Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Flip and Flop: Romney Says He's Against Blunt Amendment, Campaign Then Denies He's Against It

Liberal GOP Presidential Candidate Willard "Mittens" Romney was being interviewed by an Ohio TV station and was asked whether or not he is for the Blunt/Rubio Amendment, which give employers a conscience clause to opt out of birth control coverage.

Romney said (text from Washington Compost - Greg Sargent, Plum Line).

“I’m not for the bill. But, look, the idea of presidential candidates getting into questions about contraception within a relationship between a man and a woman, husband and wife, I’m not going there.”

Sargent writes:

That’s pretty remarkable. If Romney knew what he was saying, the Senate GOP caucus, which is set to vote on this amendment tomorrow, may feel as if Romney has pulled the rug out from underneath them. And this has become an important issue for conservatives. So it’ll be interesting to see how the base reacts to this, particularly since the GOP primary is anything but over and Rick Santorum — who’s perceived as a more reliable social conservative — is likely to use this to attack Romney, who will be under continued pressure to connect with social and religious conservatives.

But the Romney Campaign is walking it back (TPM).

After conflicting reports over whether Mitt Romney told an Ohio TV reporter he opposed the Blunt amendment, which allows employers to deny health care coverage that conflicts with their conscience, the campaign clarified that Romney supports Sen. Roy Blunt's (R-MO) legislation.

“Regarding the Blunt bill, the way the question was asked was confusing," a spokesman told TPM. "Governor Romney supports the Blunt Bill because he believes in a conscience exemption in health care for religious institutions and people of faith.”

The question was confusing? Here's the video, you decide. It sounded pretty straightforward to me.

And the Republican Establishment wonders why they haven't been able to sell this lemon called Romney to conservatives?

No comments: