Sunday, June 30, 2013

Incivility For Infanticide: Wendy Davis Is No Hero

On today's Sunday morning "news" shows, the liberal Obama lapdog media is working to make a national hero out of Texas State Senator Wendy Davis.

Why?

Because Davis led an 11 hour filibuster against a bill that would restrict abortions after 20 weeks.

However, liberal Democrats, and their media allies are ramping up the fear-mongering, calling this taking away women's rights, restricting access to "women's health-clinics" (read: abortion facilities), and other phony BS terms.

The passage of the bill was all but certain, but what stopped it was an unruly mob of liberals who disrupted the Texas Senate Chamber when Davis' filibuster was stopped on procedural terms. The behavior of the Obamabots and liberals was a scene of bullying reminiscent of a third-world banana republic, not a representative Republic.

Obama sent out a Tweet:


And his AstroTurf organization sent out an e-mail showing support for the unruly mob,



...even though Obama has lectured the nation before about the need for "civility" and talking to opponents "in a way that heals, not in a way that wounds."  But that's not the case. What happened at the State Capitol Building in Austin was another example of Chicago-style thuggery, approved by the Community Organizer-In-Chief.

Wendy Davis is being portrayed by so-called "feminists," the Democrats and liberals as a "hero," who are not only seeking to turn the Red state of Texas to Blue, but protecting the sacred blood sacrament of their "religion" called liberalism.

Why is this heroic, and what is it that Davis, as well as Obama, the national Democrat Party, Planned Parenthood and the abortion on demand lobby trying to stop?

There's an explanation at Lone Star Tea Party:
Instead of seeking publicity and trying to ingratiate herself with Obama/Pelosi/Richards, Sen. Wendy Davis (and all Texas women) should thank the Texas Legislators who wrote SB 5 because they are trying to make sure that Dr. Kermit Gosnell’s “house of horrors” do not repeat themselves in Texas. 
Here are excerpts taken from various Internet sites.  These should shock and dismay even the most hardened pro-abortion supporters such as Sen. Wendy Davis. 
1.20.11 – “At Filthy Clinic, Babies Met an Inhumane End, Grand Jury Says” – by Dana Difilippo – Philly.comhttp://articles.philly.com/2011-01-20/news/27038788_1_grand-jury-ab...
 In his squalid West Philadelphia abortion clinic, Kermit Gosnell had a surefire way of dealing with the unwelcome complication of a live birth: He'd allegedly plunge scissors into the squirming newborn's neck, killing it by severing the spinal cord.
 …One premature infant wiggled around on a counter for 20 minutes before an untrained worker slit his neck - after first playing with him.
 Gosnell killed "hundreds" of babies and at least two women during abortions from 1979 to last year at his Women's Medical Society at 38th Street and Lancaster Avenue, according to the grand jury. Further, he and his unlicensed, unskilled staff overdosed patients with drugs, perforated their wombs and bowels, and spread venereal disease by using unsterilized equipment, the report said.
But there's more about SB5 the lapdog media probably hasn't told you, since they're too busy cheerleading Davis.
Texas SB 5 is directly in line with the same, ever-growing medical evidence that was brought before the U. S. House.  It was this medical evidence that led the U. S. House to pass a bill on 6.18.13 banning late-term abortions after 20 weeks because preborn children feel pain. Texas SB 5 contains that same requirement.
...Our Texas Legislature also added other medically protective mechanisms to SB 5:
Requiring all abortion clinics to meet the same health and safety regulations as ambulatory surgical centers
Requiring a doctor providing abortions to secure admitting privileges at a nearby hospital
Requiring a doctor to personally administer the abortion-inducing drugs to the patient

In a piece that appeared at The Corner on National Review, Michael New wrote:
The media’s coverage surrounding SB 5 during the last few days has been very revealing. Many outlets have run puff pieces about state senator Wendy Davis who mounted a filibuster to block the pro-life law. However, there are a number of other stories the media have decided to ignore. First is that SB 5 enjoyed broad support in the Texas legislature. For a bill that the media spin machine relentlessly tried to hype as controversial, SB 5 was supported by nearly two thirds of the State Senate. A similar bill was supported by 70 percent of the State House. A recent poll by National Journal finds that by a 48-44 margin, Americans favor banning abortion after 20 weeks of gestation. Furthermore, 50 percent of women surveyed support the ban.
Think about this too. This is what Wendy Davis and the liberals are saying you have the right to end the life of.

 
Image above from NikkiandNicholas.com
 
Image above from BabyCenter.com

From Pregnancy Corner:

At 11 ounces and a little more than 7 ½ inches long, your baby’s growth has slowed in recent weeks, but it will pick back up from the 20th week forward. You’re probably feeling movements made by your baby more frequently as he or she tests the boundaries within the walls of the womb. The lungs are not yet mature, but the baby is breathing.

In other words, the baby at 20 weeks and beyond is moving and breathing.  Yet Wendy Davis, Obama and the Democrats think a woman should have the right to end the baby's life?

Even though I'm a man, (the enemy, according to the modern feminist movement) I'll never forget when my son was this far along in his development, when I heard his heartbeat, or saw him through the ultrasound. Regardless of my gender, if anything ever cemented my position as being pro-life, it was seeing my son's development, knowing there was a living, breathing, moving person inside my wife.

This is what insults me about modern "feminism."  The Obamabots at OFA depict limiting abortions after 20 weeks as "taking women's rights away." Why is it that the only right women are to have is to an abortion, in the minds of liberal Democrats? What about the right to be individuals?  The "choice" to be either a homemaker or career woman, as well as a mother.  Fulfilling your own destiny, instead of having some liberal "group think" tell you what to believe, and when you choose your own path (aka Sarah Palin, Michele Bachmann, other conservative or free-thinking women), you're derided as a "traitor" or "runaway slave" by the gatekeepers of group think for the so-called "special interests" liberals claim to champion.

And don't lecture me about "privacy" and "no one should be between a woman and her doctor." Especially when we have a President who has violated every American's privacy via the NSA, and Obamacare, which put the government bureaucrats between every American and their doctor.

Sorry libs, Obama and your AstroTurf...Wendy Davis is no hero. She's not standing up for women, nor the lives of the most innocent.

Friday, June 28, 2013

Sarah Palin To Marco Rubio "Hope It Was Worth 30 Pieces Of Silver"

Tea Party turncoat Senator Marco Rubio is now the darling of open-borders libs like the Brooklyn ambulance chaser Upchuck Schumer, and even got a phone call from Richard Milhous Obama to congratulate him on the passage of the Senate's Amnesty bill passing yesterday.

Sarah Palin, who championed Rubio when he ran for Senate in 2010, took to Twitter and took the turncoat to task.


Rush Limbaugh even said on his radio show today how Upchuck Schumer used Rubio to "neutralize" criticism from him and other conservative voices against the amnesty bill.



Hope you enjoy your new liberal friends now, Marco. You're done!

Alec Baldwin Off His Meds Again; Uses Anti-Gay Slurs Against Reporter In Twitter Rant

The lunatic liberal actor Alec Baldwin went off his rocker again, attacking a reporter for publishing a story alleging Baldwin's wife of Tweeting during the funeral of James Gandolfini (LA Slimes).
Alec Baldwin went on a homophobic, profanity-laden online rant Thursday before shutting down his Alec Baldwin Foundation Twitter account, all in defense of his pregnant wife Hilaria, whom a Daily Mail reporter had apparently errantly accused of tweeting while the couple attended James Gandolfini's funeral.
The Mail story's headline screams, "Alec Baldwin's pregnant wife Hilaria TWEETS about Rachael Ray and anniversary gifts during James Gandolfini's funeral."
Baldwin replied with screaming of his own -- words of denial and retaliation that lit up Twitter on Thursday night and into Friday. 
The "30 Rock" actor's rep explained in a statement to KTLA and other outlets, "It's disgraceful that a reporter would manufacture and publish a story and not call for comment or explanation -- especially when it's intended to take away attention from honoring the memory of a beloved figure like James Gandolfini."
Hilaria had denied the story as well, tweeting on Thursday afternoon, "FYI I don't believe in bringing phones into a funeral and I never did and I never would."
The couple had left "discreetly out a side door" about 45 minutes into the service, after the eulogies but before communion, according to L.A. Times reporter Meredith Blake, who was in attendance and noted it was extremely hot in the non-air-conditioned church. The couple's child is reportedly due in mid-August, and sources told the Daily Mail the mom-to-be was "feeling faint."
BuzzFeed has Baldwin's twitter rant (Language Warning).


 Reminder that, earlier this year, Baldwin ranted against a photographer in New York, allegedly calling the shutterbug a "coon."  He's been thrown off an American Airlines flight for exploding at a flight attendant, and of course there was the angry phone message he left his daughter.

But I'm not holding my breath he'll get the same treatment that Paula Deen has received for admitting to a slur she used a long time ago.

Apparently he won't. Militant gay group GLADD is giving Mr. Anger Management at pass, according to TMZ.

Wednesday, June 26, 2013

Obama Regime Meets With Radical Imam Who Called The Jews "Transgressors On Our Land"

Holding true to what he quoted in "The Audacity of Hope" (except he said "I will stand with them..." and referred to Muslims when saying that), members of the Obama Regime have opened the doors of The White House to radical Islamists (The Daily Caller).
In a posting on his website, brought to The Daily Caller’s attention by the Investigative Project on Terrorism, Shaykh Abdullah Bin Bayyah revealed that he met at the White House on June 13 with Gayle Smith, senior director of the National Security Council, and Rashad Hussain, President Obama’s special envoy Organization of the Islamic Conference, among other officials.
The posting also initially stated that the “national security adviser” was at the meeting, without naming him directly, though that part of the post was removed shortly after TheDC contacted the White House to see if  National Security Adviser Tom Donilon was in fact at the meeting. According to the Investigative Project on Terrorism, the Arabic version of the post was also changed to say that the deputy national security adviser attended, not the national security adviser.
Among the topics the post says Bin Bayyah addressed at the meeting was how to “lift the injustices from vulnerable peoples such as the Syrian people, the Palestinians, and the Muslims in Myanmar” and for the U.S. to do more to aid the Syrian revolution.
According to Bin Bayyah’s website’s account of the meeting, it was the White House who asked for an audience with him.
A senior Obama administration official confirmed to TheDC that the meeting took place, but declined to confirm whether all the officials listed by Bin Bayyah’s website, including the American “national security adviser,” were in attendance. The official claimed that the meeting was set up to learn about Bin Bayyah’s efforts to ”counter the al Qaeda narrative.”
Well it's interesting they want to look for ways to "counter the al Queda narrative" with someone who is vice president of an organization whose founder praised the Holocaust, as well as the killing of US soldiers.

Did The White House know of Bin Bayyah's views of terrorist groups that attack the State of Israel, as well as viewing the Jews as "transgressors" on Muslim land.
While Bin Bayyah says he opposes terrorism, he has at the same time sought to distinguish between Palestinian terrorism and terrorism perpetrated by groups like al Qaeda.
“[P]lacing  the Palestinian resistance, which defends internationally recognized rights, on an equal footing with intercontinental terrorist organizations not based on any moral principle, would be detrimental to the cause of the fight against terrorism and mix the cards,” Bin Bayyah declared on his website, according to a translation by the Investigative Project.
Bin Bayyah has also said that Muslims should only enter into dialogue with the “small group of Jews in the world who have a humanistic approach” and who oppose the existence of the State of Israel, or as he put it, the “Zionist project in the region.”
“The Muslims have to distinguish between dialogue with the Jews transgressing on our land and holy places, and the Jews opposing this occupation,” he has said. “That is, there is a small group of Jews in the world who have a humanistic approach. This group stands strongly against the Israeli occupation and the Zionist project in the region. Hence, there is no harm in opening a channel of constructive dialogue with them to the interest of the Muslims.”
No wonder the LA Slimes did their best before 2008, and again in 2012, to hide the going away party of former PLO official Khalid Rashidi that was attended by Obama.

Tuesday, June 25, 2013

Audience Leaving Obama's GloBULL Warming Speech Off To Good Start...Leaving Trash Behind

YES WE CAN...TRASH THE PLACE!

We saw how the Obama cult worshippers behaved on the day of his coronation in 2009, and today was no different.

Obama gave a speech vowing to take unilateral action on combating the fraud known as GloBULL Warming, even though records show this past spring was the coldest since 1975.  His college age audience at Georgetown University took their guru's words to heart...

...by leaving their trash behind and not picking up after themselves (via Twitchy).

Liberal Hypocrisy: Protest Supreme Court Decision On Voting Rights Act; Silent On New Black Panther's Voter Intimidation & IRS Disenfranchising Tea Party Voters

The Supreme Court today struck down a provision of the 1965 Voting Rights Act, ruling the provision as written was obsolete to today's standards.

Despite the progress made in over 40 years, Democrats and the Obama Regime started playing the fear card, in scaring blacks and other minorities that somehow the KKK was around the corner.

USA Today reports the Democrat Party is using the decision for their fundraising.

Meanwhile, the Chicago Tribune, writes:

Obama, a Democrat who in 2009 became the country's first African American president, said: "I am calling on Congress to pass legislation to ensure every American has equal access to the polls."

The Voting Rights Act, a centerpiece of the American civil rights movement in the 1960s, was meant to ensure access to the ballot box for minorities, traditional allies of Democrats, in states where such voting rights were considered at risk.

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy promised to move quickly to restore the law in the 100-seat, Democratic-led U.S. Senate.

"I intend to take immediate action to ensure that we will have a strong and reconstituted Voting Rights Act that protects against racial discrimination," Leahy said.

A Senate Democratic aide familiar with the issue said it was likely that the Judiciary Committee would hold hearings on new legislation, but it was unclear how quickly a bill would begin moving through the Senate.

 ... House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi denounced the Supreme Court ruling as "a step backward on civil rights," but said Congress should take it "as a cue" to take additional action itself, like it did in 2006, to bolster the law.

"It is our responsibility to do everything in our power to remove obstacles to voting, to ensure every citizen has the right to vote and every vote is counted as cast," Pelosi said
.And then the big one, Attorney General Eric Holder slammed the ruling.
Let me be very clear: We will not hesitate to take swift enforcement action using every legal tool that remains available to us against any jurisdiction that seeks to take advantage of the Supreme Court's ruling by hindering eligible citizens full and free exercise of the franchise,” Holder said, not long after President Barack Obama said he was "deeply disappointed" by the ruling—a phrase Holder echoed twice.
Problems with voting “have not been consigned to history,” he said, and the Voting Rights Act has proven key in defending voters. In 2012, lower courts ruling on preclearance requests blocked a South Carolina voter ID law and a Texas congressional redistricting map, the attorney general noted. “Without the Section 4 coverage formula, neither of these discriminatory voting changes would have been subject to review, and both could have been implemented immediately,” Holder said.
Again echoing Obama, Holder called on Congress to take action to counter the ruling, and said he is “hopeful that new protections can and will pass in this session of Congress.”
If that's the case, then why did Eric Holder drop charges when the voting rights of white voters in Philadelphia were threatened by a black-supremacist group called the New Black Panthers in 2008? The Panthers brandished clubs outside a polling place and told white voters "you're about to be ruled by the black man, cracker."




But Holder had the InJustice Department drop the charges against this black-supremacist group, saying the case demeaned "his people."

The George Soro$ funded Media Mutters called this voter intimidation "bogus." Likewise, Democrats were silent about this obstruction of voters. Just as Democrats who raised protests over voter ID laws did nothing when the IRS thrwarted political activities of the Tea Party by giving them more scrutiny than other organizations. That had a dramating impact on getting people to the polls in 2012 that might have voted against Richard Milhous Obama.

But, like Obama, Democrats don't represent all Americans.  They only use race and other factors as wedges to create straw-man arguments.

Monday, June 24, 2013

NAME EM & SHAME EM - 15 "Republicans" Who Voted For Amnesty Bill

Lisa Murkowski, Alaska
John McCain, Ariz.
Jeff Flake, Ariz.
Marco Rubio, Fla.
Mark Kirk, Ill.
Susan Collins, Maine
Roger Wicker, Miss.
Dean Heller, Nevada
Kelly Ayotte, N.H.
Jeffrey Chiesa, N.J.
John Hoeven, N.D.
Lindsey Graham, S.C.
Bob Corker, Tenn.
Lamar Alexander, Tenn.
Orrin Hatch, Utah

These fifteen need to be primaried and thrown out of office. 

Senate's "Immigration Bill" = ObamaCare Part Deux - Reasons It's No Good And Must Be Defeated

In typical Washington form, the Senate's "Comprehensive Immigration Reform Bill" is supposed to be voted on today, even though it is a massive, 1,200 page bill that none of the Senators have probably had the chance to read thoroughly.

In other words, it's complex and does nothing to reform immigration.  All it does is give amnesty to almost 11 million illegal aliens who broke our immigration laws with the false promise of securing the border, which is what the previous "immigration reform" bill in 1986 did, but on a smaller scale.

The Heritage Foundation has reviewed the bill and listed 10 Problems with the Gang of Eight bill:
The media and many Senators have been trumpeting a new amendment to the bill by Senators Bob Corker (R-TN), John Hoeven (R-ND) and Chuck Schumer (D-NY), saying it would fix the border security holes in the original legislation. But Heritage experts have explained why the amendment is deeply flawed and “does not even promise a reduction in illegal immigration.”
The new border-security language isn’t the only change. When the revised bill was released Friday afternoon, it had ballooned to 1,190 pages. Our colleagues at Heritage Action spent the weekend combing through the bill for other changes. Several sweetheart deals are included in the new bill text, such as special treatment for Alaskan seafood processing and $1.5 billion for youth job training.
Today, the U.S. Senate will vote at 5:30 p.m. to end debate. That’s typical Washington—rush to pass a bill before lawmakers can find out what is in it.
To help you understand what’s at stake, the Heritage Immigration and Border Security Reform Task Force released a paper detailing the top 10 concerns about the bill. Here is an infographic you can share with some of the highlights.
10Probs_immig_v3

Prof. William Jacobson at Legal Insurrection writes about another big problem with the the bill.  It gives the Department of Homeland Security Secretary (Janet Incompatano) great latitude to allow almost anyone to stay in the country and not be deported.
One of the things I learned from Obamacare was that each section of the law could take many hours to understand because of cross-references to other sections and other laws.  Amendments make the problem even greater.
Put that problem into a 1000+ page  bill, and it is almost impossible to uncover all the mischief — intentional and unintentional — buried in the language, something we are learning after the fact with Obamacare.
The rush to pass the Gang of 8 1000+ page bill is another example.  As if that weren’t bad enough to start, Sen. Bob Corker last night unveiled his 1190-page amendment, and Harry Reid is rushing the first test vote to Monday.  We have seen this movie before.
There is one provision which has not received a lot of press.
Yesterday Dana Loesch had a series of tweets about a section of the original Gang of 8 bill giving the Secretary of Homeland Security almost complete discretion to waive all other provisions of the law as to removal, deportation and inadmissibility.
It took me many hours to run that down and confirm.  And I have done so.

Gang of 8 Immigration Bill Section 3214 Discretion of Secretary Title
Gang of 8 Immigration Bill Section 3214(b) Discretion of Secretary marked
 
You would think that, after the Boston Marathon jihadist bombing, there would be real immigration reform, done in a simple matter, that would do something about keeping track of those who overstay the visas (as the Boston bombers did). But that's not the case.
 
This bill has two purposes only. It was put together by willing suckers in the Republican Party (John McLame, Lindsey Grahamnesty, Jeff Flake and the turncoat Marco Rubio) with ultra-partisan Democrats like Upchuck Schumer, the Brooklyn ambulance chaser, to appease media critics who lectured the party after the 2012 election disaster. But it's main purpose (which is why Schumer is involved and Obama is in the shadows) is the electoral destruction of the Republican Party.  Why? Despite the phony lectures from the media elites ("You Republicans have to get off this 'no amnesty' and these social issues like abortion and gay marriage"), electoral history has shown that the last amnesty in 1986 did nothing to attract Hispanics to the GOP.  Consider also, that, despite the media's lectures about amnesty, a poll taken post Election Day 2012 showed 61% of voters embrace Arizona-style immigration laws, including 40% of Hispanics.
 
Never mind that the traitor to the Tea Party, Marco Rubio, once opposed the very type of amnesty that he is now pushing through today in the name of "outreach" by the GOP to Hispanics.
 


Yet Rubio turned his back on this belief and Tea Party principles, in order to give a big wet kiss to Richard Milhous Obama and liberals like Upchuck Schumer, who want nothing more but a one-party electoral rule.

This "Gang of Ocho" legislation is the very antithesis of the Tea Party. It was drafted in secret, with kickbacks and payoffs added, all in one massive bill that is not comprehensive, and must be rushed through for a final vote. 

Kind of like Obamacare?


Which is what the Senate's immigration bill is...Obamacare, Part Deux. It puts those who broke immigration laws ahead of those who are playing by the rules to become citizens and throws poor unemployed American workers under the bus.

Any Republican who votes for this monstrosity should be thrown out of office on his butt.

Sunday, June 23, 2013

CIVILITY: "Screamin" Howard Dean On Those Who Don't Believe In GloBULL Warming: "Run 'Em Over"

The unhinged nut job Howard "the Duck" Dean gives us another illustration about the "civility" (or lack thereof) of liberals.

He was quoted the other day at the Nutroots conference when asked about those who don't believe in the false science known as climate change, or "gloBULL warming." (Red Alert Politics)
“I heard a great program on CurrentTV yesterday about people who deny climate change, and I’m in favor of what their solution was,” Dean said. “We don’t have to talk to them anymore about stuff that’s not true and this propaganda that’s a lie. We’re just going to run ‘em over. And that’s exactly what we’re going to do.”
That's in direct conflict to what Screamin Howie said back in 2005, when he was quoted in the Washington Times as saying "it's a moral value to respect those who disagree with you."

Now he just wants to run us over.

No wonder he isn't playing with a full deck.


YEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAHHHH!!!!!!!!!!

Saturday, June 22, 2013

(UPDATED WITH VIDEO) HA HA! Nancy Pelosi Gets Booed & Heckled At Leftist Nutroots Conference

This is priceless! The only thing missing is video (Politico, via Twitchy).
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi was booed by progressive activists Saturday for defending President Obama on the NSA’s surveillance programs and suggesting that alleged leaker Edward Snowden broke the law.

Speaking in a wide-ranging Q&A session at this year’s Netroots Nation conference, Pelosi said it’s unfair to equate Obama and former President George W. Bush on the issue of surveillance.

“People on the far right are saying oh, this is the fourth term of President Bush,” the California Democrat said. “Absolutely, positively not so.”

As Pelosi was saying the country needs a “balance” between security and privacy, Marc Perkel, a 57-year-old activist from Gilroy, Calif., started shouting at Pelosi during her answer and was escorted out of the room.

“It’s not a balance. It’s not constitutional!” he yelled. “No secret laws!”

Others in the room began shouting as well, saying things like “Leave him alone!” or “That’s what a police state looks like right there!”

The moderator, Zerlina Maxwell, worked to quiet the crowd by saying audience members needed to submit questions via Twitter rather than shouting them out, but Pelosi said she didn’t mind.

“I welcome the challenges that people pose because I think that those questions must be answered,” Pelosi said.

She was further booed when she said Snowden did break the law by leaking the information he revealed.

“As far as Snowden: he did violate the law in terms of releasing those documents,” she said.
Some of the crowd erupted in boos, with one man screaming, “You suck!”

“I look forward to working with all of you,” Pelosi continued. “Now that the public knows more – it gives us an opportunity for some of the things we’ve been advocating for a while.”
Oh yeah, when Richard Milhous Obama is spying on all Americans, Nazi Pelosi is all for it, but when George W. Bush was using the NSA program with a narrow focus on people in the US talking to suspected terrorists overseas, she opposed it. Here's a quote from January 2006.
House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi says President Bush should have used his extensive authority under the law to monitor suspected terrorists rather than approve the National Security Agency's disputed monitoring program.

"I would not want any president - Democrat or Republican - to have the expanded power the administration is claiming in this case," Pelosi, D-Calif., said in an interview with The Associated Press.
 
Pelosi did not say the NSA's surveillance program was illegal. But she said the administration should follow the procedures in the 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which allows government lawyers to ask a secretive court for warrants for surveillance in the United States during national security investigations.
 
"If you say . . . this is for a narrow universe of calls, there is absolutely no issue with getting a FISA warrant for that," said Pelosi, who was the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee and has been involved for the past 13 years in overseeing U.S. intelligence agencies.
 
"It is when you go beyond that, that it becomes a challenge," she said in the interview Friday. "The president says he is not going beyond that, so why can't he obey the law?"

In other words: Republican spying b-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-d; Democrat spying g-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-d!

Here's the video:


Thursday, June 20, 2013

Bill O'Reilly Is Not Looking Out For Unemployed Americans, He's Siding With Those Who Broke Immigration Laws Instead

If Bill O'Reilly had any sense of honor and decency, he'd leave Fox News and go join MSNBC, because he showed tonight he's definitely not looking out for the "folks."

Not only did O'Reilly endorse the massive, not yet completed, so-called "immigration reform" bill, he got his clock cleaned when Laura Ingraham (who has actually read what's been written as a bill) brought facts to torpedo his emotionally charged arguments, reminding him at the same time how he wasn't "looking out for the folks." (Mediaite)



Even after border security amendments were added today, many Republicans and conservatives are still skeptical of the immigration reform bill. Ingraham told O’Reilly that she was “uproariously laughing” at his interview with a Republican senator supporting the bill, saying people like Marco Rubio were claiming the public months ago the bill had the toughest immigration enforcement ever. O’Reilly was more optimistic about the bill, clashing with Ingraham over the economic benefits of the bill and whether the GOP needs immigration reform in order to gain more support among Hispanic voters. Ingraham rolled her eyes at O’Reilly and told him not to buy into the Democrats’ “phony, fraudulent narrative.”

Ingraham is right. O'Reilly has bought into the liberal narrative that the GOP will not win elections nationally if they don't drop the securing the border narrative. Let me ask Bill O'Reilly, what makes you think that's true? Because the clowns at MSNBC like RINO Morning Joke and others lecture the GOP to become more liberal?  When was the last time the media lectured Democrats not to be too far left?

The problem O'Reilly, and many in the GOP leadership as well as Marco Rubio, have forgotten is something that Mittens Romney acknowledged at least for one brief moment. The media is not our friend.  They are not interested in the electoral success of Republicans.  O'Reilly was sounding more and more like a liberal he belongs on MSNBC, all while he's allowing all the spin from Rubio and other pro-Amnesty Republicans in the so-called "No Spin Zone."

Right Bill.

So I guess we can say that Bill O'Reilly is not looking out for the folks who are unemployed or working for less than what they were making a few years ago. He's only looking out for the liberal and GOP establishment elitists who want cheap labor, which hurts poor Americans who can't find work.

Wednesday, June 19, 2013

REMINDER! MAF's Troopathon 2013 - Help Team COINS & Make A Donation Supporting Our Troops

I wrote about this last week, and wanted to remind you that this blog is taking part in the Move America Forward Troopathon once again this year in the blogger competition, as a part of Team COINS.

From our team captain, Mandy, aka Liberty Chick:
Leading up to the live broadcast, Troopathon runs a blogger competition to help in the fundraising activities.  Teams of bloggers compete to see which can raise the most.  I am the team captain this year for Team COINS, and am joined by several other excellent bloggers, including:
Marooned in Marin, on Twitter: @MaroonedInMarin
The Minority Report Blog, on Twitter: @stevenfoley
Help our team raise money for care packages for the troops.
$25 – Small Pack – Serves 1 – 2 Troops
$50 – Large Pack: Serves 3 – 4 Troops
$100 – Squad Pack: Serves 8 – 10 Troops
$200 – Platoon Pack: Serves 15 – 20 Troops
$600 – Company Pack: Serves 25 – 30 Troops
$1000 – Battalion Pack: Serves 50 – 60 Troops
troopathontwitterhash
You can also help by spreading the word and tweeting about Troopathon’s donation drive, using the #troopathon hashtag.  Support our blogger team by adding #TeamCOINS!
Here’s a suggested tweet, or make up your own:
Help #TeamCOINS in supporting our troops. Donate to #Troopathon to raise money for care packages. Time’s running out! http://libertychick.com/2013/06/19/troopathon-2013-help-teamcoins-in-supporting-our-troops/

Go to the link above, or to the top button in the sidebar to make your donation. Thank you, but more importantly, our troops will thank you! 

Obama Surrendering To Taliban; Leaves Afghanistan Out Of Negotiations

An absolute disgrace!

Obama is America's Neville Chamerlin, surrendering the "Good War" that the Democrats said back in 2006 to 2008 we should only be fighting...the one in Afghanistan (Powerline).

The U.S. has commenced negotiations with the Taliban. The Afghan government is excluded from the talks, which I consider a disgrace.
 Obama's Peace Partners and their "War on Women"
The U.S. has proved to be a worse than feckless partner. Why any state or group would ever again cast its lot with America, where there are other options, is beyond me.
Quite apart from the exclusion of the Afghan government, the negotiations strike me as a classic case of “lose-lose” as far as the United States is concerned. The Taliban has no good reason to negotiate seriously with us. It knows that most of our troops will be going home soon and that, therefore, its prospects for winning a military victory are good.
Under these circumstances, the Taliban cannot be expected to make concessions. Thus, the likely outcome is “no deal.” This is a loss for the U.S. because we will have gone to the Taliban, hat-in-hand and over the objections of our partner in the fight, and received nothing in return.
But because our negotiating position is so weak, a deal would be even worse. God only knows what concessions we need to make to obtain a deal from such a position. And whatever those concessions are, a deal would describe the terms of our defeat for all the world to ridicule.
I’m not cynical enough to believe that this is what President Obama wants, but the thought has crossed my mind.

I think he would. He supported the rise of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and the Libyan takeover that led to the Benghazi attack.

Far from decimating the group, Obama is overseeing the resurrection of al-Queda. The end result? The kids in elementary & junior high today will be re-fighting a war that Obama surrendered, and which the Afghans and Middle East will not be able to take us at our word.

And to think Obama and the Democrats made "not turning our backs on allies" an issue in their elections.

WOW! Obamaphones Sold And Money Used To Buy Drugs In Philadelphia

James O'Keefe and Project Veritas have released a video looking at fraud involving the "Obamaphones."  That includes, people selling the phones for money, even saying they'll buy drugs with them.

The answers given by the "Obamaphone" workers are stunning.

Here is the raw video:


Tuesday, June 18, 2013

Moochelle Obama's Irish Trip: 30 Hotel Rooms at $3,300 Each

Ms. Big Spender is at it again (Washington Times).


First lady Michelle Obama is sparing no expense on her trip to Ireland, staying at a $3,300-per-night hotel suite in Dublin.

Irish press reports Monday said Mrs. Obama and her entourage have booked 30 rooms in the five-star Shelbourne hotel. The first lady is said to be staying in the Princess Grace Suite, named for the Hollywood film star and princess who had an attachment to the room.



The suite has two guest bedrooms, a living room and a dining area, according to the hotel’s website. There are four phones, three large televisions, bedding of 100 percent Egyptian cotton, a Nespresso machine and butler service.

The cost of the two-day trip in Ireland and Northern Ireland has been estimated at around $5 million. U.S. taxpayers pay the cost of the first family’s travel.

The Obama family also will travel to Germany, where President Obama is to give a speech on Wednesday.

At a time of sequestration budget cuts, the Obamas are coming under fire for their travel costs. The first family’s three-nation trip to Africa at the end of this month is expected to cost up to $100 million.


All while the White House tours are closed, and the town of West, Texas, had FEMA disaster funds denied to them.

Monday, June 17, 2013

(C)Rapper Lil Wayne Walks On American Flag During Video Shoot

Video below, and story from NY Daily News.
Political protest or accidental flag faux pas?
Filming for Lil Wayne’s “God Bless Amerika” music video in New Orleans is under scrutiny after a clip of his performance shows an oversized American flag drop to the street before Wayne tramples Old Glory as he raps.
It may have been overlooked, if not for the incendiary lyrics in the song:
“My country ‘tis of thee/ sweet land of kill ‘em all and let ‘em die/ God bless Amerika/ This so godless Amerika … the stars on the flag are never shining,” the song, off this year’s “I Am Not a Human Being II,” goes.
The one-minute clip shows Weezy, 30, singing in front of the huge red, white and blue flag before it’s let go onto the Hollygrove, New Orleans, street. The drop reveals a group of people standing behind Wayne as he continues to rap, stepping all over the flag as he dances and moves in his hometown.
“All Americans should treat (the flag) with respect,” said John Raughter, an American Legion spokesman speaking generally about the flag and who admitted he had yet to see the clip. “It is the American flag that is draped across the coffins of our fallen heroes when they come back from war. In fact, any veteran can have a flag on their coffin. As such, it’s entitled to the highest respect.”



Wonder if Richard Milhous Obama will reconsider being a fan of this crapper? Or maybe he'll have him over to the White House for dinner after this.

GOP Rep: Boehner Should Be Removed As Speaker If He Brings Senate Amnesty Bill To Floor

A shot across the bow of the crybaby lush who serves as the impotent Speaker of the House (The Hill, via FreeRepublic).

Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-Calif.) warned Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) would face a conference revolt that could threaten his Speakership if he allows a House vote on the immigration bill presently being debated in the Senate.

Conservatives have been pressuring Boehner to adhere to the unwritten “Hastert Rule” — named after former Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) — that says no bill should come to the House floor unless it has the backing of a majority of a chamber's majority party.
Rohrabacher said if Boehner moves forward with a vote on immigration reform without a Republican majority, it would be a “betrayal” of his party.

“I would consider that a betrayal of the Republican members of the House and a betrayal of the Republicans throughout the country,” Rohrabacher said on World Net Daily radio. “If Boehner moves forward ... and permits this to come to a vote even though the majority of Republicans in the House — and that’s if they do — oppose what’s coming to a vote, he should be removed as Speaker.”

Rohrabacher conceded that he didn’t know if a majority of Republicans in the House currently supported a vote on immigration, but said if they do, it’s only because they’ve been deceived by propaganda from the media and a push from conglomerates looking to import cheap labor.

....Rohrabacher blasted his GOP colleague Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), a member of the Gang of Eight, for his part in pushing immigration reform.

“Rubio is so confused and so mixed up I think that he has given up his rightful place to advise any of us in Washington what to do, and certainly given up any right to be trusted by the American people,” he said. “It was over and over, contradiction after contradiction, lie after lie.”

Rohrabacher accused Rubio of using “weasel words” to make the case for reform, and said the Florida senator claimed to support a stronger border as a pre-condition for the legalization of immigrants in the country illegally, but backed down in the face of criticism.

“He all along has been saying all along that we need to have border security first, and then when he gets on Spanish TV, he ends up saying, no, no, that will never get in the way, that legalization status isn’t contingent on border control,” Rohrabacher said. “Well, this is outrageous and no one should believe him."
Just about hits the nail on the head. Also, more of why you should oppose this amnesty bill? It would created a national database of every adult in the U.S.

Not like the NSA has already done that, of course.

Two Lousiana Black Democrats Defect & Join GOP

The worst fear of the Democrat leadership at the state and national levels, when blacks (as well as women and other groups) leave the liberal victim plantation of their party (Star Parker, Townhall.com).


Anyone who doubts that the Republican Party can attract black voters needs only look south to Louisiana.
At a conference held in Baton Rouge at the end of May, called @Large and aimed to attract black conservatives, black Democrat Elbert Guillary, a member of the state legislature, announced that he was switching party and becoming a Republican.
Less than two weeks later, just up the road in Central City, Louisiana, black Democrat city councilman Ralph Washington – who attended this same @Large conference, made the same announcement – he’s becoming a Republican.
It’s really not such a mystery. The mystery is why this is not happening more often.
I’m asked all the time why, when it is so clear that blacks are damaged by the left wing political agenda, black voters so uniformly and consistently support candidates – Democrats – who advance this agenda.
My answer is that Republicans need to start acting more like the businesspeople they claim to be.
Any businessman convinced that his product is the best doesn't blame customers for not buying it. He doubles down on his efforts to understand these potential customers better and how to sell to them.
There needs to be more appreciation of the differences in the black population.
A Gallup poll done in 2011 showed that whereas 39 percent of whites say they are “very religious,” 53 percent of blacks do. A large percentage of “very religious” blacks are conservative and very different from blacks on the left who identify with the NAACP.
The @Large conference, where I was a speaker, was hosted by pastor C.L. Bryant, who tells his own story about leaving the left-wing black establishment in his new film “Runaway Slave.”
Bryant was president of the NAACP chapter in Garland, Texas, but his relationship with the NAACP soured when he refused to speak at a Planned Parenthood pro-abortion event.
His eyes began to open and see that his traditional Christian values – protecting the unborn and promoting the traditional family, individual freedom, and dignity – were out of whack with the political agenda blacks were automatically signing onto.
Elbert Guillary is now the first black Republican in the Louisiana state legislature since reconstruction.
Listen to him to understand why a conservative black leaves the Democratic Party.
He called the Democrats “the party of disappointment” and expressed disillusionment with Democratic policies on abortion, gun control, education, and immigration.
Democrats “have moved away from the traditional values of most Americans,” he said. “Their policies have encouraged high teen birth rates, high high school drop-out rates, high incarceration rates, and very high unemployment rates.”
I don't entirely agree with Parker's assertion that the GOP needs to act like businesspeople. Certainly, yes, it needs to be a party of opportunity. But, there also needs to be a distinct difference between the GOP and Democrats, instead of being "Democrat lite," or coming across in a way that might be interpreted by some as pandering.

What about the immigration (aka amnesty) bill in the Senate?  There's a good opportunity for the national party. Black leaders are writing the Congressional Black Caucus and telling them that this amnesty bill will hurt workers. This comes at a time when 13 percent of blacks are unemployed--double the national average, under Obama.

Saturday, June 15, 2013

Sarah Palin Blasts Amnesty, Jeb Bush In Faith and Freedom Coalition Speech

Sarah Palin has put added her voice against the secretive Gang of Eight amnesty bill in a speech in Washington DC today (Breitbart).
Former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin said the Senate's "special interest" immigration bill rewards "rule breakers" and was not the way to rebuild a conservative majority in America of people who want to restore the country's founding principles.

"Let's not kid ourselves," Palin said while speaking at the Faith and Freedom Coalition's "Road to Majority" conference on Saturday.

She said the Senate's immigration bill not only panders but also rewards "rule breakers." She also pointed out the border security provisions in the bill do not have teeth in criticizing the "special-interest-written amnesty bill."

She also poked fun at Jeb Bush's comments at the conference on Friday in which he said he supported immigration reform because immigrants were "more fertile."

She said it was "dangerous territory" to have immigration debates concerning "one race’s fertility rate over another."

"And I say this from someone who’s kinda fertile herself,” Palin zinged.
Here's Palin's entire speech.


 
Palin also blasted Obama's "Big Brother" spying program on all Americans (Mediaite).
“It seems so Orwellian around here,” Palin said. “Before 1984, terms like ‘leading from behind’ meant following. The other day the White House testified before Congress, bragging that they used the ‘least untruthful statement.’ Where I come from that’s called a lie.”
“Yes, officials lied, and government spied,” Palin rhymed. “In Benghazi, government lied, and Americans died. These scandals are coming at us so fast and furious.”
“It reminds me of a comedy bit from my really, really good friends at Saturday Night Live,” Palin said. “They should think of me as a friend, for a while I was supplying more job security for the Tina Feys of the world and doing more for those employment numbers than Obama’s ever done.”
Palin proceeded to do her best Amy Poehler impression.
“Our government spied on every single one of your phone calls,” she said, “but it couldn’t find two pot-smoking deadbeat Bostonians with a hotline to terrorist central in Chechnya. Really? And it’s built apparatus to sneak into all of the good guys’ communications, but oopsy-daisy! It missed the Fort Hood mass-murder of our own troops, despite this Islamic terrorist declaring his ideology in numerous army counseling sessions and on his own business cards. But no red flags there. Really?”
This is why Sarah Palin resonates with Americans, because she's not a part of nor speaks for the DC elite GOP crowd. That's why the GOP establishment hate her, and why conservatives can't stand the modern GOP a party whose leadership stands for nothing and will fall for anything.

Friday, June 14, 2013

CONFIRMED: CBS Reporter Sharyl Attkisson's Computer Hacked

One of the rare reporters doing actual journalism at the so-called "legacy" media (aka Lapdog Media) is Sharyl Attkisson of CBS News. She is one of the rare big media journalists who has investigated Fast and Furious, as well as BenghaziGate.

Today, CBS has confirmed claims by Attkisson made earlier that her computer had been hacked.

CBS News spokeswoman Sonya McNair said that a cybersecurity firm hired by CBS News "has determined through forensic analysis" that "Attkisson's computer was accessed by an unauthorized, external, unknown party on multiple occasions in late 2012."

"Evidence suggests this party performed all access remotely using Attkisson's accounts. While no malicious code was found, forensic analysis revealed an intruder had executed commands that appeared to involve search and exfiltration of data. This party also used sophisticated methods to remove all possible indications of unauthorized activity, and alter system times to cause further confusion. CBS News is taking steps to identify the responsible party and their method of access."

Several months ago, Attkisson had reported suspected intrusions of her computers, including her CBS News work computer, prompting CBS News to hire a firm to look into the hacking.

At this time, no one has determined who the hacker might be. CBS noted they are not accusing the Federal Government of hacking her computer.

But when AP's and James Rosen of Fox news' phone records have been seized by Eric Holder, you can't help but be suspicious and not trust the government.

Mosques Exempt From Obama's Spying Eyes

Answers the question many of us had. If the Obama Regime's NSA spying on all Americans is for security, then why weren't the Boston Bombers captured and their plot thwarted? (IBD, via American Power).
The White House assures that tracking our every phone call and keystroke is to stop terrorists, and yet it won't snoop in mosques, where the terrorists are.

That's right, the government's sweeping surveillance of our most private communications excludes the jihad factories where homegrown terrorists are radicalized.

Since October 2011, mosques have been off-limits to FBI agents. No more surveillance or undercover string operations without high-level approval from a special oversight body at the Justice Department dubbed the Sensitive Operations Review Committee.

Who makes up this body, and how do they decide requests? Nobody knows; the names of the chairman, members and staff are kept secret.

We do know the panel was set up under pressure from Islamist groups who complained about FBI stings at mosques. Just months before the panel's formation, the Council on American-Islamic Relations teamed up with the ACLU to sue the FBI for allegedly violating the civil rights of Muslims in Los Angeles by hiring an undercover agent to infiltrate and monitor mosques there.

Before mosques were excluded from the otherwise wide domestic spy net the administration has cast, the FBI launched dozens of successful sting operations against homegrown jihadists — inside mosques — and disrupted dozens of plots against the homeland.

If only they were allowed to continue, perhaps the many victims of the Boston Marathon bombings would not have lost their lives and limbs. The FBI never canvassed Boston mosques until four days after the April 15 attacks, and it did not check out the radical Boston mosque where the Muslim bombers worshipped.
Meanwhile, FBI Director Robert Mueller says Obama's NSA program could have stopped 9/11.

Really?

Thursday, June 13, 2013

Twitter Critic, State Department Whistleblower Among Those Receiving Threats From Obama Regime

Perhaps before reading the rest of this post, you need to play this music in the background. Because when you see what the US Government is doing under Richard Milhous Obama, you'll think we live under a dictatorship.


A Twitter user just got a visit from the authorities for criticizing Dear Leader (Examiner via Gateway Pundit).
Tom Francois is an outspoken critic of Barack Hussein Obama- and has a robust Twitter presence. He also likes to dabble with his “paint” program to create funny cartoons. He has never threatened the President in any way, manner or form.
On April 11, 2013, he heard relentless pounding on his door shouts of “Police!” The officers introduced themselves as members of The Secret Service and asked if they could “take a look around.”
Since Tom had nothing to hide (and he didn’t want any return visits) – he complied fully with their request. He even signed a consent to search his premises AND an “Authorization To Review Medical and Mental Health Records!”
They asked Tom if he ever left his state or traveled to Washington, D.C.
One Agent asked Tom if he has any intentions of “whacking” the President.” To which Tom replied- “Of course not. I wish him no harm. I disagree with his policies and actions and I make no bones about it. It’s my First Amendment Right and I intend to exercise it.”
When I spoke to Tom he said, “Yes, I am EXTREMELY critical of Obama in my posts, but I never cross the line and threaten his being. EVER. It’s just the idea of Obama’s Secret Service intruding on my life when they knew I wasn’t really a threat.”
The Secret Service had a thick FBI file- filled with screenshots of hundreds of posts. Said Tom, “I flat out told them ‘I have NEVER threatened Obama’s life! Yes, I despise him as you can plainly see, but I have that right!’ They actually ADMITTED and agreed with me that I hadn’t threatened Obama.”
A State Department whistleblower is being threatened for revealing a cover up of some Department employees using prostitutes and drugs (USA Today).
The allegations were revealed after Aurelia Fedenisn, a former investigator at the State Department's Office of the Inspector General, complained to Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, that senior State Department officials interfered with investigations she was involved in, and then caused a report about the interference to be watered down.
Dallas lawyer Damon Mathias, who represents Fedenisn, said Fedenisn hired him after two diplomatic security agents spoke in a threatening manner to her teenage children at her home in a Virginia suburb of Washington. The agents arrived at the home to talk to Fedenisn about documents Fedenisn had given to Cruz and told the teens that they demanded to speak to their mom immediately, Mathias said.
Royce said he instructed his staff to investigate. At least one other committee is also investigating, according to a senior congressional staffer who was not authorized to speak on the record.
State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki told reporters Tuesday that the allegations are based on a memo that was written "without the benefit of reviewing any case files, (and) included a number of unsubstantiated accusations."
"The notion that we would not vigorously pursue criminal misconduct is not only preposterous, it's inaccurate," Psaki said.
Fedenisn had turned to Cruz after she learned that an investigative report she helped write before she retired in December lacked many investigative details when it was published in February, Mathias said.
Mathias says Fedenisn's claim is that agents from State's Diplomatic Security and other divisions engaged in very questionable and possibly criminal conduct; the Inspector General has been hampered in performing its oversight role; "and the findings they wanted to put in the report end up being left out," Mathias said. "So you have a coverup of the coverup."
When Fedenisn and her lawyers met with lawyers for the Office of the Inspector General, the government lawyers demanded she hand over the documents or they would refer the matter to the Department of Justice and Fedenisn would face criminal prosecution, Mathias said.
"They made it clear that they would go after her criminally," he said.
To show you how the Obama Regime is putting their people in sensitive places, Jen Psaki was part of Obama's 2008 and 2012 campaigns.  Now she's off covering for his Regime at the State Department.

Is it any wonder why so many people are willing to give Ed Snowden hero status?  I don't think I've ever seen a time when so many people have lost trust in government, and are using "security" as a reason to intrude on the lives of everyday Americans.

And how many more are afraid to speak out because of the thuggish tactics being used by this Regime?

Obama's Plan African Family Trip... $60-$100 Million To Be Picked Up By You And I

While many Americans won't have much of a vacation again this summer (seen those fuel costs? airplane fares?), the Obamas are planning another exquisite adventure for which we're picking up the tab for (Weekly Standard).

 
President Obama and his family will be going to Africa later this month. But the trip won't be cheap; it's expected to cost American taxpayers $60 to $100 million, according to the Washington Post.
"When President Obama makes his first extended trip to sub-Saharan Africa later this month, the federal agencies charged with keeping him safe won’t be taking any chances. Hundreds of U.S. Secret Service agents will be dispatched to secure facilities in Senegal, South Africa and Tanzania. A Navy aircraft carrier or amphibious ship, with a fully staffed medical trauma center, will be stationed offshore in case of emergency," reports the Post.
"Military cargo planes will airlift in 56 support vehicles, including 14 limousines and three trucks loaded with sheets of bullet-proof glass to cover the windows of the hotels where the first family will stay. Fighter jets will fly in shifts giving 24-hour coverage over the president’s airspace so they can intervene quickly if an errant plane gets too close.
"The extraordinary security provisions — which will cost the government tens of millions of dollars — are outlined in a confidential internal planning document obtained by The Washington Post. While the preparations appear to be in line with similar travels in the past, the document offers an unusual glimpse into the colossal efforts to protect the U.S. commander-in-chief on trips abroad."
After the paper questioned the costs of a planned family safari, the White House nixed the plan. "The president and first lady had also planned to take a Tanzanian safari as part of the trip, which would have required the president’s special counter-assault team to carry sniper rifles with high-caliber rounds that could neutralize cheetahs, lions or other animals if they became a threat, according to the planning document. But the White House canceled the safari on Wednesday following inquiries from The Washington Post about the trip’s purpose and expense, according to a person familiar with the decision."
The paper adds, "Obama’s trip could cost the federal government $60 million to $100 million based on the costs of similar African trips in recent years, according to one person familiar with the journey who was not authorized to speak for attribution. The Secret Service planning document, which was provided to The Post by a person who is concerned about the amount of resources necessary for the trip, does not specify costs."

Meanwhile, Obama's FEMA denied aid to West, TX, after the deadly explosion at a fertilizer plant killed 14, destroyed a school, other buildings and damaged roads.   I guess the good people of West and the rest of America are supposed to "eat cake" while the Obamas live it up with vacations and golf outings.

Wednesday, June 12, 2013

Obama Donor Bill Maher Calls Trig Palin "Retarded." Doesn't Obama Owe Sarah Palin A Phone Call?

Liberal "comedian" Bill Maher donated a million dollars to a pro-Obama super PAC last year.  Never mind that Obama took Maher's money, even though the liberal celebrity has called Sarah Palin a "cunt" and a "twat" in his "comedy" routines.

Maher went even more over the line, attacking the Palin's young special needs son Trig, who suffers from Downs Syndrome (Breitbart.com).
(Ron) Futrell, a former Las Vegas sports broadcaster and Breitbart News contributor, says on his blog that Maher used the term "retarded" to describe young Trig Palin during the comedy performance. Later, Futrell started heckling the comic over a reference to Halliburton, a confrontation which eventually led to Futrell being asked to leave the venue.
He didn't regret speaking out during the stand-up event.
"I will also always be glad to stand up for those, who many times, have no voice," he wrote on his blog regarding the incident.

Good for you, Ron, for having some decency and standing up to this liberal coward who attacks a special needs child.

Palin issued a challenge to Maher on Twitter.


Maher, being the coward he is, isn't man enough to the challenge. He'd probably wet his pants and run away if Palin entered the same room he was in.

Meanwhile, remember how Richard Milhous Obama condemned Rush Limbaugh, after the radio host called Sarah the Fluke a "slut" because she wants taxpayers to pay for her sex life?  Obama even called the Fluke and took one on the campaign trail with him.

Now, Obama's donor has attacked a special needs child.

Hey Obama, don't you think you owe Sarah Palin a phone call, as well as condemn Bill Maher and return that one million?  After all, where's all that "civility" you lecture us about?

Obama Threatens Veto Of Religious Speech Protection for Our Military

The First Amendment does not apply to those who defend it, according to their so-called "Commander-in-Chief." (Breitbart.com).
Breitbart News reported last week that Rep. John Fleming (R-LA) passed an amendment in the House Armed Services Committee protecting religious speech of service members in the military. President Barack Obama has now threatened to veto the bill if it passes the full House and Senate.
The White House released a Statement of Administration Policy (SAP) on H.R. 1960, the National Defense Authorization Act of 2014. Among other items, the SAP includes as an objection to the bill:
Expansion and Implementation of Protection of Rights of Conscience of Members of the Armed Forces and Chaplains of Such Members: The Administration strongly objects to section 530, which would require the Armed Forces to accommodate, except in cases of military necessity, “actions and speech” reflecting the “conscience, moral principles, or religious beliefs of the member.” By limiting the discretion of commanders to address potentially problematic speech and actions within their units, this provision would have a significant adverse effect on good order, discipline, morale, and mission accomplishment.
The SAP includes a veto threat: “…if the bill is presented to the President for approval in its current form, the President’s senior advisers would recommend that the President veto the bill.”
In other words, Obama says he will veto any bill that forbids his appointees or officers from telling a soldier that he cannot mention Jesus during prayer or have a Bible on his desk, or that keeps those appointees from telling a chaplain (who is an ordained clergyman) what religious teachings he is allowed to give in worship services, or what spiritual counseling he can give to another soldier
 
 

UNBELIEVEABLE! Obama's FEMA Denies Disaster Aid For West, TX After Explosion

On April 25th, Richard Milhous Obama visited West, Texas, the site of a massive explosion at a fertilizer plant that killed 14 people, and told those gathered at a memorial service...

"We'll be there even after the cameras leave and after the attention turns elsewhere. ...Your country will remain ever ready to help you recover and rebuild and reclaim your community."

As what we've come to expect from Obama, those were "just words, just speeches." (WFAA)
The Federal Emergency Management Agency is refusing to provide money to help rebuild West, where a deadly fertilizer plant explosion leveled numerous homes and a school, and killed 15 people.

According to a letter obtained by The Associated Press, FEMA said it reviewed the state's appeal to help West but decided that the explosion "is not of the severity and magnitude that warrants a major disaster declaration." FEMA has, however, provided emergency funds to individual residents.

"I’m very disappointed," said Mayor Tommy Muska. "I guess we’re third page news now.  I’d like to know what their definition of a 'major disaster' really is."

Muska said the rural community of 2,800 people needed the money to repair roads, the damaged sewer system and a school. He said the estimated cost of those repairs is $57 million, including $40 million to rebuild a school that was destroyed when the West Fertilizer Co. blew up in April.

"We don't have the money to go out and borrow the money. We don't have the means to pay that note back," Muska said. "There's got to be some public assistance."

FEMA already has provided millions of dollars in aid to the town of West and its residents, but the decision prevents them from getting some of the widespread assistance typically available to victims of tornadoes, hurricanes and other natural disasters.
 
The decision likely means less money to pay for public repairs to roads, sewer lines, pipes and a school that was destroyed.
But Hanoi John Kerry waived restrictions and sent $1.3 billion in military aid to the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt.  Shouldn't that go to Texas, instead of a brutal regime overseas?

Move America Forward Troopathon 2013 - Support Our Troops! Donate At Sidebar

It is an honor to once again take part in Move America Forward's annual Troopathon, as part of the Blogger competition.



Background information here, for more about Troopathon.
Troopathon is a once-a-year event held by Move America Forward (MAF) which is a non-profit charity dedicated to serving those who protect us: our brave troops. Troopathon 6 is a month-long care package drive that culminates in a star-studded 8-hour web-a-thon broadcast. This year’s broadcast will go live on June 27th from the Richard M. Nixon Presidential Library in Yorba Linda, CA.
Some Useful Facts About Troopathon:

Troopathon is a non-partisan non-political effort. We work with celebrities from Hollywood, television, the music industry, sports heroes and athletes, bloggers, journalists, radio personalities, academics, experts in the field, and elected officials to bring together a wide variety of guests to support our troops.
Past Troopathon events have raised over $3.5 million for our troops. Last year, Troopathon 5 raised over $420,000 but we’d like to break that total this year!
Last year’s Troopathon was hosted by Melanie Morgan who continues to be a voice for our troops through her career behind the microphone at KSFO radio in San Francisco. She was joined by former Congressman J.D. Hayworth, radio host and Fox News contributor Dana Loesch, and Gold Star Mom Debbie Lee. Until his sad passing, Andrew Breitbart was a close member of the Troopathon family and co-hosted every year.
Some of the names who will take part in this year's Troopathon  include two good friends of this blog, Melanie Morgan and Larry O'Connor, Texas Gov. Rick Perry, Gary Sinise, S.E. Cupp, former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, and (just announced) Gene Simmons of the rock band KISS.

But you don't have to wait until June 27th to make a donation to send our troops a care package. At the top of the sidebar is a button for Troopathon, where you can click and make a donation for a care package as a way to say "Thank You" to our troops.

See Move America Forward for more information about Troopathon, and what they do for those who serve us.

Why I'm Witholding Judgement On Edward Snowden

If you've followed the news over the weekend, you'd have found out about Edward Snowden, the leaker of the NSA program that is, well, snooping on us all.

Since there, there have been a lot who have quick to declare him a hero, while the criminal Democrap Party and RINOs like Lindsey Grahamnesty, have branded Snowden a "traitor." All while the Obama/Holder InJustice Department are looking to file charges against him.

Meanwhile, in one of the rare times I agree with them, the ACLU has filed suit against the program.

Well, I'm not too hot about him going off to China for asylum, but I'm not ready to call the guy a traitor, nor a hero...at least yet. 

Hear what Mark Levin said...



Who has done more National Security damage to this nation? I mean who is it, that is not securing the southern border? Who is it, who’s slashing and burning aspects of the United States Military? Who is it that’s doing these things? It’s not some little jerk named Snowden, or somebody else. It’s our President, Barack Hussein Milhouse Obama.
Who is making us more vulnerable ladies and gentlemen? I’m very very serious about this. With his embrace of the Muslim Brotherhood. Let me suggest the Commander In Chief, that’s who. And I mean it.
Which is true, but there's more to Obama's NSA program, which bothers me.

Instead of just targeting suspected terrorists, as his predecessor George W. Bush did, these NSA sweeps are looking at everyone, even those who have not been suspected of a crime. Well, doesn't that violate something known as the Fourth Amendment? Apparently, Mr. Constitutional Lawyer Richard Milhous Obama isn't aware of that, or doesn't care. I think it's the latter. He says we have to choose between liberty and security. That's a phony argument, and rejects that there is a balance between the two. If you begin to act suspiciously, then you start inviting the authorities to watch you.

I supported Bush's NSA program, primarily because it was limited in scope. Obama's (as noted above) is not. Obama and Democraps like Stingy Hoyer, Dianne "ChiFi" Feinstein, support Obama's spying on all Americans but didn't support Bush's spying on suspected terrorists. Why is that? Are Islamofascist terrorists part of the Democrat constituency? Liberals act like they care more about the rights of al-Queda instead of American citizens. Likewise, liberals/Democrats see Tea Party, Christian, NRA and patriot groups as real terrorist threats, while acting as apologists for radical Islamists and Sharia law. It's probably also more of how Democraps suffer from too much of the "My party...right or wrong" attitude, and forget they swore an oath to protect the Constitution "from all enemies, foreign and domestic.

Added to that is the nature of this current Regime. Political opponents, as we have seen with the IRS abuses, have come under punishment and scrutiny for daring to use their First Amendment right to oppose Obama.  The Obama Lapdog Media, as well as Fox News' James Rosen, had their phone records seized. Don't forget that Obama, himself, gained national office in the US Senate when his opponents divorce records were unsealed and leaked to the press.  Eric Holder couldn't answer whether or not Congress had their phones tapped.  Glenn Beck even has theorized that Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts may have been blackmailed into changing his Obamacare decision midstream.

While the Obama Lapdog Media has twisted polls claiming the public supports the seizing of their liberty, it's not true.  Compare this from Rassmussen Reports...public opinion on Bush's NSA program, vs. Obama's.

Rasmussen, December 28, 2005:
Sixty-four percent (64%) of Americans believe the National Security Agency (NSA) should be allowed to intercept telephone conversations between terrorism suspects in other countries and people living in the United States. A Rasmussen Reports survey found that just 23% disagree.
Rasmussen today:
Just 26% of Likely U.S. Voters favor the government's secret collecting of these phone records for national security purposes regardless of whether there is any suspicion of wrongdoing. The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 59% are opposed to the practice. Fifteen percent (15%) are undecided.
Notice the one difference between the two programs, besides the different numbers?

To me, the big difference between Snowden and other leakers is the nature of the leak. Snowden claims he was being selective in his leaks, only exposing the fact all Americans are being spied upon. People whom I think should be considered traitors, like Bradley Manning and Daniel Ellsburg ("Pentagon Papers") leaked military secrets for the purpose of not only aiding our enemies but undermining the war effort against them.

And if Obama's NSA program is protecting Americans, why didn't the Boston Marathon bombers' deadly jihadist attack not get thwarted? Why haven't authorities found and arrested the person(s) behind the political SWATing of Patrick "Patterico" Frey, Erick Erickson, and my friend Aaron Walker?

And to those elected officials who have more of a problem with Snowden instead of the revelations of this unconstitutional spying on all Americans, I ask this question...

Did you forget that your oath of office was to preserve and protect the Constitution against all enemies: foreign and domestic? It is not a loyalty oath to any President or political party.