Saturday, December 20, 2014

The Blood Of Two NYPD Officers Is On Your Hands...

Al Sharpton,
New York Mayor Bill De Commie-o,
Eric Holder,
Barack Hussein Obama

After using the deaths of  Michael Brown and Eric Gardner to attack police as being motivated by race, the chickens have (sadly) come home to rooost.

Two NYPD police officers were killed execution-style this afternoon in Brooklyn, the apparent assalant, Ismaaiyl Brinsley, shot himself to death later.

But before he carried out his killing, Brinsley posted the following on Instagram, specifically addressing the deaths of Garner and Brown, which Sharpton, Holder, Obama and Mayor DeCommieo have been agitating about.

More images from The Pundit Press...

Notice the blood spots on his pants. According to sources, Brinsley had shot someone in Baltimore earlier today and drove up to New York City to kill police officers.

More at Heavy: Ismaaiyl Brinsley - Five Fast Facts You Need To Know

Got News has much more on Brinsley, including his criminal record and social media.

At the press conference tonight, police turned their backs on the cop-bashing mayor.

Friday, December 19, 2014

End Of Year Thoughts Before Winter Blogging Break (and Pondering the Blogging Future)

Hope your December is going well, that you’ve got all that Christmas shopping done, and will be enjoying time with family and friends soon.

A lot has been going on in the last week and I haven’t had the opportunity to comment on it. But I was thinking about some of this while I was watching a made-for-TV movie from the 1970s about Dwight D. Eisenhower during the time he led the United States and our allies to victory in Europe against the Nazi regime of Adolf Hitler.

The movie began at the time Pearl Harbor was attacked 73 years ago this month. After footage of the attacks played, the well-known speech by President Franklin D. Roosevelt was shown, in which the asked the Congress to declare war on Japan.

Anyone who knows me knows the World War II era has been one of my favorite eras of history. That being said, I was struck, watching FDR’s speech, as well as seeing (then) General Eisenhower and the Chief of Staff, Gen. George Marshall being depicted.

“Where are leaders like this today?,” I asked myself.

One might disagree (rightfully) with a lot of FDR’s domestic policies. But when it came to America being attacked and facing the threat of Nazism and Imperial Japan, the entire nation rallied around him on the war effort.  There was a resolve and a moral clarity. We did not go looking for the fight, but when we were attacked, we didn’t run from it.

Compare that to today, when the person who has stepped in FDRs shoes (and is also a member of his party), is willing to make deals with oppressive regimes like the Cuban communists, the Iranian mullahs, and negotiate the release of terrorists for a suspected US Army deserter, while his party attacks our military and intelligence gathering community as “torturers” as a way of extracting political revenge on the previous President.  Or, how a cyber-attack on a US corporation is met with silence. There is not the moral clarity we had back in 1941. Instead, since the 1960s, we’ve had a moral relativism pushed by liberals that says we are to blame for attacks upon us. Or, as Hillary Rotten Clinton says, we need to “empathize” with our enemies.

Can you imagine FDR saying something like that about either Tojo or Hitler? Likewise, FDR wouldn’t have engaged in some outdoor pleasure activity for cameras to see after declaring December 7, 1941 “a day of infamy.”

But it’s also the entire political system in both parties (with few exceptions). Deals are made behind closed doors. Both sides represent only the special interests who give them big donations, while the rest of us work harder for less, and lose a little more freedom in the process.

Obama and his party may have lost the power in Congress in last month’s mid-terms, but as we head into 2015, I’m skeptical, especially after the big spending bill pushed through last week, about the Republican Party doing anything significant to check his abuses of power, especially with the “leadership” (and I use that term loosely) that makes up the new majority.

So, as we look toward 2015, I am, barring any breaking news or anything major that I feel like commenting on, planning to take the rest of December and first few days of the New Year off from blogging as a way of catching up on things around the homestead and “recharging the batteries,” so to speak.

A lot has gone in this last year with me personally, so my mind and energies have been other places. It’s been easy to think, “What’s the use! Someone else might say it better” as an excuse not to post, and yes, posting has been down from previous years.

This blog has been a labor of love, I have not done this for a profit, nor have I posted a “tip jar” and I have no desire to.  In case you don’t know, January 5th will mark the ninth year of this blog’s existence, and the blogosphere (as well as the State of the Nation) isn’t the same as it was in 2006. Things change and grow, that’s a part of life. Now perhaps it is time for me to ponder a lot of personal decisions, as well as the future of this blog…is this still the forum I should remain in, or is there perhaps another outlet for me to participate in that engages a wider audience.

Whatever I decide, I plan to be back here by January 5th. Until that time, I do plan stay in touch via Twitter, and maybe some Facebook posts. So, feel free to keep in touch via Twitter or e-mail.
And if I don’t talk to you before, I wish you and your loved ones a very Merry Christmas, as well as a Happy and Blessed 2015.

Saturday, December 13, 2014

This GOP Can Go To Hell For Siding With Obama's Unconstitutional Amnesty

If you recall, the Republican Party ran candidates who promised, if elected, they would fight Obamacare and Obama's unconstitutional executive amnesty.

But once the midterms of 2014 were history, and the GOP was rewarded with big majorities, they went back listening to Karl Rove and the special interests like the US Chamber of Commerce instead of the voters.

Tonight, they told the voters who sent them to DC to go to Hell, after Ted Cruz, one of the few in DC who has an ounce of courage, forced them to put up or shut up on their promises.

But too many in the GOP betrayed you, me, and all of America, no too long ago this evening, by siding with Obama on his unconstitutional amnesty.

Use this list to Name them and Shame Them....
Lamar Alexander (R-TN), Kelly Ayotte (R-NH), John Barrasso (R-WY), Dan Coats (R-IN), Thad Cochran (R-MS), Susan Collins (R-ME), Bob Corker (R-TN), John Cornyn (R-TX) Mike Enzi (R-WY), Jeff Flake (R-AZ) Lindsey Graham-nesty (R-SC), Orrin Hatch (R-UT) Dean Heller (R-NV), Ron Johnson (R-WI) Mark Kirk (R-IL), John McCain (R-AZ), Mitch "Seen My Balls" McConnell (R-KY), Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), Pat Toomey (R-PA) and Roger Wicker (R-MS).
These so-called "Republicans" put their own egos and self-interest above those of the nation and the Constitution they swore an oath to defend.  In my opinion, they are bigger traitors to this nation than Obama, because when push came to shove, they chose NOT to stand up to his lawlessness and unconstitutional amnesty.

Oh, but next year, they'll fight! Spare me that nonsense. That was always the cowardly drunk John Boehner's excuse when it came to explaining every time he surrendered to Obama. Next time would be different. What happens? Next time comes around it's the same old game. But many of these blowhards will campaign and fundraise off stopping Obamacare and amnesty and don't have the will to fight it.

The same goes for Reince Priebus and the RNC. Stopping Obamacare and amnesty is only a fundraising ploy. They have shown their true colors tonight. This GOP only listens to what Karl Rove and the special interests, who buy them like the cheapest trick on a street corner. tell them to do, All while the rest of us get screwed in the process, and a little more of what was once the America we love is squandered away for political expediency by a Congressional leadership of a gutless eunuch in the Senate and a sobbing drunk in the House.

As far as I'm concerned, if this GOP and it's leadership cannot or will not stand up to a dictatorial chief executive, they can all go to Hell, and until the day that this putrid leadership in the House, Senate and Party level is flushed out, I have zero confidence in them to do anything that deserves them having power.

Wednesday, December 10, 2014

GOP Needs A Leadership Overhaul, From Reince Priebus On Down

Get ready America, because the Weeping Wino John Boehner and Mitch McConnell are selling America out, just as we expected (TPNN).
With a government shutdown looming, House Republicans, led by Speaker John Boehner, have compromised with Democrats in agreeing on a $1.1 trillion omnibus spending bill, a behemoth temporary stopgap that encompasses over 1,600 pages. 
Boehner is hoping for a full House vote on the measure by Thursday, which breaks his pledge to give Americans “at least 72 hours” to read every bill, a promise he made on Feb. 18, 2010. 
“One of my first orders of business would be to post every bill online for at least 72 hours before it comes to the floor of the House for a vote,” Boehner then promised. 
Considering its massive size, it is extremely doubtful that any congressman will read the entire bill in only two days. Perhaps, Mr. Boehner is saying to the American voter, as Nancy Pelosi did in 2009, “We have to pass the bill to see what’s in the bill.” 
The bill, agreed upon by both party’s leaderships, would fund the entire government through the current fiscal year, which ends on September 30, with the exception of the Department of Homeland Security, which will run out of money again on February 27, 2015. 
“I think the fix is in,” Congressman Matt Salmon (R-AZ) told The Hill  in regards to the establishment of both parties joining together against the will of the American citizen in ramming through the spending bill. 
Rep. Salmon said that he wanted Republican leaders to bring the bill to the floor earlier with stronger anti-amnesty language, rather than waiting just days before a shutdown would occur on December 12. 
“I’ve implored them [GOP leadership]. I’ve begged them. I’ve spoken in various meetings so that we wouldn’t be up against some crisis…This is not the way it’s supposed to be done,” Salmon said. 
“They don’t want you to read it, that’s why! You think they want you to analyze all the mischievous items in there?” Rep. Walter Jones (R-NC) told The Hill. 
“That’s not to squeeze Harry Reid.” Congressman Tim Huelskamp (R-KS) added. “That’s to squeeze us [conservatives],” he concluded. 
As noted, Boehner broke his pledge to give at least 72 hours to read the bill. Well, maybe he can write that excuse off by saying he was drunk when he made that promise.

The bigger issue is that Boehner and these GOP-establishment cowards are enabling and emboldening Obama's unconstitutional amnesty by refusing to fight it. Why? Too afraid to shut down the government is the excuse, because Karl Rove will tell them it turns people off, never mind the voters are adamant against Obama's illegal amnesty.  But, in reality, the GOP establishment likes the amnesty.

This is why a lot of people will not vote, because they think there isn't a dime of difference between the two parties.  There are no good Democrats, and very few good Republicans.  It seems way too many are more interested in doing what's best for the party or for their next election...not what's best for all of America.

The problem is the leadership. The GOP is headed by a bunch of Bushies who are hostile to conservatives. Sure, they'll send out petitions for you to sign opposing Obama's amnesty or Obamacare, but they're fundraising ploys for which the party is only looking out for themselves and the special interests who fund them.

Well, leadership is doing the right thing, NOT doing what might be popular. Fighting Obama's abuses of power by sending out petitions is as feckless and stupid as Obama's "hashtag" campaign. And we're not going to get leadership from this bunch of checked-pants, Country Club Republicans who sit in the positions of power and then try to manipulate the rules to benefit themselves and shut out the grassroots base.

It's way past time the putrid milquetoast Rinse Preebus has his office packed and shown the front door at the RNC and the party is led by a constitutional conservative who will set up a party of "bold colors."  This leader also needs to crack the whip on the House and Senate, but not before they show Bushies like Karl Rove and these other consultants the door.

Tuesday, December 09, 2014

Dianne Feinstein & The Democrats Are Siding With Al-Queda, Islamofascists Against Our Military With Their "Torture Report"

Oh, that sounds mean doesn't it? Well I don't take a word of it back because the truth hurts.

That old arrogant hag from San Fransicko, Dianne Feinstein and her fellow travelers in the Party of Treason (Democrats) in the US Senate decided to play a game of "SQUIRREL" to distract from Romneycare/Obamacare architect Jonathan Gruber being grilled for admitting the whole Obamacare scheme was a lie, as well as their little temper-tantrum on the way out the door after being defeated in November.

Except this distraction is a dangerous one that may get Americans killed.

Feinstein, with the blessing of the Obama Regime, release reports of enhanced interrogration methods used during the Bush administration against the poor, helpless terrorists who belonged to the group and ideology who attacked us on 9/11, despite the possibility that this report might encourage the terrorists Democrats sympathize with to attack more Americans.

Liberal Democrats, like defeated Colorado Democrat Mark Udall, called the release of this report "transparency," never mind that these same hypocrites will do everything to cover up, ignore, and stymie investigations into the Obama Regime's Fast and Furious gunrunning scheme, the Benghazi attack and lies the nation was told in the aftermath, and the IRS auditing the Democrats political enemies.

Even when Congress knew and had been briefed about these methods (WSJ from 2009).
Director of National Intelligence Dennis Blair got it right last week when he noted how easy it is to condemn the enhanced interrogation program "on a bright sunny day in April 2009." Reactions to this former CIA program, which was used against senior al Qaeda suspects in 2002 and 2003, are demonstrating how little President Barack Obama and some Democratic members of Congress understand the dire threats to our nation.
George Tenet, who served as CIA director under Presidents George W. Bush and Bill Clinton, believes the enhanced interrogations program saved lives. He told CBS's "60 Minutes" in April 2007: "I know this program alone is worth more than the FBI, the Central Intelligence Agency and the National Security Agency put together have been able to tell us."
Last week, Mr. Blair made a similar statement in an internal memo to his staff when he wrote that "[h]igh value information came from interrogations in which those methods were used and provided a deeper understanding of the al Qa'ida organization that was attacking this country."
It was not necessary to release details of the enhanced interrogation techniques, because members of Congress from both parties have been fully aware of them since the program began in 2002. We believed it was something that had to be done in the aftermath of the 9/11 terrorist attacks to keep our nation safe. After many long and contentious debates, Congress repeatedly approved and funded this program on a bipartisan basis in both Republican and Democratic Congresses.
The former CIA directors blasted Feinstein's report.
Six former Directors and Deputy Directors of the CIA fired back at the Senate Intelligence Committee with a vehemence almost never seen in the intelligence world.
The former CIA leaders -- including George Tenet, Porter Goss and Michael Hayden -- blasted the Senate report as “one-sided and marred with errors” and called it “a poorly done and partisan attack on the agency that has done the most to protect America after the 9/11 attacks.”
Their 2,500-word rebuttal was posted as an op-ed on the Wall Street Journal website once the report was released. The former intel chiefs are also launching their own website to respond to the attacks on CIA’s post-9/11 activities.
Dianne Feinstein has been deserving of an investigation for a long time. She is a corrupt, arrogant sleazebag who has used her position as a US Senator to enrich her husband, Richard Blum more than once.  Remember too, how she had her staff remove Seasoned Citizens who wanted to let her know their opposition to Obamacare.  See how arrogant she was towards lib Wolf Blitzer on CNN when he asked her about this report potentially harming Americans.

The Democrat Party is the lowest form of scum on the planet. They will attack the police and law enforcement and side with illegal aliens, gang-bangers and violent, Communist-affiliated protesters. They will attack our military and intelligence officials while having more sympathy towards Islamic terrorists instead of Americans or Westerners beheaded or killed by these scum in terror attacks. The Democrats would destroy this country just to get and keep political power and control over every citizen.

Sorry, Dianne and you treasonous Democrats. You went from doing your patriotic act of singing "God Bless America" on the steps of the Capitol the night of 9/11 to stabbing our men and women in unform in the back for partisan political purposes. If one American should die because of this report, you and every Democrat responsible for it will have the blood of Americans on your hands, because you gave aid and comfort to the enemy.

Sunday, December 07, 2014

1992 CBS Report On Obama/Holder Confidante Al Sharpton Shows Signs At His Marches Calling White Man "The Devil," Killing "Crackers"

Remember on David Letterman's show when Richard Milhous Obama said someone who is elected President of the United States is supposed to work for the entire country?

"If you want to be president you have to work for everybody not just for some."
But Obama does not work for everybody, and here's another reason to illustrate that fact. He is appearing on BET (Black Entertainment Television) tomorrow night, where he attacks the United States as a nation deeply rooted in racism (Gateway Pundit).
Obama said racism is “deeply rooted” in our society.
“When you deal with something as deeply rooted as racism or bias in any society you have to realize that it’s going to take some time and you just have to be steady.”
So much for that post racial America promise.
The Washington Times reported:
Addressing protests over minorities killed by police officers, President Obama said racism is “deeply rooted” in the U.S. and that activists should keep pressing steadily in their demands for reform.
“This is something that is deeply rooted in our society, it’s deeply rooted in our history,” Mr. Obama said in an interview with BET, a portion of which was released Sunday. “When you’re dealing with something as deeply rooted as racism or bias … you’ve got to have vigilance but you have to recognize that it’s going to take some time, and you just have to be steady so you don’t give up when we don’t get all the way there.”
Maybe Obama sees America as "deeply rooted in racism" because he hangs around people who are racketeers in the racial grievance mob who promote division, rather than unity.

Like his former "minister" of 20 years?

Like his confidante the "Reverend (of what?) Al Sharpton, who has served as an advisor to Obama and Obama has used racial demogagery when speaking to Sharpton's followers?

Check out this video of a 1992 report on Sharpton as aired on CBS' 48 Hours, where Sharpton said: "I would love to use love. But if I gotta use hate, I'll deal what my hand calls for."

The report also showed Sharpton's followers at two different marches with signs containing racist rhetoric.

Now do you think a white President could get away with having a confidante who held marches where signs containing the "N-word" were allowed? No, it wouldn't have happened. But the self-righteous liberal media has no problem with a racist like Sharpton having the ear of and influencing the holder of the highest office in America, as well as the attorney general.

Judge Jeanine Pirro has a candid observation about how Obama sees racism everywhere.

Just like Obama/Holder and the racial grievence mongers were silent when a white Australian basetball player were killed by two black teens, as well as suspected in the murder a World War II vet?

Is it any wonder how Americans polled today see racial relations as worse under Obama?  Because he is at the center of the worst division in this nation's history since the Civil War.

Wednesday, December 03, 2014

Thousands of Pages Of Taxpayer Information Disclosed To White House By IRS...Won't Reveal Documents

Remember how the IRS targeting of Tea Party groups scandal was just the work of a couple of rogue agents?

Richard Milhous Obama said he didn't know a thing until he heard it on the news?

If that's the case, why won't the Regime release documents with taxpayer information that ended up at the White House? (Fox News).
The revelation by the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) came as part of a lawsuit filed by non-profit group Cause of Action, which began investigating whether the IRS was improperly sharing taxpayer information with the White House in 2012.
Cause of Action originally filed a Freedom of Information Act request asking the IRS to turn over any documents, if they existed, related to correspondence between the IRS and the White House about requests for tax returns for individuals or businesses.
When the IRS said it was unable to do so because of constraints in the Internal Revenue Code, the group filed the lawsuit. A judge ruled that the IRS must turn over any relevant documents to Cause of Action by Dec. 1 to comply with the FOIA request.
On Tuesday, an attorney with TIGTA wrote a letter to Cause of Action, and acknowledged that the watchdog had located “2,509 pages of documents potentially responsive to your request.” Of those, TIGTA confirmed that 2,043 were in fact responsive to the request. 
However, TIGTA said it could not release the documents to the group, citing the tax code.
“These pages consist of return information protected by 26 U.S.C. § 6103 and may not be disclosed absent an express statutory exception,” the letter said. “Because no such exception exists here, we are withholding those.”
Dan Epstein, a spokesman for Cause of Action, told he believes that the IRS “essentially ignored the order of the court” with this declaration and that the group is considering the best path forward to force the IRS to disclose the documents.
Right! The fact that this much taxpayer info ended up at the White House and they can't say why smells of a cover up bigger than Watergate.

Thank You Greg Abbott, For Doing The Job "Sobbin John" Boehner & GOP Eunuchs Refuse To Do...Stop Obama's Amnesty

If you want leadership, just look to Texas, because that's where you'll find real men instead of sobbing lushes (NBC).
Seventeen states, led by Texas Attorney General and Governor-elect Greg Abbott, are suing the Obama administration over the president's recent executive actions on immigration.
Abbott, the Republican elected to succeed outgoing Gov. Rick Perry next year, has promised to bring the lawsuit since Obama announced his executive actions last month.
The coalition of states involved in the suit includes: Alabama, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, North Carolina, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, West Virginia and Wisconsin.
Here's part of Abbott's statement on the Texas Attorney General's website:
“The President’s unilateral executive action tramples the U.S. Constitution’s Take Care Clause and federal law. The Constitution’s Take Care Clause limits the President’s power and ensures that he will faithfully execute Congress’s laws – not rewrite them under the guise of ‘prosecutorial discretion.’ The Department of Homeland Security’s directive was issued without following the Administrative Procedure Act’s rulemaking guidelines and is nothing but an unlawfully adopted legislative rule: an executive decree that requires federal agencies to award legal benefits to individuals whose conduct contradicts the priorities of Congress.
The President is abdicating his responsibility to faithfully enforce laws that were duly enacted by Congress and attempting to rewrite immigration laws, which he has no authority to do – something the President himself has previously admitted. President Obama’s actions violate the Take Care Clause of the U.S. Constitution and the Administrative Procedure Act, which were intended to protect against this sort of executive disregard of the separation of powers.”
Obama's action is tantamount to treason, because he is not only violating his oath of office, he is siding with non-citizens who have broken U.S. immigration law that only Congress can make.

But Obama is not the only traitor to this nation. John Boehner, Mitch McConnell and every RINO Republican who refuses to defund this unconstitutional act is just as much, if not an even bigger, traitor to this nation.

National Review Online:
Senate Republicans had no appetite for discussing how to thwart President Obama’s executive orders on immigration during the conference’s weekly lunch, according to a source familiar with the meeting.
Senator Mike Lee (R., Utah) and Senator David Vitter (R., La.) tried to broach the topic, but were ignored.
“At different times, Lee and Vitter stood up and tried to begin a discussion about what the plan was and asked leadership about what their strategy was to deal with the spending bill and respond to Obama executive amnesty, and the reply was always an effort to try to change the subject to the ozone rule from the EPA or some other issue, and it was just bizarre,” the source said.
With House conservatives wanting to keep the pressure on Barack Obama given his end run of the political process when it comes to illegal immigration, reports indicate Republican House Speaker John Boehner may be considering doing the un-thinkable -- abandoning House conservatives to do a deal with Democrat Leader Nancy Pelosi to keep the government open long-term.
Hardline conservatives who have caused problems for leaders for years were not falling in line. These conservatives estimate their ranks are 30 to 40, enough to derail a vote.
That swelling Republican opposition gives Pelosi and her down-in-the-dumps House Democrats some unexpected power: the ability to rescue Boehner’s Republican Conference as Democrats have again and again in the big fights of the past three years.
If Boehner cuts that deal, it will serve as a warning that Boehner intends to do precisely as some have predicted, abandon House Conservatives next year and rely on moderates and Democrats  to govern weakly, to the extent he can. That stands in stark contrast to Democrats and former Speaker Nancy Pelosi who seemed to relish shoving bills like ObamaCare down America's throat, GOP opposition be damned.
So John Boehner is full of it. One moment he saying how Obama's actions are unacceptable, then the next moment, he's plotting with the enemy to fund this treason, because Karl Rove and the rest of the Bushies running the GOP don't have the stomach for a fight (unless it's beating up on conservatives or Tea Party members).

Well maybe there needs to be enough constituent pressure to topple Boehner. America needs a leader against this dictator in the Oval Office. Clearly, Boehner (from rumours around DC) is too impaired to fit the bill.

Monday, December 01, 2014

Obama Meets With Race-Baiter Sharpton Today About Ferguson After Bosnian Killed By Black Mob In St. Louis

Remember on David Letterman's show when Richard Milhous Obama said someone who is elected President of the United States is supposed to work for the entire country?

"If you want to be president you have to work for everybody not just for some."

But Obama does not work for everybody and he showed it again today, as he met at the White House with racial grievance monger Al Sharpton in regards to the Ferguson, MO protests (Business Insider).
President Barack Obama is spending a good portion of his afternoon on Monday dealing with the ongoing fallout from the protests in Ferguson, Missouri.
Obama was set to gather with Vice President Joe Biden and cabinet officials "to discuss federal programs and funding that provide equipment to state and local law enforcement agencies," according to the White House.
Afterwards, the president was to hold meetings with civil-rights activists and elected officials, including Rev. Al Sharpton and New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio (D). 
Some have criticized the deployment of military-style equipment and uniforms in Ferguson when the protests began last August after 18-year-old Michael Brown was shot and killed by a white police officer. A new wave of violent demonstrations hit the city last Monday after a grand jury decided to not indict the officer.
Of course, the whole gist of the Obama pow-wow was to attack the police and recommend use of body cameras for them. There was no attempt by Obama, his Regime, or any in the racial grievance industry to tone down the rhetoric and violence by the demonstrators in Ferguson and around the nation, in a movement being co-opted by Communist front groups to agitate for revolution in the US.

But Obama and these radicals are ignoring the murder over the weekend of a Bosnian immigrant in St. Louis by a mob of black teens who (according to the person filming) yelled "f**k the white people, kill the white people"  (Video from Bob McCarty, via Gateway Pundit).
WARNING: GRAPHIC LANGUAGE -- St. Louis Post-Dispatch reporter Joel Currier’s article about a Bosnian immigrant being murdered by hammer-wielding teenagers fails to mention the possibility that at least some of the teens were black until deep into the article. Conversely, a video shot by a resident of South St. Louis’ Bevo Mill neighborhood reveals heretofore-unpublished details about what happened near the intersection of Gravois Avenue and Itaska Street before the attack that left Zemir Begic, 32, dead. More at

Contrary to Obama, Holder and Sharpton's rhetoric, not once do they report on how whites have been killed by black cops.  And I'm not bringing this up to say that the whites who were killed were innocent or guilty, it's the double-standard.

It seems that Holder and the Obama Regime have something against police officers. Recently, the Department of Racial Justice that Holder leads removed the death penalty for four blacks who killed a white police officer in Virginia.

And for all the talk against bullying from this White House, why is there silence about this recent act in Florida caught on camera?

Well, we certainly don't hear anything about any of this from this White House, because it's clear that Obama only represents illegal aliens, gang-bangers and racial grievance mongers, instead of (as he lectured Mittens Romney) the entire country.

Ann Coulter's Anti-Amnesty Candidate Mittens Romney Says GOP Should "Swallow Hard" And Pass Amnesty

During a CPAC 2014 blogger's briefing (when she wasn't making crude rape jokes), alleged conservative Ann Coulter told bloggers in attendance the reason Mitt Romney was her 2012 preferred candidate (and may be in 2016) was because of enforcing e-verify and the idea of "self-deportation."

Well, in the wake of Richard Milhous Hussein-Obama's unConstitutional amnesty, Mittens Romney, the alleged "anti-amnesty" candidate showed why so many of us had doubts about him in 2012 (Breitbart).
Romney recently told Spanish-language Univision that Obama is "giving people false hope" and "communicating to people outside this country, ‘Hey, get into the United States illegally and stay, because they’ll always let you stay.'”
Romney's solution is for Congress to pass a “permanent clarification of our immigration laws so that people know where they stand," because Obama's executive amnesty is only temporary. But Romney said that he was "pretty confident that what the president’s doing will so inflame passions on the part of many in my party… that they will be far less likely to move aggressively on the type of permanent reform that’s so badly needed." He hoped the party could work on some piecemeal solutions on immigration to get the ball rolling.
"Maybe even then, Republicans will swallow hard and say, 'OK, even despite the fact that we now have a stick in our eye launched by the president, we’re going to go ahead and try and see if we can’t make some improvements to the immigration system,'" Romney said. "I hope we’re able to do that.”
Well Mittens, many of us swallowed hard to vote for you when you were simply not fit to run against Obama. Given that, our fears have now been verified.  This while Ted Cruz is one of the few talking about fighting Obama's illegal amnesty.

So whatcha gonna do now, Annie? Go back to Crispy Creme as your preferred candidate?

Sunday, November 30, 2014

Communist Front Groups Disrupt DC This Weekend Over #Ferguson. I-395 Blocked Sunday Afternoon By Protesters

If you were driving either direction on Interstate 395 just about an hour ago, you probably were sitting in a traffic jam.

That's because a bunch of rabble-rousers protesting the grand jury decision not to indict Officer Darren Wilson over the death of Michael Brown were allowed to block this major artery connecting Washington DC and Alexandria, VA. (photos via Twitter)

These videos (Video 1, Video 2, Video 3) were uploaded onto Instagram, as was this embedded one on YouTube.

Yesterday, the protesters protested in Georgetown, before heading over to Pentagon Mall to hold a "die in" both inside and outside the mall (photos via Flickr acct untoldcarlisle)

Taking a look at the photos from yesterday, there are various signs that one should pay attention to, in order to tell the groups behind them, and that the media no doubt will ignore the radical backgrounds of.

ANSWER Coalition (whom this blog has blogged about for years) evolved after 9/11 in response to the War on Terror. From David Horowitz' Discover the Network website.
International ANSWER (an acronym for "Act Now to Stop War and End Racism") is run by Ramsey Clark’s International Action Center, which is staffed by members of the Marxist-Leninist Workers World Party (WWP). ANSWER views the United States as a racist, imperialist, sexist, homophobic nation and the world’s chief violator of human rights -- guilty of unspeakable atrocities, past and present, foreign and domestic.
PSLWeb (signs in the photo near the FedEX truck) stands for Party for Socialism and Liberation, per Wikipedia.

National Black United Front was listed on this FreeRepublic link as a communist organization. Per Wikipedia, the group was called "Christian, Left-leaning, somewhat Black nationalist and to work in the tradition of the Million Man March and Malcolm X."

That is why this manufactured outrage over the Ferguson grand jury has echoed nationwide. Since the beginning, what happened in Ferguson has been taken and manipulated by these and various other Communist front groups who use the theme of "racism" to agitate for the overthrow of capitalism.

Thursday, November 27, 2014

Happy Thanksgiving 2014

Wishing you all a very Happy Thanksgiving, and that you have a great day with family and friends.

Especially, let's give thanks to those who have given up this day to be away from their families in the defense of our Nation.

Pray for America and each other.

Wednesday, November 26, 2014

Racist Obama: Unless You're Native American, Quit Complaining About My Unlawful Amnesty

It is bad enough that Richard Milhous-Hussein Obama admitted yesterday he unilaterally (and unlawfully, I must add) changed immigration law, but he bascially told the American citizenry to go to hell as well (Daily Caller).
The only Americans who can legitimately object to immigration are native Indian-Americans, President Barack Obama told his Chicago audience Nov. 24, as he made an impassioned ideological plea for endless immigration, cultural diversity and a big government to manage the resulting multicultural society.
There have been periods where the folks who were already here suddenly say, ‘Well, I don’t want those folks,’ even though the only people who have the right to say that are some Native Americans,” Obama said, rhetorically dismissing the right of 300 million actual Americans to decide who can live in their homeland.
Americans should not favor other Americans over foreigners, Obama demanded. “Sometimes we get attached to our particular tribe, our particular race, our particular religion, and then we start treating other folks differently… that, sometimes, has been a bottleneck to how we think about immigration,” he said in the face of many polls showing rising opposition to his immigration agenda.
And guess what else? Dictator Obama's unConstitutional amnesty rewards US companies $3,000 for hiring an illegal alien over an native-born American worker.

Let me remind Obama about something he said right after Benghazi on David Letterman's show, when he was attacking Mittens Romney for his "47 percent" comment that Jimmy Carter's spawn secretly taped.

“Well, I don’t know what he was referring to, but I can tell you this. When I won in 2008, 47 percent of the American people voted for John McCain, they didn’t vote for me. And what I said on election night was, even though you didn’t vote for me, I hear your voices and I’m going to work as hard as I can to be your president. And one of the things I’ve learned as president is you represent the entire country. And when I meet Republicans as I’m traveling around the country, they are hard working, family people, who care deeply about this country and my expectation is that if you want to be president you got to work for everybody not just for some.”
Obviously, those were "just words" because you didn't mean any of it.  Your comments above from Chicago certainly don't resemble someone who "represents the entire country," because one can objectively look over your failed time in office and see that you've only put the interests of those people or groups of people who support or helped you (Solyndra, anyone?), and make snide remarks toward your opponents. You've talked about "getting in people's faces" and "punishing your enemies."  You have more understanding for an illegal alien, a gang-banger or a Islamic terrorist than you do the police, the military, or black citizens who are unemployed or lost their business in the racially charged circus you and your fellow racist Eric Holder created.  Because you're an angry racist with a huge chip on your shoulder.

In short, you don't respect the citizens of this nation, your Oath of Office or the Constitution you swore to uphold.  It's just a taxpayer-funded ticket for you and Moochelle to take your lavish vacations and play all the golf you want.

Maybe if you have such a disrespect for this nation and it's people, you should do the honorable thing (if you had honor) and resign your office.

Joe Biden might be off his rocker, but God knows we could use come comedy relief after the pain you've put this nation through.

Tuesday, November 25, 2014

Mark Levin: Ferguson Is "Left's War On Civil Society"

Like most of America last night, I was following the grand jury decision in Ferguson, MO, in which they found Officer Darren Wilson not criminally liable for the death of Michael Brown this past August.

I also followed, via Twitter and online streams, the ensuing riot and lawlessness that occurred, and saw a transcript of Richard Milhous Obama's remarks on the matter, which were sickening and offensive, to say the least because of his attacks on the police and this nation, trying to imply that this came about because of the "legacy of discrimination" that happened a long time ago, and which Leftist agitators like him, Attorney General Eric Holder, Al Sharpton and others do not want to let go of.

Mark Levin wrote the following this morning on his Facebook page that really put the events in Ferguson in context.
Ferguson burns and violence has been unleashed thanks to the reckless liberal media, the lawless administration (especially Eric Holder) exploiting the shooting to smear police departments across the nation, phony civil rights demagogues, race-baiting politicians, and radical hate groups.  
The lies about why and how Officer Darrin Wilson shot Michael Brown started on day one and never ended.  The indisputable facts are that Brown was shot because he assaulted a police officer, attempted to take the officer's pistol resulting in two close range gun shots in the police cruiser, and then turned around and charged the officer as he was being pursued. The entire event was precipitated by Brown earlier stealing cigars from a local store and assaulting the owner.  
What we are witnessing now is the left's war on the civil society.  It's time to speak out in defense of law enforcement and others trying to protect the community and uphold the rule law
Not to long after reading The Great One's Facebook post this morning, I saw a heartbreaking photo that appeared in my Twitter feed of a woman, Natalie DuBose, tears in her eyes after losing her cake store to these thugs whose emotions had been stirred up by the people Levin referenced in his note.

I also saw a comment referenced from a black employee at the Little Ceasars Pizza in Ferguson that was burned to the ground, that it looked like he was now unemployed.

But when you listened to Obama last night, you got the sense that Obama felt an "understanding" with the protesters, instead of business owners like the lady above, and the people who were employed in those businesses that went up in flames. Remember how he'd met with them the day after the mid-term election and told them "stay the course?" Sure, he made references to protest peacefully and made it sound like the trouble was from just a handful of troublemakers. But it looked like more than a handful on the news. Obama had the audacity to talk about the "rule of law," but, it was not the protesters and their lawlessness Obama came down on. Instead, like Holder many other times before, Obama the lawless Ruler by Executive Fiat focused on the police and law enforcement, making them appear to be the problem, as they've created, "mistrust" in black communities.

Where has that mistrust come from?  We can get a clue from a quote by Booker T. Washington.
"There is a class of colored people who make a business of keeping the troubles, the wrongs and the hardships of the Negro race before the public. Some of these people do not want the Negro to lose his grievances because they do not want to lose their jobs. There is a certain class of race-problem solvers who don't want the patient to get well."
I can start here with the so-called "Reverend" Al Sharpton. Events like Ferguson are made to order for this rabble-rouser to come in with his bullhorn screaming "No Justice, No Peace." The fact Sharpton still is given a platform to spew his venom is a testament to the corrupt media in America, as Sharpton first came to prominence by pushing the Tawana Brawley alleged rape case that turned out to be a massive hoax. Sharpton lost a slander suit by an Assistant DA Steven Pagones (paid for by supporters) and now owes over a million dollars in back taxes, but this fraud has been a confidante of Obama, being the source for the "stay the course" comment, and also pushing Loretta Lynch to continue Eric Holder's race-baiting legacy leading the Department of (Racial) Justice. It's not just Sharpton. "Screwy" Louis Farrakhan and Jesse Jackson are others who can be counted upon to stir up racial resentment and bring up past grievances As far as we've come as a nation on race, these Three Stooges would make people think there's a KKK meeting around the corner, if you took them at face value.

Then there's the political class, where Obama and Holder fit in. But it's not just them. It's also the Congressional Black Caucus, who have also weighed in on the Ferguson manner in a racially-divisive way.  Don't forget these are the same people who will make up false stories of racial slurs used against them in a way to smear Tea Party activists as being motivated by race.  Obama and Holder have also played into this narrative that their ideological opponents are motivated by bigotry. Where playing on racial resentment keeps Sharpton, et al, in business, people like Obama, the CBC, use it to acquire and hold onto political power. Martin Luther King Jr.'s dream of a color-blind society doesn't work for these people, so they use racism as a way to divide America as "us vs. them."

But none of these so-called "leaders" will address serious issues facing the black community. A high unemployment rate that's worse under Obama, and the breakdown of the black family.  For one, take a look at Michael Brown's stepfather after the grand jury decision talking about "burn this mother-f**ker down" and you have to ask yourself what kind of parenting skills were being used in the home.

Beyond that, there are also outside extremist groups who prey on these situations in order to topple American society, as the Christian Science Monitor explains.
Among the groups active in Ferguson are the Revolutionary Communist Party (RCP) and the Revolution Club of Chicago. The RCP – a small, mysterious, but nationally dispersed Maoist cell led by activist Bob Avakian – has been in the area since at least Wednesday, along with the Revolution Club and the New Black Panthers Party. The New Black Panthers Party has been classified as a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center, among other organizations.
“We have a responsibility to be here,” Lou Downey of the Revolution Club told The Kansas City Star. “We are revolutionaries. We’re working to do this in a way that puts an end to the system that for generations has criminalized youth, especially black youth, and rounds them up into prisons.”
So, yes, it is a war on civil society as well as the very fabric of our nation, and the lawlessness in the Executive Branch of our government is an encouragement to these activists. It's more of a reason why all American need to stand up when too many others are afraid to lead during these uncertain and trying times.

Sunday, November 23, 2014

When You've Lost Saturday Night Live....

Even the NBC late night comedy show mocks Dicktator-in-Chief Obama's unconstitutional end-run around Congress using the classic Schoolhouse Rock.

Wednesday, November 19, 2014

If Not Now, When? Addressing GOP Hesitancy To Stand Up For America Against Obama Tyrannical Executive Amnesty

"Speak for England, Arthur!"

Those words were spoken by Leo Amery, member of England's Parliament as Labour Party leader Arthur Greenwood rose to respond to British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain on September 2, 1939, after the Appeaser of Hitler at Munich gave a lackluster speech on whether England would aid Poland against invading Nazi Germany or not. It was certainly a dark time for Europe, for England, and the world, which was soon to be plunged in World War II and needed leadership to stand up against the forces of tyranny that sought to take over Europe, and, eventually, the entire world.

Tonight, America is on the cusp of some dark and uncertain days ahead, the outcome of which threaten the very ideas and principles that our nation was not only founded upon, but also made it great and a beacon for all peoples around the world.

On Friday, Richard Milhous-Hussein Obama will, by executive order (without Congressional approval) grant amnesty to an estimated five million illegal aliens at an event in Las Vegas, Nevada.

This also comes on the heels of uncertainty in Ferguson, MO, where racist activists like Al Sharpton, who have been egged on by Obama (who urged the protesters to stay the course), are threatening violence if police officer Darren Wilson is not criminally charged with the killing of the thuggish Michael Brown, who was caught on video strong-arming a store clerk in a robbery before he was shot and killed by the officer.

Obama's actions in bypassing Congress are, despite what the Regime bootlickers at the Associated (with Obama) Press say, unprecedented.  (Here's why what Reagan and Bush 41 did does not compare to Obama's actions).  Unlike Reagan and Bush, Obama cannot get the "immigration reform" (read: amnesty) bill he wants passed, so, he's going to thwart the very fabric our government was founded upon, the Separation of Powers laid out in the Constitution, and bypass that lawmaking body.

Unconstitutional lawlessness of the type one would see in a third-world dictator or communist despot is going to be taken by the President of the United States. But why should the law matter to Obama?  He embraces lawlessness, or he would not be standing on the side of anarchists and rabble-rousers in Ferguson, MO.

But it's more than just the Constitution and the rule of law, it is a slap-in-the-face to those immigrants who went through the years of red tape, etc, and followed the rules to become legal citizens of the United States, because the very idea that made so many risk their lives to come to this nation--liberty--is being replaced with the tyranny of a rule-by-fiat from a narcissistic, thin-skinned, and petty little man stung by the rebuke he and his party received from the voters of America two weeks ago tonight.

But though the American voter spoke against Obama and his radical ideology and designs (even Blue State Oregon rejected overwhelmingly giving driver's licenses to illegal aliens), Obama smirks in their face and goes ahead anyway, because he has no fear of retribution right now.

Why? The new Republican leadership, Mitch McConnell and John Boehner, are adamant that there will be no government shut down.  Even impeachment, which Obama's actions (as well as others) warrant, is off the table.

The Democrat Party, who made such an issue of alleged abuses of executive power during George W. Bush's administration, is marching in goose-step with Obama's unlawful action. Clearly, their loyalty is only to Party and to their leader..."My Party, Right or Wrong." What about the oath you took to America? To defend the Constitution "against all enemies, foreign and domestic?"

Likewise, what about the Republican Party and their leaders, McConnell and Boehner? They seem more intent on destroying any conservative, Tea Party Senator or Congressman but will play kid gloves with Obama because they're so afraid of being called "racists," and Karl Rove said "let's not turn people off by looking mean."  To the Republican Party, I would remind them as well that you took an oath to this nation to defend the Constitution "against all enemies, foreign and domestic." You did not take an oath to Karl Rove and the GOP consultant class who are more afraid of losing an election than they are of winning one, the US Chamber of Commerce, or the crony-capitalist corporatists who want amnesty just as bad as Obama.

This is not a Republican or Democrat issue, nor a right or left issue. This is about the rule of law and whether or not those whom the voters entrusted two weeks ago with leadership to stand up against Obama's radical "transformation of America" will (as Ronald Reagan said 50 years ago) "preserve for our children this, the last best hope of man on earth, or we'll sentence them to take the last step into a thousand years of darkness."

Because if not now, when will those "leaders" finally have the courage.

Sorry to say, If not now, it will be too late, because that fine line will have been crossed, and the cowardice of Boehner and McConnell will reward Obama's lawlessness and encourage him to push the envelope even further.

Now's the time for those we entrusted to power to, for once, have the courage to "Speak for America!"

Monday, November 17, 2014

State of Emergency Declared In Missouri Over Protesters To Whom Obama Told To "Stay The Course"

The Governor of Missouri declared a "state of emergency" over the possibility of violent protests pending the grand jury decision if Ferguson, MO Police Officer Darren Wilson should be criminally liable for the death of Michael Brown (Fox News).
Residents and officials in the region fear another wave of rioting if the grand jury decides not to indict Wilson.
"We are bracing for that possibility. That is what many people are expecting. The entire community is going to be upset," said Jose Chavez, 46, a leader of the Latinos en Axion community group.
For some cities, a decision in the racially-charged case will, inevitably, re-ignite long-simmering debates over local police relations within minority communities.
"It's definitely on our radar," said Lt. Michael McCarthy, police spokesman in Boston, where police leaders met privately Wednesday to discuss preparations. "Common sense tells you the timeline is getting close. We're just trying to prepare in case something does step off, so we are ready to go with it."
Meanwhile, The New York Times (h/t Gateway Pundit) revealed President Obama met with the activists in Ferguson, MO, where all the unrest is happening.
Some of the national leaders met with President Obama on Nov. 5 for a gathering that included a conversation about Ferguson.
According to the Rev. Al Sharpton, who has appeared frequently in St. Louis with the Brown family and delivered a speech at Mr. Brown’s funeral, Mr. Obama “was concerned about Ferguson staying on course in terms of pursuing what it was that he knew we were advocating. He said he hopes that we’re doing all we can to keep peace.”
 You mean this Al Sharpton?

Meanwhile, the President of the United States, who said on David Letterman's show a President has to represent all of the people, is meeting with a racist, rabble rouser who always goes to these towns with his bullhorn screaming "No Justice, No Peace," while they're threatening the property and well-being of the law-abiding citizens of Ferguson.

How can Obama lecture about "civility" on one hand, and then meet with violent street agitators the next.

Because Obama does not "represent" all of America, and if, God forbid, there is violence, he and that other bigot, Eric Holder, are responsible for helping to agitate the discontent for pure political purposes.

OBAMA LIED: Named Jonathan Gruber In 2006 As Someone Whose Ideas He'd "Stolen From Liberally"

Yesterday Richard Milhous Obama tried to pretend that Jonathan Gruber had little or nothing to do with putting together Obamacare.
“The fact that an adviser who was never on our staff expressed an opinion that I completely disagree with in terms of the voters is not a reflection on the actual process that was run,”
Well, Obama lied and here's the more evidence that he did.

From April 5, 2006 (Washington Free Beacon). 
"You have already drawn some of the brightest minds from academia and policy circles, many of them I have stolen ideas from liberally, people ranging from Robert Gordon to Austan Goolsbee; Jon Gruber; my dear friend, Jim Wallis here, who can inform what are sometimes dry policy debates with a prophetic voice."

Think of it.

In 2006, Obama credit Gruber among those whose ideas he'd stolen from liberally.

Gruber visited the Obama White House 19 times, and the Obama campaign in 2012 prominently featured Gruber in a video.

Now, when citizen journalists find videos of Gruber saying the process had to be "less than transparent" to put Obamacare together, in order to take advantage of the "stupidity of the American voter," Obama and the Democrats act like they've never heard of him.

They got caught with their hands in the cookie jar and now they're lying about it. All of them!

Sunday, November 16, 2014

PROOF OBAMA LIES! Calls Gruber "Adviser Who Was Never On Our Staff," But 2012 Campaign Featured Gruber In Video

Channeling former President Bill Clinton, Richard Milhous-Hussein Obama addressed the growing Jonathan Gruber/Obamacare scandal that is engulfing his Regime from Australia this morning (Politico).
“The fact that an adviser who was never on our staff expressed an opinion that I completely disagree with in terms of the voters is not a reflection on the actual process that was run,” Obama declared at a press conference here, speaking for the first time about the comments by MIT economist Jonathan Gruber.
When the president was asked whether he had intentionally misled the public in order to get the law passed, he replied: “No. I did not.”
Here's the video (along with news of another ISIS beheading) showing Fox News' Ed Henry asking Obama. As usual, Obama is doing his usual plausible deniability (aka The Limbaugh Theorem) on the issue (just like the IRS and ISIS)..."I didn't know bout that til I was told about it before coming on stage here."

Obama is lying and it is easily provable.

Exhibit A - Obama's 2012 Campaign used a video on the anniversary of RomneyCare in which Gruber was "featured prominently", according to CNN on April 12, 2012.

Maybe you've heard the president's top aides call Mitt Romney the "godfather" of the Obama health care law?
Now the Obama campaign is out with a web video that drives home the message.
"I helped Gov. Romney develop his health care reform or Romneycare, before going down to Washington to help President Obama develop his national version of that law," says Jonathan Gruber a bright eyed MIT Health Consultant featured prominently in the video. The spot includes old footage of Romney thanking Gruber for his work on the Massachusetts health bill.
Gruber's verdict: "The core of the Affordable Care Act or Obamacare and what we did in Massachusetts are identical."

Exhibit B - Obama's Department of Health and; Human Services paid Gruber, and, according to White House visitor logs, he visited the Executive Mansion 19 times. Nancy Pelosi (who now claims not to know Gruber) and the White House website cited Gruber (Fox News).
But while Jonathan Gruber might not have been a familiar name until this week for many, Pelosi and the rest of the lawmakers who pushed the law certainly knew who he was in 2009 and 2010.
A look at the record shows he was in fact paid to advise the Department of Health and Human Services. And he continues to play a role in health policy elsewhere, even as his unearthed videos cause headaches for the administration, just ahead of this weekend’s Round 2 enrollment launch.
Gruber, an MIT professor and economist, has lived amid the health care debate in Washington for at least 20 years.
Gruber was retained by the Department of Health and Human Services in 2009 on a $297,600 contract to provide “technical assistance in evaluating options for national healthcare reform.” Gruber also confirmed to The Washington Post that he was paid another $95,000 before that, for a total of nearly $400,000
Around this time, his analysis was not only featured on Pelosi’s House speaker website in 2009, but cited by the White House several times. Though he often was billed as an analyst in media interviews where he touted the merits of the plan, critics complained his financial ties to the administration weren’t disclosed.
Gruber also spent a good deal of time testifying on the Hill and in meetings at the White House – 19 visits from 2009 to June of this year, according to publicly available logs.
Exhbit C - As for the claim he did not mislead America on health care, we've long known, and the Obamacare rollout last year proved it, how everything Obama said about his health care plan was bull-s**t!

Here's video compilation by Sean Hannity of Obama's lies, that you could keep your doctor, your health-care plan, and insurance would be more affordable.  Period!

But it isn't true. Insurance costs increased, coverage went down, and millions of Americans lost their coverage that Obama promised they could keep.

Like Rich Weinstein, an investment adviser in Philadelphia who received notification in 2013 his insurance plan was being cancelled. After doing research on the Internet, Weinstein uncovered the Gruber videos, doing the job our corrupt lapdog media refuses to do.

Saturday, November 15, 2014

Obama 2012 Video Features Jonathan Gruber Saying He Helped Develop Obamacare

Jake Tapper posted on Twitter the following video from the Obama 2012 campaign.

In it, Jonathan Gruber mentions how he helped Mittens Romney develop Romneycare, and then went to help Obama put Obamacare together.

In case this video disappears, here's a screenshot.

But since his video where Gruber is caught on camera saying they were less than transparent, in order to take advantage of the "stupid" American voter, Democrats and Obama can't seem to remember who Jonathan Gruber is.

But it is all over the Internet, there's no denying his links to Obamacare.

SMOKING GUN(s): Gruber Met At White House With Obama, Obama's 2012 Website Gruber "Helped Write Obamacare"

Because there's more than one "smoking gun" (cue up Robert Cray).

First, from Gateway Pundit, is a video of Jonathan Gruber saying he was in the room in the oval office "on what can we do to get credible savings on cost control that the Congressional Budget Office would recognize and score as savings in this law."

Who else was in that meeting with Gruber and Obama?
According to ABC, everyone.
In addition to the president and Elmendorf, present in the meeting were White House officials such as Assistant to the President for Legislative Affairs Phil Schiliro, Director of the White House Office of Health Reform Nancy-Ann DeParle, Office of Management and Budget director Peter Orszag (a former CBO director himself), National Economic Council Director Larry Summers, chair of the Council of Economic Advisers Christy Romer, senior adviser David Axelrod, and press secretary Robert Gibbs.
Others were there as well, including Department of Health and Human Services adviser Meena Seshamani, Harvard University economist David Cutler and Alice Rivlin of the Brookings Institute, who was founding director of CBO from 1975-1983.”
Gruber was not mentioned by name in the ABC piece, but the White House logs show us that Jonathan Gruber and David Cutler, a Harvard economist, entered the White House at the same time to meet the POTUS in the West Wing.
So, it wasn't just Obama, it was the whole team...Axlerod, Robert Fibbs, Peter Orszag, et al.

Then there's this, from Obama's 2012 website, now scrubbed, but found in the Wayback Archive (PunditPress, h/t Sister Toldjah on Twitter).
According to, President Obama’s official website, Jon Gruber “helped write Obamacare.”
The post was written in 2012 and was about specific quotes from President Obama trying to tie Mitt Romney to ObamaCare by saying that “RomneyCare” was the model for the Affordable Care Act.
In an act to hide the connection to Barack Obama after Gruber’s quotes about the “stupidity of American voters” went viral, the article has been taken down by Organizing for Action. However, it was online as recently as August of this year, and a cached version still exists that clearly shows its original content. Pundit Press found the cached version.

PunditPress also noted this 2012 NY Slimes article on how Obama's team called Gruber.

"Then came the call in 2008 from President-elect Obama's transition team, the one that officially turned this stay-at-home economics professor into Mr. Mandate."
Finally, Ace of Spades writes how Peter Orzag (mentioned earlier) lauded the "Cadillac Tax" mislableing, as discussed by Gruber.
So Obama cannot claim he didn't know. Peter Orzag talks about Obamcare phasing out the health care exemption, through the deceptive means of indexing the "Cadillac Plan" threshold to slow-growing CPI rather than fast-moving (and accurate) rate of medical inflation.
He also states that they went about phasing out the health care exemption because certain people -- unnamed, but he means Obama -- had demagogued McCain's honest discussion of ending the exemption (replacing it with a tax credit), and, as Orzag says, to now embrace an honest plan like McCain's (repealing health care tax exemption while offering a $10K tax credit, M.I.M.) would be "awkward."
So instead they lied.
...As soon as he's elected, Obama begins scheming as to how he can tax people's health insurance -- this time, not bothering to offer the $10,000 tax credit, which would make people net-neutral on the deal. He wants to tax them more. So no tax credit.
And since he just got done demagoguing the issue, he has to do it secretly. So he gets together with Orzag and Gruber to repeal the exemption over the course of years, as the "Cadillac Plan" threshold fails to keep pace with actual inflation.
So where are we now? Well, according to Gruber, we are 20 years away from all plans being taxed at 40% rate, which means that most employers won't offer them, and will just dump people on to the government exchanges.
They'll give people some cash in lieu of health care-- which will be taxed (unlike the health care benefits, making the middle class triple losers on the deal).
And the MSM is embargoing this, instead choosing to talk about Kim Kardashian's asshole.
Well, because the Obama Lapdog Media, like Gruber and the Democrats, all think Americans are too stupid to figure all this out.

Well, then why is it that many Americans can see through the Obama Regime lies, because they're living through higher health premiums, loss of coverage, not being able to find meaningful work after losing a job.

That's how Gruber's lies were initially found, a guy who lost his health care coverage began researching and found Gruber talking about the "stupidity of the American voter."  They weren't found by the corrupt media who, unlike 40 years ago, are engaging in aiding All The President's Cover-Ups.

Now imagine Jonathan Gruber had been a member of the Bush Administration and claimed all the WMD evidence in Iraq was fabricated...the howls of outrage in the Corrupt Media and Democrat Party would be deafening.

Friday, November 14, 2014

UNBELIEVABLE! Muslims Throw Woman Out Of National Cathedral For Saying The Words "Jesus Christ"

The secularized Episcopal Church allowed Muslims to use the 100 year old National Cathedral as a mosque today (IBD).
As the Washington Post explained, "Organizers said they are seeking to make a statement by having Muslim leaders come and hold their service in such a visible Christian house of worship."
Who are these "organizers"? Members of known Muslim Brotherhood front groups, including the Council on American-Islamic Relations and the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA). The Justice Department has identified both as belonging to the Hamas wing of the radical Brotherhood. It's also implicated them in a Hamas conspiracy to raise millions for Palestinian suicide bombers. These co-sponsors of the National Cathedral jumuah ("for invited guests only") remain unindicted co-conspirators in a major terror case.
CAIR is so toxic the FBI won't do outreach with the group. But cathedral clergy rolled out prayer rugs for it.
Another co-sponsor is the ADAMS (All Dulles Area Muslim Society) mosque of Northern Virginia, which the Brotherhood controls through deed-holder ISNA.
"We want the world to see the Christian community is partnering with us and is supporting our religious freedom in the same way we are calling for religious freedom for all minorities in Muslim countries," an ADAMS spokesman claimed.
Really? We don't recall ADAMS demanding Palestinians to stop denying Jews access to the Temple Mount. Or the Brotherhood to stop burning Coptic churches. Or the Saudis to stop persecuting non-Muslims.
We'll believe such interfaith efforts are real when ADAMS opens its own building for Christian prayers.
And look at what happens when a woman objecting to the use of a Christian church as a mosque by the same people who claim they want religious freedom (NBC Washington).
"Jesus Christ died on that cross over there!" a woman said loudly, immediately after beginning announcements were made. He is the reason why we are to worship only him. Jesus Christ is our lord and savior!"
As she spoke, a man attempted to touch her arm, but she moved away from him several times.
She continued in a loud voice, "We have built, and allowed you here in mosques across this country. Why can't you worship in your mosque, and leave our churches alone?"

The reason, ma'am, was made pretty clear in 1998 by CAIR's co-founder, when he was quoted as saying at a speech in Fremont, CA (Discover the Networks).
"Islam isn't in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant. The Koran … should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on Earth." 
Also, if there's supposed to be an "Interfaith dialogue" why then do reports indicate that nine of 10 countries oppressive to Christians are Islamic nations?