Wednesday, October 22, 2014

Jihad In Canada - Days After Islamist Runs Over Two Soldiers, Another Soldier Killed In Ottawa By Muslim Convert

This was the scene in the Canadian Parliament today (Ottawa Citizen, via Jihadwatch).


A gunman has been shot and killed inside Parliament Hill’s Centre Block and police are swarming over downtown Ottawa hunting for other possible suspects after several shootings rocked Ottawa on Wednesday morning — including one at the War Memorial that wounded a soldier and another near the Rideau Centre mall.

The War Memorial shooting occurred just before 10 a.m., and the shooter then apparently drove to the gates of Parliament Hill and ran inside the buildings. A witness also reported that another man headed east, potentially in the direction of the Rideau Centre.

Witnesses said 30 to 50 shots were fired inside the Centre Block.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper and the leaders of the other political parties are all believed to be safe. The prime minister was taken away from Parliament to a secure place, officials said. The Hill was immediately locked down….

Local schools and the U.S. Embassy, which is near Parliament Hill, were also locked down….

Other witnesses described seeing the gunman carjack a vehicle. Others gave differing descriptions of the car. Police quickly surrounded a Toyota Corolla, which was parked on Wellington Street in front of the Parliament gates.

The suspect was described as 5-9 to 5-10, overweight and wearing a dark jacket. At least one witness said he wore an “Arabic scarf.”…
According to Heavy.com, the photo below was of the gunman, Michael Zehaf-Bibeau, and was tweeted by some ISIS Jihadi-sympathizing Twitter account.
A 32-year-old Quebec man who had recently converted to Islam shot and killed a Canadian soldier standing guard at the War Memorial in Ottawa, then traveled to the nearby Canadian parliament, where he opened fire before being fatally shot by the sergeant at arms, whose heroic actions likely saved countless lives.
Multiple media outlets identified the man as Michael Zehaf-Bibeau, who had been known as Michael Joseph Hall before converting.
Here’s what we know about Bibeau:

Just after Bibeau’s name was reported, an ISIS Twitter account posted the above picture claiming it was the Ottawa shooter. An hour later, the account was suspended.
Military Studies told Heavy.com that the same Twitter account was followed by Martin Couture-Rouleau. On October 20, Rouleau killed a Canadian soldier by hitting him with his car. Rouleau was a recent convert to Islam and told a 911 operator that he performed the act in the name of “Allah.
CBS News quoted U.S. officials when reported Bibeau’s name. CNN and other outlets reported earlier that Canadian officials had shared the name with the FBI. According to the New York Times, the U.S. government has no record of Bibeau’s behavior.
Jihadwatch has more about the October 20 killing here.

Plus, we find out today three teenage girls from the Denver area were lured to join ISIS over the Internet.  And the media (besides the blogosphere) have largely ignored the Oklahoma beheading a couple of weeks ago.

How many more people need to be killed before not only this nation, but the civilized world takes seriously the threat to our way of life by these murderous savages?

Tuesday, October 21, 2014

Obama Regime Preparing For (Unconstitutional) Executive Amnesty, Soliciting Bids For Millions Of 34 Million ID Cards

From Breitbart.com.


Despite no official action from the president ahead of the election, the Obama administration has quietly begun preparing to issue millions of work authorization permits, suggesting the implementation of a large-scale executive amnesty may have already begun. 
Unnoticed until now, a draft solicitation for bids issued by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) Oct. 6 says potential vendors must be capable of handling a “surge” scenario of 9 million id cards in one year “to support possible future immigration reform initiative requirements.” 
The request for proposals says the agency will need a minimum of four million cards per year. In the “surge,” scenario in 2016, the agency would need an additional five million cards – more than double the baseline annual amount for a total of 9 million. 
“The guaranteed minimum for each ordering period is 4,000,000 cards. The estimated maximum for the entire contract is 34,000,000 cards,” the document says. 
The agency is buying the materials need to construct both Permanent Residency Cards (PRC), commonly known as green cards, as well as Employment Authorization Documentation (EAD) cards which have been used to implement President Obama's “Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals” (DACA) program. The RFP does not specify how many of each type of card would be issued. 
Jessica Vaughn, an immigration expert at the Center for Immigration Studies and former State Department official, said the document suggests a new program of remarkable breadth.
The RFP “seems to indicate that the president is contemplating an enormous executive action that is even more expansive than the plan that Congress rejected in the 'Gang of Eight' bill,” Vaughan said.
Last year, Vaughan reviewed the Gang of Eight's provisions to estimate that it would have roughly doubled legal immigration. In the “surge” scenario of this RFP, even the relatively high four million cards per year would be more than doubled, meaning that even on its own terms, the agency is preparing for a huge uptick of 125 percent its normal annual output.
It's not unheard of for federal agencies to plan for contingencies, but the request specifically explains that the surge is related to potential changes in immigration policy.


It isn't unheard of. Remember when there was the rush of unaccompanied minors toward the border in late Spring? Well, the Regime was preparing for that by putting similar bids in January to handle "unaccompanied alien children."

Question is, if the GOP wins the Senate, will they have the will to stop this unconstitutional rewriting of immigration laws and mass amnesty at a time when more Americans are out of work at any time since 1978?

Monday, October 20, 2014

After Hitting Bottom With Wheelchair Ad, Abortion Barbie Keeps Digging In Latest Attack On Greg Davis

Wendy Davis, the Abortion Barbie, just doesn't know when to stop.

A little over a week after she attacked Republican Greg Abbott in an ad with an empty wheelchair (Abbott is handicapped), Davis tweeted the following this morning on her Twitter account.

W-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-l, there's a little problem with that claim of yours, Wendy (The Texas Tribune).
If Attorney General Greg Abbott wins his campaign to succeed Perry — and he is favored to do so — his wife would become the first Latina to be the first lady of Texas.
Yes, Greg Abbott who (according to the Abortion Barbie) hates minorities, is married to a Latina.

Keep trying Wendy, after you get that pink sneaker out of your mouth!

Thursday, October 16, 2014

WMDs Were In Iraq & Karl Rove Betrayed Our Troops By Letting Democrats Get Away With Their Slanderous Lies

The New York Slimes reported yesterday that, after the Democrats and Richard Milhous Obama told us for ten years that there were no WMDs in Iraq, that George W. Bush had lied to take the United States into war, well, there were WMDs in Iraq after all, and some of them have gotten into the hands of the Islamists known as ISIS.

But that info was kept from the American public, until now.

I could tell the reason why that happened with two words--Karl Rove, and Eli Lake confirms it at The Daily Beast (h/t Mark Levin Radio Show).


Starting in 2004, some members of the George W. Bush administration and Republican lawmakers began to find evidence of discarded chemical weapons in Iraq. But when the information was brought up with the White House, senior adviser Karl Rove told them to ‘let these sleeping dogs lie.’
The issue of Iraq’s WMD remnant was suddenly thrust back into the fore this week, with a blockbuster New York Times report accusing the Bush administration of covering up American troops’ chemically-induced wounds.
To people familiar with the issue, both inside that administration and without, the blame for the cover up falls on one particular set of shoulders: Rove’s.
From the perspective of Rick Santorum, a Republican senator from Pennsylvania who lost his seat in 2006, some of the weapons of mass destruction President Bush promised would be in Iraq before the 2003 invasion of the country began turning up as early as 2004.
In an interview with The Daily Beast, former Senator Rick Santorum said he and his staff began receiving photographs of discarded Sarin and Mustard shells from U.S. soldiers in 2004. Two years later, when he was up for re-election, Santorum even went public with some of this information in a press conference disclosing a Pentagon report that found 500 chemical weapons shells had been found in Iraq.
One might think a politically vulnerable Bush White House would’ve seized on Santorum’s discovery. After all, Bush and his subordinates famously accused Iraq of having active weapons of mass destruction programs.
But at least in 2005 and 2006 the Bush White House wasn’t interested. “We don’t want to look back,” Santorum recalled Rove as saying (though Santorum stressed he was not quoting verbatim conversations he had more than eight years ago). “I will say that the gist of the comments from the president’s senior people was 'we don’t want to look back, we want to look forward.'”
Dave Wurmser—who served at the time as a senior adviser to Vice President Dick Cheney on national security issues —remembers receiving a similar message from Rove.
According to Wurmser, “in 2005-6, Karl Rove and his team blocked public disclosure of these (findings) and said ‘let these sleeping dogs lie; we have lost that fight so better not to remind anyone of it.’
Rove declined to comment for this story.
...Santorum said that in 2005 he began raising the issue in 2005 with the White House himself. “I had discussions over a period of a year or two. Why aren’t we mentioning this? Why aren’t we doing anything on this?” he recalled. But Santorum later became so frustrated that by 2006, his message to the White House was: “I am going to do this [go public] whether you do it or not.”
One former senior White House official who requested anonymity confirmed that the White House had no interest in 2006 in re-engaging the public debate over weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. He said that other lawmakers had recommended Bush give a press conference with some of the discarded weapons wearing a protective suit.
It is one thing to blame the "Party of Treason," the entire Democrat Party, including Obama, for the way they practiced what Joseph Goebbels said, ("Tell a lie over and over again and people will believe it.") in their slanderous allegation that there were no WMDs in Iraq and Bush lied to go to war...all for their own political gain and insulting our troops with some of the most vicious slurs in the process (Tiny Dick Turbin, "Hanoi" John Kerry, Jackoff Murtha).  But right up there with them is Karl Rove, because he, for political purposes as well, did not fight back against the Democrats slanderous lies against our troops and their mission.

Neither did Rove, nor anyone else, fight back against the other lie about Playboy Joe Wilson's non-covert CIA wife's identity being leaked by the White House. That was done by Richard Armitage.  But that was another liberal lie that Rove allowed the Democrats to get away with.

In that sense, Rove is just as guilty (if not more) as the entire Democrat Party in betraying our troops.

And what did Rove's brilliant strategery lead to?  Voters believed the Democrat lies that Rove didn't fight against, and Rove, by default, became "the Architect" of the Democrat takeover of Congress in 2006, and Obama's win in 2008. Rove has attacked any worthwhile conservative who has dared to challenge his eunuch RINOs who are unable to seal the deal with the electorate, both in 2012 and thus far in 2014. He has attacked repeatedly an articulate conservative woman named Sarah Palin, just because she's not in his Ivy League pedigree.

I was already sick of Rove for his Tokyo Rose attitude toward conservatives, but this takes the cake, and is much worse. How many people lost limbs and lost loved ones, and saw their sacrificed degraded by sleazy politicos who were out for power, only to have Rove aid their treason by proxy?

If Karl Rove had any shame, he'd never appear on Fox News again and never show his face in public. Our troops deserve better than his betrayal of their mission.

Annise Parker Is Unworthy To Be Mayor Of Houston & Should Resign

This has nothing to do with who she sleeps with (that's her personal business), but if she is going to let her sex life make her a militant fascist against those who may disagree with her, then she is unworthy of being Mayor, let alone Dog Catcher, of Houston, TX (Fox News).
The city of Houston has issued subpoenas demanding a group of pastors turn over any sermons dealing with homosexuality, gender identity or Annise Parker, the city’s first openly lesbian mayor. And those ministers who fail to comply could be held in contempt of court.
“The city’s subpoena of sermons and other pastoral communications is both needless and unprecedented,” Alliance Defending Freedom attorney Christina Holcomb said in a statement. “The city council and its attorneys are engaging in an inquisition designed to stifle any critique of its actions.”
ADF, a nationally-known law firm specializing in religious liberty cases, is representing five Houston pastors. They filed a motion in Harris County court to stop the subpoenas arguing they are “overbroad, unduly burdensome, harassing, and vexatious.
“Political and social commentary is not a crime,” Holcomb said. “It is protected by the First Amendment.”
The subpoenas are just the latest twist in an ongoing saga over the Houston’s new non-discrimination ordinance. The law, among other things, would allow men to use the ladies room and vice versa.  The city council approved the law in June.
The Houston Chronicle reported opponents of the ordinance launched a petition drive that generated more than 50,000 signatures – far more than the 17,269 needed to put a referendum on the ballot.
However, the city threw out the petition in August over alleged irregularities.
After opponents of the bathroom bill filed a lawsuit the city’s attorneys responded by issuing the subpoenas against the pastors.
The pastors were not part of the lawsuit. However, they were part of a coalition of some 400 Houston-area churches that opposed the ordinance. The churches represent a number of faith groups – from Southern Baptist to non-denominational.
“City council members are supposed to be public servants, not ‘Big Brother’ overlords who will tolerate no dissent or challenge,” said ADF attorney Erik Stanley.  “This is designed to intimidate pastors.”
Mayor Parker will not explain why she wants to inspect the sermons. I contacted City Hall for a comment and received a terse reply from the mayor’s director of communications.
“We don’t comment on litigation,” said Janice Evans.
What else are we to expect from a militant liberal like Parker, who acts in a bullying manner similar to Obama. Now, to demand copies of sermons simply because they might disagree with her lifestyle choice is a page out of Nazi Germany or some other fascistic regime.

I wonder if she'd be willing to do the same if there were a group of people who were recruiting for terrorists in Houston?

Well, there have been reports of attempts to recruit for ISIS in Houston, including one who was simply "escorted" out of a mosque, but does Parker investigate?  No, she has Iftar dinners with Houston-area Muslims, including groups (according to ACT for America - Houston) linked to radical Wahhabist Islam.

And if you're a firefighter in Houston who allegedly makes anti-Islamic posts on your Facebook page, you'll lose your job.

But if you are a Bible-believing Christian in Houston, you apparently don't have the rights guaranteed to you under the First Amendment (freedom to worship, freedom of speech).

Welcome to the new America that the liberal Democrats want to impose on all of us.

MORE: Mayor Annise Parker Needs a Bible, Will You Send Her One? Erick Erickson, RedState

Monday, October 13, 2014

FLASHBACK: Mark Warner In 2001 Said Christian Coalition, NRA, Pro-Lifers Have Views "Threatening To What It Means To Be American"

Mark Warner, the liberal Democrat who was a deciding vote in Richard Milhous Obama's risky socialized medicine scheme known as Obamacare, has often tried to portray himself as "moderate."

But he's really anything but a moderate.

Jim Gilmore failed to use this to his advantage against Warner in 2008, but it bears repeating about Warner's liberal leanings, as well as what he thinks about those who believe in the Second Amendment and Christianity.


"you’re going to see a coalition that has just about completely taken over the Republican Party in this state and if they have their way, it’s going to take over state government. It’s made up of the Christian Coalition, it’s made up of the right to lifers, it’s made up of the NRA, it’s made up of the homeschoolers, it’s made up of a whole coalition of people that have all sorts of different views that I think most of us in this room would find threatening to what it means to be an American."
So, if you believe in Jesus Christ, or the right to keep and bear arms, and the sanctity of life, Mark Warner thinks you are a threat to the country.

If you ask me, I think someone like Mark Warner, who votes for a job-killing, freedom-stealing bill known as Obamacare, doesn't have a clue what it means to be an American.

If Ed Gillespie has some fight in him, he will use this, and the allegations made over the weekend about the Senator.

Saturday, October 11, 2014

Lib. US Senator Mark Warner Under Investigation, Allegedly Tried To Bribe Virginia State Senator

The partisan attempt by liberal Democrats to force Medicaid expansion (aka - a statewide version of Obamacare) by any means necessary went beyond an alleged bribe from Terry McAwful's office.

Now, US Senator Mark Warner, who is up for re-election, may have participated as well (Washington ComPost).
The son of a former Virginia state senator has told federal investigators that U.S. Sen. Mark R. Warner discussed the possibility of several jobs, including a federal judgeship, for the senator’s daughter in an effort to dissuade him from quitting the evenly divided state Senate.
Warner was part of a string of high-powered Virginia Democrats who in early June pressed then-state senator Phillip P. Puckett not to go through with plans to give up his seat in the middle of a bitterly partisan battle over health care.
A Warner spokesman acknowledged Friday that the conversation occurred, but he emphasized that the senator had made no explicit job offer.
Puckett eventually resigned, throwing control of the chamber to the Republican Party and dooming Gov. Terry McAuliffe’s top legislative priority — expanding Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act. The incident also triggered a federal investigation into Puckett’s surprise exit, which came at a time when Republicans were planning to give Puckett a job on the state tobacco commission and confirm his daughter to assume a judgeship.
On June 6, three days before the state senator’s resignation became official, Warner called Puckett’s son, Joseph, and discussed an appointment to the federal bench as well as a potential corporate position for Martha Puckett Ketron, according to Joseph Puckett’s attorney, Charles E. “Chuck” James Jr. of Williams Mullen.
James said that Warner suggested a post for Ketron at CGI, at high-tech firm Warner helped lure to Southwest Virginia when he was governor a decade ago.
“My client, Joseph Puckett, received a phone call from Senator Warner, in which there was discussion of a CGI [ job] or a federal judgeship for the sister,” James said Friday.
...The day after the conversation, Joseph Puckett recounted it in a text message to someone else.
“Talked to Warner for an hour last night,” Joseph Puckett wrote in the message, read to The Washington Post by two people close to the matter. He went on to report, “He had no answer for how Democrats could deliver for Martha except for a potential corporate gig of some kind, which is not what she wants.”
The question is, who got Sen. Warner involved? Gov. McAwful's office?

Warner is leading in the polls against GOP establishment's Ed Gillespie. Despite his appearances as a "moderate," Warner is a purely partisan liberal Democrat who loyally voted for Obamacare.  It will be interesting to see if this revelation has any impact on the race.

Friday, October 10, 2014

SICK! "Abortion Barbie" Wendy Davis Uses Empty Wheelchair In Ad to Attack Greg Abbott

This is the last act of a desperate candidate, to attack a handicapped opponent.


Remember how political operatives affiliated with the Abortion Barbie were caught on film mocking Abbott.

 


Racist, Obama-Appointed Judge Strikes Down Texas Voter ID Law

The Left will do anything to steal an election, or (as we've seen with gay marriage initiatives), override the will of the people (The Blaze).
 A federal judge on Thursday blocked Texas from enforcing voter ID requirements just weeks ahead of the November elections, knocking down a law that the U.S. Justice Department condemned in court as the state’s latest means of suppressing minority turnout.
The ruling by U.S. District Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos of Corpus Christi is a defeat for Republican-backed photo ID measures that have swept across the U.S. in recent years and mostly been upheld in court. However, the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday night blocked Wisconsin from implementing a law requiring voters to present photo IDs.
Gonzales Ramos, an appointee of President Barack Obama, never signaled during a two-week trial in September that she intended to rule on the Texas law — rebuked as the toughest of its kind in the U.S. — before Election Day. But the timing could spare an estimated 13.6 million registered Texas voters from needing one of seven kinds of photos identification to cast a ballot.
The Justice Department says more than 600,000 of those voters, mostly blacks and Hispanics, currently lack any eligible ID to vote.
Gonzales Ramos’ ruling says the law “creates an unconstitutional burden on the right to vote, has an impermissible discriminatory effect against Hispanics and African-Americans, and was imposed with an unconstitutional discriminatory purpose.” It added that the measure: “constitutes an unconstitutional poll tax.”
Republican Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott’s office said it would appeal.
“The State of Texas will immediately appeal and will urge the Fifth Circuit to resolve this matter quickly to avoid voter confusion in the upcoming election,” said Lauren Bean, a spokeswoman for Abbott’s office.
Gonzales Ramos is the racist here, because her ruling is typical of the racism we've seen from the Obama/Holder Racial Justice Department, they are always claiming to look out for the rights of a few citizens based on their race or ethnicity.  Never mind that the ID applies to all, regardless of race, color, or ethnicity.

How many of these people get on an airplane, or buy liquor? You need an ID to verify who you are and your age. Is that racist?

Second of all, the Obama Regime and Holder are the biggest hypocrites when it comes to picture IDs. Go to the White House website and see that you need a photo ID to tour the White House.

If blacks are too poor to afford ID as well, then how come the NAACCP required ID to attend a speech given by the racist Eric Holder?  Bigots!

The real reason is that Democrats use the lack of ID to commit voter fraud, and it all benefits Democrats.