Wednesday, October 31, 2012

Rape Jokes Told At Liberal Moonbat Alan Grayson's Hollywood Fundraiser

How many times in the last few months have liberals accused GOP candidates of being "pro-rape" because they may hold the opinion that abortion should not be legal in the case of a pregnancy from a rape?  That's what they've done to people like Todd Akin and, most recently, Richard Mourock.

But liberals can hold a fundraiser for an ex-congressman who was one of the most unhinged, partisan, left-wing moonbats from the state of Florida, and the rape jokes flew like birds (Daily Caller).
The five comedians there to support Grayson performed jokes that were edgy, raunchy and sometimes funny. That’s standard fare for the comedy club circuit. Topics that would be out of bounds to joke about in normal conversation are covered in abundance when the lights dim on the stand-up stage. There’s nothing necessarily wrong with that. What’s unusual is that 10 days before Election Day, a congressional candidate would raise money from an event full of rape jokes.
Making fun of Republican Missouri Senate candidate Todd Akin’s suggestion that there is some biological mechanism to prevent a woman from being impregnated when she is raped, comedian Jimmy Dore riffed on how he and his wife were poor when they were younger and couldn’t afford birth control.
Guess you’re going to have to rape me,” Dore mimicked his wife saying.
Melodramatically striding to the stage to Enya’s “Only Time,” (Sarah) Silverman declared to much laughter as the music faded, “Wow. God, I love that song — I was a brutally raped to that song.”
Didn’t ruin it for me,” she added.
Silverman went on to explain that while rape is perhaps the most “heinous crime imaginable,” rape jokes are a “hidden gem in comedy.”
Rape jokes are great because they make a comedian seem very edgy and very dangerous,” she said.
Plus, she added, “who’s going to complain?”
Silverman joked that rape victims are “traditionally not complainers” and the worst that could happen is ”after a show a woman might come up to you and say, ‘Look, I’m a victim of rape … and I thought that joke was insensitive and inappropriate and totally my fault.’”
Moving away from rape jokes, Silverman told the crowd of just under 100 that they must remember that both conservatives and liberals want the best for the country, even if liberals are more “open-minded” and conservatives are “less open-minded” and ” a little more “faggot-ish.”
But, “I pray for them,” she said.

It gets raunchier so you can click and read the rest.

OK, what Todd Akin said was wrong, and he has apologized several times for it. He has not made the same mistake. Unfortunately, many in the conservative movement (myself included) quickly threw him under the bus because of the stigma that the abortion lobby has put on anyone who deeply questions their blood sacrament.  It was the wrong thing to do.  I still don't agree with what Akin said, but think Missourians should keep in mind he has not made the same mistake and he'd be a much better Senator than the corrupt, Obamabot Claire McCaskill.

That said, what these liberals have done is much, much worse than what Akin did.  They are taking one of the most brutal crimes and making a joke out of it. Don't get me started about Sarah Silverman. She is a vile creature who, if you remember, made a video attacking Jewish GOP donor Sheldon Adelson. In the video, she asked him to give money to Obama and she was seen humping a small dog near the end of the video.  Did you notice also she used an anti-gay slur in the DC story above?

How many times, especially if you're on Twitter, do these same "anti-rape" liberals attack conservative women with rape threats? I've seen it done to Michelle Malkin, Sarah Palin, Dana Loesch, and even yesterday to a teenage conservative.

So you libs don't give me your self-righteous malarkey about rape when you joke about it and threaten women with it with a frightening regularity.

Tuesday, October 30, 2012

Obama: "We Leave Nobody Behind"

Talking today at the American Red Cross following Hurricane Sandy, Richard Milhous Obama said the following (Brietbart.com) (at 8:54 in video below).


This is a tough time for a lot of people; millions of folks all across the Eastern Seaboard, but America's tougher. And we're tougher because we pull together, we leave nobody behind, we make sure we respond as a nation and remind ourselves that whenever an American is in need, all of stand together to make sure we're providing the help that's necessary.

Mr. Obama, it would have been nice if Ambassador Chris Stevens, Sean Smith, Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty would not have been left beind by you and your Regime to be killed by al-Queda terrorists in Benghazi, Libya.

Islamist Tool "Jihad" Gerry Connolly Says Military Vets Not Qualified To Serve In Congress - VOTE HIM OUT NOV 6!

I'm writing this post to those in the Virginia Congressional District 11, and to those who will be part of it due to redistricting.

We need to defeat the current Dist. 11 Representative "Jihad" Gerry Connolly next Tuesday.

Connolly is facing a challenge from Republican Chris Perkins, a former Green Beret in next week's election. The Congressman attacked Perkins military service (LVTSG, via Gateway Pundit).





Virginia Congressman Gerry Connolly (D-11) shocked constituents by suggesting that military Veterans are unqualified to serve in Congress because their deployments prevent them from putting “sweat equity” into the districts they hope to serve in Congress.
Congressman Connolly is running against Colonel Chris Perkins, a retired officer who served most of his more than 24 years in uniform as an Army Green Beret deployed overseas. Connolly has repeatedly suggested that Perkins’ lack of local involvement because of his military career makes him unqualified to hold federal office.
In an October 22nd Washington Post interview, Connolly “dismisses Perkins as unqualified” for Congress, despite Colonel Perkins’ many leadership assignments that included command of a Special Forces Battalion of over six-hundred men, and numerous combat deployments.
While speaking to a local Chamber of Commerce a few weeks earlier, Connolly asked the audience, “Where has my opponent been” while Connolly served in local government for 16 years.
Days later at a neighborhood civic association, Congressman Connolly subsequently pressed his line of attack dismissing Colonel Perkins’ extensive military experience saying, “I expect a [Congressional] candidate to have demonstrated some sweat-equity” on local issues, ignoring the 24 years Colonel Perkins served as an Army Green Beret.
 
 Perkin's response:




Connolly is following the same disgraceful attack lines used by fellow military-bashing Democrat Jim Moron back in 2010.

Personally, I think a Green Beret has more sense than a liberal clown who not only ran Fairfax County into the ground financially, but used his positions of public trust to act as a tool for radical Islamists, hence the nickname "Jihad Gerry."

When he was Chairman of the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors, Connolly vocally defended the Islamic Saudi Academy during their lease renewal hearing in 2008 when they were in the news for extremist material in their textbooks, as well as links to Islamofascist terrorism. In the process, "Jihad Gerry" attacked good people like Andrea Lafferty of the Traditional Values Coalition, her husband Jim Lafferty, and others as "slanderous bigots" while defending the madrassa as "diversity." (video below from Black Velvet Bruce Li).







It was during his run for Congress in 2008 that it was revealed Connolly had received support and contributions from radical Islamists.  Connolly, along with former part-time VA Governor/DNC chair (now US Senate candidate) Tim Kaine, Moran and other Democrats were invited guests at a fundraiser in 2010 for the radical Dar-al-Hijrah Islamic Center in Falls Church, VA, where two 9/11 hijackers and the Ft. Hood Jihadist attended the sermons of deceased radical Imam Anwar Al Alwaki. Kaine, Moron and others back out, but Connolly did not give word if he did attend or not.

During his first term, "Jihad Gerry" showed more of his outrage towards those who wear the uniform by wanting photos released of alleged "torture and abuse" of jihadis by US military interrogators.  But despite all his defense of Islamists, "Jihad Gerry" doesn't believe in religious freedom, especially when it comes to matters of conscience with birth control and the liberal blood sacrament of abortion.


But despite all his concern for women's rights, Connolly's staff has contempt for conservative women, allegedly pushing one blogger back in 2009 during the run up to ramming Obamacare down our throats.  Of course, Connolly is in lockstep with the extreme, left-wing agenda of Nancy Pelosi and Richard Milhous Obama. He has openly stated he is "proud of have been a part" of Obama's radical agenda that has destroyed prosperity in America. All the while, he openly lies about GOP VP Candidate Paul Ryan's plan to fiscal sanity.

Some are more equal than others, especially if you're a liberal Congressman. BVBL wrote in 2010 of how Connolly had snow from a blizzard on his street cleared for him to get to Congress while others, well, weren't so fortunate.



I could go on and mention Connolly being videotaped for advocating voter supression in selecting his replacement, Sharon Bulova, as Fairfax County Board of Supervisors Chair in 2009.

It's time for us who are or are soon to be in District 11 to retire "Jihad" Gerry Connolly and replace him with a patriot who has served this nation with honor.

You can find out more about Chris Perkins by going here, as well as donating to his campaign here.

Civility: MorOn.org Ad Uses Seniors In Ad Threatening Violence If Mitt Romney Wins

The far-left fringe of the Democrat Party has lost it.

They've falsely attacked Mitt Romney as a tax cheat, a felon, and his wife Ann has been attacked by feminazis for being a stay at home mom. Libs have also attacked her for having a riding horse, never mind she has one as therapy for multiple sclerosis recovery.

Now that their False Messiah Richard Milhous Obama is losing favor with Americans, as well as footing in the polls, libs are now threatening violence should Mitt Romney win the Presidency.

Gateway Pundit posted this ad funded by MorOn.org and that lard ass Michael Moore.  Be prepared to be offended.


The first elderly lady says, if Mitt Romney wins, we're going to burn this motherf-cker to the ground!

The second one says if Mitt Romney wins, “I’m going to give Romney a cock-punch right in his nut sack.”

All I can do once again is remind libs of their false Messiah's words from January 2011.


“At a time when our discourse has become so sharply polarized–at a time when we are far too eager to lay the blame for all that ails the world at the feet of those who happen to think differently than we do–it’s important for us to pause for a moment and make sure that we are talking with each other in a way that heals, not a way that wounds.”
Not just uncivil, but the sign of a campaign that is losing and lashing out.

Calm After The Storm In DC Burbs

Where I am just 20 miles away from Washington DC, the winds have died down and the rain isn't as heavy from Hurricane Sandy.

But people up above us have it much worse: property damage, flooding, loss of power...you name it.

Keep those seriously afflicted from this storm in your prayers and thoughts.

Sunday, October 28, 2012

Dem Pollster Pat Caddell Anger On BenghaziGate "These People (Obama Regime & Media) Have No Honor"

This clip was from Jeanine Pirro's Fox News TV show last night, and should be passed around to anyone who cares about this nation (Right Scoop).

In a clearly emotional moment, Pat Caddell says he feels outrage and shame for his country after listening to Tyrone Woods family speak out over the handling of the Benghazi attacks by the Obama administration as the way the media is ignoring it. He says they have no honor and repeats his statement that the MSM has become a fundamental threat to American democracy and the enemies of the American people.


Caddell said the Obama Lapdog Media has "been in the tank on this in a way I've never seen... I am appalled right now. This White House, this President, this Vice President, this Secretary of State, all of them, are willing apparently to dishonor themselves and this country for the cheap prospect of getting reelected...willing to cover up and lie. The worst thing is the very people who are supposed to protect the American people with the truth - the leading mainstream media...they have become a threat, a fundamental threat to American democracy and the enemies of the American people... these people have no honor... coverup is too nice of a word..."

Even though he worked with Jimmy Carter, I have to say Pat Caddell is one of the last intellectually honest Democrats who is actually willing to put country ahead of party.  Everyone, regardless of party affiliation, should be appalled at the way the Obama Regime LIED to the American people and tried to cover-up the truth of what happened in Benghazi on 9/11/2012, including putting an American in jail for making a YouTube video.

Preparing For An Unwelcome Visitor - Hurricane Sandy

If you're anywhere in the Mid-Atlantic or East Coast, your Sunday afternoon plans have no doubt shifted because of the threat of Hurricane Sandy (Weather.com).
Tens of thousands of people along the coast in Delaware, New Jersey, Connecticut and other threatened areas were also under orders to clear out because of the danger of as much as a foot of rain, punishing winds of 80 mph and a potentially deadly tidal surge of 4 to 8 feet.
"This one is going to be completely different from (Hurricane) Irene, because of a very different track, coming in from a completely different direction when it comes to shore," said Dr. Rick Knabb, director of the National Hurricane Center.
"This leftward turn (to the west) that we're forecasting… when a cyclone takes a completely different track, that increases the chances of different spots that did or didn't experience flooding and other impacts to have a different outcome this time. So you have to prepare as if you've never experienced this (storm) before, because you haven't."
Sandy was headed north from the Caribbean to meet a winter storm and a cold front, plus high tides from a full moon, and experts said the rare hybrid storm that results will cause havoc over 800 miles from the East Coast to the Great Lakes.
The danger was hardly limited to coastal areas. Forecasters were far more worried about inland flooding from storm surge than they were about winds. Rains could saturate the ground, causing trees to topple into power lines, utility officials said, warning residents to prepare for several days at home without power.
What makes the storm so dangerous and unusual is that it is coming at the tail end of hurricane season and the beginning of winter storm season, "so it's kind of taking something from both," said Jeff Masters, director of Weather Underground.
Masters said the storm could be bigger than the worst East Coast storm on record -- the 1938 New England hurricane known as the Long Island Express, which killed nearly 800 people. "Part hurricane, part nor'easter -- all trouble," he said.
If you've never been through a hurricane before, there's Hurricane preparedness tips at the Red Cross website. The Red Cross also has more information here, as well as a downloadable hurricane app where you can find a nearby shelter.

Having been though hurricanes before, it is important to have batteries, non-perishable food items and plenty of bottled water on hand.  Cell phones should be charged up in case power goes out.  You may also have to wait to use tap water, as supplies might be contaminated.  Same goes with sewer systems, which could prevent flushing toilets. It's best to take all precautions and not try to do anything that could put your life and the lives of others at risk.

If you've followed this blog for a while, you'll remember we liveblogged Hurricane Irene last year, which wasn't my first time riding out a hurricane. I can recall going through the Category 5 storm Hurricane Allen in August 1980, which had winds in the Gulf of Mexico up to 180 mph. It weakened considerably to a Category 3 before making landfall in the lower Rio Grande Valley area of South Texas where I lived with my parents (video footage).


Two other Category 5 storms threatened our area, Hurricane Anita in September 1977 threatened the Rio Grande Valley of Texas but went into northern Mexico (was the only time I ever remember schools being closed due to weather).  Hurricane Gilbert in September 1988 gave us a lot of wind, rain and tornadoes, but also went into northern Mexico.

It looks like here in the DC area, we're going to get winds and a lot of rain. Have heard from one high school friend in Norfolk that they had to move her husband's truck to higher ground. New York, Philadlephia, Delaware and New Jersey are going to get a lot the brunt, from reports I've seen on Weather Channel. Will be posting updates when they come available and try to live-blog when I can.  To all readers and friends on the East Coast, stay safe!

My good friend Tania Gail at MidnightBlue has posted information for her local area of Philadelphia.

Saturday, October 27, 2012

#BenghaziGate: Father Of Hero Navy SEAL Tyrone Woods Speaks With Sean Hannity

This was from last night's edition of Hannity (video via This Ain't Hell).


In another post, Jonn at TAH goes into the game of finger pointing and evasion coming from 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.
But in the vacuum of non-answers from the President, the White House’s National Security Council spokesman Tommy Vietor recently told the folks at Yahoo News that “Neither the president nor anyone in the White House denied any requests for assistance in Benghazi” which still doesn’t answer the question. Since the Defense Department and the CIA have both told the media that neither of them denied fire support for the embattled Americans in the consulate, the who was it? It only leaves the State Department without a denial.
Our new buddy, William Kristol at the Weekly Standard claims that only the White House could have made the decision to intercede, so someone isn’t being forthcoming with the American people who are clamoring for answers. COB6, a long-experienced special warfare officer, himself, agrees;
Only two places could have called off the attack at that point; the WH situation command (based on POTUS direction) or AFRICOM commander based on information directly from the target area.
If the AC130 never left Sigonella (as Penetta says) that means that the Predator that was filming the whole thing was armed.
If that SEAL was actively “painting” a target; something was on station to engage! And the decision to stand down goes directly to POTUS!
From the Fox News link;
Obama also said in the TV interview, as he said previously said, the administration is going to “investigate what happened to make sure it never happens again” and find out who was involved in the attack so they can be brought to justice.
Yeah, at this point, I think the only way we’re going to make sure that it doesn’t happen again is to remove everyone who was involved in the decision-making on this instance come election day. Since the president is so adamant about NOT making this an election issue only makes me want to make it MORE of an election day issue. That might be the only way to get any straight answers out of this White House.

The more that comes out about what happened, the more it should become an election year issue.  Why? Because the number one responsibility of our federal government is protecting America. How can you do that when the "Commander-in-Chief" is willing to cut spending on the backs of the military, but is also unwilling to make the "gutsy call" to protect Americans and our assets when they are under attack from our enemies.

It's fair to say that Obama's campaign slogan of "Forward" needs an update. Here's my proposal.

At A House In Manassas, VA...

...someone is a real fan of Richard Milhous Obama (sarcasm off)!



via Sister Toldjah on Facebook.

Friday, October 26, 2012

CIA Director Petraeus Tosses Obama Under Bus; Obama Refuses To Answer Questions On Benghazi to Denver News

More BenghaziGate news:

Richard Milhous Obama is finding out what the wheels on the bus look like from down under, as CIA Director Gen. David Petraeus has tossed him under his own bus (Weekly Standard, via Sister Toldjah).

Breaking news on Benghazi: the CIA spokesman, presumably at the direction of CIA director David Petraeus, has put out this statement: "No one at any level in the CIA told anybody not to help those in need; claims to the contrary are simply inaccurate. ”

So who in the government did tell “anybody” not to help those in need? Someone decided not to send in military assets to help those Agency operators. Would the secretary of defense make such a decision on his own? No.
 
It would have been a presidential decision. There was presumably a rationale for such a decision. What was it? When and why—and based on whose counsel obtained in what meetings or conversations—did President Obama decide against sending in military assets to help the Americans in need?
 
Obama's lapdog media has ignored the story, but one Denver TV station tried to press him on these troubling revelations that came out today, and he did his best to evade the questions (9News.com).
 
KYLE CLARK: Were the Americans under attack at the consulate in Benghazi Libya denied requests for help during that attack? And is it fair to tell Americans that what happened is under investigation and we'll all find out after the election? 
PRESIDENT OBAMA: Well, the election has nothing to do with four brave Americans getting killed and us wanting to find out exactly what happened. These are folks who served under me who I had sent to some very dangerous places. Nobody wants to find out more what happened than I do. But we want to make sure we get it right, particularly because I have made a commitment to the families impacted as well as to the American people, we're going to bring those folks to justice. So, we're going to gather all the facts, find out exactly what happened, and make sure that it doesn't happen again but we're also going to make sure that we bring to justice those who carried out these attacks. 
KYLE CLARK: Were they denied requests for help during the attack? 
PRESIDENT OBAMA: Well, we are finding out exactly what happened. I can tell you, as I've said over the last couple of months since this happened, the minute I found out what was happening, I gave three very clear directives. Number one, make sure that we are securing our personnel and doing whatever we need to. Number two, we're going to investigate exactly what happened so that it doesn't happen again. Number three, find out who did this so we can bring them to justice. And I guarantee you that everyone in the state department, our military, the CIA, you name it, had number one priority making sure that people were safe. These were our folks and we're going to find out exactly what happened, but what we're also going to do it make sure that we are identifying those who carried out these terrible attacks.

Oh yes, this election has a lot to do with four Americans who were killed. It is a barometer to decide if the person who is Commander in Chief is willing to act in the best interests of those who serve under them, or are they willing to act only on political motives.

I'm mean, look, we have a "President" who won't face the American people and come clean on some very damning revelations, especially when one American is in a jail cell as a whipping boy of this President for creating a silly YouTube video.  All this President does is go on every other celebrity show where they fawn all over him and attend one fundraiser after another.

When he's not doing that, he's attacking his GOP opponent, Mitt Romney, with more fervor than he is the scum who killed our people in Benghazi, as he did today, which Sarah Rumph at Sunshine State Sarah notes.



Wow. Mitt Romney, sitting on a chair wearing a dunce cap, with the caption, "Sums it up." I'm surprised they didn't just say he was a "stupidhead" or a "poo-poo-face" or any of the other creative little insults that six year olds are so talented at creating.

If you click on the image on the Tumblr page, it takes you to another page with the image again and the following text:
Romney’s foreign policy record is extraordinarily lack-luster; America needs to work in specifics, not generalities. We cannot trust his heavy hand in dealing with nuances of international diplomacy.
Ah, yes, the nuances.
 
Think about this...four Americans were killed on the anniversary of the attack on our homeland, the President did nothing, and yet this jerk takes childish pot shots at Romney and questions his foreign policy as "lackluster?" Give me a f--ing break! He's spent the last year spiking the football as "President Gutsy Call" over killing bin Laden, and yet when he had the chance to make a REAL gutsy call to save the lives of those at Benghazi, he voted "Present." 

Gutsy-call my ass!

Mark Levin (audio at the Right Scoop) went nuclear this evening. You must hear the clip at the link.

A Friendly Reminder....

Got this photo from my sister yesterday, when it was 12 days away from November 6th.

This should motivate us to keep it going until then.


#WAR

BenghaziGate: CIA Operators Told Stand Down; Biden Asks Father Of Fallen SEAL If His Son "Always Have Balls The Size Of Cue Balls"

BenghaziGate is getting worse by the day.

Fox News is reporting (via Legal Insurrection) that CIA operators were denied request for help while the attack was happening.

Fox News has learned from sources who were on the ground in Benghazi that an urgent request from the CIA annex for military back-up during the attack on the U.S. consulate and subsequent attack several hours later was denied by U.S. officials -- who also told the CIA operators twice to "stand down" rather than help the ambassador's team when shots were heard at approximately 9:40 p.m. in Benghazi on Sept. 11.

Former Navy SEAL Tyrone Woods was part of a small team who was at the CIA annex about a mile from the U.S. consulate where Ambassador Chris Stevens and his team came under attack. When he and others heard the shots fired, they informed their higher-ups at the annex to tell them what they were hearing and requested permission to go to the consulate and help out. They were told to "stand down," according to sources familiar with the exchange. Soon after, they were again told to "stand down."

Woods and at least two others ignored those orders and made their way to the consulate which at that point was on fire. Shots were exchanged. The rescue team from the CIA annex evacuated those who remained at the consulate and Sean Smith, who had been killed in the initial attack. They could not find the ambassador and returned to the CIA annex at about midnight.

At that point, they called again for military support and help because they were taking fire at the CIA safe house, or annex. The request was denied. There were no communications problems at the annex, according those present at the compound. The team was in constant radio contact with their headquarters. In fact, at least one member of the team was on the roof of the annex manning a heavy machine gun when mortars were fired at the CIA compound. The security officer had a laser on the target that was firing and repeatedly requested back-up support from a Spectre gunship, which is commonly used by U.S. Special Operations forces to provide support to Special Operations teams on the ground involved in intense firefights. The fighting at the CIA annex went on for more than four hours -- enough time for any planes based in Sigonella Air base, just 480 miles away, to arrive. Fox News has also learned that two separate Tier One Special operations forces were told to wait, among them Delta Force operators.

The information coming out about BenghaziGate is now prompting some to come forward with their anger towards the Regime, like the father of Navy SEAL Tyrone Woods (UK Daily Mail).

Charles Woods, father of Tyrone Woods, said he thought Barack Obama had 'no remorse' over the attack and felt Hillary Clinton was 'not telling the truth'.

And he revealed that at the ceremony for the return of Tyrone's body, the Vice President approached his family and asked, 'Did your son always have balls the size of cue balls?'

Mr Woods added that the President seemed cold and distant at the time, saying: 'Shaking hands with him, quite frankly, was like shaking hands with a dead fish.'

Mr. Woods told this to Glenn Beck yesterday (video below).


Hillary Rotten Clinton apparently told Mr. Woods the Regime would not rest until the guy who filmed the YouTube video was behind bars.  That's where he is, behind bars today and won't be released until after the election.

People who have this much disrespect for the famlies of the fallen, as well as the right of free speech do not belong in our highest offices and we have the chance to remove them on November 6.

Thursday, October 25, 2012

A NEW LOW - Obama Campaign Compares Voting To Losing Virginity

Mark Levin was talking about this earlier and the ad was being passed around on Twitter.

This is from the Obama Campaign, targeting first time women voters.


Sister Toldjah writes:

And here I thought women were more than just the sum total of our “lady parts”? Apparently not. Is nothing sacred and innocent anymore? Most “first time” voters are those who have turned 18. This video is aimed at young teenage women!

Twitchy.com has a tweet round-up of the enthusiastic supporters of this disgusting tactic – like (unsurprisingly) actress Ashley Judd, as well as comments from critics. This one pretty well sums it up for me:
Make sure you (respectfully) let Obama campaign manager Jim @Messina2012 (who is promoting this video) know how you feel about it, especially if you’re a woman sick of being treated like you need to be extra nice (hint hint) to Uncle Sam to make it in the world.

With this whole birth control, "lady parts" meme being run by the Obama Campaign, I've felt and stated that they treat women like sex objects. This disgusting ad is further proof of that.

President Civility Obama: "That's (Mitt Romney) A Bullshitter"

Remember back in 2011, after the tragic shooting of Rep. Gabby Giffords and 13 others, with six people killed, President Richard Milhous Obama took the opportunity to lecture the nation about "civility" after it was (falsely) alleged by liberals in the media and politics that Giffords was targeted by the Tea Party and Sarah Palin.

"At a time when our discourse has become so sharply polarized," he said, "at a time when we are far too eager to lay the blame for all that ails the world at the feet of those who happen to think differently than we do — it's important for us to pause for a moment and make sure that we are talking with each other in a way that heals, not a way that wounds."

We know how well Democrats took those words to heart last year.


Over a year later, Obama showed just how uncivil he is in regards to his Republican opponent, Mitt Romney, in responding to well wishes from the six year old child of an editor (Business Insider).

"We arrived at the Oval Office for our 45-minute interview ... on the morning of October 11th. ... As we left the Oval Office, executive editor Eric Bates told Obama that he had asked his six-year-old if there was anything she wanted him to say to the president. ... [S]he said, 'Tell him: You can do it.' Obama grinned. ... 'You know, kids have good instincts,' Obama offered. 'They look at the other guy and say, 'Well, that's a bullshitter, I can tell.'"

Besides his lack of civility while lecturing for more of it, Obama the Jerk likes to dish out the trash talk but can't take it when it's thrown back at him.  Remember when Mark Halperin said Obama acted like a (rhymes with Rick) last year?  Well, Jay Carney called MSNBC and complained for President Thin-Skinned.
"The comment that was made was inappropriate," Carney said. "It would be inappropriate to say about a president of either party."
But it's OK for Obama the classless jerk to call his opponent a foul name?

BREAKING: Criminal Investigation Launched Into Rep. Jim Moran's Son In Vote Fraud Video

James O'Keefe of Project Veritas stuck again yesterday, releasing a video that featured the Congressional District 8 (next door to me) in Northern Virginia, a deep blue district.  It is represented by Democrat Jim Moran (or, as one health care town hall protester refered him to me as, the "Alexandria town drunk").

Anyway, Moran's son, Pat, who is the field director for his dad's campaign, was caught on video talking to an undercover reporter about faking utility bills in an effort to commit voter fraud.



Moran stepped down as his dad's field director yesterday afternoon, but his troubles are just beginning.

This morning, Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli appeared on WMAL and said only the Arlington (VA) County Prosecutor has the authority to investigate. The only time the Virginia Attorney General gets involved is when the Board of Elections asks for the AG to investigate.


 
 
 
Just this afternoon, Arlington County authorities have started a criminal investigation into Pat Moron  (ARLNow.com).
 
The Arlington County Police Department has opened a criminal investigation into a video of Patrick Moran, son of Rep. Jim Moran and former field director of his reelection campaign. 
The video, released yesterday by conservative activist James O’Keefe, allegedly shows Moran offering advice on how to cast fraudulent ballots. The advice was given to an undercover reporter who approached Moran with a scheme to fraudulently vote on behalf of 100 people. 
Moran has since resigned from the campaign. 
From an ACPD press release:
The Arlington County Commonwealth Attorney’s Office and the Arlington County Police Department have been made aware of a video released yesterday allegedly depicting Patrick Moran, former Director of Field Operations for the Jim Moran for Congress campaign organization, assisting another to vote illegally.

The Arlington County Police Department has initiated a criminal investigation of this matter.

Of course, it remains to be seen if this will have any effect at all on his father's re-election. Rep. Moron has been re-elected 11 times, despite anti-Semitic slurs, spousal abuse claims and other assaults, including an attack on an eight year old African American child.

Censorship At Washington ComPost: Dissent Against "Hating Breitbart" Negative Review Erased

On Sunday, I ended up reading a hard copy version of Mark Jenkins' "review" of the movie "Hating Breitbart," which was essentially just a character attack on Breitbart, as well as a dismissal of his work and legacy, disguised as a movie review.

Apparently, many people dissented from the ComPost reviewer, so much so that their comments were taken down (Anne Sorock, Legal Insurrection).

The Washington Post, whose Mark Jenkins (also of NPR) gave 1.5 stars to the Andrew Breitbart documentary Hating Breitbart, has now erased all user reviews from their website, according to the movie’s producer Andrew Marcus. The documentary, which brought in the second-highest per-screen revenues in the country over the weekend, had such a successful run that it is now expanding beyond its initial four-market opening.

Marcus tweeted Wednesday morning, “WaPo flushed all of the positive reader reviews of Hating Breitbart down the memory hole!” with a link to the prior reviews that used to be on the site:

WaPo’s Mark Jenkins had nothing but derision for the man and the movie, writing in his review that “it’s hard to argue that he left a major legacy.”

....Breitbart created an army of citizen journalists, full of blue-haired old ladies, retired men and women, working moms, businessmen, and every other ilk other than those who went to journalism school. I’m one of them, and many of my friends entered into the scrum solely because of Breitbart’s influence. It is we who Mark Jenkins is attacking in his piece. For if Andrew Breitbart has no legacy, we don’t exist.

And apparently our reviews don’t exist either, as the Washington Post proves Andrew Breitbart’s point that our biggest enemy is, above all, with the so-called media. Since the deletions, users have begun reposting their reviews on the site.

#WAR
Jenkins' "review" had nothing to do with the movie at all. In fact, I wonder if he even watched it. Instead, his piece was a snide and arrogant dismissal of Breitbart's legacy and work, which is nothing more than a reflection of how much they hate the watchdogs like Breitbart and other new media journalists.  As Andrew said here in an interview after the release of his book "Righteous Indignation" using a Caddyshack reference:
"There are a lot of elites out there in the vast media country club who are not excited that we’re coming in on Employee Family Day and, you know, the Almond Joy has been dumped into the pool.  ...They’re not too excited about it! I’m doing cannonballs into the mainstream media country club pool, and they’re not happy!"

To which Mark Jenkins and the Washington ComPost, knowingly or unknowingly, made Andrew Breitbart's point about the arrogance of liberal media elites for him.

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

"Obama Let Them Die" - Troops One Hour Away From Benghazi, Was Obama Regime Arming Al-Queda, Thus The Cover-Up?

It's hard to tell what is more outrageous: how the Obama Regime not only lied to the American people about the 9/11/2012 terrorist attack on our consulate in Benghazi and the cover up, or the Obama Lapdog Media assisting the Regime in the cover-up.


Obama has their blood on his hands - image via Gay Patriot

Some details are emerging and they're raising more questions.

It has been revealed that there were US troops an hour flight-time away in Italy.  The e-mail came in two hours after the attack and it lasted five more hours. The troops were not called upon to defend our ambassador.  Why?

At The Ulsterman Report, one WH insider says:

WHI: Benghazi story now breaking out even bigger. As promised. I was pissed the governor did not push the issue during last debate. Now I understand. I was not in the loop on that but that’s ok. Very smart move by the campaign. Don’t count on media falling over themselves to make this a headline though. That will be done with them kicking and screaming. And read that first report carefully. And then smile. The Old Man made this happen. At least some of it. It’s pretty much spelled out in first report. He’s got to have logged about 30,000 miles in the last month alone. Don’t know how he’s doing it healthwise. But he is. Thank God.

UM: So how does Benghazi story now play out?

WHI: Let the roll out complete itself. Then we watch and wait. Need enough in media to confirm, question, and then demand WH response. That will take about 48 to complete. Cannot guarantee success, but like our odds. It’s the timeline that is so offensive. Security could have been deployed within 3 hrs. At the most is what I was told. 3 hrs. There was a 7 hr. gunfight. With a break in between. Simple math. The ambassador and the other three could have been saved. Obama let them die. And I go back to why. What the f-ck were they covering up out there in Libya? That’s the info I really wish I had but for now, the emails are what we got and they sure as hell pin the Obama WH to the wall on this thing.

They knew it was terrorism within two hours and yet Obama went to sleep that night, gives a Rose Garden speech the next day blaming a YouTube video then jets off to Vegas to fund raise and says "we had a bad day."  Those optics sucked then and they look even worse now.

Is there an even deeper reason for the cover-up? Frank Gaffney, a former Reagan Administration official, wrote in the Washington Times (via Pat Dollard):

The evidence suggests that the Obama administration has not simply been engaging, legitimating, enriching and emboldening Islamists who have taken over or are ascendant in much of the Middle East. Starting in March 2011, when American diplomat J. Christopher Stevens was designated the liaison to the “opposition” in Libya, the Obama administration has been arming them, including jihadists like Abdelhakim Belhadj, leader of the al Qaeda franchise known as the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group.

Once Moammar Gadhafi was overthrown, Stevens was appointed ambassador to the new Libya run by Mr. Belhadj and his friends. Not surprisingly, one of the most important priorities for someone in that position would be to try to find and secure the immense amount of armaments that had been cached by the dictator around the country and systematically looted during and after the revolution.

One of the places in Libya most awash with such weapons in the most dangerous of hands is Benghazi. It now appears that Stevens was there — on a particularly risky day, with no security to speak of and despite now copiously documented concerns about his own safety and that of his subordinates — for another priority mission: sending arms recovered from the former regime’s stocks to the “opposition” in Syria. As in Libya, the insurgents are known to include al Qaeda and other Shariah-supremacist groups, including none other than Abdelhakim Belhadj.

Fox News has chronicled how the Al Entisar, a Libyan-flagged vessel carrying 400 tons of cargo, docked on Sept. 6 in the Turkish port of Iskenderun. It reportedly supplied both humanitarian assistance and arms — including deadly SA-7 man-portable surface-to-air missiles — apparently destined for Islamists, again including al Qaeda elements, in Syria.

What cries out for further investigation — and debate in the remaining days of this presidential election — is whether this shipment was part of a larger covert Obama effort to transfer weapons to our enemies that could make the Iran-Contra scandal, to say nothing of Operation Fast and Furious, pale by comparison.


Investigative journalist Aaron Klein has reported that the “consulate in Benghazi” actually was no such thing. He observes that although administration officials have done nothing to correct that oft-repeated characterization of the facility where the murderous attack on Stevens and his colleagues was launched, they call it a “mission.” What Mr. Klein describes as a “shabby, nondescript building” that lacked any “major public security presence” was, according to an unnamed Middle Eastern security official, “routinely used by Stevens and others to coordinate with the Turkish, Saudi and Qatari governments on supporting the insurgencies in the Middle East, most prominently the rebels opposing Assad’s regime in Syria.”


We know that Stevens‘ last official act was to hold such a meeting with an unidentified “Turkish diplomat.” Presumably, the conversation involved additional arms shipments to al Qaeda and its allies in Syria. It also may have involved getting more jihadi fighters there. After all, Mr. Klein reported last month that, according to sources in Egyptian security, our ambassador was playing a “central role in recruiting jihadists to fight Bashar al-Assad’s regime in Syria.”

It gets worse. Last week, Center for Security Policy senior fellow and former career CIA officer Clare Lopez observed that there were two large warehouse-type buildings associated with the so-called “consulate” whose purpose has yet to be disclosed. As their contents were raided in the course of the attack, we may never know for sure whether they housed — and were known by the local jihadis to house — arms, perhaps administered by the two former Navy SEALs killed along with Stevens.

What we do know is that the New York Times — one of the most slavishly pro-Obama publications in the country — reported in an Oct. 14 article, “Most of the arms shipped at the behest of Saudi Arabia and Qatar to supply Syrian rebel groups fighting the government of Bashar Assad are going to hard-line Islamic jihadists, and not the more secular opposition groups that the West wants to bolster.”

In short, it seems President Obama has been engaged in gun-walking on a massive scale. The effect has been to equip America’s enemies to wage jihad not only against regimes it once claimed were our friends, but inevitably against us and our allies as well. That would explain his administration’s desperate and now failing bid to mislead the voters through the serial deflections of Benghazigate.
If this allegation is true, this is outright treason. 

This story needs to be spread to as many people as you know. As far as I'm concerned, November 6th isn't just Election Day, it is the day that the American people have the ability to do what Congress doesn't have the guts to do...Impeach Richard Milhous Hussein Obama and remove him from office.  This matter also needs to be thoroughly investigated to find out who did what and what laws were broken.

Forget Watergate or any other -Gate. American lives were lost because of this (as well as Fast and Furious).

Tuesday, October 23, 2012

PROOF OBAMA REGIME LIED ON LIBYA: Were Told Islamic Militants Took Responsibility TWO HOURS After Attack

Not only did the Regime sit and do nothing for seven hours while the attack was going on at the consulate in Benghazi, but Reuters reports tonight that they were told an Islamofascist militant group took responsibility...two hours after the attack began.

The emails, obtained by Reuters from government sources not connected with U.S. spy agencies or the State Department and who requested anonymity, specifically mention that the Libyan group called Ansar al-Sharia had asserted responsibility for the attacks.

The brief emails also show how U.S. diplomats described the attack, even as it was still under way, to Washington.

U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans were killed in the Benghazi assault, which President Barack Obama and other U.S. officials ultimately acknowledged was a "terrorist" attack carried out by militants with suspected links to al Qaeda affiliates or sympathizers.

Administration spokesmen, including White House spokesman Jay Carney, citing an unclassified assessment prepared by the CIA, maintained for days that the attacks likely were a spontaneous protest against an anti-Muslim film.

While officials did mention the possible involvement of "extremists," they did not lay blame on any specific militant groups or possible links to al Qaeda or its affiliates until intelligence officials publicly alleged that on September 28.

There were indications that extremists with possible al Qaeda connections were involved, but also evidence that the attacks could have erupted spontaneously, they said, adding that government experts wanted to be cautious about pointing fingers prematurely.

U.S. intelligence officials have emphasized since shortly after the attack that early intelligence reporting about the attack was mixed.

Spokesmen for the White House and State Department had no immediate response to requests for comments on the emails.

So, here it is. More proof that the Obama Regime not only lied to the American people, they knew it was a terrorist attack from the beginning and tried to cover it up.

Question is...who ordered the cover-up?

Any sort of "October Surprise" planned by Democrats, especially rumors of one by that disgusting media whore Gloria AllRed, should be seen for what it is, a distraction from exposing the lies of a criminally negligent President who needs to be removed from office in two weeks for his derelection of duty.

More Evidence Obama's Electoral Ship Is Sinking...

Ever since the whole Benghazi attack, lie and cover-up, I've gone over to Larry Johnson's blog No Quarter to get another perspective.  He was real pro-Hillary and I don't always agree with everything there, but he writes some interesting things sometimes.

Today, Johnson happened to be on an airplane leaving Ft. Lauderdale and wrote that a whole bunch of the Obama sycophant press was on the same plane.

I was standing behind Chris Matthews in the security line. He is looking very unhappy this morning. Having been on his show several times in 2001 and 2002, I know his happy face and I know when he is in a major funk. He was very funky today.

Immediately to my right (on the other side of the security line) was F. Chuck Todd, oblivious to all around him, talking on the phone. I heard him say, “Yeah, Obama’s numbers are collapsing.”

Once through security I spied David Corn, Howard Feinstein, Major Garret and Candy Crowley. This looks like a frigging press charter plane for the Obama campaign. The average American really cannot appreciate the level of incest that is the so-called mainstream media. They are their own echo chamber. The vast majority are the geeks who were tortured in high school. That’s why they hate Mitt Romney so. He reminds them of the popular, successful kids they were not.

Boy, are they bummed this morning. Some may put on the happy face on TV, but they rarely tell viewers and readers what they really know. In this case, there are the real polls. Each campaign has a good handle on whether they are moving up or moving down. Obama is in free fall and did not do himself any favors last night. Why?

What are we talking about the morning after the debate? Obama’s strong, steady leadership or his claim, later denied by his spinners, that sequestration would not happen?

Are we talking about his spine of iron as commander-in-chief or is the talk about his peevish, juvenile remark dismissing Romney’s remarks about the shrinking size of the U.S. Navy?

You know the answer. Obama lost because of his misstatements and errors. Whenever your spokes people and lackeys have to hit the airwaves and try to explain what you meant to say you know you stepped in the feces.

And Obama? He was high stepping. In his effort to portray Romney as a know nothing on military affairs, Barack Obama referred to submarines as a “SHIP.” Idiot. Any sailor knows that a sub is a boat not a ship. Submariners never refer to their rides as a “ship.” Barack showed his ass on that one in more ways than one.

...While Obama may have satisfied the hardcore lefty partisans who ache for a fight and love to watch someone act like an inconsiderate ass, true adults understand that kind of behavior does not rally nor inspire independent voters. Obama’s desperate embrace of this base worked to his disadvantage with women and elderly looking for “No Drama.” Obama’s angry, petulant, in-your-face histrionics did not sway the middle. It alienated them.

That’s the dirty secret that most of the media knows and refuses to disclose to America. The election has shifted decisively in Romney’s favor and Obama’s ship, not submarine, is going under. Glug. Glug. Glug.

Final Debate - Afterthoughts

You know all the liberal spin-meisters were going to spin the final Presidential debate was a win for Obama, but that's what they said about the last one too.

It wasn't.

Personally, I wanted Romney to hit Obama hard on the Benghazi lies and cover-up. He didn't.

I think Romney had a strategy last night, and probably decided to stick to it when he saw Obama's demeanor and heard his tone.  That strategy? My opponent is going to implode so I'm going to stand out of the way and let him.

Here is one example:



“But I think Governor Romney maybe hasn’t spent enough time looking at how our military works. You mentioned the Navy, for example, and that we have fewer ships than we did in 1916. Well, Governor, we also have fewer horses and bayonets, because the nature of our military’s changed. We have these things called aircraft carriers, where planes land on them. We have these ships that go underwater, nuclear submarines.”


It was only after the debate when Fox News revealed that a Marine had tweeted that Marines still use bayonets. And horses? Well thanks to Debra Burlingame of 9/11 Families for a Safe & Strong America, the Special Ops team who led off the invasion of Afghansitan used horses.  There's a monument that honors them.

Obama tone last night was one of arrogance and contempt for Mitt Romney, you could see it on his face as well. Very unpresidential.  Made me wonder if Mark Halperin might be brought back to Morning Joe this morning to repeat the following:


You could tell by the reaction of the Obama cheerleaders at MSNBC that he lost. Even the way he and Michelle greeted each other post debate.  They know it is only two weeks away from the pink slip being sent to 1600 Pennsylvania Ave by the American people.

Monday, October 22, 2012

Obama White House Hosts Radical Islamists

This is pretty frightening (Daily Caller).

White House visitor records show that administration officials have hosted numerous White House meetings with a series of U.S.-based Muslim political groups that have close ties to jihadi groups and push to reduce anti-terrorism investigations.

The visits were discovered by the Investigative Project on Terrorism, which compared the Obama White House’s visitor records with its database of Islamist advocacy groups.
For example, the records show that officials from the Council on American Islamic Relations have visited the White House 20 times, according to the organization’s report.

Members of CAIR were invited to the White House, even though an April 2009 FBI statement said the bureau “does not view CAIR as an appropriate liaison partner” because of its ties to the Hamas jihadi group.
Daily Caller WH Visitor Logs for IPT Report


Administration officials also invited Syrian-born Louay Safi to the White House twice in 2011, even though he had been named an unindicted co-conspirator in two terrorism cases, and had been barred from Fort Hood following the 2009 jihadi attack by a Muslim U.S. Army major.

In contrast, White House officials have not invited Zuhdi Jasser, an Arizona-based, American-born moderate Muslim and former Navy officer.

“We’ve never been invited and nether have any of [the 24 leaders in] our American Islamic Leadership Coalition,” Jasser told The Daily Caller.

The absence of invitations to real Muslim moderates allows White House officials to pretend that members of the well-funded, U.S.-based radical group are moderates, even when they’re linked to the Egypt-based Muslim Brotherhood, he said.

Jasser’s nonpartisan coalition includes left-wing and feminist Muslims who are frequently criticized by the groups invited to the White House, he said.

“The White House has selectively omitted genuine [Muslim] moderates and instead has picked radical Muslims to meet,” said a statement from Steve Emerson, founder of the Investigative Project on Terrorism.

So, as tonight is the final Presidential debate and centers on foreign policy, how can we trust a Presidency that cozies up to groups linked with radical Islamist terror groups?  Is this the reason that the Obama Regime has tried to cover up what was really behind the 9/11/2012 terror attacks in Benghazi that led to the death of our ambassador and three others?

Saturday, October 20, 2012

"Hating Breitbart" A Must See! A Fitting Tribute To His Legacy

If you are anywhere near Arlington, VA; Dallas, TX; Burbank, CA and St. Louis, MO, and you do only one thing this weekend, you MUST GO SEE the new movie "Hating Breitbart," which opened in those four markets last night! (Ticket info here)

If you're not in those areas, demand that "Hating Breitbart" be brought to a theatre near you!

I attended the 7:50 p.m. showing at the Regal Ballston theatre in Arlington, VA, in what was a packed house.


Those of us at CPAC 2012 got a taste of the movie, as an early trailer was shown right before Andrew Breitbart gave (unbeknownst to us) what was to be his last major speech before his untimely death a couple of weeks later.  The film had been finished before Breitbart's passing, and the only reference to his passing is a notation in the credits.

"Hating Breitbart" does a great job in illustrating the genius that was Andrew Breitbart, centering around some of the big stories he was involved with: The take down of ACORN with James O'Keefe and Hannah Giles, the rise of the Tea Party and the hateful attacks from the Left, the March 20, 2010 "Kill The Bill" Rally and the false allegations by Rep. Andre Carson that he and the Congressional Black Caucus were called the "n-word," the Shirley Sherrod story, and "Weinergate."  The movie also shows Breitbart in various "behind the scenes" locations (hotels, cars, backstage at speeches), as well as clips of some of his speeches at the 2010 Tea Party Convention, CPAC, the Tea Party rally in Searchlight, NV, and the 2010 Tax Day Tea Party and 9/12 march in Washington DC.  The viewer also gets to see the other side of Andrew, how approachable he was at these events to attendees.

The film also documents the unhinged hate Breitbart received from Leftists, like the "Dingy" Harry Reid supporters in Searchlight, NV who had just egged the Tea Party Express bus, protesters at an anti-Glenn Beck rally, and unhinged libs calling him a racist at the NutRoots convention.

On Thursday evening, Breitbart.com released a 20 minute sneak preview of "Hating Breitbart," which is linked below. It centers on the phantom "n-word" accusation, and how Andrew Breitbart took the ball and defended the Tea Party movement against these phony allegations. Breitbart used the megaphone he had to turn the argument around, noting that since the CBC had taped their walk through the crowd, they should prove their allegations. In the end, they never did.



For purposes of disclosure, I must note that a video I filmed that day and posted on YouTube is in this part of the movie, as well as a nine-second video clip also taken that day. That nine-second clip is the one I gave to Breitbart almost a month later (See this post for more of that story). Additionally, I'm also in one scene talking to Breitbart as he's headed to the stage to speak at the 9/12/2010 rally in Washington DC (see American Spectator piece "An Army of Breitbarts" by Robert Stacy McCain).

To show the level of vitriol these unhinged liberals still, in death, have for Andrew, I've just seen news that at the 10:20 p.m. showing of the movie in Arlington, VA was interrupted by some moonbat yelling allegations that Breitbart was a "cokehead." There is suspicion the heckler is Huffington ComPost writer Ryan Clayton, who is also in the movie and claimed (with no proof) Breitbart was a coke addict. You can tell how much of a hateful person Clayton is by looking at his face in the scene.

Well, all I can say is that Ryan Clayton or whomever it was that was yelling this garbage during the movie is damn lucky they weren't at the 7:50 p.m. showing.  Why? Because just as Andrew Breitbart told me on Sept. 12, 2010  "keep your eyes out," I'd have had my iPhone in video mode on your pathetic ass as you were being escorted out of the theatre.

"Hating Breitbart" is a fitting tribute to the legacy of Andrew Breitbart, and a reminder of who we lost with his untimely death.  Seven months later, it's hard to believe that man with such energy and passion is no longer with us. His legacy is that any one of us can break a story and "Be Breitbart."  To those of us in the new media, it is up to us not just to remember him, but keep his memory alive by picking up where he left off.

To that end, it's somehow fitting this movie is released 18 days before the most important election of our lifetimes, as well as our nation's history. With that in mind, perhaps it is fitting to say we should spend the remaining days up to November 6 to "Win This One For Andrew."  Not just getting rid of Richard Milhous Obama, but keeping the House and taking the Senate as well.

RELATED: Hating Breitbart — Loving Breitbart by Anne Sorock at Legal Insurrection

#WAR

Thursday, October 18, 2012

CAUTION! Let's Not Get Cocky, But Things Are Looking Very Bad For Obama

Keep in mind, we still have 19 days before November 6. Still, there's a lot of indicators that are pointing in one direction: the walls are beginning to crack on Obama's re-election campaign.
First sign. The Gallup poll today has Romney up one point from yesterday: 52 to 45 percent.  That number is very significant! Karl Rove pointed out yesterday that no Presidential candidate this late in October has lost with a poll number like Romney has.
Second: Kevin DuJan at HillBuzz wrote how Obama is planning his Election Night festivities at McCormick Place in Chicago, NOT at Grant Park, as he did in 2008 and that drew over 200,000 people.
 

McCormick Place, Chicago, IL...where Obama is having his Nov. 6th Festivities
I’ve suspected for some time that Obama was going to plan for a concession speech on November 6th, but last night final confirmation arrived in the form of leaked news that the Obama election night event is being staged in private McCormick Place, not a big public setting like Grant Park. 
Let me put this as clearly as I can because it’s crucial: if Democrats really thought Barack Obama was going to be reelected, then they would have planned a massive rally in Grant Park again; the fact this is not happening is proof that, despite what you hear coming out of the Ministry of Truth that is the national media, the Democrats really do not expect Obama to win this election. Campaign operatives in Chicago are, thus, making appropriate preparations for his imminent defeat. 
Instead of Grant Park, Obama’s apparently going to have his election night event at McCormick Place…the convention center here in Chicago. 
Let me explain a few things about McCormick Place that you could intimate from the photo above: 
* it’s separated from the City by highways and is hard to reach by anyone traveling on foot from the various “El” trains that service Chicago…which indicates this event is not intended for throngs of Obama supporters. 
* there are no buses that readily service McCormick Place like they do Grant Park…so once again, this event is not being planned for the public to come and celebrate with Obama. 
* McCormick Place is completely indoors and is a venue that Democrats can easily control in terms of the camera angles and stagecraft of the event…which is a big deal because losing campaigns choose small, isolated places to hold concession speeches while winning candidates are feted on election night in, well, places like Grant Park. 
I was an event planner here in Chicago for several years before the 2008 presidential campaign. I planned events in McCormick Place for various trade shows; it’s a building designed with flexibility for downsizing an audience if the need suddenly arises so that the participants do not feel lost in too much extra space. There are modular walls that achieve this, with dividers capable of cutting a space in half…and then in half again…if that’s what needs to be done to make a sparse crowd seem bigger for cameras. 
Despite being within sight of the Museum Campus and Soldier Field, McCormick Place is a fortress-like island surrounded on most sides by freeways or railroad tracks (with the lake on the other side). This is where the G-8 summit was held, so the dignitaries could be isolated and kept as far away from the public as possible in downtown Chicago. Because the only realistic way of reaching McCormick Place is by taxi (or car, if people drive themselves) this is clearly not a place Obama would be holding an election night event if he really thought he was going to win the election. How on Earth would his throngs of supporters be able to reach him if he won and the event was held here of all places?
What DuJan writes is about McCormick Place is true. I was there for work a few years ago. Convention centers, while being big buildings, are not built that way for one event, like a basketball arena. There's an expo center, tons of hallways, break out rooms, etc. Plus, compared to other conventions I've been at, hotels are usually close by, within walking distance. I stayed in a hotel close to Grant Park when I was in Chicago for business, and had to take a five to 10 minute shuttle ride to McCormick Place. I also remember how the Chicago Hilton had a big deal in their lobby, noting it was the base hotel for the 2008 Election Night festivities. Grant Park was close-by. McCormick is further away.
Third: There's a report that the Obama campaign is pulling out of several "battleground" states like Florida, North Carolina, and here in the Commonwealth of Virginia, to mount a "last stand" in places like New Hampshire, Nevada, Iowa and Ohio.
Fourth: It appears "Slick Willie" Clinton got his revenge for all the attacks on him and Hillary in 2008, being called a racist, and for Hillary taking the fall for what Obama was too cowardly to do (Washington Examiner  via Gateway Pundit.
 
 
"Governor Romney's argument is, we're not fixed, so fire him and put me in," Clinton said, speaking to voters this afternoon. "It is true that we're not fixed," Clinton added. "When President Obama looked into the eyes of that man who said in the debate, 'I had so much hope four years ago and I don't now,' I thought he was going to cry, because he knows that its not fixed."
Man, did you hear that!
Finally, ask yourselves, is using "women in binders," and Big Bird against Mitt Romney enough to inspire people in a down economy, and after a terror attack that the Regime lied about, to re-elect him for another four years? Is that your plan for a second term?
Like I said, let's not get cocky, but the only poll that matters is the one that is counted on November 6th 2012.

Wednesday, October 17, 2012

CROWLEY LIED: She Questioned Why It Took So Long To Call Benghazi A Terror Attack...On Sept. 30

A Twitter user @lochnar did some digging and found something that blows down Candy-ass Crowley's lies last night, in trying to defend Richard Milhous Obama during last night's debate (via Ace of Spades). CNN Transcript.
CROWLEY: I am joined by Obama campaign senior adviser David Axelrod. I want to pick up on what John McCain and I were talking about. There's a back and forth now about why didn't this administration -- why did it take them until Friday after a September 11th attack in Libya to come to the conclusion that it was premeditated and that there was terrorists involved. John McCain said it doesn't pass the smell test, or it's willful ignorance to think that they didn't know before this what was going on. Your reaction?
AXELROD: Well, first of all, Candy, as you know, the president called it an act of terror the day after it happened. But when you're the responsible party, when you're the administration, then you have a responsibility to act on what you know and what the intelligence community believes. This was -- this is being thoroughly investigated. 
CROWLEY: But first it was, like, not planned. 
AXELROD: We need to bring to justice-- 
CROWLEY: First, they said it was not planned, it was part of this tape. All that stuff. 
AXELROD: As the director of national intelligence said on Friday, that was the original information that that was given to us. What we don't need is a president or an administration that shoots first and asks questions later. 
CROWLEY: But isn't that what happened? 
AXELROD: And, you know, Governor Romney leaped out on this Libya issue on the first day, and was terribly mistaken about what he said. That is not what you want in a president of the United States. And as for Senator McCain, for whom I have great respect, he has disapproved of our approach to Libya from the beginning, including the strategy that brought Gadhafi to justice. 
CROWLEY: But this has to do not with the approach to Libya but with the murder of four Americans in Libya. And didn't the administration shoot first? Didn't they come out and say, listen, as far as we can tell, this wasn't preplanned, this was just a part of - 
(CROSSTALK) 
AXELROD: At this point, this is what we know, and we are thoroughly investigating. And that's exactly what you should do. That's what the responsible thing to do is. I was kind of shocked to see Representative King attack Ambassador Rice for what she said last Sunday here and elsewhere, because she was acting on the intelligence that was given to her by the intelligence community. To say she should resign -- she is one of the most remarkable, splendid public servants we have. That's thoroughly irresponsible.
But last night, she interjected herself into the debate in an effort to help Richard Milhous Obama cover up not one, but two Presidential scandals which are much worse than Watergate.

Note to CNN: If you have any credibility as a news organization, you would fire Candy-ass Crowley immediately.

Mitt Romney Brings Up Fast & Furious, Liberal Candy Crowley Saves Obama

Brent Bozell, the head of the Media Research Center, said after the Presidential debate last night that whoever in the Republican National Committee approved CNN's Candy-ass Crowley, to be the moderator for last night's debate should be fired.

Why?  She acted like an unofficial member of the Obama 2012 Campaign last night, instead of a Presidential debate moderator.

Mitt Romney brought up the topic of Fast and Furious, the Obama/Eric Holder gun-running scandal to Mexican drug cartels that has killed hundred of Mexican citizens, as well as Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry and ATF agent Jaime Zapata.



This is Fast and Furious: what Richard Milhous Obama was laughing about, and his campaign cohort Candy Crowley covered up.
 

 


How many stories about Fast and Furious has CNN done, Candy-ass?  I'll bet I can count the number on my hand and have fingers left over.

She did the same thing when the topic of Obama's failure in Benghazi came up. Candy-ass corrected Romney and falsely claimed Obama called it an act of terror in the Rose Garden (as Obama was headed out the door to go fundraise in Las Vegas).

Journalism died in 2008, but Candy-ass Crowley showed how the people once known as journalists have become activists, willing to cover up for a corrupt President.

RELATED: Man on Fox News focus group says Obama has "been bullshitting the public for four years."