Tuesday, September 02, 2014

"Abortion Barbie" Wendy Davis Lies, Thinks Greg Abbott Has Power To Keep Prayers From Being Answered

How bad is Wendy "Abortion Barbie" Davis losing in her campaign to be governor?

So bad that she is engaging in a smear campaign against Attorney General (and GOP nominee) Greg Abbott, claiming he has the powers to keep the prayers of cancer patients from being answered by the Almighty.

Here's the ad:

Kristin Tate at Breitbart Texas writes:
But Chris Walling, a former investigator for the Travis County district attorney's office who was part of the investigation, provided an affidavit which showed that neither Abbott nor Perry are guilty of corruption.

The investigation into CPRIT is now closed. Only Jerald Combs, the former Chief Commercialization Officer of the CPRIT, was indicted. Combs had not contributed to Abbott in the past, according to the Texas Ethics Commission.

The affidavit provided by Walling stated that there was "no evidence whatsoever" that anyone other than the indicted individual was responsible for any wrongdoing.

As Breitbart Texas previously reported, Abbott appointed Jay Dyer to represent him on CPRIT's board. Hirsch previously told Breitbart Texas that Abbott appointed Dyer to represent him "to retain his independence and remove himself from potential conflicts."

(Abbott campaign director Matt) Hirsch added, "Having just lost a family member to cancer, Greg Abbott thinks it offensive that the Davis campaign would knowingly use the Cancer Institute as a political ploy--especially when her claims are completely false. Texans deserve better."
That's pretty bad to falsely attack someone who lost a family member to cancer, but what else are to we expect from the Abortion Barbie, especially when groups linked to her attacked Abbott for being paraplegic.

Saturday, August 30, 2014

ISIS Seeks To Use Open Border From Mexico To Launch Attacks in US

While the Celebrity-In-Chief President who doesn't have a plan, except to punish his enemies, the Islamist terror threat he does not speak about seeks to use the open border with Mexico as a springboard to launch terrorist attacks (Judicial Watch, via Shoebot.com).
Islamic terrorist groups are operating in the Mexican border city of Ciudad Juarez and planning to attack the United States with car bombs or other vehicle born improvised explosive devices (VBIED). High-level federal law enforcement, intelligence and other sources have confirmed to Judicial Watch that a warning bulletin for an imminent terrorist attack on the border has been issued. Agents across a number of Homeland Security, Justice and Defense agencies have all been placed on alert and instructed to aggressively work all possible leads and sources concerning this imminent terrorist threat.

Specifically, Judicial Watch sources reveal that the militant group Islamic State of Iraq and Greater Syria (ISIS) is confirmed to now be operating in Juarez, a famously crime-infested narcotics hotbed situated across from El Paso, Texas. Violent crimes are so rampant in Juarez that the U.S. State Department has issued a number of travel warnings for anyone planning to go there. The last one was issued just a few days ago.

Intelligence officials have picked up radio talk and chatter indicating that the terrorist groups are going to “carry out an attack on the border,” according to one JW source. “It’s coming very soon,” according to this high-level source, who clearly identified the groups planning the plots as “ISIS and Al Qaeda.” An attack is so imminent that the commanding general at Ft. Bliss, the U.S. Army post in El Paso, is being briefed, another source confirms. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) did not respond to multiple inquiries from Judicial Watch, both telephonic and in writing, about this information.
How open is the border there? Remember what James O'Keefe did recently, while dressed as Osama bin Laden?

Friday, August 29, 2014

"We Have No Strategy Yet" But We're Monitoring Twitter For Hate Speech: The Disconnect Of Our Pop-Culture President & Lib Media Sycophants

Yesterday saw perhaps the most mind-blowing, inexplicable words ever uttered by an American President, especially when it comes to the threat of Islamic terrorists from ISIS and ISIL.

"I don't want to put the cart before the horse. We don't have a strategy yet."
I guess this is what happens when all you have to worry about is the next fundraiser or when the next tee time is.  Because this weekend, Obama has two fundraisers to attend in Westchester County, New York, as well as the wedding of an MSNBC talking head.

Meanwhile, across the pond in England, Prime Minister David Cameron seems to understand the threat being faced by the free, Western world (AP via ABC News).
Prime Minister David Cameron pledged Friday to plug gaps in Britain's armory to combat terror, describing the extremist threat posed by the Islamic State group as being more dangerous than even that of al-Qaida.

Cameron's remarks came just moments after authorities raised Britain's terror threat level to severe, the second-highest level. The decision was related to developments in Iraq and Syria, but there was no information to suggest an attack was imminent.

"What we are facing in Iraq now with ISIL is a greater threat to our security than we have seen before," Cameron said, using an abbreviation for a longer name the Islamic State previously used: the Islamic State of Iraq and Levant.

He told reporters that while the Taliban facilitated al-Qaida terrorism, the Islamic State group is "effectively a state run by terrorists." He said the ambition to create an Islamist caliphate isn't something that could be ignored.

"We could be facing a terrorist state on the shores of the Mediterranean and bordering a NATO member," he said, referring to Turkey.

Intelligence and security services now believe around 500 Britons have gone to fight in Syria and potentially Iraq. Some of the plots are likely to involve fighters who have traveled from Britain and Europe to take part in fighting in the Middle East.
But in America, the collective head of our government is placed in the sand. Two weeks away from the 13th anniversary of the 9/11 terror attacks in New York, and the two year anniversary of the attack on the Benghazi compound, the Obama Regime, the Democrat Party and their liberal sycophants in the media are still in denial about the threat of Islamists against the free world.

To prove my point...liberal media pundits Paul "The Forehead" Begala and Alan "The Eyebrow" Colmes.

Begala sent out the follow Tweet to defend his liberal President while attacking President Bush.

So, to liberal Clintonoid Begala, our military are a bunch of conquerors and occupiers, the typical line of the radical hate-America-first left since they flew the Vietcong flag in the 1960s and spit on returning soldiers, calling them "baby killers."

Colmes showed another example of the "See No Evil, Hear No Evil" attitude toward Islamic terror that the Left has had since 9/11 last night on the O'Reilly Factor (The Blaze).

Fox News host Greg Gutfeld clashed with liberal guest Alan Colmes Thursday night, pushing back against Colmes’ contention that the Islamic State does not currently pose a direct threat to the United States.

“Why is it that lefties like you … have a hard time identifying actual existential evil unless it’s a Republican or a stay-at-home mom, where you can condemn them?,” asked Gutfeld, who was filling in for Bill O’Reilly. ”But when it comes to somebody who wants to kill you, oh, you know, they’re nobodies.”

Colmes, who posited that it seems as though the Islamic State threat is being ginned up in an effort to potentially lead the U.S. into another war, said that he was by no means defending the Islamic State, but that he didn’t want to see yet another American-led conflict unfold.

“I guess what it is is they’re not reaching the Colmes level of barbarism,” Gutfeld said. “They’re just not vicious enough for you.”
Colmes and I went at it on Twitter earlier.

Colmes later wrote:

Gullible Alan? Was the following below not enough bloodshed to wake Alan Colmes and his liberal bed wetters up to the threat of radical Islamists toward our fellow citizens?

Now if you cannot remember these sights and sounds from 13 years ago, and they don't anger you, something is wrong.  But the media decided to quickly take the footage off the TV of the people jumping from the buildings. Instead, a few kooks decided to make hair brained theories that 9/11 was some big government plot to go to war for oil. Democrats, whose patriotism after 9/11 lasted about as long as the flags that popped up on cars, led those who believed these theories by 2006, because they still seethed with anger over the "stolen" 2000 Presidential election.  Their big hero was a big, fat fraud from Michigan who spun his own web of lies, using the blood shed on this sacred day to attack the President with, as well as profit from.

This is not to say that President George W. Bush, nor any other US President, is ever off limits from criticism.  Bush certainly deserves criticism for his domestic spending (biggest government spender post LBJ, pre-Obama), his pro-amnesty position, and even some decisions in war planning in the War on Terror (which Iraq was a part of).  But it is an entirely different subject when certain members of our government engaged in an effort to embolden the enemies by declaring the "war is lost" (Harry Reid), calling our troops Nazis, Soviet gulags, or Pol Pot (Dick Turbin), or that US Marines killed civilians in cold blood (Jackoff Murtha), or "air raiding villages and killing civilians" which Obama said in 2007 on his road to the Presidency while campaigning to reverse the Bush policies...all this for political gain.

The Democrats fought their war against Bush and the GOP, with (to Bush's shame) no effective response in defense. And what happened? The War on Terror became "Overseas Contingency Operations" or "Man Caused Disasters." A jihadi attack at an Arkansas recruiting station, the Marine Corps Museum and Chantilly VA Marine Recruiting station were blips on the media radar, while Eric Holder's Racial Justice Department announced Muslims would get their protection. And we saw the fruition of that as the Ft Hood jihadi Nidal Hassan's act of terrorism was classified as "workplace violence."

Meanwhile, patriotic American citizens who were opposed to higher taxes, more government intrusion in our daily lives, government-run healthcare, etc, were dubbed by the new Obama Regime as "domestic security threats." Obama talked about "punishing enemies" and his thuggish underlings used terms like "punch back twice as hard."

And while Obama golfs as ISIS beheads Americans and kills Iraqi Christians and other infidels, news broke this week on how the Regime is funding a database monitoring Twitter for "hate speech."

The National Science Foundation is financing the creation of a web service that will monitor “suspicious memes” and what it considers “false and misleading ideas,” with a major focus on political activity online.

The “Truthy” database, created by researchers at Indiana University, is designed to “detect political smears, astroturfing, misinformation, and other social pollution.”

The university has received $919,917 so far for the project.

“The project stands to benefit both the research community and the public significantly,” the grant states. “Our data will be made available via [application programming interfaces] APIs and include information on meme propagation networks, statistical data, and relevant user and content features.”

“The open-source platform we develop will be made publicly available and will be extensible to ever more research areas as a greater preponderance of human activities are replicated online,” it continues. “Additionally, we will create a web service open to the public for monitoring trends, bursts, and suspicious memes.”

“This service could mitigate the diffusion of false and misleading ideas, detect hate speech and subversive propaganda, and assist in the preservation of open debate,” the grant said.
Why would this Regime want to monitor speech on the Internet, and who would be defining what is and isn't "hate speech"?

For all the talk about "political extremism" coming for the right, it is the Left who keeps tabs on "hate speech" and inspires their crazies to act in deadly ways, such as the attempted attack on the Family Research Council by a homosexual activist who wanted to kill and smear Chick-fil-A sandwiches in the faces of his victims. He was inspired by the Leftists at the Southern Poverty Law Center, who listed the FRC as a hate group.

But what Obama, the Democrats, Alan Colmes, Paul Begala, and the other liberal apologists for Islamic terrorism forget, is the phrase I heard from some after 9/11.

"We are all in this together."

The al-Queda terrorists on 9/11 didn't ask what political party or ideology, sexual orientation, gender, race or religion the victims on the four planes, the Pentagon and the Twin Towers were. They were all equally infidels and were all equally targeted.

The threat of terrorism is bigger than loyalty a President, a political party or ideology.

We are all equally a threat.

And for those like Colmes, Begala and others who want to deny that threat, while looking at conservatives/Tea Party members as the real enemy, well, you are part of the problem.

Saturday, August 23, 2014

Religious Extremist Kills Two Gay Men In Seattle: The Hate Crime You Never Heard Of

Now, if you read the headline above, you might assume (thanks to the liberal media narrative) that some Christian killed three gays, because liberals and gay activists like to portray Christians as mean, bigoted, psychos who want nothing else but to eliminate gays.

But the religious extremist in question is not a Christian (NJ.com via The Other McCain).
The man accused of killing a New Jersey teenager and three other men as retribution for U.S. military action in the Middle East could eventually be charged with terrorism offenses, according to a national security expert.
William C. Banks, Director of the Institute for National Security and Counterterrorism at Syracuse University, said that if the details of a confession by Ali Muhammad Brown described in court papers filed in Washington state Wednesday are accurate, he could face additional charges at either the state or federal level.
“If he’s got the motivation that he announced he has, which is to exact revenge for the U.S. killing of Muslims in that part of the world, he’s a terrorist,” Banks said. “It’s a matter of motivation.”
Brown, 29, has been in custody at the Essex County Jail in Newark since July 18 on charges related to the murder of Brendan Tevlin, a 19-year-old college student from Livingston who was shot eight times as he drove through West Orange on his way home June 25.
Authorities in Washington have also charged him with a trio of slayings, including the shooting deaths of two gay men in Seattle on June 1, and the death of another man whose body was found on a highway in an unincorporated area outside the city April 27.
McCain pointed to this link, which says that Brown picked up the gay men he killed via a smartphone app.
The bodies of two gay men, 27-year-old Ahmed Said and 23-year-old Dwone Anderson-Young were found in the early morning hours of [June 1] not far from Seattle’s Capitol Hill gayborhood. According to police, they were both executed by Brown no more than 17 minutes after they had picked him up via a social networking app near a popular gay bar in town.
Both victims were shot in the head and police say there was no evidence of a struggle, robbery, exchange of drugs or any other type of crime. Neither of the victims had a criminal history, leading police to believe the crime was motivated exclusively by hate. . . .
Though court documents don’t directly implicate Grindr as the app used by the victims in this case, a friend of Said’s is quoted telling police officers that Said was texting frequently on “an app like Grindr or Jack’d” before his murder.
Brown was arrested July 18. Now, we're just finding out he was investigated back in 2004 for terrorism and he went on his murder spree because of the War on Terror?

Where is Eric "My People" Holder and the Department of Racial Justice investigating this?  Where is the media? You can bet your life if this had "Christian" or "Tea Party" written as a reflection of who the killer allegedly is, it's all you would be hearing about on the news.
Noah Rothman at Hot Air suggests the national media is ignoring Brown’s murder spree precisely because it is Islamic terrorism. Certainly, if these killings had been committed by anyone who could be portrayed as “right-wing,” there would be wall-to-wall coverage on CNN and MSNBC, liberal blogs would be going crazy and President Obama would be welcoming the families of the victims at the White House. But that’s not happening, is it?
The Matthew Sheppard killing had something to teach us. There were many, many reports about that. It was the most infamous single American murder of that decade.
In this case, three gay men were murdered. Three.
Not even a blip on the national news radar screens.
You know what this reminds me of? The “Asian rape gang” phenomenon.
Schoolgirls in England, some as young as 12, were basically being “groomed,” seduced and pimped out by gangs of Islamic men. (In Britain, “Asian” is a term used to describe immigrants or the children of immigrants from Pakistan or wherever, most of whom are Muslim.) These stories made tabloid headlines, but the respectable “mainstream” media was hopelessly gagged by political correctness and the fear of being perceived as racist or “Islamophobic.” However, despite this self-imposed blackout by the respectable press, everyone in England knows what is really happening. The subhuman status assigned to women in Islamic cultures is certainly no secret, yet British feminists were suspiciously mute about the rape gangs.
There is a conspiracy of silence, you see, which includes both gay activists in America and feminists in England, to suppress the brutal truth about Islamic jihad and what it really means. Why is this? Because the gay-rights movement and the feminist movement are both part of the progressive Left, which aims to destroy Western civilization — and Islam is their ally in that regard.

Friday, August 22, 2014

TSA Lied, Now Admitting They Let Illegal Aliens Fly Without ID

Feel safer in the air now (The Lonely Conservative)?
When news first broke that the TSA was allowing illegal immigrants to board commercial airplanes without proper identification the agency denied the allegation and went on the attack against the reporter who brought us the news. As it turns out, it was true and now the TSA is admitting that they allow illegal immigrants to use their “notice to appear” forms as ID, which can be recreated on any word processing program.
A new letter from the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) admits that illegal aliens were being allowed to board planes using Notice to Appear forms they received after entering the U.S. illegally. The revelation directly contradicts a TSA statement last month denying such allegations to various media outlets, including Breitbart News. In July Breitbart Texas Managing Director Brandon Darby broke the news that the TSA was letting illegal aliens board planes using Notice to Appear forms; subsequently, a TSA spokesperson publicly attacked Darby on Twitter, insisting that his report was “completely wrong.”
The newly-surfaced TSA letter was penned on August 7, according to the Gateway Pundit. It was reportedly sent from the TSA to Rep. Kenny Marchant (R-TX), a member of the Border Security Caucus. The letter confirms that illegal aliens are being allowed to board planes using a Notice to Appear form (also known as I-862), as Darby revealed in July.
Hector Garza, a spokesman for the National Border Patrol Council (NBPC) told Darby that Notice to Appear forms can “easily be reproduced or manipulated on any home computer. The Notice to Appear form has no photo, anyone can make one and manipulate one. They do not have any security features, no watermark, nothing. They are simply printed on standard copy paper based on the information the illegal alien says is the truth.” (Read More)

Bigoted Harry Reid Thinks Asians Aren't "Smarter Than Everybody Else"

"Dingy" Harry Reid likes throwing the race card against the GOP and others.

But if he really wants to see a racist, maybe he should walk over to the mirror, because as the video below shows, Reid lets the bigotry drip casually from his lips (Rachel Pulaski at Gateway Pundit).

On Thursday, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid spoke at a Las Vegas Asian Chamber of Commerce meeting. Reid decided this was a great place to try out his new Asian jokes. In the video, Reid tells the Asian audience
“I don’t think you’re smarter than anybody else, but you’ve convinced a lot of us you are,” and before walking off the stage Reid announced, “One problem that I’ve had today is keeping my Wongs straight.”
 This is not the first time Reid has made racist comments. In 2010 he apologized for his racial comments about President Obama and in 2009 Reid was forced to defend his support for African-American politicians in a testy exchange with David Gregory on “Meet the Press” after it was disclosed that he had opposed three other black potential replaces for President-elect Barack Obama.
Not only that, Reid has attacked black Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, as recent as July after the Hobby Lobby decision, when Reid slammed the "five white men" who voted for the decision, even though Thomas was one of the five.

In late 2004, Reid also attacked Justice Thomas, calling him "an embarrassment to the Supreme Court" whose "opinions are poorly written." 

Thursday, August 21, 2014

Golfing After Speaking About Islamic Savages Beheading James Foley...It Doesn't Get Tackier Than This


That was the attitude Richard Milhous Obama had after his comments made about the vicious beheading of American journalist James Foley by these sixth century Islamosavages called ISIS or ISIL or whatever they're called (NY Daily News).

President Obama put his own spin on the oft-quoted advice of Teddy Roosevelt: Speak sharply and carry a big nine iron. 
The vacationing commander-in-chief, after promising a relentless hunt for the terrorist butchers of a U.S. journalist, teed off on a Martha’s Vineyard golf course just a short time later. 
“Obama is more dedicated to golfing than he is to defending the nation,” sniped Liz Cheney, daughter of the former GOP vice president, via Twitter. 
French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius also took a swing at Obama. 
“I know in Western countries, this is vacation period,” he said, according to The Wall Street Journal. “But when people are dying, you must return from vacation.”
It's bad when even the French have to attack the President for being on an endless vacation. Reminds me of that scene from The Naked Gun...

"Not one man will rest until the scum who did this is behind bars. Now let's get a bite to eat."

Speaking of Obama's statement, Bookworm Room makes a great argument for why it was awful.

While I predicted that Obama would express sadness on his own behalf and on behalf of the American people, it turns out that Obama, still a legend in his own mind, felt called upon to speak on behalf of the entire world: 
Today, the entire world is appalled by the brutal murder of Jim Foley by the terrorist group ISIL.[snip]
Jim was taken from us in an act of violence that shocked the conscience of the entire world.[snip]
The world is shaped by people like Jim Foley and the overwhelming majority of humanity who are appalled by those who killed him.
I don’t want to be too pedantic, but I do feel it’s incumbent upon me to point out that large swaths of the Muslim world aren’t appalled at all by “Jim’s” death but are, instead, quite pleased. (And am I the only one who finds bizarre Obama’s faux familiarity with a man he never met, who died with a dignity that at least deserves the respect of his full name?) 
Anywhere that there is radical Islamism and/or anti-Americanism you will find people celebrating the slaughter. Perhaps Obama has forgotten the spectacle of Gazans handing out candy when Americans died on 9/11 or of the 2000 Ramallah lynching that saw Muslims joyfully bathing their hands in the blood of murdered Israelis soldiers:
Ramallah lynching. 
So, no, Mr. President, the entire world is not “appalled,” and a big part of America’s problem lies in the fact that (a) you refuse to recognize that reality and (b) you think you speak for the world. 
As I also predicated, Obama did issue a strongly worded condemnation of the killers, but he combined it with the second part of my prediction, which was his assurance that the killers, despite rejoicing under a name with the word “Islamic” in it, despite dedicating their acts to Allah, and despite self-identifying as Muslim are, in fact, not Muslims at all: 
Let’s be clear about ISIL. They have rampaged across cities and villages killing innocent, unarmed civilians in cowardly acts of violence. They abduct women and children and subject them to torture and rape and slavery. They have murdered Muslims, both Sunni and Shia, by the thousands. They target Christians and religious minorities, driving them from their homes, murdering them when they can, for no other reason than they practice a different religion. 
They declared their ambition to commit genocide against an ancient people. So ISIL speaks for no religion. Their victims are overwhelmingly Muslim, and no faith teaches people to massacre innocents. No just god would stand for what they did yesterday and what they do every single day. ISIL has no ideology of any value to human beings. Their ideology is bankrupt. (Emphasis added. 
Does Obama actually believe this mush-brained babble? Does he actually think he’s the one who gets to define what constitutes Islam? If it’s good and harmonizes with his hard Left values, it’s Islam; if it’s bad and actually follows the word of the Prophet, and dedicates all acts to its religion, than Obama gets to say it’s not Islam. Obama seems to be aggregating an awful lot of godlike power to himself there.
What has been sickening to me, as an American, is how Obama and his party have been part of the problem for the last 12 years. We had a lot of 30 day patriots after 9/11, whose unity and resolve lasted about as long as the flags on their car antennas. Then, when the Left realized they could make political hay and start exploiting the War on Terror for political gain, they did it. That's not to say criticism of a President during a time of war should be off limits, but to make false allegations we were "lied" to for a war in Iraq, to claim the "war is lost," and to act as an apologist for imprisoned terrorists while attacking our military guarding them was tantamount to treason...all because the Democrat Party was madder about November 2000 than they were about September 11, 2001, and wanted revenge.

Not once has Obama dared to mention the words Islamic terrorism. Instead, it's "workplace violence. The only time Obama speaks of Islam is to defend it, like when he stood in front of the UN and say their "prophet" shall not be mocked, while peddling the lie about a video being the reason for the second 9/11 in 2012.

Maybe this is the only way Obama will wake up about Islamofascism.

Wednesday, August 20, 2014

Perry Mugshot Sticks It To Dems...Plus, More Proof Indictment Is Sleezy Partisan Politics

Yesterday, Texas Governor Rick Perry gave Texas and national Democrats a proverbial "flipping of the bird."

After speaking to supporters gathered outside, Perry took the following mug shot photo...

Compare that to the corrupt, drunken Democrat for whom Texas Democrats protected by going after Perry, for demanding the lush DA resign or he would veto funding for the Travesty County, TX Public Integrity Unit.

If that wasn't enough, Perry even stopped at Sandy's hamburger stand on Barton Springs Road in Austin for some ice cream (they have some great custard there).

If anything, the way Perry is playing this does more to help than hurt him. Even a writer at the notoriously left-wing Washington ComPost says the indictment could be "a blessing in disguise."

If you needed more proof how much this indictment is Texas sized BS, here's something you didn't know about the group who brought the complaint against Perry (IBD).
Enter George Soros, who holds all those views and whose non-government organizations are behind the funding of Texans for Public Justice via his Open Society Institute, the Sunlight Foundation and indirectly through other groups that hand cash out to causes they believe in.
They've given Texans for Public Justice at least $200,000 to masquerade as a public-spirited, good-government group instead of the pack of partisan hacks that it is.
Here's more. The Houston Comicle reported how members of the grand jury in Travesty County were "offended" by the idea that the Perry indictment was political.

But, according to Media Trackers....
Rho Chalmers, who disclosed to the Houston Chronicle yesterday that she was a member of the grand jury that indicted Texas Gov. Rick Perry, was an active delegate to the Texas Democratic Party convention during grand jury proceedings. Chalmers’ active participation in Democratic state politics is important because she claimed yesterday to the Houston Chronicle that her decision to indict Perry, a Republican, was not based on politics.
“For me, it’s not a political decision,” Chalmers told the newspaper. “That’s what a grand jury is about – take the emotion out of it and look at the facts and make your best decision based on your life experience.”
More troubling, however, is the fact that Chalmers attended, photographed, and commented on an event with Democratic state Sen. Kirk Watson while grand jury proceedings were ongoing.
Watson was a witness in front of the grand jury. On June 27, 2014, Chalmers shared a photo of the Watson event on a community Facebook page she started called Developer’s Dungeon. “Senator Kirk Watson telling the story of the Wendy Davis fillibuster (sic),” she wrote in a comment accompanying the picture.
...Numerous posts from both of Chalmers’ Facebook pages — her personal page, which she shares with her husband, Davis, and her “Developer’s Dungeon” page — make clear that she is a partisan Democratic activist, and that she was an active participant in the Texas Democratic Party’s state convention in June while grand jury proceedings were ongoing.
In one Facebook post on her personal page from June 28, she snapped a selfie showcasing her convention credentials.
Rho Chalmers TDPC Selfie
In a separate post on her “Developer’s Dungeon page,” Chalmers showcased her Texas Democratic Party convention credentials and bragged about her participation on the party’s Rules Committee.
“The Rules Committee was challenging but fun. A little over half a day to resolve everything but we ‘got er done’!” she wrote. She then liked and shared that post using her personal Facebook page, where she noted that she was “pleasantly surprised that I wasn’t completely lost on this committee.”
Rho Chalmers TDPC CredentialsRho Chalmers Rules Committee Pleasantly Surprised
Each of these posts was made while the grand jury was convened and its proceedings were ongoing.
Other Facebook activity from Chalmers also demonstrates her partisan political leanings. Her personal Facebook page shows that Chalmers “likes” the following Facebook groups: University Democrats, Central Austin Democrats, Black Austin Democrats, and South Travis United Democrats.
The University Democrats Facebook page crowed about Perry’s indictment shortly after it was announced.
Never mind that Chalmers and the other jurors broke the judge's orders not to discuss the case.

Yeah, if you believe the grand jury wasn't political, I have ocean front property in Arizona to sell you!

For that fact alone, this phony indictment should be thrown out on jury nullification.

And liberals are hardly the ones who need to lecture on ethics, especially when they defend their own lowlifes in their own party for the sake of "party before anything else."

Liberal MO Gov Nixon Convicts Police Officer In Media Without A Trial

Whatever happened to the concept of "innocent until proven guilty" in America?

The liberal Democrat Governor of Missouri, Jay Nixon, doesn't believe in it, and wants the police officer in the Michael Brown shooting "vigorously prosecuted" without looking at the facts.

Meanwhile, as Jim Hoft at Gateway Pundit reported yesterday:
...(T)wo local St. Louis sources that police Officer Darren Wilson suffered facial fractures during his confrontation with deceased 18 year-old Michael Brown. Officer Wilson clearly feared for his life during the incident that led to the shooting death of Brown. This was after Michael Brown and his accomplice Dorian Johnson robbed a local Ferguson convenience store.
Twelve separate eyewitnesses have backed up the police officer's account of events as well.

But this is what happens when you have an angry rob being stirred up by racial agitators like the New Black Panthers and the phony Reverend Al Sharpton, who flew into Ferguson with his bullhorn, and that racist Spike Lee offering conspiracy theories. Nor does it help when the President inserts himself in this matter and sends Eric "My People" Holder down there to seek justice, especially after the activist Holder has turned the Justice Department into the Racial Justice Department.