was asked whether he had intentionally misled the public in order to get the law passed, he replied: “No. I did not.”
Here's the video (along with news of another ISIS beheading) showing Fox News' Ed Henry asking Obama. As usual, Obama is doing his usual plausible deniability (aka The Limbaugh Theorem) on the issue (just like the IRS and ISIS)..."I didn't know bout that til I was told about it before coming on stage here."


Obama is lying and it is easily provable.

Exhibit A - Obama's 2012 Campaign used a video on the anniversary of RomneyCare in which Gruber was "featured prominently", according to CNN on April 12, 2012.

Maybe you've heard the president's top aides call Mitt Romney the "godfather" of the Obama health care law?
Now the Obama campaign is out with a web video that drives home the message.
"I helped Gov. Romney develop his health care reform or Romneycare, before going down to Washington to help President Obama develop his national version of that law," says Jonathan Gruber a bright eyed MIT Health Consultant featured prominently in the video. The spot includes old footage of Romney thanking Gruber for his work on the Massachusetts health bill.
Gruber's verdict: "The core of the Affordable Care Act or Obamacare and what we did in Massachusetts are identical."



Exhibit B - Obama's Department of Health and; Human Services paid Gruber, and, according to White House visitor logs, he visited the Executive Mansion 19 times. Nancy Pelosi (who now claims not to know Gruber) and the White House website cited Gruber (Fox News).
But while Jonathan Gruber might not have been a familiar name until this week for many, Pelosi and the rest of the lawmakers who pushed the law certainly knew who he was in 2009 and 2010.
A look at the record shows he was in fact paid to advise the Department of Health and Human Services. And he continues to play a role in health policy elsewhere, even as his unearthed videos cause headaches for the administration, just ahead of this weekend’s Round 2 enrollment launch.
Gruber, an MIT professor and economist, has lived amid the health care debate in Washington for at least 20 years.
Gruber was retained by the Department of Health and Human Services in 2009 on a $297,600 contract to provide “technical assistance in evaluating options for national healthcare reform.” Gruber also confirmed to The Washington Post that he was paid another $95,000 before that, for a total of nearly $400,000
Around this time, his analysis was not only featured on Pelosi’s House speaker website in 2009, but cited by the White House several times. Though he often was billed as an analyst in media interviews where he touted the merits of the plan, critics complained his financial ties to the administration weren’t disclosed.
Gruber also spent a good deal of time testifying on the Hill and in meetings at the White House – 19 visits from 2009 to June of this year, according to publicly available logs.
Exhbit C - As for the claim he did not mislead America on health care, we've long known, and the Obamacare rollout last year proved it, how everything Obama said about his health care plan was bull-s**t!

Here's video compilation by Sean Hannity of Obama's lies, that you could keep your doctor, your health-care plan, and insurance would be more affordable.  Period!


But it isn't true. Insurance costs increased, coverage went down, and millions of Americans lost their coverage that Obama promised they could keep.

Like Rich Weinstein, an investment adviser in Philadelphia who received notification in 2013 his insurance plan was being cancelled. After doing research on the Internet, Weinstein uncovered the Gruber videos, doing the job our corrupt lapdog media refuses to do.

Saturday, November 15, 2014

Obama 2012 Video Features Jonathan Gruber Saying He Helped Develop Obamacare

Jake Tapper posted on Twitter the following video from the Obama 2012 campaign.

In it, Jonathan Gruber mentions how he helped Mittens Romney develop Romneycare, and then went to help Obama put Obamacare together.


In case this video disappears, here's a screenshot.


But since his video where Gruber is caught on camera saying they were less than transparent, in order to take advantage of the "stupid" American voter, Democrats and Obama can't seem to remember who Jonathan Gruber is.

But it is all over the Internet, there's no denying his links to Obamacare.

SMOKING GUN(s): Gruber Met At White House With Obama, Obama's 2012 Website Gruber "Helped Write Obamacare"

Because there's more than one "smoking gun" (cue up Robert Cray).


First, from Gateway Pundit, is a video of Jonathan Gruber saying he was in the room in the oval office "on what can we do to get credible savings on cost control that the Congressional Budget Office would recognize and score as savings in this law."


Who else was in that meeting with Gruber and Obama?
According to ABC, everyone.
In addition to the president and Elmendorf, present in the meeting were White House officials such as Assistant to the President for Legislative Affairs Phil Schiliro, Director of the White House Office of Health Reform Nancy-Ann DeParle, Office of Management and Budget director Peter Orszag (a former CBO director himself), National Economic Council Director Larry Summers, chair of the Council of Economic Advisers Christy Romer, senior adviser David Axelrod, and press secretary Robert Gibbs.
Others were there as well, including Department of Health and Human Services adviser Meena Seshamani, Harvard University economist David Cutler and Alice Rivlin of the Brookings Institute, who was founding director of CBO from 1975-1983.”
Gruber was not mentioned by name in the ABC piece, but the White House logs show us that Jonathan Gruber and David Cutler, a Harvard economist, entered the White House at the same time to meet the POTUS in the West Wing.
So, it wasn't just Obama, it was the whole team...Axlerod, Robert Fibbs, Peter Orszag, et al.

Then there's this, from Obama's 2012 website, now scrubbed, but found in the Wayback Archive (PunditPress, h/t Sister Toldjah on Twitter).
According to BarackObama.com, President Obama’s official website, Jon Gruber “helped write Obamacare.”
The post was written in 2012 and was about specific quotes from President Obama trying to tie Mitt Romney to ObamaCare by saying that “RomneyCare” was the model for the Affordable Care Act.
In an act to hide the connection to Barack Obama after Gruber’s quotes about the “stupidity of American voters” went viral, the article has been taken down by Organizing for Action. However, it was online as recently as August of this year, and a cached version still exists that clearly shows its original content. Pundit Press found the cached version.

PunditPress also noted this 2012 NY Slimes article on how Obama's team called Gruber.


"Then came the call in 2008 from President-elect Obama's transition team, the one that officially turned this stay-at-home economics professor into Mr. Mandate."
Finally, Ace of Spades writes how Peter Orzag (mentioned earlier) lauded the "Cadillac Tax" mislableing, as discussed by Gruber.
So Obama cannot claim he didn't know. Peter Orzag talks about Obamcare phasing out the health care exemption, through the deceptive means of indexing the "Cadillac Plan" threshold to slow-growing CPI rather than fast-moving (and accurate) rate of medical inflation.
He also states that they went about phasing out the health care exemption because certain people -- unnamed, but he means Obama -- had demagogued McCain's honest discussion of ending the exemption (replacing it with a tax credit), and, as Orzag says, to now embrace an honest plan like McCain's (repealing health care tax exemption while offering a $10K tax credit, M.I.M.) would be "awkward."
So instead they lied.
...As soon as he's elected, Obama begins scheming as to how he can tax people's health insurance -- this time, not bothering to offer the $10,000 tax credit, which would make people net-neutral on the deal. He wants to tax them more. So no tax credit.
And since he just got done demagoguing the issue, he has to do it secretly. So he gets together with Orzag and Gruber to repeal the exemption over the course of years, as the "Cadillac Plan" threshold fails to keep pace with actual inflation.
So where are we now? Well, according to Gruber, we are 20 years away from all plans being taxed at 40% rate, which means that most employers won't offer them, and will just dump people on to the government exchanges.
They'll give people some cash in lieu of health care-- which will be taxed (unlike the health care benefits, making the middle class triple losers on the deal).
And the MSM is embargoing this, instead choosing to talk about Kim Kardashian's asshole.
Well, because the Obama Lapdog Media, like Gruber and the Democrats, all think Americans are too stupid to figure all this out.

Well, then why is it that many Americans can see through the Obama Regime lies, because they're living through higher health premiums, loss of coverage, not being able to find meaningful work after losing a job.

That's how Gruber's lies were initially found, a guy who lost his health care coverage began researching and found Gruber talking about the "stupidity of the American voter."  They weren't found by the corrupt media who, unlike 40 years ago, are engaging in aiding All The President's Cover-Ups.

Now imagine Jonathan Gruber had been a member of the Bush Administration and claimed all the WMD evidence in Iraq was fabricated...the howls of outrage in the Corrupt Media and Democrat Party would be deafening.

Friday, November 14, 2014

UNBELIEVABLE! Muslims Throw Woman Out Of National Cathedral For Saying The Words "Jesus Christ"

The secularized Episcopal Church allowed Muslims to use the 100 year old National Cathedral as a mosque today (IBD).
As the Washington Post explained, "Organizers said they are seeking to make a statement by having Muslim leaders come and hold their service in such a visible Christian house of worship."
Who are these "organizers"? Members of known Muslim Brotherhood front groups, including the Council on American-Islamic Relations and the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA). The Justice Department has identified both as belonging to the Hamas wing of the radical Brotherhood. It's also implicated them in a Hamas conspiracy to raise millions for Palestinian suicide bombers. These co-sponsors of the National Cathedral jumuah ("for invited guests only") remain unindicted co-conspirators in a major terror case.
CAIR is so toxic the FBI won't do outreach with the group. But cathedral clergy rolled out prayer rugs for it.
Another co-sponsor is the ADAMS (All Dulles Area Muslim Society) mosque of Northern Virginia, which the Brotherhood controls through deed-holder ISNA.
"We want the world to see the Christian community is partnering with us and is supporting our religious freedom in the same way we are calling for religious freedom for all minorities in Muslim countries," an ADAMS spokesman claimed.
Really? We don't recall ADAMS demanding Palestinians to stop denying Jews access to the Temple Mount. Or the Brotherhood to stop burning Coptic churches. Or the Saudis to stop persecuting non-Muslims.
We'll believe such interfaith efforts are real when ADAMS opens its own building for Christian prayers.
And look at what happens when a woman objecting to the use of a Christian church as a mosque by the same people who claim they want religious freedom (NBC Washington).
"Jesus Christ died on that cross over there!" a woman said loudly, immediately after beginning announcements were made. He is the reason why we are to worship only him. Jesus Christ is our lord and savior!"
As she spoke, a man attempted to touch her arm, but she moved away from him several times.
She continued in a loud voice, "We have built, and allowed you here in mosques across this country. Why can't you worship in your mosque, and leave our churches alone?"


The reason, ma'am, was made pretty clear in 1998 by CAIR's co-founder, when he was quoted as saying at a speech in Fremont, CA (Discover the Networks).
"Islam isn't in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant. The Koran … should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on Earth." 
Also, if there's supposed to be an "Interfaith dialogue" why then do reports indicate that nine of 10 countries oppressive to Christians are Islamic nations?

Wednesday, November 12, 2014

New Jonathan Gruber Video...Refers To American Voter As "Stupid" Again

Megyn Kelly played a new video last night of Obamacare architect Jonathan Gruber claiming American voters are "stupid" (Mediaite).


Gruber had said last year that a “lack of transparency” and “the stupidity of the American voter” helped the law get passed. Gruber admitted today that was inappropriate and insisted it was just an off-the-cuff mistake.
Kelly teed up the new clip (a five-second soundbite during a speech Gruber gave last year) by saying he was explaining how Democrats “played with the language of the Obamacare law.”
She then played the video, in which Gruber was talking about getting the law passed, and then said, “The American voters are too stupid the understand the difference.”
 There needs to be Congressional Hearings into this.

Tuesday, November 11, 2014

Veterans Day 2014

No "thank you" is big enough for those who have and are serving this nation by wearing the uniform of our armed services.



It is because of your sacrifice and service that we can still live in this, the greatest nation in history, and exercise the freedoms too many of us take for granted.

To all veterans, and especially to my father (US Army / Texas National Guard) my step-grandfather (USN Seabees - Pacific Theatre WWII) and my grandfather (USAAF Air Cadet, killed in training), thank you for your service.

Obamacare Architect Admits They Had To Lie To About The Bill To Take Advantage of American Voter "Stupidity"

The cat is out of the bag! Obamacare is like the President it is named after..."the greatest hoax ever perpetuated on the American people" (to paraphrase Clint Eastwood).

Many of us knew it all along, but the "architect" of the Obamacare law admits they needed a "lack of transparency" to get the bill through Congress and to dupe the stupid American voter (Daily Caller/Fox News).
(Jonathan) Gruber, the MIT professor who served as a technical consultant to the Obama administration during ObamaCare’s design, also made clear during a panel quietly captured on video that the individual mandate, which was only upheld by the Supreme Court because it was a tax, was not actually a tax.


This bill was written in a tortured way to make sure CBO did not score the mandate as taxes. If CBO scored the mandate as taxes, the bill dies. Okay, so it’s written to do that.  In terms of risk-rated subsidies, if you had a law which said that healthy people are going to pay in – you made explicit healthy people pay in and sick people get money, it would not have passed… Lack of transparency is a huge political advantage. And basically, call it the stupidity of the American voter or whatever, but basically that was really, really critical for the thing to pass… Look, I wish Mark was right that we could make it all transparent, but I’d rather have this law than not.”
[The video was from an Oct. 17, 2013 event hosted by the University of Pennsylvania.]
This is Enron-style fraud, except the scum in the Democrat Party and this creep won't go to jail for defrauding the American people.  But not just that, where are the howls of outrage from the media? If this had been someone in the Bush Administration, claiming they had to manipulate information and not be "transparent" about the sources of WMD's in Iraq, the media would be calling for Congress to impeach.

Of course we know the Democrat's claims about "lies" to go to war in Iraq were made up out of thin air. But isn't it revealing that the Democrat Party will accuse a Republican President of "lying" to go to war, but will actively engage in lying to forward their agenda, all while looking down on their voters as stupid.

The Democrats deserved everything they got at the polls last week...and more.  Now the Republican must get rid of this, or else they deserve to be replaced by people who will.

Breitbart (from Aug. 7, 2014) Democrats Distance Themselves From Obamacare Architect Gruber

Saturday, November 08, 2014

Dr. Ben Carson? Good Man, But Not Quite Ready For President

Now that the 2014 mid-terms are over, one political season has ended, and another will begin...meaning the 2016 run for President.

But now, rumors are flying that one likely contender for the GOP nomination is about to be the first to throw his hat in the ring (CNN).
On Friday, amid media reports about Carson's preparations to possibly run for president, Carson and Fox confirmed that his relationship with the cable news channel had been severed.
...While contributing to Fox programs, he openly flirted with the possibility of a presidential run in 2016. In September, he told the radio host Hugh Hewitt that the chances of a run were "reasonably good," but that he was waiting for a "few more months."
It's been a couple of months, at least. Earlier this week, The Washington Times (which publishes columns by Carson) reported that a flattering documentary about him, titled "A Breath of Fresh Air: A New Prescription for America," is set to air this weekend in local markets across the country.
"A production company run by conservative personality Armstrong Williams filmed the documentary and is paying for the airtime," The Times reported. "Mr. Williams is also Mr. Carson's business manager."
...Carson said in a statement Friday evening that "at this time, no decision has been made to run for president."
The fact that Dr. Carson is now separated from Fox News and has this prime time special is a good indicator of what he's thinking about.  But would a Carson run for the Presidency be good?

Make no mistake. Dr. Carson's story of his beginnings, and how he rose to his success as a neurosuregon, is an inspiring one and an example of the greatness of America. He had a courage few have shown, when in 2013 he criticized the direction America was headed without directly mentioning Richard Milhous Hussein-Obama's name, and while Obama was sitting at the same table. His words were right on the money, but does that speech make him Presidential material?

In my mind, no. Any one of us could have given the same speech in front of the President, but it doesn't necessarily qualify us to be President.

Remember back in 2008, during the Democrat Primary, Hillary Rotten Clinton said the following:
I think that I have a lifetime of experience that I will bring to the White House. Sen. John McCain has a lifetime of experience that he'd bring to the White House. And Sen. Obama has a speech he gave in 2002.
There is no doubt that Dr. Carson is an admirable and inspirational person. But if some are pushing him to run for President based on his National Prayer Breakfast speech, aren't we as conservatives treating Dr. Carson as Democrats did Obama?

Joe Cunningham wrote the following back in August at RedState.
What makes Ben Carson eligible to be president? What political experience does he have? I don’t dislike the guy, mind you, but in terms of realistic chances of pulling the country (and the world) from the cesspool it’s gone into, what can he bring to the table?
Under a Republican House and Senate, a President Ben Carson can repeal Obamacare… then what? He gives Republicans a chance to escape the whole racist banner Democrats have put them under? Of course not. Carson would just join the ranks of Herman Cain and Clarence Thomas as “tokens” for the Republican Party. Our image wouldn’t change that much with our political opponents.
...This cult of personality surrounding the good doctor is too in love with what he says and not with what he will actually be able to do. My biggest fear in these types of situations is what happens when that personality flops in a campaign – some of those devotees take their ball and go home, proclaiming how done they are with the party and the process. However, he is almost guaranteed to flop as he is now – a politically inexperienced man with a quote that is now easy to exploit and use against him. Further, the latter betrays the former. Someone with political experience would (should?) know better than to make a quote like this because it will hurt their chances in an upcoming election.
It’s not that I don’t think Ben Carson is qualified to be in the political world, but I definitely don’t think he’s ready for the biggest political job there is. The best presidents have political experience under their belt before they reach the top. If Carson wants to run for president one day, then it is my hope that he does. Just not in 2016. Let the man get some experience under his belt first. Then we can push him to run.
Which is true. We recently recalled the 50th anniversary of Ronald Reagan's political debut "A Time For Choosing." Keep in mind that this speech did not elevate Reagan to the White House. Sure, he'd been President of the Screen Actors Guild, but that's a different beast from being President of the United States. Instead, Reagan used his skills at SAG and learned the political ropes as two successful terms being Governor of California. This gave him the opportunity to show voters how his political philosophy worked and would work as President when he first ran (unsuccessfully against incumbent Gerald Ford for the GOP nomination) in 1976, and successfully ran in 1980.

Ben Carson doesn't have that.

Plus, what all do we know about Carson's beliefs on several issues important to conservatives? Here's one that Dana Loesch found which she said is a "deal breaker" for her, and it is for me as well.
(GLENN) BECK: Do I have the right to own a semiautomatic weapon?
CARSON: It depsnds on where you live. I think if you live in the midst of a lot of people, and I’m afraid that that semi-automatic weapon is going to fall into the hands of a crazy person, I would rather you not have it.
In this interview, Carson says that our Second Amendment natural rights are predicated upon where we live, completely antithetical to the Founders's intent and written law. 
Later, Carson said this: 
The caller said, “I’ve heard some conflicting things from people and I’m curious what your thoughts are on the Second Amendment and what this administration is doing to gut it, right now?”
Dr. Carson said, “Well, it’s always good to hear it from the horse’s mouth. First of all, I am a very strong believer in the Second Amendment. The Second Amendment is there for a very good reason, and I think our Founding Fathers were very wise to recognize that the populace could be a tremendous aid to the military. They could form their own militia; they would be a tremendous deterrent for invasion.”
He then invokes Piers Morgan's tank argument as an example of restrictions. He added:
“You do need to have a discussion about how we deal with situations where there is a tremendous amount of crime and easy access to the kinds of weapons that can create a lot of damage quickly. But that needs to be done in context of always preserving Second Amendment rights.”
We need to have a discussion on how we deal with easy access to weapons that "create a lot of damage quickly?" Sorry, but this sounds vague and seems like he's trying to say "assault weapon" without risking penalty in the conservative sphere for borrowing Bloomberg/Feinstein language. 
By the way, the caller was referring to Carson's own quote above, or, "from the horse's mouth," so to speak. Perhaps I've missed it, but I haven't seen Carson address his statement in the video above. So where does Carson stand on this issue? And why are we seriously considering presidential support for a candidate when we don't know where he stands on one of our most basic natural rights? 
Exactly! I know we as a nation are desperate for real leadership. But it shouldn't be at the expense of giving away a portion of our rights, or because we have found our own "cult of personality" that we can run against the Democrat's version in two years.

Thursday, November 06, 2014

Liberal Chick Says "George Jefferson" Who Founded America, Would Be Angry About "Voter Suppression"

Warning: I am not responsible for any monitors damaged after having a drink spit out upon them in laughter (BizPac Review).


America's Founder - George Jefferson
Is she for real? Liberal Chick says our founder, George Jefferson, would not be pleased with the Conservatives’ mid-term win.
I’m not sure if she’s right — George Jefferson was always talking about, “Movin’ on Up!”

Does that mean Weezy was the first, First Lady?

I just about choked to death because I laughed so hard seeing this, but the sad thing is, where was she when American History was being taught, if it was taught?

Even worse, that ding-a-ling Nancy Pelosi agrees with Liberal Chick that voter suppression is why the Democrats lost.

No word if San Fran Nan thinks George Jefferson is the founder of America.

Wednesday, November 05, 2014

Now It's Time To Hold Their Feet to The Fire

Yes, last night was a historic and great night.

But, let's be honest. As Donald Rumsfeld once said, sometimes you go to war with the army you have.  Frankly, we're going to have to spend the next two years not only getting ready for 2016, but putting pressure on both the House and Senate to act on what America clearly wants last night.

I'm not sure the new "leadership" will be up to the job.

Take Mitch McConnell. A few days ago, he said a Republican Senate would use the Constitutionally-granted 'power of the purse' to restrain Obama and his threat of executive amnesty.

What did Mitch say today, after voters gave him the power? (UK Daily Mail).
'There will be no government shutdown, so no default on the national debt,' said McConnell, previewing a US Senate under Republican control
A full Obamacare repeal isn't on his mind but 'If I had the ability, obviously I'd get rid of it'
What do you think this election was all about, Mitch? One, it was Obamacare. CNSNews reports that 100 percent of the candidates who won last night all campaigned on repealing Obamacare.  And, despite the GOP establishment hacks like Karl Rove, and the RINO-friendly US Chamber of Commerce's desire, most of America rejects amnesty for illegal aliens. Even in ultra-liberal Oregon, a constitutional amendment to give licenses to illegals was defeated almost two to one by voters.

America spoke loudly last night to the new GOP majority and the President...No amnesty and get rid of Obamacare.

Now it's time to hold their feet to the fire. If McConnell is going to be majority leader, then maybe we need to heckle him into action by helping him find his manhood.



Or, if he and the weeping wino Boehner refuse to lead, then step aside and let those who have a backbone push forward with what America wants!

Breitbart: Mark Levin to GOP Establishment: Don't Surrender Power of the Purse During Lame Duck Session

What's This? Obama, Jarrett & HHS Hosting Open Enrollment Conference Call on Friday With Insurance Brokers

A longtime friend who is in the insurance industry told me and a few others about this. While doing some digging, I found this in a web search (Godlyke Productions).
Not sure how I can prove this but seriously, I just received this
I had to sign up as an insurance agent on the Federal health website. due to our participation in selling health insurance. You have to take courses and pass tests, etc...no big deal.
So I'm sitting here and I get this email in my box:
It has the White House at the top and reads as follows:
"You are invited to join a conference call on Friday, November 7th at 4:00 PM ET with President Barack Obama, Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Sylvia M. Burwell, and Senior Advisor Valerie Jarrett to discuss the upcoming open enrollment period for the health insurance marketplaces under the Affordable Care Act. We encourage you to circulate this invitation to all of your members, volunteers, and partners who will engage on enrollment efforts during the open enrollment period from November 15th-February 15th." 
This call is off the record and not for press purposes. 
LOL..anyone think I should take part?
Too funny..as if I'm gonna waste my time listening to these idiots....
I did find the same text from the e-mail, via this Facebook link.

What does it mean in a supposedly free nation when the President, his top adviser, and the HHS secretary want to host a conference call with insurance adjusters because the government has essentially taken over the health care system?




Call the WAAAAMbulance! Obama Comes Across As Petulant Little Child In Press Conference

Richard Milhous Hussein-Obama held a press conference earlier this afternoon after the butt-kicking he and his party took in the mid-terms last night (See BS).
"The American people sent a message, one that they've sent for several elections now. They expect the people they elect to work as hard as they do," Mr. Obama said in a press conference the day after the election. "To everyone who voted, I want you to know that I hear you."
That's obviously not the case. Obama, like too many in the GOP-establishment consultant class (ie Karl Rove) do not understand that last night was a repudiation of Obama's lackluster economy, overseeing the rise of ISIS, unaffordable health-care thanks to Obamacare, and threats of amnesty by (unconstitutional) executive fiat.

Even the lackluster GOP chair Rinse Preebus gets it.
" In word and tone he refused to take responsibility or even express humility," said Priebus. "He seemed to suggest the only ideas he's wiling to listen to are his own, old, failed ones. That's the same my-way-or-the-highway approach that the American people rejected."
Priebus added, "Is he detached or in denial? As the president  said, his policies were on the ballot. The American people rejected them. Period.
Here's why. Look at how the Narcissist in Chief came across today in these two clips from his press conference. An algore-styled sigh when ABC's Jonathan Karl confronted him on why he's only met with Mitch McConnell twice in six years.


Then, he went off on Major Garrett



At USA Today, James S. Robbins wrote:
In fact, the Republicans have not been the obstructionists; their governing agenda has been dying quietly in the Senate. The GOP-led House has passed dozens of bills that Democratic Majority Leader Harry Reid refused to bring up for a vote. Reid insulated the White House from having to take a position on the legislation, leaving the president was free to attack a "do-nothing Republican House."
But with Republicans about to take control of both chambers, the dam will be broken. Obama will see waves of mostly Republican-crafted legislation cross his desk and he will no longer have the luxury of ignoring it. He will either have to veto the bills, or sign them. But he will no longer be able to say Congress is doing nothing.
The president does not need to hector the Congress to take action. They're going to act anyway. Republicans will spend the next two years sending him bill after bill.
The president should be careful what he wishes for, because he is certain to get it.
And narcissists don't like it when they are called out.




Tuesday, November 04, 2014

Five GOP Gains in US Senate, Tight Race In Virginia Between Gillespie and Warner, Obama Going Full Mussolini - GOP Has Six!

At this point, (10:30 pm EDT) the Republican Party has picked up five US Senate seats, one short of the six needed for majority control (NY Slimes).
Republicans on Tuesday picked up the fifth of six seats they needed to gain control of the Senate, as voters in Arkansas and Colorado ousted the Democratic incumbents Mark Pryor and Mark Udall, and elected Republicans in West Virginia, Montana and South Dakota.
Representative Cory Gardner knocked off Mr. Udall in a state that President Obama had won twice and where Democrats had pointed to a strong ground game that they said would hold off the Republican challenge.
In Arkansas, Representative Tom Cotton, the Republican candidate, defeated Mr. Pryor after hammering the Democrat’s ties to Mr. Obama in a state where the president is deeply unpopular. Mr. Cotton, an Iraq combat veteran and a first-term congressman, won despite feverish campaigning by former President Bill Clinton on behalf of Mr. Pryor, according to projections by The Associated Press.
In West Virginia, Shelley Moore Capito, a Republican, easily defeated her Democratic opponent to replace Senator Jay Rockefeller, who is retiring after 30 years in the Senate.
Mike Rounds, a former Republican governor of South Dakota, won the third pickup to add to the Republican gains, according to projections by The A.P. And in Montana, Representative Steve Daines, a Republican, won a seat that had been in Democratic hands for decades.
The victories bring the Republican Party closer to its goal of taking the Senate back from the Democrats eight years after losing the chamber amid a wave of angry voter sentiment aimed at President George W. Bush and the Iraq war.
Per Breitbart.com live radio, Tom Tillis is currently leading in North Carolina by 50,000 votes, Jodi Ernst appears to be headed to victory in Iowa, which would bring the totals to seven.

Here in Virginia, the Senate race between incumbent Mark Warner and Ed Gillespie is closer than polls had been showing. Gillespie had been trailing in the polls by double digits, but narrowed the gap.

Part of what helped Gillespie was this brilliant ad played during the Washington Redskins Monday Night Football game.


I just saw this Tweet:


Per CNN, Richard Milhous Hussein-Obama is acting defiant, fulfilling Mark Levin's prediction that Obama would go "full Mussolini."
"one White House official said you can bet that the president is going to take executive action on immigration. They said John Boehner had his chance and he blew it and so the president will move forward and keep his promise on that.

David Purdue wins, so that's six! GOP Control of the US Senate!  Ernst wins in Iowa as well.


Stick A Fork In Abortion Barbie!

It's a landslide in Texas for Greg Abbott, as he rolls over the Abortion Barbie, Wendy Davis (Politico).


Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott, a Republican, romped to victory over Democratic state Sen. Wendy Davis in the Lone Star State’s gubernatorial race on Tuesday.
According to The Associated Press, Abbott trounced Davis 58 to 41 percent with 3 percent of precincts reporting.
Davis catapulted to national fame in the summer of 2013 after filibustering a restrictive abortion measure. The state senator briefly offered Democrats hope that they could energize Hispanics, young people, women and other minorities and could put the deep-red Lone Star State into play.
But once Davis entered the race, her campaign was beset by a series of missteps, and Abbott maintained a wide lead throughout the contest.
The state attorney general ran on a slate of textbook Republican issues —jobs, the economy, opposition to the Obama administration, support for gun rights — while Davis zeroed in on education and broader economic opportunities.
Abbott trounced Davis when it came to women votes.

Dan Patrick also won Lt. Governor's race.

Game Over, Abortion Barbie!



Monday, November 03, 2014

Virginia 11th District Voters: Vote Scholte & Gillespie To Stop Obama Agenda...Plus, Final Thoughts About Tomorrow

OK, tomorrow is the day, folks.

If you are like me, a resident of Virginia's 11th Congressional District, I'm asking you to join me in voting for Suzanne Scholte for US Congress and Ed Gillespie for US Senate.

If you're in the 10th Congressional District, please vote for Barbara Comstock, who has been a great Delegate in the Virginia legislature and will be a worthy successor to retiring Congressman Frank Wolf.

I have to admit, Up until the last couple of weeks, I had been agnostic toward the idea of voting for Gillespie. He's struck me as an establishment choice who had been hostile to Reaganesque conservatism, based on a number of statements he made before. However, Mark Warner is hardly the "moderate," "bipartisan" Senator the media has spun him as. Warner, like VA 11 Congressman "Jihad" Gerry Connolly, has been a loyal soldier in blindly pushing Obama's radical socialist agenda without question.  The deciding factor was Warner's involvement in attempting to discuss job opportunities for the daughter of VA State Senator Phillip Puckett, in an attempt to stop him from switching parties and hamstringing Governor Terry McAwful's partisan scheme to foist Medicaid expansion on Virginia, which is essentially state-wide Obamacare.

By doing that, Warner is putting the interests of his party over the opinion and desires of Virginians and Americans, who increasingly don't like Obamacare.  Same is true of Connolly, who attacks people targeted by the Obama IRS(S) and walked out on the Benghazi families. It is "My Party, Right or Wrong," instead of "what is best for the country as a whole?"

Democrats who have this blind loyalty to this disaster of a President need to be removed from office because they swore an oath to the Constitution, not their party or their President. When any President is willing to act in such a lawless manner, never before seen in the history of this Republic, the best interest of the nation should come first.

So do I have any predictions?  No, I'm not sure what will happen.  At the very least, I think the GOP will squeak out a small minority. I'm concerned about voter fraud, as we've seen James O'Keefe show how easy it is.  I'm also concerned that the GOP establishment is becoming so cocky that they are beginning to act in a tyrannical manner within the party, trying to stifle debate and the voices of Tea Party conservatives.

Regardless of what happens tomorrow, the GOP badly needs a makeover, especially for 2016. It has to become a party once again of "bold colors, not pale pastels." I sometimes have wondered if we might be looking at more of a blowout if the GOP wasn't afraid to state what they are for, and where Obama and the Democrats have gone wrong, instead of being too weak-kneed.  Stand for something, don't be afraid.

Most importantly, we have to select a winning, conservative candidate for 2016.

So, let's vote tomorrow...and pray afterwards to God to Bless and heal our nation.

Moochelle Obama Makes Plea To "Our Community" Vote Democrat No Matter Who Is On The Ticket

"I'm a sheeple, your a sheeple, he's a sheeple, she's a sheeple...."



That's what Moochelle Obama implied when speaking with to Rowland Martin on TV One (Breitbart). There's a video at the link, but I won't embed autoplay videos.
"Thats my message to voters, this isn't about Barack, It's not about person on that ballot, its about you, and for most of the people we are talking to, a Democratic ticket is the clear ticket that we should be voting on regardless of who said what or did this, that shouldn't even come into the equation." 
But she also said...
"Voting is critical no matter who's on the ballot," the first lady said. "And that's one of the things we have to continuously work on in our communities of new voters — folks who maybe voted for the first time because they voted for Barack Obama, young people who voted for the first time because they were inspired by this president."
The key to this is that the interview with Martin, as well with this interview earlier today for a black Sirus XM radio station, all address the black community.

Isn't the President supposed to represent all of America? At least that's what Richard Milhous Hussein-Obama told us on David Letterman back in 2012.  But here the Obamas and other Democrats essentially telling blacks "Don't think for yourself. Just pull the lever next to the 'D'."

Ben Stein really hits the nail on the head when he made this comment the other day.

“What the White House is trying to do is racialize all politics and they’re especially trying to tell the African-American voter that the GOP is against letting them have a chance at a good life in this economy, and that’s just a complete lie. ...I watch with fascination — with incredible fascination — all the stories about how the Democratic politicians, especially Hillary [Rodham Clinton], are trying to whip up the African-American vote and say, ‘Oh, the Republicans have policies against black people in terms of the economy.’ But there are no such policies. It’s all a way to racialize voting in this country. This president is the most racist president there has ever been in America. He is purposely trying to use race to divide Americans.”

(VIDEO) James O'Keefe Shows How Easy It Is To Get Ballot Of Inactive Voters In North Carolina

On the eve of Election Day, James O'Keefe of Project Veritas has just released a video showing just how easy it is to get a ballot of an inactive voter in North Carolina.

The result? It creates a ripe environment for voter fraud.

O'Keefe noted that only once did an official ask for an ID, especially when it is not required.

Now you know why photo ID is needed?

Watch the video:

Sunday, November 02, 2014

"Jihad" Gerry Connolly Politicizes VA Tech Shooting Against Suzanne Scholte In Mailer; What About His Support For Funding Hamas?

I'd mentioned last week how Democrat "Jihad" Gerry Connolly could face an upset in his reelection bid against Suzanne Scholte for the VA 11th District US Congressional Seat.

He must be feeling the heat, because he's running a dirty, smear campaign against Scholte to deflect from his record as an obedient soldier in pushing the Obama/Pelosi extreme socialist agenda, as well as being an apologist for Islamic terrorism.

Now, "Jihad" Gerry is sending this mailer below, using the 2007 Virginia Tech shooting as a political tool to attack Scholte's support for the Second Amendment.



Robin Pyle, a VA Tech student back in 2007, sent out a fundraising e-mail expressing her disgust with Connolly.
I attended Virginia Tech shortly after the terrible tragedy in 2007. I went to school with many students who lost friends, and I witnessed firsthand the impact those events had on the Blacksburg community.
That’s why I find it so disgusting that my Congressman, Gerry Connolly, is willing to politicize that tragedy in an effort to score political points.
Connolly is sending offensive mail attacking Suzanne Scholte, using human tragedy as a political weapon. We deserve better discourse from our elected officials, period.
Suzanne Scholte knows that we deserve better than political attacks based on dark, emotional appeals. We deserve a real conversation, and real leadership, on serious issues like gun violence.
Connolly also sent out a similar mailer below,



that was addressed in the following Scholte ad.



Well since "Jihad" Gerry is using the murder of innocent children a political issue, maybe the following questions need to be asked of him.

If Connolly care so much about children, why then does he support the murder of unborn children after 20 weeks and call it a "choice?"  Connolly has a 100 percent pro abortion record, according to the National Right to Life Committee.

Finally, how can "Jihad Gerry" talk about gun violence while he supports our tax dollars funding the Hamas-led Palestinian government in Gaza, who have admitted to the killing of three Israeli teens who were kidnapped earlier this year, and whose bombs and terror attacks have killed more Israeli children and civilians.  Connolly is also willing to take campaign contributions from allies of the Muslim Brotherhood as well.

If you ask me, it's Connolly who supports an extreme agenda that is not only un-American, but also not representative of Northern Virginia. It's why Connolly must be voted out of office this Tuesday.