Saturday, October 25, 2014

More of Democrat John Foust's Ties To Islamist Extremists Revealed

When he's not engaging in his own war on women against Republican Barbara Comstock for (in his mind) never having "a real job," liberal Democrat John Foust continues attacking Comstock with falsehood to paint her as "too extreme."

But if Foust wants to look at the real extremist in the race to replace Frank Wolf in Congress, he needs only to run to the nearest mirror and look at his reflection.

Last month, I posted this video of how Foust, as Fairfax County Supervisor, voted for and expressed support for the radical Islamic Saudi Academy (ISA) back in 2009, saying "a lot of the charges that were directed at your school were misplaced."

This was after independent studies of texts used at the ISA showed hatred and intolerance towards Christians and Jews. The ISA's 1999 valedictorian was also arrested for links to a 2005 plot to assassinate President Bush.  Foust's comments above came a year after the ISA's director was arrested for obstruction of justice in failing to report a possible sexual assault.

Yesterday, the Daily Caller reported more of Foust's links to Islamic extremists tied to Hamas and al-Queda.
When the federal government carried out Operation Green Quest in 2002, it investigated Jamal Barzinji, Yaqub Mirza, and Hisham al Talib for having ties to terrorist groups such as the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, Hamas, and al Qaeda through their Herndon, Virginia-based businesses and their non-profit organizations, which included the Safa Trust and the International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT).
Together, the trio have given the Foust campaign $12,050 so far this election cycle, according to Federal Election Commission reports.
They and their organizations have also been flagged by watchers of Islamist groups as having ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and to organizations that are alleged to have supported Hamas, a designated terrorist organization.
In 2012, Barzinji received a lifetime achievement award from the Council of American-Islamic Relations, or CAIR. And in 2008 and 2011 respectively, Barzinji and al-Talib received community service awards from the Islamic Society of North America, or ISNA.
Both of those groups were unindicted co-conspirators of the federal case against the Holy Land Foundation in which the organization was found to have provided support to Hamas.
But that's not all...
In April 2009, Foust attended a state assembly campaign kickoff for Esam Omeish, a Virginia-based physician who was the president of the Muslim American Society between 2004 and 2008.
Foust spoke at the event, but Omeish ultimately lost the election.
Omeish was in the national spotlight less than two years before when, in Sept. 2007, the Muslim leader was forced to resign a position with a Virginia state immigration council after videos of extreme speeches he had given in 2000 came to light.
In those speeches, Omeish embraced “the jihad way” and praised the Palestinian fight against Israel.
“We the Muslims of the Washington metropolitan area are here today…to tell our brothers and sisters in Philistine [Palestine] that you have learned the way, that you have known that the jihad way is the way to liberate your land,Omeish told a crowd, which included protesters holding signs equating the Star of David to a Nazi swastika.
The last thing we need in Congress from Northern Virginia is a carbon copy of Congressman "Jihad" Gerry Connolly, another apologist for Islamic extremists, at a time when ISIS and radical Islamists are on the move.

Friday, October 24, 2014

Fast & Furious Cover-Up Reaches White House Via Valerie Jarrett. What Did Obama Know...?

Worse than Watergate, because, just as Benghazi, people were killed. Thanks to Judicial Watch, we see that Richard Milhous Hussein-Obama's top adviser was in on the cover-up of Fast and Furious.
President Obama’s trusted senior advisor, Valerie Jarrett, was a key player in the effort to cover up that Attorney General Eric Holder lied to Congress about the Fast and Furious scandal, according to public records obtained by Judicial Watch.
The information is part of a Department of Justice (DOJ) “Vaughn index” detailing records about the gun-running operation known as Fast and Furious. JW had to sue the agency for the records after the Obama administration failed to provide them under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). A federal court ordered the DOJ to provide the records over the agency’s objections. Yesterday JW reported on the broad information in the records, including that Obama asserted executive privilege for Holder’s wife as part of the administration’s efforts to cover up the scandal.
Practically lost in the 1,000-plus pages of records is an index that shows Jarrett was brought in to manage the fact that Holder lied to Congress after the story about the disastrous gun-running operation broke in the media. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco Firearms and Explosives (ATF) ran the once-secret program that allowed guns from the U.S. to be smuggled into Mexico so they could eventually be traced to drug cartels. Instead, federal law enforcement officers lost track of hundreds of weapons which have been used in an unknown number of crimes, including the murder of a U.S. Border Patrol agent in Arizona.
The files received by JW include three electronic mails between Holder and Jarrett and one from former U.S. Attorney Dennis Burke to Jarrett. The e-mails with Holder are all from October 4, 2011, a significant date because, on the evening of October 3rd, Sheryl Attkisson (then at CBS news) released documents showing that Holder had been sent a briefing paper on Operation Fast and Furious on June 5, 2010. The paper was from the director of the National Drug Intelligence Center, Michael Walther.
This directly contradicted Holder’s May 3, 2011 testimony to the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, during which he stated that he, “probably heard about Fast and Furious for the first time over the last few weeks.” The October 4, 2011 date may also be significant because it came shortly after the August 30, 2011 resignation of U.S. Attorney for Arizona Dennis Burke and reassignment of acting ATF director Kenneth Melson to the position of “senior forensics advisor” at DOJ.
The description of one of the e-mails, written from Jarrett to Holder, reads, “re: personnel issues.” Another, also from Jarrett, reads, “outlining and discussing preferred course of action for future responses in light of recent development in congressional investigation.” Unfortunately, the index is vague and that’s all the information we have about them. Nevertheless, given the timing and subject of these e-mails, it seems clear that Jarrett quickly became a key player in the Fast and Furious cover-up in the immediate aftermath of the revelation that Holder had lied to Congress.
So, since we see that Jarrett, who is so closely linked to Obama, is in on this, the old Watergate adage cannot help to be brought up.

"What did the President know and when did he know it?"

The Sickening War On Sarah Palin & Her Family Hits A New Low - CNNs Carol Costello Should Be Fired

Let me set this up...

One of the most telling quotes about former Alaska Governor (and 2008 Vice Presidential nominee) Sarah Palin, was made the other day by communist, 9/11 troofer and cop-killer supporter Van Jones.
"Sarah Palin .. people forget. She had the Democratic party shaking in our boots in 2008. She came out, she gave that speech at the convention. That was, hands down, one of the best convention speeches - not by a woman, by anybody in 2008. People were running for the hills. ... Now it can be told! Now it can be told! We were scared!"
And let's be honest, for that, Sarah Palin had to be destroyed.  Not just her, but her family. It started with the kooky Andrew Sullivan, Alan Colmes, the human chipmunk Katie Couric, the entire Democrat Party, various bloggers up in Alaska who came up with half-witted stories and extended to washed up liberal comedian David Letterman, Bill Maher, and Martin Bashir.

It wasn't just Democrats and liberals, it was also members of the McLame campaign (Steve Schmidt and the Hillary-fan Nicolle Wallace), as well as people like Karl Rove and others in the Republican Party establishment loyal to Mittens Romney, who weeks before the 2008 election made it known their plan was to destroy their VP nominee.
Former Mitt Romney presidential campaign staffers, some of whom are currently working for Sen. John McCain and Gov. Sarah Palin's bid for the White House, have been involved in spreading anti-Palin spin to reporters, seeking to diminish her standing after the election. "Sarah Palin is a lightweight, she won't be the first, not even the third, person people will think of when it comes to 2012," says one former Romney aide, now working for McCain-Palin. "The only serious candidate ready to challenge to lead the Republican Party is Mitt Romney. He's in charge on November 5th."

The GOP-RINO establishment did the same after 2010.

The "gentlemen" in the GOP (and I use that term loosely) did nothing to stand up for her when she was attacked by the media and the attention grabbing Mark Kelly, after the 2011 Tuscson shooting.

All this designed to make Sarah Palin look less attractive to America as a potential Presidential candidate, as well as to conservatives/Republicans who were enthusiastic about her.

Which brings us to the latest in this vast, bipartisan conspiracy to destroy Sarah Palin. Various rumors, spread by these anti-Palin bloggers in Alaska who have been known to spin half-truths, involved a "drunken brawl" up in Anchorage. The Left-leaning media ate up the accounts, even before the accounts of what happened were verified.

And when they did, earlier this week, the Obama lapdogs at CNN (Carol Costello) were giddy about it.

Bristol Palin wrote on her blog to compare these two videos of CNN's Carol Costello.

Earlier in the week, Bristol Palin had also written the following:
This is what I don’t understand.  I have mostly stayed out of the public eye for the past few years. I clock in and out of work – yes I actually have a job – like most middle class Americans and chip away at making my son’s life just a little bit easier.  So why does the media still choose to put the Palins into an entirely different category of people?  This “story” is still running over a month and a half later. Rumors still run wild, unsubstantiated claims are printed as true, and random people who weren’t even there are considered “eye witnesses.”
In the meantime, did you even hear about Vice President Joe Biden’s adult son who kicked out of the Navy for cocaine?  (That’s the real Vice President’s kid…)  So pause for a moment and consider the hysteria over our stupid “incident”, compared to our actual Vice President’s son not even being able to hold on to a position in the Navy Reserve.
I’m sure you heard the happy news that Chelsea Clinton had a baby. But did you know her father-in-law and Clinton family pal Edward Mezvinsky is a convicted felon because of committing bank, wire, and mail fraud?
Of course, you didn’t.  Because the friends and family of the revered liberal elite are treated like delicate China.  Don’t handle too roughly.  They are precious.  They are off limits. Don’t push on them too hard.
In the meantime, I was pushed and held down by some guy…  and the media salivates like a dog that’s just been given a bone.
Here’s the thing.  Violence against women is never okay…  Even if that violence occurs against conservative women.  Imagine for a second the outrage that would happen if Chelsea Clinton had gotten pushed by some guy.  Had she tried to defend herself, the liberal media would’ve held her up as some feminist hero.
But it wasn’t Chelsea.
It wasn’t Hillary.
It wasn’t someone they liked or someone they agreed with.
It was a conservative.
And once again, the hypocrisy of the media is laid bare.
Sarah Palin wrote on Facebook:
This example makes me physically sick because they spit in the face of every American who has fought for freedom and sacrificed to protect everyone's First Amendment rights. It's not because this issue involves my daughter; it's because Carol Costella, her ilk, and her boss are disgustingly dismissive and disrespectful of the sacrifices made that allow them a platform from which to broadcast their hate and stupidity. CNN is lucky to have their few outstanding employees that shine through the darkness that is CNN. I admire the good ones, and hope they land at more deserving companies when CNN goes under. Zucker, not for my sake, but for the sake of a cornerstone of our democracy—the press—get ahold of your underlings. They make you look really, really bad, and they are ruining America.
Costello has apologized via an e-mail, but not on the air. Since it has been more than 24 hours, I think an apology at this time is insincere and not acceptable.

I could care less about what Carol Costello's personal opinions are, but as a supposed "journalist," she is supposed to check her personal opinions at the door. But, as we know, she works at liberal CNN.

Even more hypocritical is how Costello has gone after people for making light of domestic abuse, as she did with an ESPN host Stephen A. Smith.
This was really painful for me, because I've never spoken about this incident. I've never spoken about it. I just told my mother a few years ago because of so many reasons, but back in college, I had a very jealous boyfriend and in a rage one day, he threw me against the wall and he knocked me out, and things got worse from there and I choose not to go into them, but when I heard the NFL's punishment for Ray Rice and when I heard Stephen A. Smith say that "sometimes a woman can provoke a man into battering her" I just ....I was so angry. I was so angry that I poured all of my anger into this op-ed for and I must say it made me feel a little tiny bit better. Stephen A. Smith's apology, not so much. I mean, it's great that he went on the air, Michaela, I think he apologized, but come on, he should have been suspended for what he said
And to Fox News hosts...
Kilmeade — along with Fox News host Steve Doocy and Anna Kooiman — had made light of video on Monday that showed NFL player Race Rice punching his then-girlfriend in an elevator, and knocking her out. Kilmeade said that the message was to “take the stairs.” And Doocy reminded abusers to stay out of elevators, where “there’s a camera.”
“The heart of the matter is, what about the women?” Costello asked on Tuesday. “All the mothers and daughters and sisters who are abused by someone who [says he] loves them. And why, all too often, we’re quick to point the finger of blame their way.
Or her CNN commentary.
My dad told me real men don't hit women.
He believed that because men were physically stronger and mentally tougher, men had the obligation to shield women from harm.
I didn't buy the mentally tougher part, but I did embrace the idea that men were born with a kind of wonderful genetic code that made it impossible for them to pummel any woman, least of all a woman they cherished.
And look who laughs as a young woman is physically and verbally assaulted, just because her last name is's none other that phony feminist Carol Costello who self-righteously goes after people who make light of domestic abuse.

It happened to Martin Bashir, and now it should happen to the cowardly liberal Carol Costello. Either CNN is a legitimate news organization or it is a Democrat Party propaganda outlet. You can't have it both ways Carol, either you are against domestic violence or you're not.

Carol Costello, if she had any courage, would apologize and resign. But she doesn't, so she should be fired.

Your dad is right Carol, real men don't hit women. But supposed "feminists" shouldn't laugh at the abuse of other women.

In closing, I, for one, have had it with this deranged, psychotic hatred toward not only Sarah Palin, but her entire family, that liberals and RINOs feel they have to engage and take the Politics of Personal Destruction at its lowest point. It tells me that both the Left and the GOP establishment know they cannot intellectually defeat Palin, so they use made up quotes "I can see Russia from my porch" or engage in tabloid-like smears or attacks based on falsehoods.

But what the Left and RINO Palin-haters are really doing is signaling their contempt for anyone who is not of the elite.  Which is why we need a lot more Sarah Palins in this country, if you ask me.

Hatchet-Wielding Jihadist In Queens Attacks Police, Shot Dead

One day after the Canadian jihadist shot and killed a Candian soldier, an axe wielding jihadist attacked a group of rookie NYPD officers in Queens (NY Daily News).

Police are investigating the possibility that the attacker killed on a rainswept shopping corridor, identified by police sources as Zale Thompson, 32, had links to terrorism. A Zale Thompson on Facebook is pictured wearing a keffiyeh and had a recent terrorism-related conversation with one of his Facebook friends, according to a police source.
Thompson made no statements as he approached the four officers with hatchet in hand on Jamaica Ave. near 162nd St. in Jamaica at 2 p.m., officials said.
The officers, who all graduated from the academy in July, had huddled together to take a photo for a freelance photographer when Thompson ran up and started swinging, striking a 24-year-old cop in the right arm, said NYPD Police Commissioner Bill Bratton.
He then brought the axe down on the second cop, cracking his skull, police sources said.
The two uninjured officers pulled their weapons and blasted away at Thompson, firing 19 rounds, the source said.
“It was a completely unprovoked attack,” said NYPD Chief Kim Royster, a department spokeswoman.
Thompson died at the scene. It was not immediately clear where on the body he was hit.
“I saw the cop on the ground,” said witness Kelli Reddick, 24. “He looked so bloody. His face was just covered in blood. He was laying on his side. He wasn’t moving at all.”
It’s not believed that the photographer who asked the cops to pull together was working with Thompson, Bratton said.
 At Twitchy, there is an unconfirmed report that Thompson also went by the name Zaim Farouq Abdul-Malik.

I'm sure Richard Milhous Hussein-Obama, the Muslim-sympathizer-in-Chief, will be quick to assure us all that this is not representative of Islam, on his way out to the golf course.

And again I will ask, how many more people have to be maimed or killed before the civilized world wakes up from the denial about the threat posed by this ideology?

Wednesday, October 22, 2014

Jihad In Canada - Days After Islamist Runs Over Two Soldiers, Another Soldier Killed In Ottawa By Muslim Convert

This was the scene in the Canadian Parliament today (Ottawa Citizen, via Jihadwatch).

A gunman has been shot and killed inside Parliament Hill’s Centre Block and police are swarming over downtown Ottawa hunting for other possible suspects after several shootings rocked Ottawa on Wednesday morning — including one at the War Memorial that wounded a soldier and another near the Rideau Centre mall.

The War Memorial shooting occurred just before 10 a.m., and the shooter then apparently drove to the gates of Parliament Hill and ran inside the buildings. A witness also reported that another man headed east, potentially in the direction of the Rideau Centre.

Witnesses said 30 to 50 shots were fired inside the Centre Block.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper and the leaders of the other political parties are all believed to be safe. The prime minister was taken away from Parliament to a secure place, officials said. The Hill was immediately locked down….

Local schools and the U.S. Embassy, which is near Parliament Hill, were also locked down….

Other witnesses described seeing the gunman carjack a vehicle. Others gave differing descriptions of the car. Police quickly surrounded a Toyota Corolla, which was parked on Wellington Street in front of the Parliament gates.

The suspect was described as 5-9 to 5-10, overweight and wearing a dark jacket. At least one witness said he wore an “Arabic scarf.”…
According to, the photo below was of the gunman, Michael Zehaf-Bibeau, and was tweeted by some ISIS Jihadi-sympathizing Twitter account.
A 32-year-old Quebec man who had recently converted to Islam shot and killed a Canadian soldier standing guard at the War Memorial in Ottawa, then traveled to the nearby Canadian parliament, where he opened fire before being fatally shot by the sergeant at arms, whose heroic actions likely saved countless lives.
Multiple media outlets identified the man as Michael Zehaf-Bibeau, who had been known as Michael Joseph Hall before converting.
Here’s what we know about Bibeau:

Just after Bibeau’s name was reported, an ISIS Twitter account posted the above picture claiming it was the Ottawa shooter. An hour later, the account was suspended.
Military Studies told that the same Twitter account was followed by Martin Couture-Rouleau. On October 20, Rouleau killed a Canadian soldier by hitting him with his car. Rouleau was a recent convert to Islam and told a 911 operator that he performed the act in the name of “Allah.
CBS News quoted U.S. officials when reported Bibeau’s name. CNN and other outlets reported earlier that Canadian officials had shared the name with the FBI. According to the New York Times, the U.S. government has no record of Bibeau’s behavior.
Jihadwatch has more about the October 20 killing here.

Plus, we find out today three teenage girls from the Denver area were lured to join ISIS over the Internet.  And the media (besides the blogosphere) have largely ignored the Oklahoma beheading a couple of weeks ago.

How many more people need to be killed before not only this nation, but the civilized world takes seriously the threat to our way of life by these murderous savages?

Tuesday, October 21, 2014

Obama Regime Preparing For (Unconstitutional) Executive Amnesty, Soliciting Bids For Millions Of 34 Million ID Cards


Despite no official action from the president ahead of the election, the Obama administration has quietly begun preparing to issue millions of work authorization permits, suggesting the implementation of a large-scale executive amnesty may have already begun. 
Unnoticed until now, a draft solicitation for bids issued by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) Oct. 6 says potential vendors must be capable of handling a “surge” scenario of 9 million id cards in one year “to support possible future immigration reform initiative requirements.” 
The request for proposals says the agency will need a minimum of four million cards per year. In the “surge,” scenario in 2016, the agency would need an additional five million cards – more than double the baseline annual amount for a total of 9 million. 
“The guaranteed minimum for each ordering period is 4,000,000 cards. The estimated maximum for the entire contract is 34,000,000 cards,” the document says. 
The agency is buying the materials need to construct both Permanent Residency Cards (PRC), commonly known as green cards, as well as Employment Authorization Documentation (EAD) cards which have been used to implement President Obama's “Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals” (DACA) program. The RFP does not specify how many of each type of card would be issued. 
Jessica Vaughn, an immigration expert at the Center for Immigration Studies and former State Department official, said the document suggests a new program of remarkable breadth.
The RFP “seems to indicate that the president is contemplating an enormous executive action that is even more expansive than the plan that Congress rejected in the 'Gang of Eight' bill,” Vaughan said.
Last year, Vaughan reviewed the Gang of Eight's provisions to estimate that it would have roughly doubled legal immigration. In the “surge” scenario of this RFP, even the relatively high four million cards per year would be more than doubled, meaning that even on its own terms, the agency is preparing for a huge uptick of 125 percent its normal annual output.
It's not unheard of for federal agencies to plan for contingencies, but the request specifically explains that the surge is related to potential changes in immigration policy.

It isn't unheard of. Remember when there was the rush of unaccompanied minors toward the border in late Spring? Well, the Regime was preparing for that by putting similar bids in January to handle "unaccompanied alien children."

Question is, if the GOP wins the Senate, will they have the will to stop this unconstitutional rewriting of immigration laws and mass amnesty at a time when more Americans are out of work at any time since 1978?

Monday, October 20, 2014

After Hitting Bottom With Wheelchair Ad, Abortion Barbie Keeps Digging In Latest Attack On Greg Davis

Wendy Davis, the Abortion Barbie, just doesn't know when to stop.

A little over a week after she attacked Republican Greg Abbott in an ad with an empty wheelchair (Abbott is handicapped), Davis tweeted the following this morning on her Twitter account.

W-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-l, there's a little problem with that claim of yours, Wendy (The Texas Tribune).
If Attorney General Greg Abbott wins his campaign to succeed Perry — and he is favored to do so — his wife would become the first Latina to be the first lady of Texas.
Yes, Greg Abbott who (according to the Abortion Barbie) hates minorities, is married to a Latina.

Keep trying Wendy, after you get that pink sneaker out of your mouth!

Thursday, October 16, 2014

WMDs Were In Iraq & Karl Rove Betrayed Our Troops By Letting Democrats Get Away With Their Slanderous Lies

The New York Slimes reported yesterday that, after the Democrats and Richard Milhous Obama told us for ten years that there were no WMDs in Iraq, that George W. Bush had lied to take the United States into war, well, there were WMDs in Iraq after all, and some of them have gotten into the hands of the Islamists known as ISIS.

But that info was kept from the American public, until now.

I could tell the reason why that happened with two words--Karl Rove, and Eli Lake confirms it at The Daily Beast (h/t Mark Levin Radio Show).

Starting in 2004, some members of the George W. Bush administration and Republican lawmakers began to find evidence of discarded chemical weapons in Iraq. But when the information was brought up with the White House, senior adviser Karl Rove told them to ‘let these sleeping dogs lie.’
The issue of Iraq’s WMD remnant was suddenly thrust back into the fore this week, with a blockbuster New York Times report accusing the Bush administration of covering up American troops’ chemically-induced wounds.
To people familiar with the issue, both inside that administration and without, the blame for the cover up falls on one particular set of shoulders: Rove’s.
From the perspective of Rick Santorum, a Republican senator from Pennsylvania who lost his seat in 2006, some of the weapons of mass destruction President Bush promised would be in Iraq before the 2003 invasion of the country began turning up as early as 2004.
In an interview with The Daily Beast, former Senator Rick Santorum said he and his staff began receiving photographs of discarded Sarin and Mustard shells from U.S. soldiers in 2004. Two years later, when he was up for re-election, Santorum even went public with some of this information in a press conference disclosing a Pentagon report that found 500 chemical weapons shells had been found in Iraq.
One might think a politically vulnerable Bush White House would’ve seized on Santorum’s discovery. After all, Bush and his subordinates famously accused Iraq of having active weapons of mass destruction programs.
But at least in 2005 and 2006 the Bush White House wasn’t interested. “We don’t want to look back,” Santorum recalled Rove as saying (though Santorum stressed he was not quoting verbatim conversations he had more than eight years ago). “I will say that the gist of the comments from the president’s senior people was 'we don’t want to look back, we want to look forward.'”
Dave Wurmser—who served at the time as a senior adviser to Vice President Dick Cheney on national security issues —remembers receiving a similar message from Rove.
According to Wurmser, “in 2005-6, Karl Rove and his team blocked public disclosure of these (findings) and said ‘let these sleeping dogs lie; we have lost that fight so better not to remind anyone of it.’
Rove declined to comment for this story.
...Santorum said that in 2005 he began raising the issue in 2005 with the White House himself. “I had discussions over a period of a year or two. Why aren’t we mentioning this? Why aren’t we doing anything on this?” he recalled. But Santorum later became so frustrated that by 2006, his message to the White House was: “I am going to do this [go public] whether you do it or not.”
One former senior White House official who requested anonymity confirmed that the White House had no interest in 2006 in re-engaging the public debate over weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. He said that other lawmakers had recommended Bush give a press conference with some of the discarded weapons wearing a protective suit.
It is one thing to blame the "Party of Treason," the entire Democrat Party, including Obama, for the way they practiced what Joseph Goebbels said, ("Tell a lie over and over again and people will believe it.") in their slanderous allegation that there were no WMDs in Iraq and Bush lied to go to war...all for their own political gain and insulting our troops with some of the most vicious slurs in the process (Tiny Dick Turbin, "Hanoi" John Kerry, Jackoff Murtha).  But right up there with them is Karl Rove, because he, for political purposes as well, did not fight back against the Democrats slanderous lies against our troops and their mission.

Neither did Rove, nor anyone else, fight back against the other lie about Playboy Joe Wilson's non-covert CIA wife's identity being leaked by the White House. That was done by Richard Armitage.  But that was another liberal lie that Rove allowed the Democrats to get away with.

In that sense, Rove is just as guilty (if not more) as the entire Democrat Party in betraying our troops.

And what did Rove's brilliant strategery lead to?  Voters believed the Democrat lies that Rove didn't fight against, and Rove, by default, became "the Architect" of the Democrat takeover of Congress in 2006, and Obama's win in 2008. Rove has attacked any worthwhile conservative who has dared to challenge his eunuch RINOs who are unable to seal the deal with the electorate, both in 2012 and thus far in 2014. He has attacked repeatedly an articulate conservative woman named Sarah Palin, just because she's not in his Ivy League pedigree.

I was already sick of Rove for his Tokyo Rose attitude toward conservatives, but this takes the cake, and is much worse. How many people lost limbs and lost loved ones, and saw their sacrificed degraded by sleazy politicos who were out for power, only to have Rove aid their treason by proxy?

If Karl Rove had any shame, he'd never appear on Fox News again and never show his face in public. Our troops deserve better than his betrayal of their mission.

Annise Parker Is Unworthy To Be Mayor Of Houston & Should Resign

This has nothing to do with who she sleeps with (that's her personal business), but if she is going to let her sex life make her a militant fascist against those who may disagree with her, then she is unworthy of being Mayor, let alone Dog Catcher, of Houston, TX (Fox News).
The city of Houston has issued subpoenas demanding a group of pastors turn over any sermons dealing with homosexuality, gender identity or Annise Parker, the city’s first openly lesbian mayor. And those ministers who fail to comply could be held in contempt of court.
“The city’s subpoena of sermons and other pastoral communications is both needless and unprecedented,” Alliance Defending Freedom attorney Christina Holcomb said in a statement. “The city council and its attorneys are engaging in an inquisition designed to stifle any critique of its actions.”
ADF, a nationally-known law firm specializing in religious liberty cases, is representing five Houston pastors. They filed a motion in Harris County court to stop the subpoenas arguing they are “overbroad, unduly burdensome, harassing, and vexatious.
“Political and social commentary is not a crime,” Holcomb said. “It is protected by the First Amendment.”
The subpoenas are just the latest twist in an ongoing saga over the Houston’s new non-discrimination ordinance. The law, among other things, would allow men to use the ladies room and vice versa.  The city council approved the law in June.
The Houston Chronicle reported opponents of the ordinance launched a petition drive that generated more than 50,000 signatures – far more than the 17,269 needed to put a referendum on the ballot.
However, the city threw out the petition in August over alleged irregularities.
After opponents of the bathroom bill filed a lawsuit the city’s attorneys responded by issuing the subpoenas against the pastors.
The pastors were not part of the lawsuit. However, they were part of a coalition of some 400 Houston-area churches that opposed the ordinance. The churches represent a number of faith groups – from Southern Baptist to non-denominational.
“City council members are supposed to be public servants, not ‘Big Brother’ overlords who will tolerate no dissent or challenge,” said ADF attorney Erik Stanley.  “This is designed to intimidate pastors.”
Mayor Parker will not explain why she wants to inspect the sermons. I contacted City Hall for a comment and received a terse reply from the mayor’s director of communications.
“We don’t comment on litigation,” said Janice Evans.
What else are we to expect from a militant liberal like Parker, who acts in a bullying manner similar to Obama. Now, to demand copies of sermons simply because they might disagree with her lifestyle choice is a page out of Nazi Germany or some other fascistic regime.

I wonder if she'd be willing to do the same if there were a group of people who were recruiting for terrorists in Houston?

Well, there have been reports of attempts to recruit for ISIS in Houston, including one who was simply "escorted" out of a mosque, but does Parker investigate?  No, she has Iftar dinners with Houston-area Muslims, including groups (according to ACT for America - Houston) linked to radical Wahhabist Islam.

And if you're a firefighter in Houston who allegedly makes anti-Islamic posts on your Facebook page, you'll lose your job.

But if you are a Bible-believing Christian in Houston, you apparently don't have the rights guaranteed to you under the First Amendment (freedom to worship, freedom of speech).

Welcome to the new America that the liberal Democrats want to impose on all of us.

MORE: Mayor Annise Parker Needs a Bible, Will You Send Her One? Erick Erickson, RedState

Monday, October 13, 2014

FLASHBACK: Mark Warner In 2001 Said Christian Coalition, NRA, Pro-Lifers Have Views "Threatening To What It Means To Be American"

Mark Warner, the liberal Democrat who was a deciding vote in Richard Milhous Obama's risky socialized medicine scheme known as Obamacare, has often tried to portray himself as "moderate."

But he's really anything but a moderate.

Jim Gilmore failed to use this to his advantage against Warner in 2008, but it bears repeating about Warner's liberal leanings, as well as what he thinks about those who believe in the Second Amendment and Christianity.

"you’re going to see a coalition that has just about completely taken over the Republican Party in this state and if they have their way, it’s going to take over state government. It’s made up of the Christian Coalition, it’s made up of the right to lifers, it’s made up of the NRA, it’s made up of the homeschoolers, it’s made up of a whole coalition of people that have all sorts of different views that I think most of us in this room would find threatening to what it means to be an American."
So, if you believe in Jesus Christ, or the right to keep and bear arms, and the sanctity of life, Mark Warner thinks you are a threat to the country.

If you ask me, I think someone like Mark Warner, who votes for a job-killing, freedom-stealing bill known as Obamacare, doesn't have a clue what it means to be an American.

If Ed Gillespie has some fight in him, he will use this, and the allegations made over the weekend about the Senator.