At Least One US Senator Threatens Federal Funds For Berkeley

Republican U. S. Senator Jim DeMint of South Carolina has stepped up to the plate and threatened to cut off federal funds to that Communist anti-military hellhole known as Berkeley, CA, after the city council called our US Marines "unwelcome" in their town.

From Michelle Malkin.

"Washington, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senator Jim DeMint (R-South Carolina) released the following statement in response to the decision by the City Council of Berkeley, California to evict the U.S. Marine Corps Recruiting Station from the city.

'This is a slap in the face to all brave service men and women and their families. The First Amendment gives the City of Berkeley the right to be idiotic, but from now on they should do it with their own money. If the city can’t show respect for the Marines that have fought, bled and died for their freedom, Berkeley should not be receiving special taxpayer funded handouts. I am currently drafting legislation to ensure that American taxpayers aren’t forced to pay for this insult by rescinding all of the earmarks for Berkeley in the Omnibus Appropriations bill, and to transfer the funds to the Marine Corps.'"

Yes!!!!!! Jim DeMint should run for President because he'd have my vote. At least there's one guy in the Senate who still has a pair.

And shame on Feinstein and Boxer for saying nothing about this travesty in Berkeley. What else would one expect from a Democrat?

Marines Not Welcome In Berkeley CA, But Pot Smokers Are

I'm not going to mince words for the disgust I feel towards this pathetic town, where the social pollution of modern Leftism was born.

Last night, the City Council of Berkeley, CA approved two resolutions (Mercury News.com) attacking the United States Marine Corps. The first resolution decreed that a Marine Corps recruiting station which opened last summer is "is not welcome in the city, and if recruiters choose to stay, they do so as uninvited and unwelcome intruders."

Free speech doesn't belong to the brave who protect it, decrees the socialist Berkeley City Council (photo montage courtesy Move America Forward)

Can you imagine that? A city in the United States calls members of our military intruders? Who the hell do these jerks think gave them the right to write such ignorant garbage?

Telling the Marines to leave town wasn't enough. The City Council voted to give a parking space at the front of the recruiting center to Code Pinko so they can harass the Marines without ever having to reapply for a permit. Don't forget that Code Pinko is an anti-military, anti-American group who gave $600,000 to the terrorists and called for the support of the terrorist insurgency at a 2005 tribunal.

Councilman Gordon Wozniak was the only dissenting vote on both resolutions.

Over at her website, Melanie Morgan commented, along with Move America Forward:

"It is disgraceful that in the birthplace of the Free Speech Movement, anti-military activists would attempt to silence the same military men and women who serve this country and give their lives to protect the free speech rights of all Americans, including these ungrateful and despicable people on the Berkeley City Council."

Make no mistake, the so-called "free speech" movement wasn't about free speech. It was only for the freedom to promote communism on the UC campus. From there, the town went downhill for the next 40 plus years. Remember when the fire department was ordered to pull the American flag off the fire trucks after 9/11? Berkeley has been nothing but an anti-American town who cheers America's enemies, from the Vietcong to al-Queda.

The federal government should cut off all federal funds to Berkeley and let them handle their problems, since the city council knows best how to run the world. Don't come crying to Uncle Sam if Islamic terrorists decide to.... well wait a minute, what am I saying? Al-Queda probably would set up shop in Berkeley due to the friendly atmosphere there. The idiots on the City Council and that little commie lawyer Sharon Adams would probably protect them. The council would even have Code Pinko form a human wall around AQ's offices to protect Osama and Ayman from arrest.

Al-Queda's not yet been given the welcome mat in Berkeley, but pot smokers using so-called "medical marijuana" were given sanctuary there in another resolution also passed last night. This resolution, according to the Daily Californian, "opposes attempts by the Drug Enforcement Administration to conduct raids on medical marijuana dispensaries in Berkeley, and urges city, county and state departments to not cooperate in the event that a raid occurs."

In other words, breaking federal drug laws is encouraged by the Berkeley City Council.

The City of Berkeley can leave the United States and go straight to Hell, as far as I'm concerned.

Here's contact info for the treasonous Berkeley City Council that gives potheads and America-haters preference over those who keep our nation free:

Mayor
Tom Bates
(510) 981-7100 P
(510) 981-7199 F
mailto:mayor@ci.berkeley.ca.us

District 1
Linda Maio
(510) 981-7110 P
(510) 981-7111 F
mailto:lmaio@ci.berkeley.ca.us

District 2
Darryl Moore
(510) 981-7120 P
(510) 981-7122 F
mailto:dmoore@ci.berkeley.ca.us

District 3
Max Anderson
(510) 981-7130 P
(510) 981-7133 F
mailto:manderson@ci.berkeley.ca.us

District 4
Dona Spring
(510) 981-7140 P
(510) 644-3662 F
mailto:spring@ci.berkeley.ca.us

District 5
Laurie Capitelli
(510) 981-7150 P
(510) 981-7155 F
mailto:lcapitelli@ci.berkeley.ca.us

District 6
Betty Olds
(510) 981-7160 P
(510) 981-7166 F
mailto:olds@ci.berkeley.ca.us

District 7
Kriss Worthington
(510) 981-7170 P
(510) 981-7177 F
mailto:kworthington@ci.berkeley.ca.us

District 8
Gordon Wozniak (the lone dissenting vote on Marines vote)
(510) 981-7180 P
(510) 981-7188 F
mailto:gwozniak@ci.berkeley.ca.us

McLame To Attend CPAC

Apparently, Juan McLame will be attending CPAC next week in Washington DC for outreach to conservatives. The date he will attend has not been listed. I'm planning to attend Saturday the 9th so I'll post more at that time.

McLame should know that it's going to take more than coming to an important conservative gathering to get us on his side. Whatever he says will have to match closely with his actions.

I Just Can't See Myself Voting For Juan McLame

He ended up winning Florida last night and now will pick up the endorsement of Rudy Giuliani, who is planning to exit the Republican race for the Presidential nominee.

I just can't see myself voting for Juan McLame and I know many others are of the same opinion. Come November, unless something drastic happens which will get me to the polls, I'm considering staying at home. I'm not willing to jump on the McLame's Bulls**t Express just because he has an "R" by his name.

"Oh, but you'll help elect Hillary or Obama that way." Well, what's the use when McLame is just as liberal as the Democrats? There's almost no difference between the two parties on ending illegal immigration, taxes, judges, the phony global warming propaganda. There's the war, but McLame shows about as much sympathy for the terrorists detained at Gitmo as the Democrats do. Plus, why should I or any other conservative go vote for a guy who flirted with becoming John Kerry's running mate?

There's that old cliched saying, "don't burn your bridges behind you." Juan McLame spent the last eight years constantly working against us conservatives. Now that he's close to being the Republican nominee, he's going to need those of us he hasn't had any use for.

Bob at Confederate Yankee sums up my feelings:

Berkeley Zoning Proposal Against Military Recruiters Led By Pro-Hugo Chavez NLG Lawyer

The attack on military recruiters continues in Berkeley, aka "Commietown."

Michelle Malkin writes how one lawyer is proposing an initiative to make it harder for military recruiters to open in the home of the so-called "Free Speech Movement." One of the Appeasement and Injustice scum even had the nerve to compare our military to prostitutes.

In response to a Marine Corps recruiting office established in Berkeley last year, local activists are trying to make it more difficult for future recruiting centers to open in the city.

If passed by a majority of Berkeley voters, a proposed initiative would require military recruiting offices and private military companies in Berkeley to first acquire a special use permit.

To obtain this permit, a business must hold public hearings and a public comment period.

If the initiative passes, recruitment offices could not be opened within 600 feet of residential districts, public parks, public health clinics, public libraries, schools or churches.

Currently, a recruiting office is held to the same standards as most other businesses, which do not require a public hearing or have limits on where offices can be established.

The author of the initiative, Berkeley-based lawyer Sharon Adams, modeled the initiative after current zoning law that restricts the location of adult-oriented businesses.

“In the same way that many communities limit the location of pornographic stores, that’s the same way we feel about the military recruiting stations,” said Phoebe Sorgen, an initiative proponent and a member of the city’s Peace and Justice Commission.

Sharon Adams, the anti-military lawyer from Berkeley, poses in Carcas, Venezuela with Dan Mayfield, steering committee member for National Lawyer Guild's Military Law Task Force

Who exactly is Sharon Adams? More than just a "Berkeley-based lawyer," Adams is an At-Large board member of the National Lawyers Guild Bay Area Chapter, friend of Code Pinko and signer of a pro-Bob Avakian (chariman of the Revolutionary Communist Party) statement. Adams visited Venezuela, writing the following glorification of the nation's Communist dictator Hugo Chavez in the NLG newsletter.

"Despite a campaign of misinformation perpetrated by U.S. and Venezuelan media, the majority of Venezuelans strongly support Chavez. Since he was elected President in 1998 Hugo Chavez has worked to implement policies that benefit the people.

...In 2002, with prior knowledge and apparent support of the U.S., an opposition faction implemented a coup, and illegally jailed Chavez....However, the extensive media campaign could not defeat the will of the people. Chavez managed to communicate from his jail cell that he had not resigned. This message spread from person to person through cell phone and text messaging, and Chavez supporters came down from the barrios in the hills. Millions of people surrounded the presidential palace and forced Carmona out.

The U.S. media often portrays Venezuela as a country where the opposition is silenced. Nothing could be further from the truth."

Let Sharon Adams know what you think of her Leftist attack on our military: sjadams@adamslaw.biz

McLame Smears Romney On Iraq Withdrawal

John McLame smeared Mitt Romney as supposedly advocating a timetable for withdrawal of American troops from Iraq yesterday.

But Romney never made such a suggestion. "The Great One" Mark Levin follows up at NRO.

I think this smear against Romney was McLame's way of distracting from the news of his Hispanic outreach director, Dr. Juan "Think Mexico First" Hernandez.

BJ Says Obama Like Jesse Jackson--Start Of Clinton's "Southern Strategy?"

Former (impeached) President Bill Clinton said the following yesterday after Barack Hussein Obama's win in the South Carolina primary:

"Jesse Jackson won South Carolina in '84 and '88. Jackson ran a good campaign. And Obama ran a good campaign here."

The Clintons seemed to know they were going to lose South Carolina. Now that they have, could this be the start of their "Southern Strategy" some have speculated on? Comparing Obama to Jackson was not meant to be complimentary. Clinton simply did this to signal white southern Democrat voters going to the polls next week that Obama is black.

Coming Back From Bad Cold.....

My energy level is back up after the last few days but also my turn to play house doctor to my family, who've got colds now. I'll make comments as I can.

Hillary In Radio Interview Slips Into Southern Accent, Double Talk On Illegal Alens

The Hildebeast was just on a DC urban radio station 96.3 WHUR, appearing on the nationally syndicated Michael Baisden show. I don't know if it was the effects of the cold I've had for the last day (I can barely type right now) but I swear I heard her slip into a phony southern accent at times.

She was asked about illegal immigration and said employers who hire illegals should be punished and the border should be secured. At the same time, she said there should be a system to keep track of the illegals already here.

And this is from the candidate who said last week that "No woman is illegal."

One member of Baisden's online forum posted about Hillary's answer concerning illegals:

"i just listened to hilary's response to roland's questions concerning immigrants/illegals. she would never repeat that response on national tv or in the presence of a latino audience. she says what she knows is what the current
audience wants to hear. don't be fooled."

"Independent" Study Of "Misleading Statements" On Iraq Funded By $oros & Other Leftist Groups

The Associated Press via Yahoo news reports about a study by two independent groups alleging "False Statements Preceded (Iraq) War."

"A study by two nonprofit journalism organizations found that President Bush and top administration officials issued hundreds of false statements about the national security threat from Iraq in the two years following the 2001 terrorist attacks.

The study concluded that the statements "were part of an orchestrated campaign that effectively galvanized public opinion and, in the process, led the nation to war under decidedly false pretenses."

The study was posted Tuesday on the Web site of the Center for Public Integrity, which worked with the Fund for Independence in Journalism.

...The study counted 935 false statements in the two-year period. It found that in speeches, briefings, interviews and other venues, Bush and administration officials stated unequivocally on at least 532 occasions that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction or was trying to produce or obtain them or had links to al-Qaida or both.

Named in the study along with Bush were top officials of the administration during the period studied: Vice President Dick Cheney, national security adviser Condoleezza Rice, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary of State Colin Powell, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz and White House press secretaries Ari Fleischer and Scott McClellan."

Bush led with 259 false statements, 231 about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and 28 about Iraq's links to al-Qaida, the study found. That was second only to Powell's 244 false statements about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and 10 about Iraq and al-Qaida.

What AP reporter Douglass Daniel neglected to do was research into who funds these groups, namely people hostile towards the Bush Administration. One of the funders for the Center for Public Integrity is Leftist sugar daddy George $oros' Open Society Institute. In addition, both named "independent groups" are also funded by the (Barbra) Streisand Foundation and The Schumann Center for Media and Democracy whose president is Bill Moyers.

Once again, the liberal MSM (AP) passes off a Leftist funded attack on the Administration and the Iraq War as an "independent study." No wonder Americans believe the media has become too ideological in their reporting.

Question to AP writer Douglass Daniel, George $oro$, Barbra Streisand, Bill Moyers and your funded tools of mass deception; Center for Public Integrity and the Fund for Independence in Journalism, were the following Democrats lying about Iraq from as far back as 1998 (via Michelle Malkin)? They include Madeline Albright, former President Bill Clinton, Sandy Burglar, Nancy Pelosi, Jay Rockefeller, Dr. Evil Harry Reid, Joe Biden, John Edwards, Evan Bayh and Hillary Rotten Clinton.

Oliver Stone Claims His Bush Movie Will Be Fair--Yeah Right

Coming soon, to a theatre near you, maybe in time for the November election, is another Oliver Stone hit piece on an American President.

This time, it's George W. Bush.

Possible poster for upcoming Bush movie by Oliver Stone?

From AP:

The Oscar-winning director has been quietly shopping a script for "Bush" — a film focusing on the life and presidency of George W. Bush, according to Daily Variety.

Stone, an outspoken critic of the Bush administration's invasion of Iraq, told the trade publication he's not looking to make an anti-Bush polemic. He said he wants "a fair, true portrait of the man. How did Bush go from being an alcoholic bum to the most powerful figure in the world?"A phone message left by The Associated Press at Stone's office Monday was not immediately returned.

Stone told Daily Variety that "Bush" is "a behind-the-scenes approach, similar to 'Nixon,' to give a sense of what it's like to be in his skin." It will "contain surprises for Bush supporters and his detractors," he said.

Oh I can't wait for the "surprises" Oliver Stoned has in store for us. Granted, World Trade Center was surprisingly good, so much so I thought it was done by another director with the same name. But Bush? But when it comes to Presidents, who does Oliver think he's fooling?

We saw the director's character assassination of Richard Nixon and how the truth conflicted with Stone's portrayal. And don't get me started about J.F.K. In Stone's warped mind, everyone from the FBI, CIA, Lyndon Johnson, the mob, Cuban freedom fighters, the Dallas Police and maybe the washroom attendant at the White House were involved in the conspiracy to kill President Kennedy. There's only two problems. First, Kennedy was far from the liberal dove who wanted to withdraw from Vietnam as Stone made him out as. Consider the speech Kennedy was supposed to give that fateful day in Dallas, in which he would have stated:

"Reducing our efforts to train, equip and assist their armies (nations like South Vietnam) can only encourage Communist penetration and require in time the increased overseas deployment of American combat forces. And reducing the help needed to bolster these nations that undertake to help defend freedom can have the same disastrous result."

Secondly, Stone ignored all the incriminating evidence against Lee Harvey Oswald and does not address inconsistencies between fact and theory. It's notable also that Vincent Bugliosi, in his recent book on the JFK assassination, stated that with so many conspirators named, the only place where they could have met to hatch the plot was Madison Square Garden.

Even more telling is about the planned Bush biopic is the casting of Josh Brolin as Dubya, son of James "Happy 9/11" Brolin (aka Mr. Barbra Streisand). Remember the hatchet job he and Barbra were going to do on Ronald Reagan?

Here's some predictions of the stupid, insane, wacko, tin-foil hat conspiracies and other theories (from Leftist BDS websites mind you) Stone's script will probably include and pass off as fact (and this is not including 9/11 theories).

*George W. Bush is supposedly the blood grandson of Aleister Crowley. With no proof whatsoever, the Left has circulated the theory that Dubya's grandmother, Pauline Pierce (mother of Barbara Bush) had a fling in Europe with Crowley, an English satanist who called himself, "The Great Beast 666" and "The Wickedest Man in the World." Crowley was also a practicioner of "sex magick." The day I'll consider the remote possibility this may be true is when George W. and mother Barbara have dinner with Led Zeppelin guitarist (and Crowley aficionado) Jimmy Page.

*Bush the elder and Bush the junior were involved in conspiracies to kill JFK (Stone's favorite topic). A film by these Alex Jones 9/11 conspiracy loons claims Dubya was involved in the death of John F. Kennedy Jr., just like George H.W. Bush was (supposedly) involved in the assassination of JFK. What's next, a drunk Dubya really drove Teddy's Oldsmobile off the Chappaquiddick Bridge and killed Mary Jo? Like the ridiculous Crowley assertion and 9/11 theories, there's no proof to back this up. But since when did the truth ever get in the way of a liberal?

God only knows what other off-the-wall distortions Stone will have in "Bush the Movie." The one thing I know is, I won't be buying a ticket to see it!

Fred Bows Out...

Bad news. Hopefully, Fred will remain active in helping us push the nominee to Conservatism and not the "living, breathing" type.

Now it's time to make sure John McLame and Mike Huckleberry are not the Republican nominee.

From "Go To Hell White Man" To Hosting Fidel Castro--The Story Of Hillary's Sanctified Endorser, Rev. Butts

Yesterday, Hillary Rotten Clinton received an endorsement from the Rev. Calvin Butts of Harlem's Abyssinian Baptist Church, an endorsement needed to help her attract black voters.

What has escaped media reports of Hillary's endorsement is the extreme nature of this Reverend. Discover the Networks has the dossier on Rev. Butts, who not only views America as a racist nation but once had Fidel Castro as a guest in his church.

Rev. Butts passes out the race card like a card dealer in Vegas. He's used the term against former New York mayors Ed Koch and Rudy Giuliani, among others. In 2000, after the acquittal of New York City police officers in the shooting of Amadou Diallo, Butts called for a boycott of white businesses and, from his pulpit, told the story of a businessman who told him "...to understand that it was a fair trial,” that “most crime is black-on-black crime, and the police have done a lot of good. At that point, I told him: ‘Go to hell, white man.’”

At a 2004 UN conference on "Confronting Islamophobia, Butts claimed, “whether Muslims like it or not, Muslims are labeled people of color in the racist U.S… . . . they won't label you by calling you a nigger but they'll call you a terrorist.”

Johnnie Cochran, who defended O.J. Simpson from murder charges, was a parishioner of Butts. While eulogizing Cochran, Butts said that the attorney who I and many others believe helped free a murderer “deserves a standing ovation from everybody in this house.”

But nothing can top when Cuban Communist dictator Fidel Castro came to New York in 1995 and was shunned by politicians like Rudy Giuliani and even Bill Clinton. However, Fidel found a friend in Hillary's endorser, Rev. Butts. According to the DTN website:

"To remedy what he perceived as the injustice of the snub, Butts hosted Castro at his Abyssinian Baptist Church. Then, in front of a crowd of 1,300—among whose number were several Democratic New York politicians, such as representatives Charles Rangel, José Serrano, and Nydia Velazquez—Butts lavished praise on the honored guest. 'It is in our tradition to welcome all who are visionaries, revolutionaries and who seek the liberation of all people,' he gushed."

Will Hillary repudiate Rev. Butts' extremism or is she desperate for a major endorsement from the black community?

I only hear the crickets chirping.

WoolseyWatch--Turning Her Back On Homeless Veterans

In the Marietta Daily Journal, Laura Armstrong wrote about an extension of the national federal housing program being voted on by Congress called HOPE VI. The cost to extend the program to 2015 is $800 million per year.

According to Armstrong:

"The legislation as written (H.R. 3524) gave preference to a group called the "hard to house," people like convicted felons, sex offenders and drug abusers - some just weeks out of prison.

But Republicans, led by Missouri Congressman Sam Graves, caught the ridiculousness of that preference and added an amendment to the bill while on the floor, rightly calling for HUD to put veterans before criminals when deciding eligibility.

'Veterans should be at the front of the line,' said Graves, a sixth-generation family farmer and relative newcomer to Washington.

Here is the shame: The vote was 372 in favor of veterans getting HUD housing preference. But 28 Democrats, including Georgia's own John Lewis, actually voted to put vets at the back of the line behind criminals."

Graves said about the amendment, "This wasn't a Republican issue or a Democrat issue, it was an American issue. We owe our daily freedoms to veterans and this is one small thing we can do to say thank you."

Besides John Lewis, the North Bay's own Congressional embarrassment, Lynn Woolsey, voted against giving preference to homeless veterans for federal housing dollars. Other no votes included the original bill's sponsor Maxine Waters, Pete Stark and Virginia's Jim "We went to war for Israel" Moron.

Keep in mind this vote goes against what Woolsey said on the House floor almost a year ago, when she was doing one of her daily Surrender to the Terrorists floor speeches, when she stated:

"Iraq must belong to the Iraqi people. Having learned from our past, we will never turn our backs on the returning troops, those who have been put in an unimaginable position. They have seen death; they have seen destruction up close, in a way many of us will never understand. They are returning with scars, both visible and invisible. The least we can do is fulfill our commitment to them by fully funding the medical services they have been promised. This is not a gift we are giving them. This is a right, this is an entitlement."

Armstrong asked in her piece, "How do they live with themselves?"

How does Lynn Woolsey the hypocrite live with herself?

McLame Wins S.C.--Time For Us To Reject "Living, Breathing Conservatism"

What a frustrating night last night, to see John "You can't (pick lettuce) my friends" McLame win the South Carolina primary and Mike Huckleberry come in a close second.

Of the two most conservative candidates, it's now down to one, as Duncan Hunter exited yesterday. After coming in third, I wonder what the future will hold for Fred Thompson.

All I can say, is that it is time for you and I who consider ourselves conservatives first is to reject the brand of conservatism that changes with the times. I call it a "living, breathing conservatism."

We saw it in the comments of former Speaker Newt Gingrich last Sunday, where he claimed we the Reagan era was over and added, "we're about to redefine the Republican Party based on what people need." Last night, John McLame illustrated "living, breathing conservatism" in his interview with Sean Hannity (from Gateway Pundit).

Sean Hannity: (To Senator McLame) Do you think your willingness to change your position towards securing the border first helped a lot?

John McLame: Actually, I didn't change my position...

Sorry! Conservatism is not kissing up to Hillary Rotten Clinton on health care (as Newt did), drinking the global warming kool aid (like Newt, Ahnold Schwarzenkennedy and other RINO's are doing), bailing out people who can't make mortgage payments (as Bush is doing), claiming the Constitution is "a living, breathing document" (as Huckleberry did) or writing legislation with some of the most Leftist senators in Washington (as McLame has done). Neither is it about welcoming in more people who broke our immigration laws. At least Reagan admitted signing the disastrous Simpson Mazzoli Amnesty Bill of 1986 was a mistake. John McLame still can't admit he was wrong about amnesty.

While there is still time, we must select a nominee who is the closest embodiment of real conservatism (lower taxes, limited government, more individual freedom) and reject the "living, breathing conservatism" of John McLame, Lindsey Graham-Cracker and Mike Huckleberry. We don't need to become liberal-lites in order to win the Presidency.

Obama Receives $2,300 Donation From Code Pinko Co-Founder UPDATE: Has Also Raised Over $50K in Bundled Donations For Obama

Barack Hussein Obama received a $2,300 donation to his presidential campaign from Jodie Evans, co-founder of the anti-military, pro-terrorist group Code Pinko.

As a result, the patriots at FreeRepublic.com have rightfully asked the Obama campaign to renounce the contribution.

"The leader of our military must have the confidence of the American people that he is not in bed with America's enemies," said Kristinn Taylor, co-leader of the DC Chapter of Free Republic. "It is therefore incumbent upon Sen. Obama that he immediately repudiate the $2300 terrorist supporter Jodie Evans has contributed to his presidential campaign. Rather than return her blood money to Ms. Evans, the money should be given to a troop support organization of Sen. Obama's choice.

"Should Sen. Obama elect to keep Ms. Evans' contribution, it will tell the American people that he shares her support for the terrorist-led insurgency in Iraq," Taylor added.


After further research, Taylor has also discovered that Evans is a bundler for Obama and raised over $50,000 for him, according to records at Public Citizen. A bundler is defined by Public Citizen as "fundraisers who pool a large number of campaign contributions from political action committees (PACs) and individuals. Bundlers, who are often corporate CEOs, lobbyists, hedge fund managers or independently wealthy people, are able to funnel far more money to campaigns than they could personally give under campaign finance laws."

Evans was an international observer for the June 2005 International Tribunal on Iraq, according to the Washington City Paper. A statement signed by attendees of the tribunal called the terrorist insurgency as “legitimate and justified” and called for war crimes charges against President Bush and world leaders who supported the invasion. Evans said at the tribunal:

"We must begin by really standing with the Iraqi people and defending their right to resist. I can remain myself against all forms of violence, and yet I cannot judge what someone has to do when pushed to the wall to protect all they love. The Iraqi people are fighting for their country, to protect their families and to preserve all they love. They are fighting for their lives, and we are fighting for lies."

At home, Evans and her Code Pinkos have held protests outside Walter Reed Hospital since 2005. While soldiers wounded in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars recovered from their wounds, Evans and her group of traitors held signs reading "Maimed for a lie" and "Enlist here and die for Halliburton."

Additionally, Evans and Code Pinko sent $600,000 in aid to the terrorist insurgency in Fallujah, Iraq in late 2004. The story was virtually ignored by the liberal MSM.

Obama should give up the money and renounce Code Pinko if he has any desire to be President. Anyone who dares to align themselves with such a group of traitors is unqualified to hold elected office in this nation.

Anti-Troop Groups Surrender Fight Against War Funds, Plan Winter Soldier Redux

Congratulations to all pro-troop groups (Move America Forward, Gathering of Eagles, FreeRepublic, et al) and all who've attended pro-troop rallies. We've won a large battle against the pro-surrender forces, as anti-American, anti-military groups have surrendered the fight to cut funds for the war, according to the Politico.

"In recognition of hard political reality, the groups instead will lower their sights and push for legislation to prevent President Bush from entering into a long-term agreement with the Iraqi government that could keep significant numbers of troops in Iraq for years to come.

'There was a consensus that last year was not productive,' John Isaacs, executive director of Council for a Livable World, said of a meeting attended by a coalition of anti-war groups last week. 'Our expectations were dashed.'

...The meeting, held at an office on K Street, was attended by around 20 representatives of influential anti-war groups, including MoveOn.org and Americans Against Escalation in Iraq, which spent $12 million last year opposing the war."

'We got our heads together and decided to go a different way,' Isaacs said. 'The consensus was not to keep beating our heads against the wall trying to block every funding
bill — not because we don’t agree with it, but because we don’t have the votes.'”

But the war is far from over. One item not mentioned by the Politico is an effort coming March 13-15 in Washington DC to smear our troops with lies just like Hanoi John Kerry did to Vietnam Veterans back in 1971. Like their 1970's predecessor, Winter Soldier, these John Kerry wanna-bes from Iraq Veterans Against The War are calling their event "Winter Soldier: Iraq & Afghanistan."

"Over thirty years later, we find ourselves faced with a new war. But the lies are the same. Once again, American troops are sinking into an increasingly bloody occupation. Once again, war crimes in places like Haditha, Fallujah, and Abu Ghraib have turned the public against the war. Once again, politicians and generals are blaming "a few bad apples" instead of examining the military policies that have destroyed Iraq and Afghanistan."

To illustrate IVAW's anti-American agenda, an unnamed group member will be a speaker Easter weekend at the Marxism 2008 conference. IVAW was founded at the 2004 Veterans for Peace convention, according to the Communist publication People's Weekly World. Veterans for Peace, besides opposing the War on Islamofascist terror, also 1980s, supported the Marxist Sandinista regime in Nicaragua in the 1980's and opposes U.S. embargo of Cuba. In 2003, local Bay Area Chapter Leader of VAP Jim Long said at a San Francisco rally "(Fidel) Castro was loved by his people, in contrast to President Bush, who had to be protected from protesters in a 'quasi-military' operation. … It’s hard for me to determine where the police state is and where the free state is.”

Our fight against these anti-American forces is far from over and unlike what happened almost forty years ago, we're not going to let them get away the same crap they pulled on returning Vietnam Veterans.

Textbook In California, Arizona Schools Whitewashes Jihad

If you have a child in one of California's government schools, be on the lookout for the textbook pictured below, History Alive! The Medieval World & Beyond.

According to Yid With Lid (also posted at Atlas Shrugs), sections of the book make the term Jihad sound harmless and good. This is from pages 101-103 from the 2005 edition.

"Jihad The word jihad means "to strive." Jihad represents the human struggle to overcome difficulties and do things that would be pleasing to God. Muslims strive to respond positively to personal difficulties as well as worldly challenges. For instance, they might work to become better people, reform society, or correct injustice. Jihad has always been an important Islamic concept. One hadith, or account of Muhammad, tells about the prophet's return from a battle. He declared that he and his men had carried out the "lesser jihad," the external struggle against oppression. The "greater jihad," he said, was the fight against evil within oneself. Examples of the greater jihad include working hard for a goal, giving up a bad habit, getting an education, or obeying your parents when you may not want to."

The whitewash of jihad continues:

"Sometimes, however, jihad becomes a physical struggle. The Qur'an tells Muslims to fight to protect themselves from those who would do them harm or to right a terrible wrong. Early Muslims considered their efforts to protect their territory and extend their rule over other regions to be a form of jihad. However, the Qur'an forbade Muslims to force others to convert to Islam. So, non-Muslims who came under Muslim rule were allowed to practice their faiths.

Oh yes, those Muslim nations are known for "religious tolerance. Bibles are confiscated in Saudi Arabia and can get a person arrested or killed. Christians have been beheaded in Muslim nations like Indonesia. Did anyone mention to the writers of this textbook how Islam translated means "submission?" The writers must have also missed the following verses of the Koran.

Sura 5.51: O you who believe! do not take the Jews and the Christians for friends; they are friends of each other; and whoever amongst you takes them for a friend, then surely he is one of them; surely Allah does not guide the unjust people.

Sura 4.89 : They desire that you should disbelieve as they have disbelieved, so that you might be (all) alike; therefore take not from among them friends until they fly (their homes) in Allah's way; but if they turn back, then seize them and kill them wherever you find them, and take not from among them a friend or a helper.

Besides California, the textbook is used in some Arizona schools. William J. Bennetta wrote for The Textbook League on the book's use in Scottsdale, AZ. Bennetta reveals the following about the publisher:

"TCI evidently enjoys a close relationship with the Islamic Networks Group (ING), a Muslim propaganda agency based in San Jose, California. TCI certainly commands the ING's admiration, for the ING (on its Web site) endorses TCI's products. The ING doesn't promote the products of any other publisher of schoolbooks."

While the textbook endorsed Islamic legends, Bennetta found that it not only ignored history but also exhibited at times contempt for Judaism and Christianity.

"In a passage in chapter 9, the TCI writers convey the lesson that a religious view held by Muslims is important, but views held by Jews and Christians are unworthy of consideration."

On the Textbook League website is an analysis by historian Thomas Madden, a professor of history at Saint Louis University. Madden found the following on the pages dealing with the Crusades.

"The choice of words [used by TCI's writers] is often surprising. When the Seljuks or other Muslim groups attack Christian peoples, kill them, and take their lands it is referred to as 'building' an empire. Christian attempts to restore those lands are referred to as 'violent attacks' or 'massacres.'"

The Crusades are blamed on Christians in the textbook:

"[Christians in Europe] feared for the safety and property of Christians living in the east...Christians feared they would no longer be able to visit Jerusalem and other sacred sites in the Holy Land...this fear helped pave the way for the crusades."

Madden's analysis on the TTL website spells out the obvious suggestions that "the crusades originated because European Christians were paranoid and were driven by their fear of things that might happen in the future. But in fact, Madden explains, these things already had happened -- indeed they had been happening for many years. 'The crusades were a belated response to these events,' Madden writes. 'Fear had nothing to do with it.'"

But don't look for the AlQueda Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) to be screaming "separation of church and state." Islam is a politically correct religion protected by liberals who are only interested in ridding any public mention of Christianity.

And of course, the ACLU is too busy defending those jihadists who've been detained at Club Gitmo.

Bill Clinton Rages At KGO Reporter

At an Oakland appearance on behalf of his alleged wife, former co-President Bill Clinton's dark side came out in reference to a question posed by KGO Reporter Mark Matthews.

The crooked finger was pointed and jabbed at Matthews while Oakland Mayor Ron "Red" Dellums attempted to pull the impeached former President away.



On the KGO blog, Matthews writes:

"...a couple of the things he asserted aren’t exactly accurate.

He told me the casino caucus goers would have a five to one advantage over Nevadans who were voting in other communities.

Technically that is possible but highly unlikely. The state democratic party decided that delegates to the state convention would be apportioned out according to a number of factors. For example rural areas of Nevada will have more weight than cities. The state party does that on purposes so that candidates will be encouraged to ignore sparsely populated areas of the state.

Most precincts are set up according to population size. But with the casino “at large” precincts…it was decided they would be weighted according to turn out. So for example if a lot of people turn out at the casino sites…each vote will be worth a little less than other precincts with a smaller population.

...And the state party approved those rules as did the national democratic party.

It wasn’t until after Barack Obama got the endorsement of the culinary workers union that anyone objected to the casino locations."

No wonder, after what happened in Michigan this week, the state's former Democrat Governor Don Riegle said of the Clintons:

“What happened in Michigan is not very different from what used to happen in the old Soviet Union,” Riegle said. “The Clinton machine manipulated the ballot. They don’t care how they win, only that they do. It’s wrong and people need to know that.”

On another note, it was ten years ago that Bill pointed his crooked finger, looked this nation in the eye and lied to us all:



The Clinton Culture of Corruption continues. Exactly why we don't need another one occupying the "Oral Office."

Poll: Americans See Media Influencing Public Policy, Hurting Troop Morale

If the results of this poll are true, Americans are increasingly losing trust in the liberal MSM.

Little Green Footballs links to a poll from Sacred Heart University which shows a surprising amount of distrust in the media.

FAIRFIELD, Conn.—A Sacred Heart University Poll found significantly declining percentages of Americans saying they believe all or most of media news reporting. In the current national poll, just 19.6% of those surveyed could say they believe all or most news media reporting. This is down from 27.4% in 2003. Just under one-quarter, 23.9%, in 2007 said they believe little or none of reporting while 55.3% suggested they believe some media news reporting.

...The perception is growing among Americans that the news media attempts to influence public opinion – from 79.3% strongly or somewhat agreeing in 2003 to 87.6% in 2007. And, 86.0% agreed (strongly or somewhat) that the news media attempts to influence public policies – up from 76.7% in 2003.

Americans surveyed provided poor ratings for the national news media on six different characteristics measured. The average overall positive rating across all six characteristics measured was 33.4%. The highest positive rating, 40.7%, was recorded for quality of reporting followed by accuracy of reporting at 36.9% and keeping any personal bias out of stories (33.3%).

Other low positive ratings included: fairness (31.3%), presenting an even balance of views (30.4%) and presenting negative and positive news equally (27.5%).

The poll also shows success in Iraq is viewed differently than by the media, mostly thanks to the New Media (bloggers, talk radio).

“Americans are discerning, through a maze of information sources, the truth about our status in Iraq. They see more success than the media is reporting,” said Jerry C. Lindsley, director of the Sacred Heart University Polling Institute. He added, “They are especially disturbed that negative media reports damage U.S. troop morale.”

Nearly three-quarters of all Americans surveyed, 70.7%, indicated they strongly or somewhat agreed that negative media reporting damages troop morale.

Over half of all survey respondents, 59.8%, agreed (strongly or somewhat) that negative media coverage damages prospects for success in Iraq because it encourages terrorists, and about half, 49.1%, agreed (strongly or somewhat) that things are likely going better for the U.S. than the U.S. media portrays."

Is this a damning indictment of the MSM or what? No wonder the MSM can be seen as what I call "purveyors of pessimism." When there's good news from Iraq, it's not news. Then it's time to report erroneous stories about soldiers coming back from war as murderers or repeating the mantra (especially in an election year) that we're supposedly in a recession.

Pay attention Bill Keller of the New York Slimes. When you claim (as you did last month in London) that "we do not go into a story with an agenda or a pre-conceived notion," more and more Americans see that you're full of bovine excrement.

Maryland's Democrat Governor Proposes Special Drivers Licenses For Illegal Aliens

When it comes to the recent move my family and I made to the East Coast, I'm grateful we did not move to Maryland.

Not only has the one party state raised taxes, but Democrat Gov. Martin O'Malley has proposed a two-tier plan for drivers licenses for illegal aliens. From NBC 4.

"The system would put Maryland in compliance with new federal security regulations. But undocumented immigrants would not be able to use their license to board airplanes, enter federal buildings or cross borders.

On Friday, the federal government announced that by 2014, anyone seeking to board an airplane or enter a federal building would have to present a REAL ID-compliant driver's license, with the notable exception of those more than 50 years old, Homeland Security officials said.

The government's "REAL ID" plan includes the following requirements:

The traditional driver's license photograph would be taken at the beginning of the application instead of the end so that should someone be rejected for failure to prove identity and citizenship, the applicant's photo would be kept on file and checked in the future if that person attempted to con the system again.

The cards will have three layers of security measures but will not contain microchips as some had expected. States will be able to choose from a menu which security measures they will put in their cards.

Over the next year, the government expects all states to begin checking both the Social Security numbers and immigration status of license applicants.

Under O'Malley's plan, undocumented immigrants would have a license to drive in Maryland, but the license would not be considered a 'REAL ID.'"

Maryland is about to become the California of the East Coast. Take a good look folks! If a Democrat is (God forbid) elected President, legalized drivers licenses for illegals will happen nationwide. This will ensure millions of new Democrat voters and a permanent Democrat majority.

Hillary Booed At MLK Rally

At a Martin Luther King Jr. rally in New York today, Hillary Rotten Clinton received tepid applause and some boos, according to The Politico.

"NEW YORK, N.Y. — Dogged by continuing racial tensions around her presidential campaign, Hillary Rodham Clinton drew a smattering of boos on Monday when she spoke at a religiously tinged Martin Luther King Jr. rally put together by a union organizing predominantly black security workers.

The catcalls came when Clinton was introduced and her speech drew only tepid applause compared to the boisterous ovations drawn by many of the pastors and reverends — not to mention a hip-hop artist and slam poet — who took the podium before her.

Her participation in the event drew nary a mention during nearly two hours of speeches, performances, prayers and acknowledgments. But she was a late addition to the event — SEIU Local 32BJ President Michael Fishman said he didn't know Clinton would be there until he arrived at the rally. The SEIU affiliate supports Clinton, though a union official stressed that the event was not a Clinton campaign rally. The New York senator called on the roughly 2,500, mostly black attendees “to fulfill [King’s] unfinished dream and to live the legacy that we have inherited.” Some of her biggest applause came when she cited her rival for the Democratic nomination, Illinois Sen. Barack Obama, who had his share of supporters at the event.

“How many of us ever dreamed that we would see the day when a woman and an African-American are running for the presidency of the United States of America?” Clinton asked, referring to herself and Obama.

That was Hillary, injecting both race and gender into the Presidential race.

One wonders if the people in the audience aren't buying the Clinton's explanation of her comments regarding Martin Luther King and their race baiting against Obama. Hillary isn't doing any favors for herself after Clinton surrogate Robert Johnson of BET said the following yesterday, at an event she also attended.

"And to me, as an African-American, I am frankly insulted that the Obama campaign would imply that we are so stupid that we would think Hillary and Bill Clinton, who have been deeply and emotionally involved in black issues since Barack Obama was doing something in the neighborhood –­ and I won’t say what he was doing, but he said it in the book (alluding to drug use? M.I.M.) –­ when they have been involved...That kind of campaign behavior does not resonate with me, for a guy who says, ‘I want to be a reasonable, likable, Sidney Poitier ‘Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner.’ And I’m thinking, I’m thinking to myself, this ain’t a movie, Sidney. This is real life.”

Don't forget the "Bill's blacker than Obama" statement made by former UN Ambassador Andrew Young last month (little Photoshop fun below).

The race baiting occurred even last year when Pastor James David Manning of ATLAH World Ministries (in the video below) called Obama a "half white boy" and that "Obama got a white mama."

New York Slimes Slanders Our Troops....Again. Move America Forward Exposes Erroneous Report

When they're not leaking classified secrets used in our fight against Islamofascist terrorists, the rag known as the New York Slimes attacks the brave men and women who serve in our military.

They did it again yesterday, in their story "Across America, Deadly Echoes of Foreign Battles."

"Town by town across the country, headlines have been telling similar stories. Lakewood, Wash.: “Family Blames Iraq After Son Kills Wife.” Pierre, S.D.: “Soldier Charged With Murder Testifies About Postwar Stress.” Colorado Springs: “Iraq War Vets Suspected in Two Slayings, Crime Ring.”

Individually, these are stories of local crimes, gut-wrenching postscripts to the war for the military men, their victims and their communities. Taken together, they paint the patchwork picture of a quiet phenomenon, tracing a cross-country trail of death and heartbreak.

The New York Times found 121 cases in which veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan committed a killing in this country, or were charged with one, after their return from war.

Move America Forward, the largest pro-troop organization, today exposed the false conclusions made by the Slimes.

"The Times documentation of 121 potential killings out of more than 1.5 million veterans of Operation Iraqi Freedom (Iraq) and Operation Enduring Freedom (Afghanistan), divided by 6 years of conflict results in a murder rate of just 1.34 incidents per 100,000 veterans per year.

That murder rate is far lower than the murder rate for the general population, demonstrating that the experiences of military service – including having served in Iraq and Afghanistan – actually made it less likely for returning veterans to commit murder once they returned home, than the general population.

Given a census-estimated population of the United States of 300,000,000 persons in this country as of October 2006, and FBI-compiled statistics of 17,399 homicide offenders for 2006, the murder rate of the general population was 5.80 offenders per 100,000 on average–and a rate of approximately 7.67 per 100,000 for men.

“It’s obvious that the New York Times has an agenda of undermining the missions of our troops in the War on Terror, so much so that they are willing to resort to demonstrably false statistics to support their anti-troop bias,” said Melanie Morgan, Chairman of Move America Forward.

“The slander of our troops and veterans by the New York Times is unfortunately all too familiar. We heard this kind of nonsense about our returning veterans from Vietnam. It’s the same insult, different war."

Here's another point I found on the Internet, which comes from a 2006 WorldNetDaily article by Joseph Farah, "Illegal aliens murder12 Americans daily, Death toll in 2006 far overshadows total U.S. soldiers killed in Iraq, Afghanistan."

"Twelve Americans are murdered every day by illegal aliens, according to statistics released by Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa. If those numbers are correct, it translates to 4,380 Americans murdered annually by illegal aliens. That's 21,900 since Sept. 11, 2001."

But you won't see the pro-open borders New York Slimes print that article. All that matters to them is attacking the same military which fights for the free speech the Slimes abuses daily. And there is no doubt either of how Slimes Editor Bill Keller and Publisher Arthur "Pinchy" Sulzberger have a vendetta against our troops and are actively agitating for them to lose the War on Terror. Here's what Slimes Publisher Pinchy Sulzberger said at the 2006 Commencement at State University of New York:

"I’ll start with an apology. When I graduated from college in 1974, my fellow students and I had just ended the war in Vietnam and ousted President Nixon. Okay, okay, that's not quite true. I mean yes, the war did end and yes, President Nixon did resign in disgrace but maybe there were larger forces at play. Either way, we entered the real world committed to making it a better, safer, cleaner, more equal place. We were determined not to repeat the mistakes of our predecessors. We had seen the horrors and futility of war and smelled the stench of corruption in government. Our children, we vowed, would never know that. So, well, sorry. It wasn't supposed to be this way. You weren't supposed to be graduating into an America fighting a misbegotten war in a foreign land. You weren't supposed to be graduating into a world where we are still fighting for fundamental human rights, whether it's the rights of immigrants to start a new life; or the rights of gays to marry; or the rights of women to choose. You weren't supposed to be graduating into a world where oil still drove policy and environmentalists have to fight relentlessly for every gain. You weren't. But you are. And for that I'm sorry."

More recently, here's what Keller said recently in London.

"We have a war going very badly in Iraq, and another one in Afghanistan where our declaration of victory looks very premature."

Need anymore proof that the management of the New York Slimes are a couple of traitors who are abusing their First Amendment rights in order to hinder American victory against Islamic Terrorists who attacked New York on 9/11 and would do it again? Instead of going after the CIA for destroying tapes of terrorist interrogations, the Justice Department should be investigating Keller and Sulzberger for treason and sabotage.

Cuban Americans Chase Code Pinko Off

You gotta love Cuban Americans, who are extremely loyal to this nation because many of them escaped the tyranny of Communist Dictator Fidel Castro. Many of them lost family members who were imprisoned or executed by Castro.

That must explain why, when Code Pinko came to Miami's Little Havana section yesterday, they ran away with their tails between their legs, according to Gateway Pundit.

The anti-American group, which attacked military recruiters in Berkeley and gave $600,000 in aid to the terrorists in Iraq back in 2004, came to Little Havana calling for the arrest of Luis Posada Carriles, an anti-Castro militant. Carriles, a former CIA operative, is wanted in Venezuela for ties to a 1976 bombing of a Cuban jetliner. He was convicted in Panama for plotting an assassination attempt on Castro. Supporters call Carriles a hero and patriot in fighting the Communist regime in Cuba.

The Pinko's headed towards the Versailles Restaurant to hold a press conference (photo from Babalu Blog).
However, around 200 Cuban Americans were waiting for them to arrive (photos from Gateway Pundit).

According to the South Florida Sun Sentinel, "...several (Cuban Americans) charged at the activists' (Pinko's) truck as they arrived, tearing at its pink fringe, while others jeered and shouted insults. The truck then drove on."

"At Versailles, a crowd of mostly older men waved Cuban flags and banners. One poster read: "Pink is close to red." Nearby, a man wore a T-shirt depicting revolutionary icon Ernesto "Che" Guevara and the label "murderer."

"Posada Carriles is no terrorist. The terrorist is Fidel Castro," said Rene Vidal, 77, among those gathered.

Needless to say, the Pinko leader and Castro groupie Susan "Medea" Benjamin, was not pleased.

"We are not in Cuba. We're supposed to have free speech," she moaned to the Sun Sentinel. Keep in mind this is the same person who once said living on the island gulag of Cuba was “like [she] died and went to heaven.” Benjamin has also written books glorifying Cuba and greenie weenie organic agriculture experiments by the Communist nation. Notice also that Susie Benjamin is silent when it comes to dissidents who are imprisoned by her hero Castro. Furthermore, why does Susie the supposed "human rights activist" take the name of a character from a play who murders her own children as revenge against her husband?

The group is planning another protest today. After yesterday, I wonder if they'll even show up.

Man In Audience To Hillary: "Marry Me"

I just spit iced tea on the monitor when I saw this story: Play of the Day: Clinton Gets Proposal.

"After wrapping up a speech outlining her economic stimulus proposal, the New
York senator took questions from the crowd. The first question from one
man was: "Hillary, marry me, baby."

The packed union hall loved it and applauded. Clinton smiled and told
the man, gently, no.

"That is certainly the kindest offer I've had in a while," she said to
laughter.

I wouldn't be suprised if this man shouting a marriage proposal is a Clinton plant. What a wonderful attempt by the Hillary camp to try and soften her image.

Clintons Under Fire For "Racial Insensitivity"

"...I have never used an ethnic, racial, anti-Semitic, bigoted, discriminatory, prejudiced, accusation against anybody. I've never done it. I've never thought it."

Hillary Rotten Clinton

July 2000

Of all the people to be accused of "racism" who'da thunk it was the "first Black President" Bill Clinton and his alleged wife, Broom Hillary.

Sweetness & Light has more on the accusations swirling around the former co-Presidency. They involve comments she made concerning Martin Luther King Jr.

"Dr King’s dream began to be realised when President Lyndon Johnson passed the Civil Rights Act of 1964. It took a president to get it done,” she said.

The so-called "Smartest Woman in the World" must have flunked civics in high school. It was Congress who passed the Civil Rights Act of 1964. President Johnson, who signed the bill into law, credited Republicans for the bill's passage, which had been filibustered by segregationist Democrats like (Bill Clinton's mentor) J. William Fulbright, Al Gore Sr. and current W. Virginia Senator (and former Kleagle/Exalted Cyclops of the Ku Klux Klan) Robert "Sheets" Byrd.

Bill earlier had referred to Hillary's rival for the Democrat nomination, Barack Hussein Obama, as a "kid" (akin to calling him "boy") and stated Obama's candidacy was a "fairy tale." For his comments, Bill had to make a pilgrimage to race hustler Al Sharpton to explain himself.

It isn't just Bill and Hillary. Clinton ally and New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo is explaining comments he made at an Albany radio show about Hillary's win in New Hampshire.

"It’s not a TV-crazed race. Frankly you can’t buy your way into it. You can’t shuck and jive at a press conference. All those moves you can make with the press don’t work when you’re in someone’s living room.”

On his blog, David Drake notes that the term "shuck and jive" has "long been words used as a negative assessment of African Americans, along the lines of a “foot shufflin’ Negro.” In fact, I don’t recall ever hearing the phrase used in reference to anyone white. According to a story in Newsday, “The 1994 book ‘Juba to Jive, a Dictionary of African-American Slang,’ says ‘shuck and jive’ dates back to the 1870s and was an ‘originally southern 'Negro' expression for clowning, lying, pretense.’"

Despite Hillary's July 2000 quote noted above, there has been allegations of racial slurs being used by both her and Bill. Some evidence has even bubbled to the surface. In 1996, Hillary made fun of then San Francisco Mayor "Slick Willie" Brown using a mock African-American voice, saying "She's (Emily's List) supportin' all these people. She's supportin' Sen. Dianne Feinstein. She's supported Sen. Barbara Boxer...She supported everybody. Why won't she support me?" Two years later, she publicly insulted Senate candidate Al D'Amato, an Italian American, as "Senator Tomato." In 2004 she used racial stereotypes towards Indians at a St. Louis fundraiser.

"I love this quote from Mahatma Gandhi - who ran a gas station down in St. Louis for a couple of years. Mr. Gandhi - do you still go down to the gas station? A lot of wisdom comes out of that gas station."

Besides being alleged of having used anti-Semitic slurs, both Clinton's have also been accused of using racial slurs toward blacks. Referencing a July 2000 Newsmax article, a piece entitled "The Foulmouthed Clintons" by Reinhold Aman, Ph.D. notes that Arkansas State Trooper Larry Patterson said he'd heard then Governor Bill Clinton use the racial slur "nigger" while speaking about Jesse Jackson and Little Rock civil rights activist Robert "Say" MacIntosh. Clinton mistress Dolly Kyle Browning recalled Bill talking about MacIntosh. "Not only did he use the 'N' word, he called him a 'GDN' [g*ddamn nigger], if you catch my drift," she said. "He has used the 'N' word before. Bill would make snide remarks about blacks behind their backs."

Patterson also accused Hillary of using that word also. "He (Patterson) heard her (Hillary) say 'nigger' 'probably six, eight, ten times. She would be upset with someone in the black community and she would use the 'N' word, like, you heard they've got the president's brother on tape using the 'N' word.'"

Of course, the liberal MSM won't hold the Clinton's responsible for these terms, not like they used "macaca" to beat over former Virginia Senator George Allen's head.

Question to ask Hillary in the next debate: You claimed once to have never used any bigoted comments. Why should we believe you after you publicly made ethnic slurs towards Al D'Amato and Gandhi?

Terrorist Sympathizers Get Rained On and Arrested In DC

John at This Ain't Hell braved the wet weather to get photos (couple of which are below) of the Moonbats Without Jobs who spent today sympathizing with their imprisoned terrorist friends in al-Queda.

As mentioned yesterday, this event was organized by the Al-Queda Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) as well as Amnesty (for) International (Terrorists).

Eighty of the moonbats were arrested when they went to the steps of the Supreme Court.

Send this hippie boy to Gitmo, or better yet, Abu Gharib

While these phony "civil liberties" and "human rights" groups cry crocodile tears for Islamic terrorists who want to kill Americans, why is the treatment of guards at Club Gitmo ignored?

Michelle Malkin reminds us of the following letter she received:

"My daughter was in Gitmo for a year as a Master-at- Arms, E4. (10/04-10/05) She was injured several times by the inmates assaulting her physically. In addition, she knew that when she was doing her job by enforcing the rules, she was threatened by the prisoners if she had to touch them. They would get her. They mixed a cocktail of urine, feces, and semen, and let it fester for days until the right moment. They warned her that she was a target and then they got her, she was assaulted several times by loads of crap thrown at her.

She had to undergo shots to prevent what diseases that she was exposed to. I don’t know why we have women guarding men, especially these animals, but that is the policy. My daughter is a tough cookie and can handle herself. In her year there she did not dishonor herself or our country. When she returned home she had a DVD of Gitmo. They made fresh bread every day!! Part of it showed how the chef’s prepared special meals for the prisoners. If a prisoner refused food the guards were happy to sample the Chicken, rice pilaf, yogurt and fresh baked pita bread, while our guys had crap food from the mess or had to buy it from Burger King.

As part of her duties, in the last month she was there, she was assigned to the hospital ward. She had to force feed those a..holes who offed themselves the other day. They were the meanest of the bunch and had to be tied down to get their food. My daughter and other personnel voluntarily submitted themselves to the force feeding procedure also so that they could do it with the least pain for the captives. It was very unpleasant for her but it helped her and others to understand how to participate in it with the least stress for the recipients. The goal was to keep them alive. She feels that the suicides would not have happened on her watch, but it was going to happen eventually. These guys are warriors. By their death they have achieved a military success in the political world. The media marches on."

I'm tired of listening to and looking at these Leftist bastards weep and moan about these phony "religious" people detained at Gitmo who violently attack our guards. Who takes up for these brave guards? Not the media, not Amnesty for International Terrorists, not the Democrat Party. All the above spend too much time worried about the comfort of the terrorists instead of the safety of American citizens.

Sorry ACLU, the survival rights of my fellow Americans, my family and I are more important than not offending Islamofascists.

And yes, I wore green today to show solidarity with the troops and those guards at Gitmo.

...And We're Supposed To Give These People A Palestinian State?

Atlas Shrugs posted this disturbing photo today which was found on an Islamic website.

The Islamic website claims this is a Palestinian mother stomping on the corpse of her own flesh and blood, her son.

What would make a "mother" do such a thing? Her son betrayed his own "religion" (Islam) by helping the Israelis.

And President Bush is deluded enough to think he can negotiate a peace between them and Israel?

RuPaul Lying When He Claims Racist Writings Weren't His

The Kooky Presidential Candidate RuPaul has been denying he had anything to do with a newsletter in his name which printed racist, homophobic and anti-Semitic writings.

While the liberal New Republic (a questionable rag) published the expose, websites like Little Green Footballs and FreeRepublic.com had exposed these writings earlier.

Ed Morrisey at Captain's Quarters offers proof today that Paul had previously taken responsibility for the newsletter and its content. He links to from a blog at Reason Magazine where Matt Welch wrote.

"...So what exactly did Paul and his campaign say about these and more egregious statements during his contentious 1996 campaign for Congress, when Democrat Lefty Morris made the newsletters a constant issue? Besides complaining that the quotes were taken "out of context" and proof of his opponent's "race-baiting," Paul and his campaign defended and took full ownership of the comments."

How are the Paulbots going to respond to this revelation? Go on a digital rampage against those who reveal it? We've seen how these goons recently attacked a great American named Sean Hannity. They even cornered Bill Clinton, who called them "crazy as hell" for claiming 9/11 was an inside job (Hell's about to freeze over, this is the second time I've said "right on" to B.J. in six months). This doesn't account for their online spamming of polls and pundits who criticize Paul for his lunatic, blame America first foreign policy.

Pink Floyd must have foreseen these Paulbots in their movie The Wall.

ACLU To Show Solidarity With Imprisoned Al Queda Terrorists Tommorrow

Besides supplying them lawyers to challenge their detention, the Al-Queda Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is asking their supporters to wear orange to show solidarity for Al-Queda terrorists detained at Club Gitmo.

Keep in mind that these aren't American citizens who committed some petty theft like burglary or stealing hubcaps. These scum whom the ACLU love so much are Islamic jihadist soldiers who've committed themselves to killing Americans and other infidels. They include Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the mastermind of 9/11 who also murdered Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl by beheading (after Pearl was forced to say "My father is a Jew, my mother is a Jew, and I am a Jew").

Who else are among the Gitmo detainees the ACLU, Democrats and phony human rights organizations shed crocodile tears for? Michelle Malkin shows a West Point report which details the following about the detainees.


• 56 individuals admitted to fighting the U.S. or Coalition forces
• 104 individuals were found to have manned the front lines
• 9 individuals were found to have participated in a bombing operation, improvised explosives device (IED) attack or other explosives-involved operation
• 98 individuals were found to have directly participated in, or supported the planning or plotting of, a combat operation.
• 3 individuals were found to have purchased weapons for the furtherance of committing hostile acts.
• 21 individuals were found to have engaged in ‘other’ hostile activities.


Never mind that many of the detainees who have been released have either been captured or killed on the battlefield.

Far from being an organization dedicated to defending "civil liberties," the ACLU are domestic enemies of the United States who seek the destruction of this nation and replacing our capitalist socitey with communism. Look at the words of ACLU founder Roger Baldwin, who once said, "I am for socialism, disarmament, and ultimately for abolishing the State itself as an instrument of property, the abolition of the properted class and sole control by those who produce wealth. Communism is the goal." While the ACLU also criticizes wiretapping of suspected terrorists, they themselves have been found to use certain technologies to gather information on members and donors. For the ACLU, what's wrong is right and what's right is wrong. Besides terrorists, they also defend child molesters like NAMBLA (North American Man Boy Love Association).


While the ACLU will show solidarity with Islamofascist terrorists by wearing organge, The Underground Conservative wisely suggests a counterprotest by wearing green tomorrow, showing solidarity with the United States Military.

I plan to do just that.

Spanish Network Celebrates McLame/Clinton Victory In New Hampshire

Who is celebrating the victory of RINO John McLame and Democrat Hillary Rotten Clinton in New Hampshire, besides their respective camps and true believers?

Supporters of "comprehensive immigration reform," meaning "amnesty for illegal aliens."

As proof, here is a translated page from the Spanish television channel Univision. "Clinton and McCain supports the legalization, N. Hampshire took a respite to reform."

"The winners of the primary election in the state of New Hampshire, Hillary Clinton (Democrat) and John McCain (Republican), support comprehensive immigration reform that includes a path to legalization for most undocumented immigrants living in the United States.

...The two senators (Clinton of New York, and McCain, Arizona), have fought for different ways to achieve a result without that Congress pass a law that removes from the shadows to undocumented immigrants, mostly from Mexico and Latin America.

And they have promised that they will continue to work towards that end if win, the first nomination and then the election of November when Americans elect a successor to George W. Bush."

The work is still not done. Along with battling turncoats like Kay Bailey Hutchinson from Texas (who gutted the border fence from the recently passed omnibus bill), those of us who vote in the primaries must make sure and select a presidential candidate who will not allow amnesty for illegal aliens.

Additionally, these Congresscritters who insist on writing these amnesty bills and weakening border security should be deported from Congress by the voters.

Reid, Pelosi Continue To Deny Success In Iraq, While Claiming Bush In Denial

The Democrat Duo of Denial, Dr. Evil Harry Reid and his Mini Me, Nancy Pelosi, released a statement today actually accusing President Bush of "deny(ing) reality in Iraq, at home."

“Like the American people, Democrats know that we urgently need a change of course in Iraq as political progress – the primary goal of the surge – remains out of reach. It is a failure of leadership when our President calls 2007 ‘incredibly successful beyond anybody’s expectations’ when the Iraqi government has done so little to achieve stability and it has been the most lethal year yet for American troops.

“Our nation faces great challenges at home and abroad. We need more clear-eyed and realistic assessments – and more willingness to work toward solutions.

“The Administration must work with Congress to strengthen the middle class and address the economic problems facing American families. We urge the President to join us as we address rising prices for everything from health care to gas to college tuition.”

Earth to Pelosi and Reid, there was a change in course in Iraq last year and it is working! The problem is, Democrats don't want our troops to succeed in Iraq. Read the report from Move America Forward of how we're winning the war.

Exactly what has the Democrat majority brought to America? Instead of Madam Speaker's promised "spirit of bipartisanship," we've had 300 plus partisan investigations into the Bush Administration, which are nothing but "fishing expeditions" to find any hint of wrongdoing. The price of a barrel of oil has increased to $100 a barrel because the Democrats are owned lock, stock and barrel by the tree-hugging, flat earth, environmentalist extremists who'd (as Ayn Rand once said) "pollute a river" if they swam in it. As a result, we're more dependent on foreign oil because the Democrats (and RINO's) won't allow us to drill for more.

No wonder Democrats have a lower approval rating than President Bush. As bad as the Republican majority could be, they at least tried to get something done. Compare that to the defeatist Democrats who secretly want the nation to go to hell in a hand basket so they can capitalize on it politically.

If anyone needs to be "redeployed," it's Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and the Democrats; out of Congress!