Friday, April 12, 2013

When It Comes To Guns, Obama Doesn't Care About Our Children, Or Our Constitution (Neither Does The GOP)

Well, if you followed the vote on the Senate bill attacking the Second Amendment, it should become clear the the Republican Party (except for Rand Paul, Marco Rubio, Mike Lee and Ted Cruz) have no interest in protecting the very Constitution they swore an oath to protect.

Instead, it's time to do something!  Because children are being murdered, and we have to protect our phony baloney jobs! Never mind that gun laws already on the books are not being enforced.

So we have to surrender our rights because we have to look like we care? If that's the case, then all those who spilled their blood protecting our Constitution and way of life have all died in vain, because a majority party in the Senate put loyalty to a party and a corrupt, criminal President above their oaths of office.

And 16 Republicans (here are the names of the Shameful Sixteen), in addition to the gutless drunk House Speaker John Boner, are willing to aid them in the surrender.  Because they're afraid of looking heartless, that the mean-old media will say they don't care about our children's safety.

I'm sure some of you libs reading this probably think I, and others who believe our Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms, are just about of selfish Americans who put our own wishes above the needs for all.  Well, I have a question for you, if you libs, or your pathetic President cares so much about kids, why is he the most extreme pro-abortion President in history?  So extreme that Obama even stood up for the right to let a baby still living after a botched abortion die on the hospital floor?

Obama says the gangsta Trayvon Martin would look like his son, while Moochelle Obama claims links herself to a murdered Chicago teenager. But neither of them say anything about the millions of babies who have been killed by abortion, because we don't want to burden our daughters with a mistake. Neither will they say a word about the gruesome baby-killing of abortionist Kermit Gosnell, whose crime is being covered up by the liberal activist media.

"If Dr. Gosnell had walked into a nursery and shot seven infants with an AR-15, it would be national news and the subject of presidential hand-wringing." That was the challenging observation made this morning by Rep. Chris Smith, R-NJ, on the floor of the U.S. House.
What have you not heard about this trial?   One courageous liberal, Kirsten Powers from Fox News has the details (via Sister Toldjah).
Infant beheadings. Severed baby feet in jars. A child screaming after it was delivered alive during an abortion procedure. Haven’t heard about these sickening accusations?
It’s not your fault. Since the murder trial of Pennsylvania abortion doctor Kermit Gosnell began March 18, there has been precious little coverage of the case that should be on every news show and front page. The revolting revelations of Gosnell’s former staff, who have been testifying to what they witnessed and did during late-term abortions, should shock anyone with a heart.
[...]Let me state the obvious. This should be front page news. When Rush Limbaugh attacked Sandra Fluke, there was non-stop media hysteria. The venerable NBC Nightly News’ Brian Williams intoned, ”A firestorm of outrage from women after a crude tirade from Rush Limbaugh,” as he teased a segment on the brouhaha. Yet, accusations of babies having their heads severed — a major human rights story if there ever was one — doesn’t make the cut.
You don’t have to oppose abortion rights to find late-term abortion abhorrent or to find the Gosnell trial eminently newsworthy. This is not about being “pro-choice” or “pro-life.” It’s about basic human rights.
But the Obamas, the godless-Democrat Party, and the liberal media are silent. Because the sacred (to the secular "religion" of liberalism) blood sacrament of abortion must be protected at all costs.

You liberals and surrender monkey in the GOP don't understand the slippery slope we're already on, and you're the ones greasing the skids to the slide. Using a tragedy like what happened in Newton, CT to justify taking away the rights of law abiding citizens is how tyrants throughout history have justified oppressing their's for the common good. We know that Obama has complained years ago about how the Constitution is a "constraining" document and a "charter of negative liberties."

So what happens when we lose the right to defend not only our families, but also stomp out the rise of a tyrannical government? Our other rights, such as the right to free speech, religion, and others, will easily be stripped away, because there will be no fear of an armed rebellion.

Look what is happening now. Dr. Ben Carson has been silenced by the left-wing fascists at the university he taught, because he believes in the idea of traditional marriage.  Pamela Geller has had a speech at a Long Island synagogue cancelled because she was going to speak against Sharia Law. That didn't sit well with the pro-Sharia lobby as well as their liberal defenders like the violence-inspiring Southern Poverty Law Center.  In other words, defending traditional marriage and family, Christianity, or warning about jihad is considered "controversial" in Richard Milhous Obama's Amerika.

Meanwhile, who is going to stand for the rest of us and our Constitution, except for just a handful of brave legislators?  Who will have the courage?

No comments: